Low-socioeconomic-status (SES) consumers tend to be more price sensitive than their high-SES counterparts. Nonetheless, various economic-related burdens, such as mobility costs and lack of information, often hinder their ability to attend to scarcity—a phenomenon called “ghetto tax.” The current research moves a step further to show that even when very poor consumers can exert price sensitivity and are fully informed, a “psychological ghetto tax” often discourages them from doing so. Across five studies, the authors demonstrate that, relative to (1) high-SES consumers or (2) contexts of intragroup interaction, low-SES consumers are willing to pay higher prices and to accept lower-value rewards to avoid commercial settings that require intergroup interaction (e.g., poor consumers in a high-end shopping mall). This effect is driven by the poor consumers’ heightened expectations of discrimination in upscale commercial settings, a concern virtually nonexistent among wealthy consumers. Companies’ inclusion statements emphasizing customer equality and/or customer diversity can serve as safety cues against stigmatized identities and increase low-SES consumers’ price sensitivity.
AguiarLucianaHaroldoTorresMeirellesRenato (2008), “O Consumidor de Baixa Renda,” in Varejo Para a Baixa renda. Porto Alegre, Brazil: Bookman, 13–32.
2.
AilawadiKusumNeslinScottGedenkKaren (2001), “Pursuing the Value-Conscious Consumer: Store Brands Versus National Brand Promotions,” Journal of Marketing, 65 (1), 71–89.
3.
AkhtarNadeem (2012), “People Need More Than Just Microfinance: Evidence from Pakistan,” British Journal of Arts and Social Sciences, 4 (2), 319–29.
4.
BertrandMarianneMullainathanSendhilShafirEldar (2006), “Behavioral Economics and Marketing in Aid of Decision Making Among the Poor,” Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 25 (1), 8–23.
5.
BhatiaNavinChatterjeeArnav (2010), “Financial Inclusion in the Slums of Mumbai,” Economic and Political Weekly, 45 (42), 23–26.
ChaneyKimberly E.SanchezDiana T.MaimonMelanie R. (2019), “Stigmatized-Identity Cues in Consumer Spaces,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 29 (1), 130–41.
8.
ChetryMichael (2011), “A Inserção dos Moradores de Favelas do Rio de Janeiro na Cidade: O Caso das Práticas de Consumo e Lazer,” Confins - Revue Franco-Brésilienne de Géographie, 13, https://doi.org/10.4000/confins.12410.
9.
ChoJaeeTadmorCarmitMorrisMichael (2018), “Are All Diversity Ideologies Creatively Equal? The Diverging Consequences of Colorblindness, Multiculturalism, and Polyculturalism,” Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 49 (9), 1376–1401.
10.
ChuJunhongChintaguntaPradeepCebolladaJavier (2008), “A Comparison of Within-Household Price Sensitivity Across Online and Offline Channels,” Marketing Science, 27 (2), 283–99.
11.
CliftonKelly J. (2004), “Mobility Strategies and Food Shopping for Low-Income Families: A Case Study,” Journal of Planning Education and Research, 23 (4), 402–13.
12.
CrockettDavidGrierSonyaWilliamsJacqueline (2003), “Coping with Marketplace Discrimination: An Exploration of the Experiences of Black Men,” Academy of Marketing Science Review, 4 (4), 1–18.
13.
DuranteFedericaFiskeSusan T. (2017), “How Social-Class Stereotypes Maintain Inequality,” Current Opinion in Psychology, 18, 43–48.
14.
DuranteFedericaTablanteBearnsFiskeSusan (2017), “Poor but Warm, Rich but Cold (and Competent): Social Classes in the Stereotype Content Model,” Journal of Social Issues, 73 (1), 138–57.
EstelamiHoomanLehmannDonald (2001), “The Impact of Research Design on Consumer Price Recall Accuracy: An Integrative Review,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 29, 36.
17.
FalkArminZehnderChristian (2013), “A City-Wide Experiment on Trust Discrimination,” Journal of Public Economics, 100, 15–27.
18.
GoslinerWendiBrownDaniel M.SunBetty C.Woodward-LopezGailCrawfordPatricia B. (2019), “Availability, Quality and Price of Produce in Low-Income Neighbourhood Food Stores in California Raise Equity Issues,” Public Health Nutrition, 22 (1), 184–85.
19.
HallCrystal C.ZhaoJiayingShafirEldar (2014), “Self-Affirmation Among the Poor: Cognitive and Behavioral Implications,” Psychological Science, 25 (2), 619–25.
20.
JayneMichele E.A.DipboyeRobert L. (2004), “Leveraging Diversity to Improve Business Performance: Research Findings and Recommendations for Organizations,” Human Resource Management, 43 (4), 409–24.
21.
JonesEugeneChernWen S.MustifulBarry K. (1990), “Are Lower-Income Shoppers as Price Sensitive as Higher-Income Ones?: A Look at Breakfast Cereals,” Distribution, 25 (1), 82–92.
22.
JonesEugeneMustifulBarry (1996), “Purchasing Behaviour of Higher- and Lower-Income Shoppers: A Look at Breakfast Cereals,” Applied Economics, 28 (1), 131–37.
23.
KearneyMelissa Schettini (2005), “State Lotteries and Consumer Behavior,” Journal of Public Economics, 89 (11/12), 2269–99.
24.
KimByung-DoSrinivasanKannanWilcoxRonald T. (1999), “Identifying Price Sensitive Consumers: The Relative Merits of Demographic vs. Purchase Pattern Information,” Journal of Retailing, 75 (2), 173–93.
25.
KrausMichaelPiffPaulMendoza-DentonRodolfoRheinschmidtMichelleKeltnerDacher (2012), “Social Class, Solipsism, and Contextualism: How the Rich Are Different from the Poor,” Psychological Review, 119 (3), 546–72.
26.
KrausMichaelStephensNicole (2012), “A Road Map for an Emerging Psychology of Social Class,” Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 6 (9), 642–56.
27.
KuangYiWangFeiWangZuo Jun (2021), “Social Class and Children’s Prosociality: A Study in the Context of China’s Dual Urban–Rural Structure,” Social Psychological and Personality Science, 12 (1), 63–70.
28.
KulshresthaS.K. (2022), “Evolution of Megacities and Megacity Regions,” in Advances in 21st Century Human Settlements. Berlin: Springer, 1–25.
29.
KunreutherHoward (1973), “Why the Poor May Pay More for Food: Theoretical and Empirical Evidence,” Journal of Business, 46 (3), 368–83.
30.
LarsonNicole I.StoryMary T.NelsonMelissa C. (2009), “Neighborhood Environments. Disparities in Access to Healthy Foods in the U.S.,” American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 36 (1), 74–81.
31.
LeeKyoungmiKimHakkyunVohsKathleen (2011), “Stereotype Threat in the Marketplace: Consumer Anxiety and Purchase Intentions,” Journal of Consumer Research, 38 (2), 343–57.
32.
LiXilinHseeChristopher K. (2021), “The Psychology of Marginal Utility,” Journal of Consumer Research, 48 (1), 169–88.
33.
LiuSongqiLuPeiWangMoZhangBaoshan (2021), “Effectiveness of Stereotype Threat Interventions: A Meta-Analytic Review,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 106 (6), 921–49.
34.
LuhtanenRiiaCrockerJennifer (1992), “A Collective Self-Esteem Scale: Self-Evaluation of One’s Social Identity,” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18 (3), 302–18.
35.
MacNellLillianElliottSinikkaHardison-MoodyAnnieBowenSarah (2017), “Black and Latino Urban Food Desert Residents’ Perceptions of Their Food Environment and Factors That Influence Food Shopping Decisions,” Journal of Hunger and Environmental Nutrition, 12 (3), 375–93.
36.
MajorBrendaO’BrienLaurie T. (2005), “The Social Psychology of Stigma,” Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 393–421.
MartínezAlexandra LópezMinaOwen Eli Ceballos (2021), “Socioeconomic Residential Segregation and Income Inequality in Bogotá: An Analysis Based on Census Data of 2005,” in Urban Socio-Economic Segregation and Income Inequality: A Global Perspective, Maarten van Ham, Tiit Tammaru, Rūta Ubarevičienė, and Heleen Janssen, eds. Berlin: Springer, 433−50.
39.
MartínezMiguelRoitmanSonia (2019), “Informal Settlers,” in Wiley Blackwell Encyclopedia of Urban and Regional Studies, Anthony M. Orum, ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell, https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118568446.eurs0160.
40.
McLainDavid L. (2009), “Evidence of the Properties of an Ambiguity Tolerance Measure: The Multiple Stimulus Types Ambiguity Tolerance Scale-II (MSTAT-II),” Psychological Reports, 105 (3), 975–88.
Moore-BergSamantha L.KarpinskiAndrew (2019), “An Intersectional Approach to Understanding How Race and Social Class Affect Intergroup Processes,” Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 13 (1), e12426.
43.
NeriMarcelo Cortes (2010), “Desigualdade e Favelas Cariocas: A Cidade Partida Está se Integrando?” FGV (August), https://cps.fgv.br/pesquisas/desigualdade-e-favelas-cariocas-cidade-partida-esta-se-integrando.
44.
NewmanCarolTarpFinnVan Den BroeckKatleen (2014), “Social Capital, Network Effects, and Savings in Rural Vietnam,” Review of Income and Wealth, 60 (1), 79–99.
45.
Ohri-VachaspatiPunamDeweeseRobin S.AcciaiFrancescoDeliaDerekTullochDavidTongDaoqin, et al. (2019), “Healthy Food Access in Low-Income High-Minority Communities: A Longitudinal Assessment—2009–2017,” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16 (13), 2354.
46.
ParkJustinVan LeeuwenFlorianChochorelouYpapanti (2013), “Disease-avoidance Processes and Stigmatization: Cues of Substandard Health Arouse Heightened Discomfort with Physical Contact,” Journal of Social Psychology, 153 (2), 212–28.
47.
PhamMichel Tuan (2016), “The Forgotten Working-Class Consumer,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 26 (4), 566–67.
48.
PiffPaul K.KrausMichael W.CôtéStéphaneChengBonnie HaydenKeltnerDacher (2010), “Having Less, Giving More: The Influence of Social Class on Prosocial Behavior,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99 (5), 771–84.
49.
PongeluppeLeandroNobuiukiItoLazzariniSérgio (2016), “A Última Milha: Distância Cotidiana Entre A Favela E A Cidade,” Arq Futuro, https://arqfuturo.com.br/post/a-ultima-milha-distancia-cotidiana-entre-a-favela-e-a-cidade.
50.
PooleSonja MartinGrierSonya A.ThomasKevin D.SobandeFrancescaEkpoAkon E.TorresLez Trujillo, et al. (2021), “Operationalizing Critical Race Theory in the Marketplace,” Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 40 (2), 126–42.
51.
PuoaneThandiHughesGail D. (2005), “SAMJ FORUM 228 Impact of the HIV/AIDS Pandemic on Non-Communicable Disease Prevention,” South African Medical Journal, 95 (4), https://journals.co.za/doi/pdf/10.10520/EJC68461.
52.
Purdie-VaughnsValerieSteeleClaudeDaviesPaulDitlmannRuthCrosbyJennifer (2008), “Social Identity Contingencies: How Diversity Cues Signal Threat or Safety for African Americans in Mainstream Institutions,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94 (4), 615–30.
53.
RattanAneetaAmbadyNalini (2013), “Diversity Ideologies and Intergroup Relations: An Examination of Colorblindness and Multiculturalism,” European Journal of Social Psychology, 43 (1), 12–21.
54.
RemediosJessica D.SnyderSamantha H. (2015), “How Women of Color Detect and Respond to Multiple Forms of Prejudice,” Sex Roles, 73 (9/10), 371–83.
55.
ReutterLinda I.StewartMiriam J.VeenstraGerryLoveRhondaRaphaelDennisMakwarimbaEdward (2009), “‘Who Do They Think We Are, Anyway?’: Perceptions of and Responses to Poverty Stigma,” Qualitative Health Research, 19 (3), 297–311.
56.
RosenthalLisaLevySheri R. (2010), “The Colorblind, Multicultural, and Polycultural Ideological Approaches to Improving Intergroup Attitudes and Relations,” Social Issues and Policy Review, 4 (1), 215–46.
57.
RukmanaDedenRamadhaniDinar (2021), “Income Inequality and Socioeconomic Segregation in Jakarta,” in Urban Socio-Economic Segregation and Income Inequality: A Global Perspective, Maarten van Ham, Tiit Tammaru, Rūta Ubarevičienė, and Heleen Janssen, eds. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 135–52.
58.
SchmaderToni (2002), “Gender Identification Moderates Stereotype Threat Effects on Women’s Math Performance,” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38 (2), 194–201.
59.
ShahAnujMullainathanSendhilShafirEldar (2012), “Some Consequences of Having Too Little,” Science, 338 (6107), 682–85.
ShahAnujZhaoJiayingMullainathanSendhilShafirEldar (2018), “Money in the Mental Lives of the Poor,” Social Cognition, 36 (1), 4–19.
62.
ShapiroJenessaAronsonJoshuaMcGloneMatthew S. (2015), “Stereotype Threat,” in Handbook of Prejudice, Stereotyping, and Discrimination: Second Edition, Todd D. Nelson, ed. New York: Taylor & Francis, 87–105.
63.
ShavittSharonJiangDuoChoHyewon (2016), “Stratification and Segmentation: Social Class in Consumer Behavior,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 26 (4), 583–93.
64.
SmithC.S.HungLi-Ching (2008), “Stereotype Threat: Effects on Education.,” Social Psychology of Education, 11 (3), 243–57.
65.
SouzaStefanie (2019), “Pacification of Rio’s Favelas and the ‘Pacification of the Pacification Police’,” Sociological Forum, 34 (2), 458–82.
TalukdarDebabrata (2008), “Cost of Being Poor: Retail Price and Consumer Price Search Differences Across Inner-City and Suburban Neighborhoods,” Journal of Consumer Research, 35 (3), 457–71.
68.
Van LaarColetteMeeussenLoesVeldmanJennyVan GrootelSanneSterkNaomiJacobsCatho (2019), “Coping with Stigma in the Workplace: Understanding the Role of Threat Regulation, Supportive Factors, and Potential Hidden Costs,” Frontiers in Psychology, 10 (August), DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01879.
69.
VarnumMichael E.W. (2013), “What Are Lay Theories of Social Class?” PLoS ONE, 8 (7), https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0070589.
70.
VieitesYanGoldszmidtRafaelAndradeEduardo (2022), “Social Class Shapes Donation Allocation Preferences,” Journal of Consumer Research, 48 (5), 775–95.
71.
WakefieldKirk L.InmanJ. Jeffrey (2003), “Situational Price Sensitivity: The Role of Consumption Occasion, Social Context and Income,” Journal of Retailing, 79 (4), 199–212.
72.
WilliamsBryan Christopher (2008), “The Challenge of the Slums: Looking for Democratic Inclusion in the Squatter Settlements of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil,” doctoral dissertation, University of Florida.
73.
WootenDavidRank-ChristmanTracy (2019), “Stigmatized-Identity Cues: Threats as Opportunities for Consumer Psychology,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 29 (1), 142–51.
74.
WrigleyNeil (2002), “‘Food Deserts’ in British Cities: Policy Context and Research Priorities,” Urban Studies, 39 (11), 2029–40.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
