Crowdfunding has emerged as an alternative means of financing new ventures wherein a large number of individuals collectively back a project. This research specifically examines reward-based crowdfunding, in which those who take part in the crowdfunding process receive the new product for which funding is sought in return for their financial support. This work illustrates that consumers make fundamentally different decisions when considering whether to contribute their money to crowdfund versus purchase a product. Six studies demonstrate that compared with a traditional purchase, crowdfunding more strongly activates an interdependent mindset and, as a result, increases consumer demand for social-good products (i.e., products with positive social and/or environmental impact). The research further highlights that an active involvement in the crowdfunding process is necessary to increase demand for social-good products: when a previously crowdfunded product is already to market, the effect is eliminated. Finally, it is demonstrated that crowdfunding participants exhibit an increased demand for social-good products only when collective efficacy (i.e., one’s belief in the collective’s ability to bring about change) is high.
AakerJennifer L.LeeAngela Y. (2001), “I’ Seek Pleasures and ‘We’ Avoid Pains: The Role of Self-Regulatory Goals in Information Processing and Persuasion,” Journal of Consumer Research, 28 (1), 33–49.
2.
AgrawalAjayCataliniChristianGoldfarbAvi (2015), “Crowdfunding: Geography, Social Networks, and the Timing of Investment Decisions,” Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 24 (2), 253–74.
3.
AgrawalNidhiMaheswaranDurairaj (2005), “The Effects of Self-Construal and Commitment on Persuasion,” Journal of Consumer Research, 31 (4), 841–49.
4.
AllisonThomas H.DavisBlakley C.ShortJeremy C.WebbJustin W. (2015), “Crowdfunding in a Prosocial Microlending Environment: Examining the Role of Intrinsic Versus Extrinsic Cues,” Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 39 (1), 53–73.
5.
ArnockyStevenStroinkMirellaDeCiccoTeresa (2007), “Self-Construal Predicts Environmental Concern, Cooperation, and Conservation,” Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27 (4), 255–64.
6.
BanduraAlbert (1997), Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York: WH Freeman/Times Books/Henry Holt & Co.
7.
BelleflammePaulLambertThomasSchwienbacherArmin (2014), “Crowdfunding: Tapping the Right Crowd,” Journal of Business Venturing, 29 (5), 585–609.
8.
BitterlSallySchreierMartin (2018), “When Consumers Become Project Backers: The Psychological Consequences of Participation in Crowdfunding,” International Journal of Research in Marketing, 35 (4), 673–85.
BrewerMarilynnGardnerWendi (1996), “Who Is This ‘We’? Levels of Collective Identity and Self Representations,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71 (1), 83–93.
11.
BrownTerrence E.BoonEdwardPittLeyland F. (2017), “Seeking Funding in Order to Sell: Crowdfunding as a Marketing Tool,” Business Horizons, 60 (2), 189–95.
12.
BurtchGordonGhoseAnindyaWattalSunil (2013), “An Empirical Examination of the Antecedents and Consequences of Investment Patterns in Crowd-Funded Markets,” Information Systems Research, 24 (3), 499–519.
13.
BurtonK. AlexGoreJonathan S.SturgeonJennifer (2012), “The Role of Relational Self-Construal in Reactions to Charity Advertisements,” Self and Identity, 11 (3), 343–59.
14.
CalicGoranMosakowskiElaine (2016), “Kicking Off Social Entrepreneurship: How a Sustainability Orientation Influences Crowdfunding Success,” Journal of Management Studies, 53 (5), 738–67.
15.
ChangHannah H.HungIris W. (2018), “Mirror, Mirror on the Retail Wall: Self-Focused Attention Promotes Reliance on Feelings in Consumer Decisions,” Journal of Marketing Research, 55 (4), 586–99.
16.
ChenGiladBliesePaul D. (2002), “The Role of Different Levels of Leadership in Predicting Self- and Collective Efficacy: Evidence for Discontinuity,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 87 (3), 549–56.
17.
ChenMei-Fang (2015), “Self-Efficacy or Collective Efficacy Within the Cognitive Theory of Stress Model: Which More Effectively Explains People’s Self-Reported Proenvironmental Behavior?” Journal of Environmental Psychology, 42, 66–75.
18.
ChernevAlexanderBlairSean (2015), “Doing Well by Doing Good: The Benevolent Halo of Corporate Social Responsibility,” Journal of Consumer Research, 41 (6), 1412–25.
19.
ChoiJungsilChangYoung KyunLiYexin JessicaJangMyoung Gyun (2016), “Doing Good in Another Neighborhood: Attributions of CSR Motives Depend on Corporate Nationality and Cultural Orientation,” Journal of International Marketing, 24 (4), 82–104.
20.
ChuangYatingXieXiaofeiLiuChang (2016), “Interdependent Orientations Increase Pro-Environmental Preferences When Facing Self-Interest Conflicts: The Mediating Role of Self-Control,” Journal of Environmental Psychology, 46(June), 96–105.
21.
DahlDarren W.FuchsChristophSchreierMartin (2015), “Why and When Consumers Prefer Products of User-Driven Firms: A Social Identification Account,” Management Science, 61 (8), 1978–88.
22.
DaiHengchenZhangDennis J. (2019), “Prosocial Goal Pursuit in Crowdfunding: Evidence from Kickstarter,” Journal of Marketing Research, 56 (3), 498–517.
23.
DownieMichelleKoestnerRichardHorbergElizabethHagaSilje (2006), “Exploring the Relation of Independent and Interdependent Self-Construals to Why and How People Pursue Personal Goals,” Journal of Social Psychology, 146 (5), 517–31.
24.
DuclosRodBaraschAlixandra (2014), “Prosocial Behavior in Intergroup Relations: How Donor Self-Construal and Recipient Group-Membership Shape Generosity,” Journal of Consumer Research, 41 (1), 93–108.
25.
FuchsChristophSchreierMartinOsselaerStijn M.J. van (2015), “The Handmade Effect: What’s Love Got to Do with It,” Journal of Marketing, 79 (2), 98–110.
26.
GalakJeffSmallDeborahStephenAndrew T. (2011), “Microfinance Decision Making: A Field Study of Prosocial Lending,” Journal of Marketing Research, 48(Special Issue), 130–37.
GerberElizabethHuiJulie (2016), “Crowdfunding: How and Why People Participate,” in International Perspectives on Crowdfunding: Positive, Normative and Critical Theory, MéricJeromeMaqueIsabelleBrabetJulienne, eds. Bingley, UK: Emerald, 37–64.
29.
GneezyAyeletGneezyUriNelsonLeif D.BrownAmber (2010), “Shared Social Responsibility: A Field Experiment in Pay-What-You-Want Pricing and Charitable Giving,” Science, 329 (5989), 325–27.
GunastiKunterRossWilliam T.Jr. (2010), “How and When Alphanumeric Brand Names Affect Consumer Preferences,” Journal of Marketing Research, 47 (6), 1177–92.
32.
HamiltonRebecca W.BiehalGabriel J. (2005), “Achieving Your Goals or Protecting Their Future? The Effects of Self-View on Goals and Choices,” Journal of Consumer Research, 32 (2), 277–83.
33.
HayesAndrew F. (2018), Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach, 2nd ed. New York: Guilford Press.
34.
HongJiewenChangHannah H. (2015), “I’ Follow My Heart and ‘We’ Rely on Reasons: The Impact of Self-Construal on Reliance on Feelings Versus Reasons in Decision Making,” Journal of Consumer Research, 41 (6), 1392–1411.
35.
JungMinah H.NelsonLeifGneezyUriGneezyAyelet (2014), “Paying More When Paying for Others,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107 (3), 414–31.
KuppuswamyVenkatBayusBarry L. (2017), “Does My Contribution to Your Crowdfunding Project Matter?” Journal of Business Venturing, 32 (1), 72–89.
38.
LalwaniAshok K.ShavittSharon (2013), “You Get What You Pay For? Self-Construal Influences Price–Quality Judgements,” Journal of Consumer Research, 40 (2), 255–67.
39.
MandelNaomi (2003), “Shifting Selves and Decision Making: The Effects of Self-Construal Priming on Consumer Risk-Taking,” Journal of Consumer Research, 30 (1), 30–40.
40.
MarkusHazel RoseKitayamaShinobu (1991), “Culture and the Self: Implications for Cognition, Emotion, and Motivation,” Psychological Review, 98 (2), 244–53.
41.
MeyvisTomOsselaerStijn M. Van (2018), “Increasing the Power of Your Study by Increasing the Effect Size,” Journal of Consumer Research, 44 (5), 1157–73.
42.
MollickEthan (2014), “The Dynamics of Crowdfunding: An Exploratory Study,” Journal of Business Venturing, 29 (1), 1–16.
MoormanRobert H.BlakelyGerald L. (1995), “Individualism-Collectivism as an Individual Difference Predictor of Organizational Citizenship Behavior,” Journal of Organizational Behavior, 16 (2), 127–42.
45.
NewmanGeorge E.DharRavi (2014), “Authenticity Is Contagious: Brand Essence and the Original Source of Production,” Journal of Marketing Research, 51 (3), 371–86.
46.
ObhiSukhvinder S.HogeveenJeremyPascual-LeoneAlvaro (2011), “Resonating with Others: The Effects of Self-construal Type on Motor Cortical Output,” Journal of Neuroscience, 31 (41), 14531–35.
47.
PietraszkiewiczAgnieszkaSoppeBirtheFormanowiczMagdalena (2017), “Go Pro Bono,” Social Psychology, 48 (5), 265–78.
48.
ReeseGerhardJungeEva A. (2017), “Keep on Rockin’ in a (Plastic-)Free World: Collective Efficacy and Pro-Environmental Intentions as a Function of Task Difficulty,” Sustainability, 9 (2), 200.
49.
RyuSunghanKimYoung-Gul (2016), “A Typology of Crowdfunding Sponsors: Birds of a Feather Flock Together?” Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 16, 43–54.
50.
ShavittSharonLeeAngela Y.JohnsonTimothy P. (2008), “Cross-Cultural Consumer Psychology,” in Handbook of Consumer Psychology, HaugtvedtC.HerrP.KardesF., eds. New York: Psychology Press, 1103–32.
51.
SimpsonBonnieRobertsonJenniferWhiteKatherine (2019), “How Co-Creation Increases Employee Corporate Social Responsibility and Organizational Engagement: The Moderating Role of Self-Construal,” Journal of Business Ethics, 166, 331–50.
52.
SimpsonBonnieWhiteKatherineLaranJuliano (2018), “When Public Recognition for Charitable Giving Backfires: The Role of Independent Self-Construal,” Journal of Consumer Research, 44 (6), 1257–73.
53.
SingelisTheodore M. (1994), “The Measurement of Independent and Interdependent Self-Construals,” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20 (5), 580–91.
54.
UtzSonja (2004), “Self-Construal and Cooperation: Is the Interdependent Self More Cooperative Than the Independent Self?” Self and Identity, 3 (3), 177–90.
55.
VaidyanathanRajivAggarwalPraveenKozlowskiWojciech (2013), “Interdependent Self-Construal in Collectivist Cultures: Effects on Compliance in a Cause-Related Marketing Context,” Journal of Marketing Communication, 19 (1), 44–57.
56.
VelasquezAlcidesLaRoseRobert (2015), “Youth Collective Activism Through Social Media: The Role of Collective Efficacy,” New Media & Society, 17 (6), 899–918.
57.
WardJames C.OstromAmy L. (2006), “Complaining to the Masses: The Role of Protest Framing in Customer-Created Complaint Web Sites,” Journal of Consumer Research, 33 (2), 220–30.
58.
WhiteKatherineArgoJennifer J.SenguptaJaideep (2012), “Dissociative Versus Associative Responses to Social Identity Threat: The Role of Consumer Self-Construal,” Journal of Consumer Research, 39 (4), 704–19.
59.
WhiteKatherineSimpsonBonnie (2013), “When Do (and Don’t) Normative Appeals Influence Sustainable Consumer Behaviors?” Journal of Marketing, 77 (2), 78–95.
60.
WinterichKaren PageBaroneMichael J. (2011), “Warm Glow or Cold, Hard Cash? Social Identity Effects on Consumer Choice for Donation Versus Discount Promotions,” Journal of Marketing Research, 48 (5), 855–68.
61.
ZhangHaisuChenWeizhi (2018), “Backer Motivation in Crowdfunding New Product Ideas: Is It About You or Is It About Me?” Journal of Product Innovation Management, 36 (2), 241–62.
62.
ZhangYinlongKhareAdwait (2009), “The Impact of Accessible Identities on the Evaluation of Global Versus Local Products,” Journal of Consumer Research, 36 (3), 524–37.
63.
ZlatevJulian J.MillerDale T. (2016), “Selfishly Benevolent or Benevolently Selfish: When Self-Interest Undermines Versus Promotes Prosocial Behavior,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 137, 112–22.
64.
ZvilichovskyDavidDanzingerShaiSteinhartYael (2018), “Making the Product Happen: A Driver of Crowdfunding Participation,” Journal of Interactive Marketing, 41(February), 81–93.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
