The exponential growth in digital media has recently challenged the value of print media in the overall marketing mix. Across three studies, the authors evaluate the relative effectiveness of print ads versus digital ads. In Study 1, using eye tracking and biometric measures during exposure, the authors find stronger encoding and engagement for print ads over digital ads. A week later, participants showed no significant difference in recognizing ads across format, though they better remembered the encoding context of print ads. Notably, using functional magnetic resonance imaging, the authors find greater activation in hippocampus and parahippocampal regions for print ads relative to digital ads. Extending these insights, Study 2 demonstrates that participants better remember print ads across contents, context, and brand associations when using snippets as retrieval cues. In addition to establishing the robustness of previous findings, Study 3 provides further evidence that the observed memory advantage for print ads is primarily due to superior encoding during initial exposure. From a practical perspective, these findings suggest that marketers should not discount the value of print media in advertising, despite the rapid growth of digital media and communications.
AndersonJohn R. (1983), “A Spreading Activation Theory of Memory,” Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22 (3), 261–95.
2.
BeckerGordon M.DegrootMorris H.MarschakJacob (1964), “Measuring Utility by a Single-Response Sequential Method,” Behavioral Science, 9 (3), 226–32.
3.
BelkRussell W. (2013), “Extended Self in a Digital World,” Journal of Consumer Research, 40 (3), 477–500.
4.
Beschloss, Morris (2016), “Print Media Faces Increasing Advertising Revenue Reduction,” Desert Sun (February 10), http://www.desertsun.com/story/money/industries/morrisbeschlosseconomics/2016/02/10/morris-beschloss-economics-print-media-faces-increasing-advertising-revenue-reduction/80063532/.
5.
BettmanJames R. (1979), “Memory Factors in Consumer Choice—Review,” Journal of Marketing, 43 (2), 37–53.
6.
BucknerRandy L. (2002), “Frontally Mediated Control Processes Contribute to Source Memory Retrieval,” Neuron, 35 (5), 817–18.
7.
BucknerRandy L. (2003), “Functional–Anatomic Correlates of Control Processes in Memory,” Journal of Neuroscience, 23 (10), 3999–4004.
8.
CraikFergus I.M.LockhartRobert S. (1972), “Levels of Processing: A Framework for Memory Research,” Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11 (6), 671–84.
9.
DobbinsIan G.WagnerAnthony D. (2005), “Domain-General and Domain-Sensitive Prefrontal Mechanisms for Recollecting Events and Detecting Novelty,” Cerebral Cortex, 15 (11), 1768–78.
10.
Du PlessisErik (1994), “Recognition Versus Recall,” Journal of Advertising Research, 34 (3), 75–91.
11.
EdenSigalEshet-AlkalaiYoram (2013), “The Effect of Format on Performance: Editing Text in Print Versus Digital Formats,” British Journal of Educational Technology, 44 (5), 846–56.
12.
EichenbaumHowardYonelinasAndrew P.RanganathCharan (2007), “The Medial Temporal Lobe and Recognition Memory,” Annual Review of Neuroscience, 30 (1), 123–52.
13.
EldridgeLaura L.KnowltonBarbara J.FurmanskiChristopher S.BookheimerSusan Y.EngelStephen A. (2000), “Remembering Episodes: A Selective Role for the Hippocampus During Retrieval,” Nature Neuroscience, 3 (11), 1149–52.
14.
eMarketer (2017), “UK’s Print Media Advertising to Suffer the Most in 2017,” (February 2), https://www.emarketer.com/Article/UKs-Print-Media-Advertising-Suffer-Most-2017/1015156.
15.
GabrieliJohn D.BrewerJames B.DesmondJohn E.GloverGary H. (1997), “Separate Neural Bases of Two Fundamental Memory Processes in the Human Medial Temporal Lobe,” Science, 276 (5310), 264–66.
16.
GoldBrian T.BucknerRandy L. (2002), “Common Prefrontal Regions Coactivate with Dissociable Posterior Regions During Controlled Semantic and Phonological Tasks,” Neuron, 35 (4), 803–12.
17.
HaleyRussell I.BaldingerAllan L. (2000), “The ARF Copy Research Validity Project,” Journal of Advertising Research, 40 (6), 114–35.
18.
HessEckhard H.PoltJames M. (1960), “Pupil Size as Related to Interest Value of Visual Stimuli,” Science, 132 (3423), 349–50.
19.
HorstmannNinaAhlgrimmAndreaGlöcknerAndreas (2009), “How Distinct Are Intuition and Deliberation? An Eye-Tracking Analysis of Instruction-Induced Decision Modes,” Judgment and Decision Making, 4 (5), 335–54.
20.
JonesMarilyn Y.PentecostRobinRequenaGabrielle (2005), “Memory for Advertising and Information Content: Comparing the Printed Page to the Computer Screen,” Psychology & Marketing, 22 (8), 623–48.
21.
KellerKevin L. (1987), “Memory Factors in Advertising—The Effect of Advertising Retrieval Cues on Brand Evaluations,” Journal of Consumer Research, 14 (3), 316–33.
22.
KellerKevin L. (1991), “Cue Compatibility and Framing in Advertising,” Journal of Marketing Research, 28 (1), 42–57.
23.
KimJi EunAndersonJim (2008), “Mother–Child Shared Reading with Print and Digital Texts,” Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 8 (2), 213–45.
24.
Kindervater, David (2019), “10 Direct Mail Marketing Statistics That Will Surprise You,” MSP (March 21), https://www.msp-pgh.com/direct-mail-marketing-statistics/.
25.
LynchJohn G.,Jr.,SrullThomas K. (1982), “Memory and Attentional Factors in Consumer Choice: Concepts and Research Methods,” Journal of Consumer Research, 9 (1), 18–37.
26.
MageeRobert G. (2013), “Can a Print Publication Be Equally Effective Online? Testing the Effect of Medium Type on Marketing Communications,” Marketing Letters, 24 (1), 85–95.
27.
Millward Brown (2009), “Using Neuroscience to Understand the Role of Direct Mail,” (accessed August 1, 2021), https://static1.squarespace.com/static/58ee4bac414fb53d228c3532/t/5d30cff8e172f9000121e612/1563480057602/MillwardBrown_CaseStudy_Neuroscience.pdf.
28.
MorwitzVicky G.SteckelJoel H.GuptaAlok (2007), “When Do Purchase Intentions Predict Sales?” International Journal of Forecasting, 23 (3), 347–64.
29.
NeijensPeter C.VoorveldHilde A. (2016), “Digital Replica Editions Versus Printed Newspapers: Different Reading Styles? Different Recall?” New Media & Society, 20 (2), 760–76.
30.
PeckJoannShuSuzanne B. (2009), “The Effect of Mere Touch on Perceived Ownership,” Journal of Consumer Research, 36 (3), 434–47.
31.
PierceJon L.KostovaTatianaDirksKurt T. (2003), “The State of Psychological Ownership: Integrating and Extending a Century of Research,” Review of General Psychology, 7 (1), 84–107.
32.
PotterRobert F.BollsPaul (2012), Psychophysiological Measurement and Meaning: Cognitive and Emotional Processing of Media. New York: Taylor & Francis.
33.
RanganathCharan (2010), “A Unified Framework for the Functional Organization of the Medial Temporal Lobes and the Phenomenology of Episodic Memory,” Hippocampus, 20 (11), 1263–90.
34.
RebJochenConnollyTerry (2007), “Possession, Feelings of Ownership and the Endowment Effect,” Judgment and Decision Making Journal, 2 (2), 107–14.
35.
SiddiquiShakeelTurleyDarach (2006), “Extending the Self in a Virtual World,” in Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 33, Connie Pechmann and Linda Price, eds. Duluth, MN: Association for Consumer Research, 647–48.
36.
SinghSurendra N.RothschildMichael L.ChurchillGilbert A.Jr. (1988), “Recognition Versus Recall as Measures of Television Commercial Forgetting,” Journal of Marketing Research, 25 (1), 72–80.
37.
SquireLarry R. (2009), “The Legacy of Patient H.M. for Neuroscience,” Neuron, 61 (1), 6–9.
38.
SteimleJurgenKhalilbeigiMohammadrezaMühlhäuserMaxHollanJames D. (2010), “Physical and Digital Media Usage Patterns on Interactive Tabletop Surfaces,” paper presented at the ACM International Conference on Interactive Tabletops and Surfaces, Saarbrücken, Germany.
39.
SundarS. ShyamNarayanSunetraObregonRafaelUppalCharu (1998), “Does Web Advertising Work? Memory for Print vs. Online Media,” Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 75 (4), 822–35.
40.
TerrenghiLuciaKirkDavidSellenAbigailIzadiShahram (2007), “Affordances for Manipulation of Physical Versus Digital Media on Interactive Surfaces,” in CHI ’07: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York: Association for Computing Machinery, 1157–66.
41.
Thompson-SchillSharon L.D’EspositoMarkAguirreGeoffrey K.FarahMartha J. (1997), “Role of Left Inferior Prefrontal Cortex in Retrieval of Semantic Knowledge: A Reevaluation,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 94 (26), 14792–97.
42.
TulvingEndel (1985), “Memory and Consciousness,” Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 26 (1), 1–12.
43.
TulvingEndelPsotkaJoseph (1971), “Retroactive Inhibition in Free Recall: Inaccessibility of Information Available in the Memory Store,” Journal of Experimental Psychology, 87 (1), 1–8.
44.
VenkatramanVinodChuahLisa Y.HuettelScott A.CheeMichael W. (2007), “Sleep Deprivation Elevates Expectation of Gains and Attenuates Response to Losses Following Risky Decisions,” Sleep, 30 (5), 603–09.
45.
VenkatramanVinodDimokaAngelikaPavlouPaul A.VoKhoiHamptonWilliamBollingerBryan, et al. (2015), “Predicting Advertising Success Beyond Traditional Measures: New Insights from Neurophysiological Methods and Market Response Modeling,” Journal of Marketing Research, 52 (4), 436–52.
46.
VenkatramanVinodPayneJohn W.HuettelScott A. (2014), “An Overall Probability of Winning Heuristic for Complex Risky Decisions: Choice and Eye Fixation Evidence,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 125 (2), 73–87.
47.
VerdiMichael P.CrooksSteven M.WhiteDavid R. (2002), “Learning Effects of Print and Digital Geographic Maps,” Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 35 (2), 290–302.
48.
Vojinovic, Ivana (2021), “Direct Mail Statistics That Will Have You Running to the Post Office,” SmallBizGenius (January 6), https://www.smallbizgenius.net/by-the-numbers/direct-mail-statistics.
49.
WagnerAnthony D.GabrieliJohn D.VerfaellieMieke (1997), “Dissociations Between Familiarity Processes in Explicit Recognition and Implicit Perceptual Memory,” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 23 (2), 305–23.
50.
WalkerDavidDubitskyTony M. (1994), “Why Liking Matters,” Journal of Advertising Research, 34 (3), 9–18.
51.
WangZhengLangAnnieBusemeyerJerome R. (2011), “Motivational Processing and Choice Behavior During Television Viewing: An Integrative Dynamic Approach,” Journal of Communication, 61 (1), 71–93.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
