Despite a rising interest in artificial intelligence (AI) technology, research in services marketing has not evaluated its role in helping firms learn about customers’ needs and increasing the adaptability of service employees. Therefore, the authors develop a conceptual framework and investigate whether and to what extent providing AI assistance to service employees improves service outcomes. The randomized controlled trial in the context of tutoring services shows that helping service employees (tutors) adapt to students’ learning needs by providing AI-generated diagnoses significantly improves service outcomes measured by academic performance. However, the authors find that some tutors may not utilize AI assistance (i.e., AI aversion), and factors associated with unforeseen barriers to usage (i.e., technology overload) can moderate its impact on outcomes. Interestingly, tutors who significantly contribute to the firm's revenue relied heavily on AI assistance but unexpectedly benefited little from AI in improving service outcomes. Given the wide applicability of AI assistance in a variety of services marketing contexts, the authors suggest that firms should consider the potential difficulties employees face in using the technology rather than encourage them to use it as it is.
AhadAnnie DayaniAriff LimSyamimi (2014), “Convenience or Nuisance?: The ‘Whatsapp’ Dilemma,” Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 155, 189–96.
2.
AhearneMichaelJonesEliRappAdamMathieuJohn (2008), “High Touch Through High Tech: The Impact of Salesperson Technology Usage on Sales Performance via Mediating Mechanisms,” Management Science, 54 (4), 671–85.
3.
AngristJoshua D.ImbensGuido W.RubinDonald B. (1996), “Identification of Causal Effects Using Instrumental Variables,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 91 (434), 444–55.
AuriniJaniceDaviesScott (2004), “The Transformation of Private Tutoring: Education in a Franchise Form,” Canadian Journal of Sociology, 29 (3), 419–38.
6.
AyyagariRamakrishnaGroverVarunPurvisRussell (2011), “Technostress: Technological Antecedents and Implications,” MIS Quarterly, 35 (4), 831–58.
7.
BathaeeYavar (2017), “The Artificial Intelligence Black Box and the Failure of Intent and Causation,” Harvard Journal of Law & Technology, 31 (2), 889–938.
8.
BeattySharon E.OgilvieJessicaNorthingtonWilliam MagnusHarrisonMary P.HollowayBetsy BuggWangSijun (2016), “Frontline Service Employee Compliance with Customer Special Requests,” Journal of Service Research, 19 (2), 158–73.
9.
BitnerMary Jo (1990), “Evaluating Service Encounters: The Effects of Physical Surroundings and Employee Responses,” Journal of Marketing, 54 (2), 69–82.
10.
BitnerMary JoBoomsBernard H.MohrLois A. (1994), “Critical Service Encounters: The Employee’s Viewpoint,” Journal of Marketing, 58 (4), 95–106.
11.
BitnerMary JoBoomsBernard H.TetreaultMary Stanfield (1990), “The Service Encounter: Diagnosing Favorable and Unfavorable Incidents,” Journal of Marketing, 54 (1), 71–84.
12.
BlackSandra E. (1999), “Do Better Schools Matter? Parental Valuation of Elementary Education,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114 (2), 577–99.
13.
BriantElizabethDohertyCatherineDooleyKarenEnglishRebecca (2020), “In Fateful Moments: The Appeal of Parent Testimonials When Selling Private Tutoring,”Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 28 (2), 223–39.
CarterKathyCushingKatherineSabersDonnaSteinPamelaBerlinerDavid (1988), “Expert-Novice Differences in Perceiving and Processing Visual Classroom Information,” Journal of Teacher Education, 39 (3), 25–31.
17.
CasteloNoahBosMaarten W.LehmannDonald R. (2019), “Task-Dependent Algorithm Aversion,” Journal of Marketing Research, 56 (5), 809–25.
18.
ChaSeung EunJunSoo JinKwonDai YongKimHan SungKimSeung BumKimJa Mee, et al. (2011), “Measuring Achievement of ICT Competency for Students in Korea,” Computers & Education, 56 (4), 990–1002.
19.
ChenChao-Hsiu (2008), “Why Do Teachers Not Practice What They Believe Regarding Technology Integration?” Journal of Educational Research, 102 (1), 65–75.
20.
CollierJoel E.BarnesDonald C.AbneyAlexandra K.PelletierMark J. (2018), “Idiosyncratic Service Experiences: When Customers Desire the Extraordinary in a Service Encounter,” Journal of Business Research, 84, 150–61.
21.
CredéMarcusKuncelNathan R. (2008), “Study Habits, Skills, and Attitudes: The Third Pillar Supporting Collegiate Academic Performance,” Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3 (6), 425–53.
22.
De GraveWillem S., DolmansDiana H.J.MVan Der VleutenCees P.M. (1999), “Profiles of Effective Tutors in Problem-Based Learning: Scaffolding Student Learning,” Medical Education, 33 (12), 901–06.
23.
DietvorstBerkeley J.SimmonsJoseph P.MasseyCade (2015), “Algorithm Aversion: People Erroneously Avoid Algorithms After Seeing Them Err,” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 144 (1), 114–26.
24.
DietvorstBerkeley J.SimmonsJoseph P.MasseyCade (2018), “Overcoming Algorithm Aversion: People Will Use Imperfect Algorithms If They Can (Even Slightly) Modify Them,” Management Science, 64 (3), 1155–70.
25.
EggerPeter H.LassmannAndrea (2015), “The Causal Impact of Common Native Language on International Trade: Evidence from a Spatial Regression Discontinuity Design,” Economic Journal, 125 (584), 699–745.
GathmannChristinaHelmInesSchönbergUta (2020), “Spillover Effects of Mass Layoffs,” Journal of the European Economic Association, 18 (1), 427–68.
30.
GoldhaberDan (2007), “Everyone’s Doing It, but What Does Teacher Testing Tell Us About Teacher Effectiveness?” Journal of Human Resources, 42 (4), 765–94.
31.
GoldhahnJörgRamptonVanessaSpinasGiatgen A. (2018), “Could Artificial Intelligence Make Doctors Obsolete?” British Medical Journal, (363), 4563.
32.
GrayHeather M.GrayKurtWegnerDaniel M. (2007), “Dimensions of Mind Perception,” Science, 315 (5812), 619.
33.
GwinnerKevin P.BitnerMary JoBrownStephen W.KumarAjith (2005), “Service Customization Through Employee Adaptiveness,” Journal of Service Research, 8 (2), 131–48.
34.
HartlineMichael D.FerrellOrville C. (1996), “The Management of Customer-Contact Service Employees: An Empirical Investigation.” Journal of Marketing, 60 (4), 52–70.
35.
HeckmanJames (1997), “Instrumental Variables: A Study of Implicit Behavioral Assumptions Used in Making Program Evaluations,” Journal of Human Resources, 441–62.
36.
HenkelAlexander P.BromuriStefanoIrenDenizUroviVisara (2020), “Half Human, Half Machine—Augmenting Service Employees with AI for Interpersonal Emotion Regulation,” Journal of Service Management, 31 (2), 247–65.
37.
HerppichStephanieWittwerJörgNücklesMatthiasRenklAlexander (2014), “Addressing Knowledge Deficits in Tutoring and the Role of Teaching Experience: Benefits for Learning and Summative Assessment,” Journal of Educational Psychology, 106 (4), 934–45.
38.
HoLi-HsingHungChang-LiangChenHui-Chun (2013), “Using Theoretical Models to Examine the Acceptance Behavior of Mobile Phone Messaging to Enhance Parent–Teacher Interactions,” Computers & Education, 61, 105–14.
39.
HoldenHeatherRadaRoy (2011), “Understanding the Influence of Perceived Usability and Technology Self-Efficacy on Teachers’ Technology Acceptance,” Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 43 (4), 343–67.
40.
HolsteinKennethMcLarenBruce M.AlevenVincent (2018), Student Learning Benefits of a Mixed-Reality Teacher Awareness Tool in AI-Enhanced Classrooms. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
41.
HomburgChristianMüllerMichaelKlarmannMartin (2011), “When Should the Customer Really Be King? On the Optimum Level of Salesperson Customer Orientation in Sales Encounters,” Journal of Marketing, 75 (2), 55–74.
42.
HomburgChristianWiesekeJanBornemannTorsten (2009), “Implementing the Marketing Concept at the Employee-Customer Interface: The Role of Customer Need Knowledge,” Journal of Marketing, 73 (4), 64–81.
43.
HuPaul Jen-HwaClarkTheodore H.K.MaWill W. (2003), “Examining Technology Acceptance by School Teachers: A Longitudinal Study,” Information & Management, 41 (2), 227–41.
44.
JacobyJacob (1984), “Perspectives on Information Overload,” Journal of Consumer Research, 10 (4), 432–35.
45.
Karr-WisniewskiPamelaLuYing (2010), “When More Is Too Much: Operationalizing Technology Overload and Exploring Its Impact on Knowledge Worker Productivity,” Computers in Human Behavior, 26 (5), 1061–72.
46.
KimSunwoongLeeJu-Ho (2010), “Private Tutoring and Demand for Education in South Korea,” Economic Development and Cultural Change, 58 (2), 259–96.
LevinTamarWadmanyRivka (2006), “Teachers’ Beliefs and Practices in Technology-Based Classrooms,” Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 39 (2), 157–81.
49.
LiaoHuiChuangAichia (2004), “A Multilevel Investigation of Factors Influencing Employee Service Performance and Customer Outcomes,” Academy of Management Journal, 47 (1), 41–58.
50.
LoggJennifer M.MinsonJulia A.MooreDon A. (2019), “Algorithm Appreciation: People Prefer Algorithmic to Human Judgment,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 151, 90–103.
51.
LongoniChiaraBonezziAndreaMorewedgeCarey K. (2019), “Resistance to Medical Artificial Intelligence,” Journal of Consumer Research, 46 (4), 629–50.
52.
LuoXuemingQinMarco ShaojunFangZhengQuZhe (2021), “Artificial Intelligence Coaches for Sales Agents: Caveats and Solutions,” Journal of Marketing, 85 (2), 14–32.
53.
LuoXuemingTongSiliangFangZhengQuZhe (2019), “Frontiers: Machines vs. Humans: The Impact of Artificial Intelligence Chatbot Disclosure on Customer Purchases,” Marketing Science, 38 (6), 937–47.
54.
MalhotraNaresh K. (1984), “Reflections on the Information Overload Paradigm in Consumer Decision Making,” Journal of Consumer Research, 10 (4), 436–40.
55.
ManchandaPuneetPackardGrantPattabhiramaiahAdithya (2015), “Social Dollars: The Economic Impact of Customer Participation in a Firm-Sponsored Online Customer Community,” Marketing Science, 34 (3), 367–87.
56.
MaurerTodd J. (2001), “Career-Relevant Learning and Development, Worker Age, and Beliefs About Self-Efficacy for Development,” Journal of Management, 27 (2), 123–40.
57.
MavrikisManolisGeraniouEiriniSantosSergio GutierrezPoulovassilisAlexandra (2019), “Intelligent Analysis and Data Visualisation for Teacher Assistance Tools: The Case of Exploratory Learning,” British Journal of Educational Technology, 50 (6), 2920–42.
58.
MelenhorstAnne-SophieRogersWendy A.BouwhuisDon G. (2006), “Older Adults’ Motivated Choice for Technological Innovation: Evidence for Benefit-Driven Selectivity,” Psychology and Aging, 21 (1), 190–95.
59.
MickDavid GlenFournierSusan (1998), “Paradoxes of Technology: Consumer Cognizance, Emotions, and Coping Strategies,” Journal of Consumer Research, 25 (2), 123–43.
60.
MitznerTracy L.BoronJulie B.FaussetCara BaileyAdamsAnne E.CharnessNeilCzajaSara J., et al. (2010), “Older Adults Talk Technology: Technology Usage and Attitudes,” Computers in Human Behavior, 26 (6), 1710–21.
61.
MohrJakkiNevinJohn R. (1990), “Communication Strategies in Marketing Channels: A Theoretical Perspective,” Journal of Marketing, 54 (4), 36–51.
62.
MorrisMichael G.VenkateshViswanath (2000), “Age Differences in Technology Adoption Decisions: Implications for a Changing Work Force,” Personnel Psychology, 53 (2), 375–403.
PhiriFletcher M.FergusonMuke M. (2016), “Exploring Parents’ Satisfaction and Its Potential in Boosting Sales and Profits in the Tutoring Business Sector,” Journal of Small Business and Entrepreneurship, 4 (2), 1–9.
65.
PloyhartRobert E.WeekleyJeff A.RamseyJase (2009), “The Consequences of Human Resource Stocks and Flows: A Longitudinal Examination of Unit Service Orientation and Unit Effectiveness,” Academy of Management Journal, 52 (5), 996–1015.
RafiqMohammedAhmedPervaiz K. (1998), “A Customer-Oriented Framework for Empowering Service Employees,” Journal of Services Marketing, 12 (5), 379–96.
68.
RosenbergHananelAsterhanChrista S.C. (2018), ““WhatsApp, Teacher?”—Student Perspectives on Teacher-Student WhatsApp Interactions in Secondary Schools,” Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 17, 205–26.
69.
RutkowskiAnne-F. and SaundersCarol S. (2010), “Growing Pains with Information Overload,” Computer, 96 (6), 94–95.
70.
SolomonMichael R.SurprenantCarolCzepielJohn A.GutmanEvelyn G. (1985), “A Role Theory Perspective on Dyadic Interactions: The Service Encounter,” Journal of Marketing, 49 (1), 99–111.
71.
SpiroRosann L.WeitzBarton A. (1990), “Adaptive Selling: Conceptualization, Measurement, and Nomological Validity,” Journal of Marketing Research, 27 (1), 61–69.
72.
SüdkampAnnaKaiserJohannaMöllerJens (2012), “Accuracy of Teachers’ Judgments of Students’ Academic Achievement: A Meta-Analysis,” Journal of Educational Psychology, 104 (3), 743–62.
73.
TanTom FangyunNetessineSerguei (2020), “At Your Service on the Table: Impact of Tabletop Technology on Restaurant Performance,” Management Science, 66 (10), 4496–4515.
74.
TeigNaniSchererRonnyNilsenTrude (2019), “I Know I Can, but Do I Have the Time? The Role of Teachers’ Self-Efficacy and Perceived Time Constraints in Implementing Cognitive-Activation Strategies in Science,” Frontiers in Psychology, 10 (1697), https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01697.
75.
ThiedeKeith W.BrendefurJonathan L.OsguthorpeRichard D.CarneyMichele B.BremnerAmandaStrotherSam, et al. (2015), “Can Teachers Accurately Predict Student Performance?” Teaching and Teacher Education, 49, 36–44.
76.
ThompsonBlair (2008), “Characteristics of Parent–Teacher E-Mail Communication,” Communication Education, 57 (2), 201–23.
77.
ThompsonDebora VianaHamiltonRebecca W.RustRoland T. (2005), “Feature Fatigue: When Product Capabilities Become Too Much of a Good Thing,” Journal of Marketing Research, 42 (4), 431–42.
78.
VanLehnKurtSilerStephanieMurrayCharlesYamauchiTakashiBaggettWilliam B. (2003), “Why Do Only Some Events Cause Learning During Human Tutoring?” Cognition and Instruction, 21 (3), 209–49.
79.
WangSijunBeattySharon E.LiuJeanny (2012), “Employees’ Decision Making in the Face of Customers’ Fuzzy Return Requests,” Journal of Marketing, 76 (6), 69–86.
80.
WeitzBarton A.BradfordKevin D. (1999), “Personal Selling and Sales Management: A Relationship Marketing Perspective,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 27 (2), 241–54.
81.
WeitzBarton A.SujanHarishSujanMita (1986), “Knowledge, Motivation, and Adaptive Behavior: A Framework for Improving Selling Effectiveness,” Journal of Marketing, 50 (4), 174–91.
82.
WoodStacy L.MoreauC. Page (2006), “From Fear to Loathing? How Emotion Influences the Evaluation and Early Use of Innovations,” Journal of Marketing, 70 (3), 44–57.
83.
YufeiLiuSalehSalmizaJiahuiHuangSyed AbdullahSyed Mohamad (2020), “Review of the Application of Artificial Intelligence in Education,”International Journal of Innovation, Creativity, and Change, 12 (8), 548–62.
84.
Zion Market Research (2019), “Private Tutoring Market by Type (Online, and Blended) and by End-User (Preschool Children, Primary School Students, Middle School Students, High School Students, and College Students): Global Industry Perspective, Comprehensive Analysis, and Forecast, 2018—2026,” (January 21), https://www.zionmarketresearch.com/report/private-tutoring-market.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
