Many new products and processes originate from projects. In two studies, the authors consider how a project's organizational design, as captured by its particular task configuration, impacts its ability to promote product and process innovation. Study 1 involves an analysis of panel data spanning 2001 through 2015 and involving 429 business-to-business projects in the construction industry. The authors test hypotheses regarding the role of project size, subcontractor diversity, and task configuration on product and process innovation. Their empirical tests show a pattern of nuanced effects on the two innovation types. A project's task configuration, as reflected in the general contractor's participation in project tasks, plays a coordination role that helps unlock a positive effect of project size on product innovation. At the same time, such participation impedes process innovation due to subcontractor concerns about information leakage. Study 2 bolsters the first study through a survey of 230 subcontractors in the U.S. construction industry to show how leakage concerns arise, their outcomes, and how they are mitigated. The authors also bolster their central study through (1) interviews with professional construction managers and (2) survey evidence across five industries. They draw on their findings to develop implications for innovation management, business-to-business marketing, and marketing organization.
AndersonErinWeitzBarton (1992), “The Use of Pledges to Build and Sustain Commitment in Distribution Channels,” Journal of Marketing Research, 29 (1), 18–34.
5.
AxelrodRobert M. (1984), The Evolution of Cooperation. New York: Basic Books.
6.
AzoulayPierreLernerJosh (2013), “Technological Innovation and Organizations,” in Handbook of Organizational Economics, GibbonsRobertRobertsJohn, eds. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 575–603.
7.
BagozziRichard P.YiYoujae (1988), “On the Evaluation of Structural Equation Models,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16 (1), 74–94.
8.
BakkerRene M.KnobenJoris (2015), “Built to Last or Meant to End: Intertemporal Choice in Strategic Alliance Portfolios,” Organization Science, 26 (1), 256–76.
9.
BaldwinCarlissvon HippelEric (2011), “Modeling a Paradigm Shift: From Producer Innovation to User and Open Collaborative Innovation,” Organization Science, 22 (6), 1399–1417.
10.
BechkyBeth A. (2006), “Gaffers, Gofers, and Grips: Role-Based Coordination in Temporary Organizations,” Organization Science, 17 (1), 3–21.
11.
BergerJonahHumphreysAshleeLudwigStephanMoeWendy W.NetzerOdedSchweidelDavid A. (2020), “Uniting the Tribes: Using Text for Marketing Insight,” Journal of Marketing, 84 (1), 1–25.
12.
BucklinLouis P. (1967), “Postponement, Speculation, and the Structure of Distribution Channels,” in The Marketing Channel: A Conceptual Viewpoint, MallenBruce E., ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 67–74.
13.
ChandyRajeshBrigitteHopstakenOmNarasimhanJaideepPrabhu (2006), “From Invention to Innovation: Conversion Ability in Product Development,” Journal of Marketing Research, 43 (3), 494–508.
14.
ChandyRajesh K.PrabhuJaideep C. (2010), “Innovation Technologies,” in Wiley International Encyclopedia of Marketing, ShethJagdish N.MalhotraNaresh K., eds. West Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
15.
ChandyRajesh K.TellisGerard J. (1998), “Organizing for Radical Product Innovation: The Overlooked Role of Willingness to Cannibalize,” Journal of Marketing Research, 35 (4), 474–87.
CohenWesley M.NelsonRichard R.WalshJohn P. (2000), “Protecting Their Intellectual Assets: Appropriability Conditions and Why U.S. Manufacturing Firms Patent (or Not),” NBER Working Paper No. 7552, National Bureau of Economic Research.
19.
CuiAnna S.O’ConnorGina (2012), “Alliance Portfolio Resource Diversity and Firm Innovation,” Journal of Marketing, 76 (4), 24–43.
20.
DamanpourFariborz (1991), “Organizational Innovation: A Meta-Analysis of Effects of Determinants and Moderators,” Academy of Management Journal, 34 (3), 555–90.
21.
DamanpourFariborz (2010), “An Integration of Research Findings of Effects of Firm Size and Market Competition on Product and Process Innovations,” British Journal of Management, 21 (4), 996–1010.
22.
DanneelsErwinKleinschmidtElko J. (2001), “Product Innovativeness from the Firm’s Perspective: Its Dimensions and Their Relation with Project Selection and Performance,” Journal of Product Innovation Management, 18 (6), 357–73.
23.
DasT.K. (2006), “Strategic Alliance Temporalities and Partner Opportunism,” British Journal of Management, 17 (1), 1–21.
DiamantopoulosAdamantiosWinklhoferHeidi M. (2001), “Index Construction with Formative Indicators: An Alternative to Scale Development,” Journal of Marketing Research, 38 (2), 269–77.
26.
DruckerPeter F. (1985), Innovation and Entrepreneurship: Practice and Principles. London: Heinemann.
27.
EcclesRobert G. (1981), “The Quasifirm in the Construction Industry,” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 2 (4), 453–57.
28.
EdquistCharlesHommenLeif (1999), “Systems of Innovation: Theory and Policy for the Demand Side,” Technology in Society, 21 (1), 63–79.
29.
FangEricLeeJongkukYangZhi (2015), “The Timing of Codevelopment Alliances in New Product Development Processes: Returns for Upstream and Downstream Partners,” Journal of Marketing, 79 (1), 64–82.
FornellClaesLarckerDavid F. (1981), “Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error,” Journal of Marketing Research, 18 (1), 39–50.
32.
FrazierGary L.MaltzElliotAntiaKersi D.RindfleischAric (2009), “Distributor Sharing of Strategic Information with Suppliers,” Journal of Marketing, 73 (4), 31–43.
33.
GallagherSara (2015), “Time, Risk, and Innovation: Creating Space in Your Day to Solve Meaningful Problems,” PMI Global Congress 2015—EMEA, London, England. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute.
34.
GansJoshua S. (2007), “Concentration-Based Merger Tests and Vertical Market Structure,” Journal of Law & Economics, 50 (4), 661–81.
35.
GhazimatinElhamMooiErik A.HeideJan B. (2021), “Mobilizing the Temporary Organization: The Governance Roles of Selection and Pricing,” Journal of Marketing, 85 (4), 85–104.
36.
GoesJames B.ParkSeung Ho. (1997), “Interorganizational Links and Innovation: The Case of Hospital Services,” Academy of Management Journal, 40 (3), 673–96.
37.
GoodmanRichard A.GoodmanLawrence P. (1976), “Some Management Issues in Temporary Systems: A Study of Professional Development and Manpower—The Theater Case,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 21 (3), 494–501.
38.
GreenwoodRoystonMillerDanny (2010), “Tackling Design Anew: Getting Back to the Heart of Organizational Theory,” Academy of Management Perspectives, 24 (4), 78–88.
GulatiRanjayWohlgezogenFranzZhelyazkovPavel (2012), “The Two Facets of Collaboration: Cooperation and Coordination in Strategic Alliances,” Academy of Management Annals, 6 (1), 531–83.
41.
HadidaAllègre L.HeideJan B.BellSimon J. (2019), “The Temporary Marketing Organization,” Journal of Marketing, 83 (2), 1–18.
42.
HandleySean M.BentonW.C.Jr. (2013), “The Influence of Task- and Location-Specific Complexity on the Control and Coordination Costs in Global Outsourcing Relationships,” Journal of Operations Management, 31 (3), 109–28.
43.
HarmanciogluNukhetWuytsStefanOzturanPeren (2021), “Governance Implications of Modularity in Sourcing Relationships,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 49 (3), 601–25.
44.
HauserJohnTellisGerard J.GriffinAbbie (2006), “Research on Innovation: A Review and Agenda for Marketing Science,” Marketing Science, 25 (6), 687–717.
45.
HayesA.F. (2022), Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach. New York: Guilford Press.
46.
HeathChipStaudenmayerNancy (2000), “Coordination Neglect: How Lay Theories of Organizing Complicate Coordination in Organizations,” Research in Organizational Behavior, 22, 153–91.
47.
HeideJan B.JohnGeorge (1990), “Alliances in Industrial Purchasing: The Determinants of Joint Action in Buyer-Supplier Relationships,” Journal of Marketing Research, 27 (1), 24–36.
48.
HeideJan B.JohnGeorge (1992), “Do Norms Matter in Marketing Relationships?” Journal of Marketing, 56 (2), 32–44.
49.
HeideJan B.WathneKenneth H.RokkanAksel I. (2007), “Interfirm Monitoring, Social Contracts, and Relationship Outcomes,” Journal of Marketing Research, 44 (3), 425–33.
50.
HollowaySamuel S.ParmigianiAnne (2016), “Friends and Profits Don’t Mix: The Performance Implications of Repeated Partnerships,” Academy of Management Journal, 59 (2), 460–78.
51.
JedidiKamelSchmittBernd H.SlimanMalek BenLiYanyan (2021), “R2M Index 1.0: Assessing the Practical Relevance of Academic Marketing Articles,” Journal of Marketing, 85 (5), 22–41.
52.
JonesCandaceHesterlyWilliam S.BorgattiStephen P. (1997), “A General Theory of Network Governance: Exchange Conditions and Social Mechanisms,” Academy of Management Review, 22 (4), 911–45.
53.
JosephJohnGabaVibha (2020), “Organizational Structure, Information Processing, and Decision Making: A Retrospective and Roadmap for Research,” Academy of Management Annals, 14 (1), 267–302.
54.
KatilaRiittaRosenbergerJeff D.EisenhardtKathleen M. (2008), “Swimming with Sharks: Technology Ventures, Defense Mechanisms and Corporate Relationships,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 53 (2), 295–332.
55.
KaufmanBruce (2013), “The Economic Organization of Employment: Systems in Human Resource Management and Industrial Relations,” in Handbook of Economic Organization, GrandoriAnna, ed. Northampton, UK: Edward Elgar, 289–311.
KnobenJorisGösslingTobias (2009), “Proximity in Temporary Organizations,” in Temporary Organizations: Prevalence, Logic and Effectiveness, KenisPatrickJanowicz-PanjaitanMartynaCambreBart, eds. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 155–70.
LaursenKeldSalterAmmon (2006), “Open for Innovation: The Role of Openness in Explaining Innovation Performance among U.K. Manufacturing Firms,” Strategic Management Journal, 27 (2), 131–50.
61.
LewbelArthur (2012), “Using Heteroscedasticity to Identify and Estimate Mismeasured and Endogenous Regressor Models,” Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 30 (1), 67–80.
62.
LiDanEdenLorraineHittMichael A.Duane IrelandR.GarrettRobert P. (2012), “Governance in Multilateral R&D Alliances,” Organization Science, 23 (4), 1191–1210.
63.
LilienGary L. (2016), “The B2B Knowledge Gap,” International Journal of Research in Marketing, 33 (3), 543–56.
64.
LundinRolf A.ArvidssonNiklasBradyTimEkstedtEskilMidlerChristopheSydowJörg (2015), Managing and Working in Project Society: Institutional Challenges of Temporary Organizations. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
65.
LundinRolf A.SöderholmAnders (1995), “A Theory of the Temporary Organization,” Scandinavian Journal of Management, 11 (4), 437–55.
MaloneThomas W.CrowstonKevinLeeJintaePentlandBrianDellarocasChrysanthosWynerGeorge, et al. (1999), “Tools for Inventing Organizations: Toward a Handbook of Organizational Processes,” Management Science, 45 (3), 425–43.
68.
MarchJames G.SimonHerbert A. (1958), Organizations. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
69.
MayerKyle J.SalomonRobert M. (2006), “Capabilities, Contractual Hazards, and Governance: Integrating Resource-based and Transaction Cost Perspectives,” Academy of Management Journal, 49 (5), 942–59.
70.
MeyersonDebraWeickKarl E.KramerRoderick M. (1996), “Swift Trust and Temporary Groups,” in Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research, KramerRoderick M.TylerThomas R., eds. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, 166–95.
71.
MintzbergHenry (1979), The Structuring of Organizations: A Synthesis of the Research. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
72.
MooiErikSarstedtMarkoMooi-ReçiIrma (2018), Market Research: The Process, Data, and Methods Using Stata. Singapore: Springer.
73.
MooiErikWathneKenneth H.KayandeUjwal (2016), “Openness and Innovation Performance Revisited,” Journal of Marketing Behavior, 2, 69–76.
74.
MoormanChristine (1995), “Organizational Market Information Processes: Cultural Antecedents and New Product Outcomes,” Journal of Marketing Research, 32 (3), 318–35.
75.
MurryJohn P.,Jr.,HeideJan B. (1998), “Managing Promotion Program Participation within Manufacturer-Retailer Relationships,” Journal of Marketing, 62 (1), 58–68.
76.
NoordewierThomas G.JohnGeorgeNevinJohn R. (1990), “Performance Outcomes of Purchasing Arrangements in Industrial Buyer-Vendor Relationships,” Journal of Marketing, 54 (4), 80–93.
77.
NoordhoffCorine S.KyriakopoulosKyriakosMoormanChristinePauwelsPieterDellaertBenedict G.C. (2011), “The Bright Side and Dark Side of Embedded Ties in Business-to-Business Innovation,” Journal of Marketing, 75 (5), 34–52.
78.
OkhuysenGerardo A.BechkyBeth A. (2009), “10 Coordination in Organizations: An Integrative Perspective,” Academy of Management Annals, 3 (1), 463–502.
79.
OliveiraNunoLumineauFabrice (2017), “How Coordination Trajectories Influence the Performance of Interorganizational Project Networks,” Organization Science, 28 (6), 1029–60.
80.
ParkSunghoGuptaSachin (2012), “Handling Endogenous Regressors by Joint Estimation Using Copulas,” Marketing Science, 31 (4), 567–86.
81.
ParmigianiAnneRivera-SantosMiguel (2011), “Clearing a Path Through the Forest: A Meta-Review of Interorganizational Relationships,” Journal of Management, 37 (4), 1108–36.
82.
PhelpsCorey C. (2010), “A Longitudinal Study of The Influence of Alliance Network Structure and Composition on Firm Exploratory Innovation,” Academy of Management Journal, 53 (4), 890–913.
83.
PowellWalter W.WhiteDouglas R.KoputKenneth W.Owen-SmithJason (2005), “Network Dynamics and Field Evolution: The Growth of Interorganizational Collaboration in the Life Sciences,” American Journal of Sociology, 110 (4), 1132–1205.
84.
PuranamPhanishRaveendranMarlo (2013), “Interdependence and Organization Design,” in Handbook of Economic Organization: Integrating Economic and Organization Theory, GrandoriAnna, ed. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 193–209.
85.
PuranamPhanishRaveendranMarloKnudsenThorbjørn (2012), “Organization Design: The Epistemic Interdependence Perspective,” Academy of Management Review, 37 (3), 419–40.
86.
RaassensNéomieWuytsStefanGeyskensInge (2012), “The Market Valuation of Outsourcing New Product Development,” Journal of Marketing Research, 49 (5), 682–95.
87.
RindfleischAricHeideJan B. (1997), “Transaction Cost Analysis: Past, Present, and Future Applications,” Journal of Marketing, 61 (4), 30–54.
88.
RindfleischAricMoormanChristine (2001), “The Acquisition and Utilization of Information in New Product Alliances: A Strength-of-Ties Perspective,” Journal of Marketing, 65 (2), 1–18.
89.
SampsonRachelle C. (2007), “R&D Alliances and Firm Performance: The Impact of Technological Diversity and Alliance Organization on Innovation,” Academy of Management, 50 (2), 364–86.
90.
SanchezRonMahoneyJoseph T. (2013), “Modularity and Economic Organization: Concepts, Theory, Observations, and Predictions,” in Handbook of Economic Organization, GrandoriAnna, ed. London: Edward Elgar, 383–99.
91.
Sa VinhasAlbertoHeideJan B. (2015), “Forms of Competition and Outcomes in Dual Distribution Channels: The Distributor’s Perspective,” Marketing Science, 34 (1), 160–75.
92.
ShapiroCarlVarianHal R. (1999), Information Rules: A Strategic Guide to the Network Economy. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
93.
SlotJohanna H.WuytsStefanGeyskensInge (2020), “Buyer Participation in Outsourced New Product Development Projects: The Role of Relationship Multiplexity,” Journal of Operations Management, 66 (5), 578–612.
94.
SorescuAlina (2017), “Data-Driven Business Model Innovation,” Journal of Product Innovation Management, 34 (5), 691–96.
95.
SusarlaAnjanaMukhopadhyayTridas (2019), “Can Outsourcing of Information Technology Foster Innovations in Client Organizations? An Empirical Analysis,” MIS Quarterly, 43 (3), 929–49.
96.
SydowJörgLindkvistLarsDeFillippiRobert (2004), “Project-Based Organizations, Embeddedness and Repositories of Knowledge: Editorial,” Organization Studies, 25 (9), 1475–89.
97.
TellisGerard J. (2013), Unrelenting Innovation: How to Create a Culture for Market Dominance. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
98.
TellisGerard J.PrabhuJaideep C.ChandyRajesh K. (2009), “Radical Innovation Across Nations: The Preeminence of Corporate Culture,” Journal of Marketing, 73 (1), 3–23.
99.
ThompsonJames D. (1967), Organizations in Action: Social Science Bases of Administrative Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
100.
TraceyPaulHeideJan B.BellSimon J. (2014), “Bringing “Place” Back In: Regional Clusters, Project Governance, and New Product Outcomes,” Journal of Marketing, 78 (6), 1–16.
101.
Von HippelEric (1988), The Sources of Innovation. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
102.
Von HippelEric (1990), “Task Partitioning: An Innovation Process Variable,” Research Policy, 19 (5), 407–18.
103.
WathneKenneth H.HeideJan B.MooiErik A.KumarAlok (2018), “Relationship Governance Dynamics: The Roles of Partner Selection Efforts and Mutual Investments,” Journal of Marketing Research, 55 (5), 704–21.
104.
WilliamsonOliver E. (1991), “Comparative Economic Organization: The Analysis of Discrete Structural Alternatives,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 36 (2), 269–96.
105.
WooldridgeJeffrey M. (2002), Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach, 2nd ed., Mason, OH: Thomson South-Western.
106.
WuytsStefanGeyskensInge (2005), “The Formation of Buyer–Supplier Relationships: Detailed Contract Drafting and Close Partner Selection,” Journal of Marketing, 69 (4), 103–17.
107.
WuytsStefanStremerschStefanDuttaShantanu (2004), “Portfolios of Interfirm Agreements in Technology-Intensive Markets: Consequences for Innovation and Profitability,” Journal of Marketing, 68 (2), 88–100.
108.
ZhaoXinshuLynchJohn G.Jr.ChenQimei (2010), “Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and Truths About Mediation Analysis,” Journal of Consumer Research, 37 (2), 197–206.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
