This article explores how consumers’ relative spatial location influences their preferences and choices. Drawing on the conceptual metaphor literature, the author proposes that people interpret the abstract concept of risk using a more tangible concept: their location relative to the center or edge of a space. Five main studies (and a pilot) reveal the existence of a metaphorical association between risk and spatial location and show how this association systematically affects consumer risk-taking behavior. Specifically, people positioned closer to the edges (vs. center) of space are disproportionately more likely to seek (vs. avoid) risky choices. This phenomenon is demonstrated across various decision-making scenarios in the laboratory and field, using both physical and virtual manipulations of space. This effect occurs because being located closer to the edges (vs. center) evokes concepts related to risk (vs. safety), making risky (vs. safe) products easier to process and, as a result, more desirable. Moreover, this research sheds light on the effect characteristics and boundary conditions. The author concludes with a discussion of the implications of these findings for consumers and businesses.
AdamsJohnHillmanMayer (2001), “The Risk Compensation Theory and Bicycle Helmets,” Injury Prevention, 7 (2), 89–91.
2.
AndersonCameronGalinskyAdam D. (2006), “Power, Optimism, and Risk-Taking,” European Journal of Social Psychology, 36 (4), 511–36.
3.
BadenhorstShaw (2009), “The Central Cattle Pattern During the Iron Age of Southern Africa: A Critique of its Spatial Feature,” The South African Archaeological Bulletin, 64 (190), 148–55.
4.
BeardenWilliam O.NetemeyerRichard G.TeelJesse E. (1989), “Measurement of Consumer Susceptibility to Interpersonal Influence,” Journal of Consumer Research, 15 (4), 473–81.
5.
BelkRussell W. (1975), “Situational Variables and Consumer Behavior,” Journal of Consumer Research, 2 (3), 157–64.
6.
BellNancy J.SchoenrockCarol J.O’NealKeri K. (2000), “Self–Monitoring and the Propensity for Risk,” European Journal of Personality, 14 (2), 107–19.
7.
BergScott W. (2009), Grand Avenues: The Story of Pierre Charles L’Enfant, the French Visionary Who Designed. Washington, DC: Vintage.
8.
BergerJonahFitzsimonsGráinne (2008), “Dogs on the Street, Pumas on Your Feet: How Cues in the Environment Influence Product Evaluation and Choice,” Journal of Marketing Research, 45 (1), 1–14.
9.
BitnerMary Jo (1992), “Servicescapes: The Impact of Physical Surroundings on Customers and Employees,” Journal of Marketing, 56 (2), 57–71.
10.
BlanchardSimon J.DyachenkoTatiana L.KettleKeri L. (2020), “Locational Choices: Studying Consumer Preference for Proximity to Others,” Journal of Marketing Research, 57 (5), 878–99.
11.
BoroditskyLera (2000), “Metaphoric Structuring: Understanding Time Through Spatial Metaphors,” Cognition, 75 (1), 1–28.
12.
CarpenterThomasPogacarRuthPulligChrisKourilMichalAguilarStephen J.LaBouffJordan P., et al. (2018), “Survey-Based Implicit Association Tests: A Methodological and Empirical Analysis,” PsyArXiv.
13.
CasasantoDaniel (2010), “Space for Thinking,” in Language, Cognition and Space: The State of the Art and New Directions, EvansVyvyanChiltonPaul, eds. London: Equinox Publishing, 453–78.
14.
ChaeBoyounHoeggJoAndrea (2013), “The Future Looks ‘Right’: Effects of the Horizontal Location of Advertising Images on Product Attitude,” Journal of Consumer Research, 40 (2), 223–38.
15.
ChenMingBurkeRaymond R.HuiSam K.LeykinAlex (2021), “Understanding Lateral and Vertical Biases in Consumer Attention: An in-Store Ambulatory Eye-Tracking Study,” Journal of Marketing Research, 58 (6), 1120–41.
16.
CianLuca (2017), “Verticality and Conceptual Metaphors: A Systematic Review,” Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, 2 (4), 444–59.
17.
CianLucaKrishnaAradhnaSchwarzNorbert (2015), “Positioning Rationality and Emotion: Rationality is up and Emotion is Down,” Journal of Consumer Research, 42 (4), 632–51.
18.
CocroftReginald B. (2002), “Antipredator Defense as a Limited Resource: Unequal Predation Risk in Broods of an Insect with Maternal Care,” Behavioral Ecology, 13 (1), 125–33.
19.
DaggerTracey S.DanaherPeter J. (2014), “Comparing the Effect of Store Remodeling on new and Existing Customers,” Journal of Marketing, 78 (3), 62–80.
20.
DeMarreeKenneth G.WheelerS. ChristianPettyRichard E. (2005), “Priming a New Identity: Self-Monitoring Moderates the Effects of Non-Self Primes on Self-Judgments and Behavior,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89 (5), 657–71.
21.
DengXiaoyanKahnBarbara E. (2009), “Is Your Product on the Right Side? The 'Location Effect' on Perceived Product Heaviness and Package Evaluation,” Journal of Marketing Research, 46 (6), 725–38.
22.
DijksterhuisApSmithPamela K.Van BaarenRick B.WigboldusDaniel H.J. (2005), “The Unconscious Consumer: Effects of Environment on Consumer Behavior,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 15 (3), 193–202.
23.
DuclosRodWanEcho WenJiangYuwei (2013), “Show Me the Honey! Effects of Social Exclusion on Financial Risk-Taking,” Journal of Consumer Research, 40 (1), 122–35.
24.
ErbHans-PeterBioyAntoineHiltonDenis J. (2002), “Choice Preferences without Inferences: Subconscious Priming of Risk Attitudes,” Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 15 (3), 251–62.
25.
FischerArnout R.H.FrewerLynn J. (2009), “Consumer Familiarity with Foods and the Perception of Risks and Benefits,” Food Quality and Preference, 20 (8), 576–85.
26.
FlaviánCarlosIbáñezSergioOrúsCarlos (2019), “The Impact of Virtual, Augmented and Mixed Reality Technologies on the Customer Experience,” Journal of Business Research, 100, 547–60.
27.
GawronskiBertramHouwerJan De (2014), “Implicit Measures in Social and Personality Psychology,” in Handbook of Research Methods in Social and Personality Psychology, 2nd ed., ReisHarry T.JuddCharles M., eds. New York: Cambridge University Press, 283–310.
28.
GilovichThomasMedvecVictoria HustedSavitskyKenneth (2000), “The Spotlight Effect in Social Judgment: An Egocentric Bias in Estimates of the Salience of One's Own Actions and Appearance,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78 (2), 211–22.
29.
GoulartVinícius D.L.R.YoungRobert J. (2013), “Selfish Behaviour as an Antipredator Response in Schooling Fish?” Animal Behaviour, 86 (2), 443–50.
30.
GrafLaura K.MayerStefanLandwehrJan R. (2018), “Measuring Processing Fluency: One Versus Five Items,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 28 (3), 393–411.
31.
Grand View Research (2019), “Fruit Beverages Market Size, Share & Trends Analysis Report by Distribution Channel, by Packaging, and Segment Forecasts,” GVR-3–68038-512-0.
32.
GreenwaldAnthony G.McGheeDebbie E.SchwartzJordan L.K. (1998), “Measuring Individual Differences in Implicit Cognition: The Implicit Association Test,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74 (6), 1464–80.
33.
GreenwaldAnthony G.NosekBrian A.BanajiMahzarin R. (2003), “Understanding and Using the Implicit Association Test: I. An Improved Scoring Algorithm,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85 (2), 197–216.
34.
HamiltonWilliam D (1971), “Geometry for the Selfish Herd,” Journal of Theoretical Biology, 31 (2), 295–311.
35.
HayesAndrew F. (2017), Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach. New York: Guilford Publications.
36.
HigginsE. Tory (1996), “Activation: Accessibility, and Salience,” in Social Psychology: Handbook of Basic Principles, E. Tory Higgins and Arie W. Kruglanski, eds. New York: Guildford Press, 133–68.
37.
HigginsLeighanneHamiltonKathy (2019), “Therapeutic Servicescapes and Market-Mediated Performances of Emotional Suffering,” Journal of Consumer Research, 45 (6), 1230–53.
38.
HillierBill (1999), “Centrality as a Process: Accounting for Attraction Inequalities in Deformed Grids,” Urban Design International, 4 (3), 107–27.
39.
HillierBill (2007), Space Is the Machine: A Configurational Theory of Architecture. London: Space Syntax.
40.
KahnemanDanielTverskyAmos (1984), “Choices, Values, and Frames,” American Psychologist, 39 (4), 341–50.
41.
KarasThomas H.MooreJudy H.ParrottLori K. (2008), “Metaphors for Cyber Security,” Sandia Report SAND 2008-5381.
42.
KotlerPhilip (1973), “Atmospherics as a Marketing Tool,” Journal of Retailing, 49 (4), 48–64.
43.
KrauseJens (1994), “Differential Fitness Returns in Relation to Spatial Position in Groups,” Biological Reviews, 69 (2), 187–206.
44.
KuceraHenryFrancisWinthrop Nelson (1967), Computational Analysis of Present-Day American English. Hanover, NH: Dartmouth Publishing.
45.
LakoffGeorge (1993), “The Contemporary Theory of Metaphor,” in Metaphor and Thought, 2nd ed., OrtonyAndrew, ed. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
46.
LakoffGeorgeJohnsonMark (1980), “The Metaphorical Structure of the Human Conceptual System,” Cognitive Science, 4 (2), 195–208.
47.
LandauMark J.MeierBrian P.KeeferLucas A. (2010), “A Metaphor-Enriched Social Cognition,” Psychological Bulletin, 136 (6), 1045–67.
48.
LevavJonathanArgoJennifer J. (2010), “Physical Contact and Financial Risk-Taking,” Psychological Science, 21 (6), 804–10.
49.
LevavJonathanZhuJuliet Rui (2009), “Seeking Freedom Through Variety,” Journal of Consumer Research, 36 (4), 600–10.
LokenEricGelmanAndrew (2017), “Measurement Error and the Replication Crisis,” Science, 355 (6325), 584–85.
52.
LoweMichael L.LovelandKatherine E.KrishnaAradhna (2019), “A Quiet Disquiet: Anxiety and Risk Avoidance Due to Nonconscious Auditory Priming,” Journal of Consumer Research, 46 (1), 159–79.
53.
MaengAhreumTannerRobin J.SomanDilip (2013), “Conservative When Crowded: Social Crowding and Consumer Choice,” Journal of Marketing Research, 50 (6), 739–52.
54.
MandelNaomi (2003), “Shifting Selves and Decision Making: The Effects of Self-Construal Priming on Consumer Risk-Taking,” Journal of Consumer Research, 30 (1), 30–40.
55.
MantovaniDanielleGalvãoFábio Henrique Silva (2017), “Brand Priming Effect on Consumers’ Financial Risk Taking Behavior,” Revista de Administração, 52 (1), 15–25.
56.
MeertensRee M.LionRene (2008), “Measuring an Individual’s Tendency to Take Risks: The Risk Propensity Scale,” Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 38 (6), 1506–20.
57.
MeierBrian P.RobinsonMichael D. (2004), “Why the Sunny Side Is Up: Associations Between Affect and Vertical Position,” Psychological Science, 15 (4), 243–47.
58.
Meyers-LevyJoanZhuJuliet Rui (2007), “The Influence of Ceiling Height: The Effect of Priming on the Type of Processing That People Use,” Journal of Consumer Research, 34 (2), 174–86.
59.
MitchellPeter (2002), The Archaeology of Southern Africa. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
60.
MorrinMaureenChebatJean-Charles (2005), “Person-Place Congruency: The Interactive Effects of Shopper Style and Atmospherics on Consumer Expenditures,” Journal of Service Research, 8 (2), 181–91.
61.
NielsenFinn A. (2011), AFINN. Informatics and Mathematical Modelling, Technical University of Denmark.
62.
PowellGeorge V.N. (1974), “Experimental Analysis of the Social Value of Flocking by Starlings (Sturnus Vulgaris) in Relation to Predation and Foraging,” Animal Behaviour, 22 (May), 501–05.
63.
RaghubirPriyaValenzuelaAna (2006), “Center-of-Inattention: Position Biases in Decision-Making,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 99 (1), 66–80.
64.
RaghunathanRajagopalPhamMichel Tuan (1999), “All Negative Moods Are Not Equal: Motivational Influences of Anxiety and Sadness on Decision Making,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 79 (1), 56–77.
65.
ReberRolfSchwarzNorbertWinkielmanPiotr (2004), “Processing Fluency and Aesthetic Pleasure: Is Beauty in the Perceiver's Processing Experience?” Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8 (4), 364–82.
66.
SchubertThomas W. (2005), “Your Highness: Vertical Positions as Perceptual Symbols of Power,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89 (1), 1–21.
67.
SchwarzNorbert (2004), “Metacognitive Experiences in Consumer Judgment and Decision Making,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14 (4), 332–48.
68.
SchwarzNorbertCloreGerald L. (1983), “Mood, Misattribution, and Judgments of Well-Being: Informative and Directive Functions of Affective States,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45 (3), 513–23.
69.
SevillaJulioTownsendClaudia (2016), “The Space-to-Product Ratio Effect: How Interstitial Space Influences Product Aesthetic Appeal, Store Perceptions, and Product Preference,” Journal of Marketing Research, 53 (5), 665–81.
70.
SingelisTheodore M. (1994), “The Measurement of Independent and Interdependent Self-Construals,” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20 (5), 580–91.
71.
SoarsBrenda (2009), “Driving Sales Through Shoppers’ Sense of Sound, Sight, Smell and Touch,” International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 37 (3), 286–98.
72.
SongHyunjinSchwarzNorbert (2009), “If It's Difficult to Pronounce, It Must Be Risky: Fluency, Familiarity, and Risk Perception,” Psychological Science, 20 (2), 135–38.
73.
SpencerSteven J.ZannaMark P.FongGeoffrey T. (2005), “Establishing a Causal Chain: Why Experiments Are Often More Effective Than Mediational Analyses in Examining Psychological Processes,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89 (6), 845–51.
74.
SpillerStephen A.FitzsimonsGavan J.LynchJohn G.McClellandGary H. (2013), “Spotlights, Floodlights, and the Magic Number Zero: Simple Effects Tests in Moderated Regression,” Journal of Marketing Research, 50 (2), 277–88.
75.
ThompsonEdmund R. (2007), “Development and Validation of an Internationally Reliable Short-Form of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS),” Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 38 (2), 227–42.
76.
ValenzuelaAnaRaghubirPriya (2009), “Position–Based Beliefs: The Center–Stage Effect,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 19 (2), 185–96.
77.
VineIan (1971), “Risk of Visual Detection and Pursuit by a Predator and the Selective Advantage of Flocking Behaviour,” Journal of Theoretical Biology, 30 (2), 405–22.
78.
YeungRuth M.MorrisJoe (2001), “Food Safety Risk: Consumer Perception and Purchase Behavior,” British Food Journal, 103 (3), 170–87.
79.
ZhuJuliet RuiArgoJennifer J. (2013), “Exploring the Impact of Various Shaped Seating Arrangements on Persuasion,” Journal of Consumer Research, 40 (2), 336–49.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
