Negotiations today are less likely to be characterized by information asymmetry—the notion that buyers are less informed than sellers—due to the amount of information available to buyers. A number of industries have reacted to this change by shifting their attention to earning profits in aftermarkets: products and services that augment the main purchase (e.g., add-ons, insurance, financing, service and maintenance). In these aftermarkets, firms often retain an information advantage, even if information asymmetries are eliminated from the main purchase. This has given rise to an interesting setting untapped by prior research: information “symmetry” in the front end (main purchase) and information “asymmetry” in the back end (aftermarket). The authors argue that symmetry in the front end provides an opportunity to build trust, as the knowledgeable customer can verify the information disclosed by the seller. In an observational study in the automotive industry, the authors find that customers to whom the salesperson revealed the cost of a car at the beginning of the negotiation spent significantly more in the back end than others. As corroborated in subsequent studies, this effect holds only when cost is disclosed at the beginning of the negotiation and when customers can verify the cost information.
AdairWendi L.BrettJeanne M. (2005), “The Negotiation Dance: Time, Culture, and Behavioral Sequences in Negotiation,” Organization Science, 16 (1), 33–51.
3.
AdairWendi L.BrettJeanneLempereurAlainOkumuraTetsushiShikhirevPeterTinsleyCatherine, et al. (2004), “Culture and Negotiation Strategy,” Negotiation Journal, 20 (1), 87–111.
4.
AtefiYasharAhearneMichaelMaxham IIIJames G.Todd DonavanD.CarlsonBrad D. (2018), “Does Selective Sales Force Training Work?” Journal of Marketing Research, 55 (5), 722–37.
5.
AusubelLawrence MCramtonPeterDeneckereRaymond J (2002), “Bargaining with Incomplete Information,” in Handbook of Game Theory with Economic Applications, Vol. 3, AumannRobert J.HartSergiu, eds. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1897–945.
BlanchardSimon J.CarlsonKurt A.HyodoJamie D. (2016), “The Favor Request Effect: Requesting a Favor from Consumers to Seal the Deal,” Journal of Consumer Research, 42 (6), 985–1001.
8.
BourguignonFrançoisFournierMartinGurgandMarc (2007), “Selection Bias Correction Based on the Multinomial Logit Model: Monte Carlo Comparisons,” Journal of Economic Surveys, 21 (1), 174–205.
9.
BrettJeanne M. (2000), “Culture and Negotiation,” International Journal of Psychology, 35 (2), 97–104.
10.
BrettJeanne M.ThompsonLeigh L. (2016), “Negotiation,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 136, 68–79.
11.
BusseMeghanSilva-RissoJorgeZettelmeyerFlorian (2006), “$1,000 Cash Back: The Pass-Through of Auto Manufacturer Promotions,” American Economic Review, 96 (4), 1253–70.
12.
BusseMeghan R.SimesterDuncan I.ZettelmeyerFlorian (2010), “‘The Best Price You’ll Ever Get’: The 2005 Employee Discount Pricing Promotions in the U.S. Automobile Industry,” Marketing Science, 29 (2), 268–90.
13.
ByronKristin (2008), “Carrying Too Heavy a Load? The Communication and Miscommunication of Emotion by Email,” Academy of Management Review, 33 (2).
DoneyPatricia M.CannonJoseph P. (1997), “An Examination of the Nature of Trust in Buyer–Seller Relationships,” Journal of Marketing, 61 (2), 35–51.
20.
FirthDavid (1993), “Bias Reduction of Maximum Likelihood Estimates,” Biometrika, 80 (1), 27–38.
21.
FulmerC. AshleyGelfandMichele J. (2012), “At What Level (and in Whom) We Trust: Trust Across Multiple Organizational Levels,” Journal of Management, 38 (4), 1167–230.
22.
GanesanShankar (1993), “Negotiation Strategies and the Nature of Channel Relationships,” Journal of Marketing Research, 30 (2), 183–203.
GuniaBrian C.BrettJeanne M.NandkeolyarAmit K.KamdarDishan (2011), “Paying a Price: Culture, Trust, and Negotiation Consequences,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 96 (4), 774–89.
26.
GuoShenyangFraserMark W. (2015), Propensity Score Analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications Inc.
27.
HainmuellerJens (2012), “Entropy Balancing for Causal Effects: A Multivariate Reweighting Method to Produce Balanced Samples in Observational Studies,” Political Analysis, 20 (1), 25–46.
28.
HoTeck-HuaWeigeltKeith (2005), “Trust Building Among Strangers,” Management Science, 51 (4), 519–30.
29.
HonkaElisabethChintaguntaPradeep (2017), “Simultaneous or Sequential? Search Strategies in the U.S. Auto Insurance Industry,” Marketing Science, 36 (1), 21–42.
30.
IngramThomas N.LaForgeRaymond W.AvilaRamon A.SchwepkerCharles H.JrWilliamsMichael R. (2015), Sales Management: Analysis and Decision Making, 9th ed. New York: Routledge.
31.
IsraeliAyeletScott-MortonFionaSilva-RissoJorgeZettelmeyerFlorian (2018), “Scarcity Rents in Car Retailing: Evidence from Inventory Fluctuations at Dealerships,” Working Paper No. 12177, National Bureau of Economic Research.
32.
JanssenMaartenPichlerPaulWeidenholzerSimon (2011), “Oligopolistic Markets with Sequential Search and Production Cost Uncertainty,” The RAND Journal of Economics, 42 (3), 444–70.
33.
JanssenMaartenShelegiaSandro (2015), “Consumer Search and Double Marginalization,” American Economic Review, 105 (6), 1683–710.
34.
JasmandClaudiaBlazevicVerade RuyterKo (2012), “Generating Sales While Providing Service: A Study of Customer Service Representatives’ Ambidextrous Behavior,” Journal of Marketing, 76 (1), 20–37.
35.
KimJungkeunRaoRaghunath SinghKimKyeongheuiRaoAkshay R. (2011), “More or Less: A Model and Empirical Evidence on Preferences for Under- and Overpayment in Trade-In Transactions,” Journal of Marketing Research, 48 (1), 157–71.
36.
KingGaryZengLangche (2001), “Logistic Regression in Rare Events Data,” Political Analysis, 9 (2001), 137–63.
37.
KongDejun TonyDirksKurt T.FerrinDonald L. (2014), “Interpersonal Trust Within Negotiations: Meta-Analytic Evidence, Critical Contingencies, and Directions for Future Research,” Academy of Management Journal, 57 (5), 1235–55.
38.
KumarNirmalyaScheerLisa K.SteenkampJan-Benedict E. M. (1995), “The Effects of Perceived Interdependence on Dealer Attitudes,” Journal of Marketing Research, 32 (3), 348–56.
39.
LiFanLiFan (2019), “Propensity Score Weighting for Causal Inference with Multiple Treatments,” The Annals of Applied Statistics, 13 (4), 2389–415.
40.
LindskoldSvenn (1978), “Trust Development, the GRIT Proposal, and the Effects of Conciliatory Acts on Conflict and Cooperation,” Psychological Bulletin, 85 (4), 772–93.
41.
LytleAnne L.BrettJeanne M.ShapiroDebra L. (1999), “The Strategic Use of Interests, Rights, and Power to Resolve Disputes,” Negotiation Journal, 15 (1), 31–51.
McGinnKathleen L.WilsonEric J. (2004), “How to Negotiate Successfully Online,”Negotiation, 2 (3), 3–5.
44.
MillimanRonald E.FugateDouglas L. (1988), “Using Trust-Transference as a Persuasion Technique: An Empirical Field Investigation,” Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 8 (2), 1–7.
45.
MohanBhavyaBuellRyan W.JohnLeslie K. (2020), “Lifting the Veil: The Benefits of Cost Transparency,” Marketing Science(published online April 22), DOI: 10.1287/mksc.2019.1200.
MorganRobert M.HuntShelby D. (1994), “The Commitment–Trust Theory of Relationship Marketing,” Journal of Marketing, 58 (3), 20–38.
48.
NarayandasDasKasturi RanganV. (2004), “Building and Sustaining Buyer–Seller Relationships in Mature Industrial Markets,” Journal of Marketing, 68 (3), 63–77.
49.
OlekalnsMaraBrettJeanne M.WeingartLaurie R. (2003), “Phases, Transitions, and Interruptions: Modeling Processes in Multi-Party Negotiations,” International Journal of Conflict Management, 14 (3/4), 191–211.
50.
PerryMotty (1986), “An Example of Price Formation in Bilateral Situations: A Bargaining Model with Incomplete Information,” Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 54 (2), 313–21.
51.
PinkDaniel H. (2012), To Sell Is Human: The Surprising Truth about Moving Others. New York: Riverhead Books.
52.
PinkleyRobin LNealeMargaret ABennettRebecca J. (1994), “The Impact of Alternatives to Settlement in Dyadic Negotiation,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 57 (1), 97–116.
53.
PorterConstance EliseDonthuNaveen (2008), “Cultivating Trust and Harvesting Value in Virtual Communities,” Management Science, 54 (1), 113–28.
54.
PuhaniPatrick (2000), “The Heckman Correction for Sample Selection and Its Critique,” Journal of Economic Surveys, 14 (1), 53–68.
55.
RackhamNeilDeVincentisJohn (1998), Rethinking the Sales Force: Refining Selling to Create and Capture Customer Value. New York: McGraw-Hill.
56.
RaoAkshay R.BergenMark E. (1992), “Price Premium Variations as a Consequence of Buyers’ Lack of Information,” Journal of Consumer Research, 19 (3), 412–23.
57.
RaoRaghunath SinghNarasimhanOmJohnGeorge (2009), “Understanding the Role of Trade-Ins in Durable Goods Markets: Theory and Evidence,” Marketing Science, 28 (5), 950–67.
ReinartzWernerUlagaWolfgang (2008), “How to Sell Services More Profitably,” Harvard Business Review, 86 (5), 90–96.
60.
SaparitoPatrick A.ChenChao C.SapienzaHarry J. (2004), “The Role of Relational Trust in Bank–Small Firm Relationships,” Academy of Management Journal, 47 (3), 400–10.
61.
SaxeRobertWeitzBarton A. (1982), “The SOCO Scale: A Measure of the Customer Orientation of Salespeople,” Journal of Marketing Research, 19 (3), 343–51.
SchurrPaul H.OzanneJulie L. (1985), “Influences on Exchange Processes: Buyers’ Preconceptions of a Seller’s Trustworthiness and Bargaining Toughness,” Journal of Consumer Research, 11 (4), 939–53.
64.
Scott MortonFionaSilva-RissoJorgeZettelmeyerFlorian (2011), “What Matters in a Price Negotiation: Evidence from the U.S. Auto Retailing Industry,” Quantitative Marketing and Economics, 9 (4), 365–402.
65.
SrivastavaJoydeepChakravartiDipankar (2009), “Channel Negotiations with Information Asymmetries: Contingent Influences of Communication and Trustworthiness Reputations,” Journal of Marketing Research, 46 (4), 557–72.
66.
SrivastavaJoydeepChakravartiDipankarRapoportAmnon (2000), “Price and Margin Negotiations in Marketing Channels: An Experimental Study of Sequential Bargaining Under One-Sided Uncertainty and Opportunity Cost of Delay,” Marketing Science, 19 (2), 163–84.
67.
SträhleOliverFüllemannMichaelBendigOliver (2012), Service Now! Time to Wake Up the Sleeping Giant, Bain & Company, ed. Munich, Germany: Bain & Company.
68.
SuarezFernando F.CusumanoMichael A.KahlSteven J. (2013), “Services and the Business Models of Product Firms: An Empirical Analysis of the Software Industry,” Management Science, 59 (2), 420–35.
69.
SwanJohn E.BowersMichael R.RichardsonLynne D. (1999), “Customer Trust in the Salesperson: An Integrative Review and Meta-Analysis of the Empirical Literature,” Journal of Business Research, 44 (2), 93–107.
70.
ThompsonLeigh L. (1991), “Information Exchange in Negotiation,” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 27 (2), 161–79.
71.
ThompsonLeigh L.HastieReid (1990), “Social Perception in Negotiation,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 47 (1), 98–123.
72.
ValleyKathleen L.MoagJosephBazermanMax H. (1998), “‘A Matter of Trust’: Effects of Communication on the Efficiency and Distribution of Outcomes,” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 34 (2), 211–38.
73.
ValleyKathleen L.ThompsonLeighGibbonsRobertBazermanMax H. (2002), “How Communication Improves Efficiency in Bargaining Games,"Games and Economic Behavior, 38 (1), 127–55.
74.
Van PouckeDirkBuelensMarc (2002), “Predicting the Outcome of a Two-Party Price Negotiation: Contribution of Reservation Price, Aspiration Price, and Opening Offer,” Journal of Economic Psychology, 23 (1), 67–76.
75.
WhiteSally BlountNealeMargaret A (1991), “Reservation Prices, Resistance Points, and BATNAS: Determining the Parameters of Acceptable Negotiated Outcomes,” Negotiation Journal, 7 (4), 379–88.
76.
WhiteSally BlountNealeMargaret A. (1994), “The Role of Negotiator Aspirations and Settlement Expectancies in Bargaining Outcomes,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 57 (2), 303–17.
77.
WiesekeJanAlaviSaschaHabelJohannes (2014), “Willing to Pay More, Eager to Pay Less: The Role of Customer Loyalty in Price Negotiations,” Journal of Marketing, 78 (6), 17–37.
78.
YangMing-HsienLinBinshanChandlreesNatalynChaoHung-Yi (2009), “The Effect of Perceived Ethical Performance of Shopping Websites on Consumer Trust,” Journal of Computer Information Systems, 50 (1), 15–24.
79.
YoshidaKazukiHernández-DíazSoniaSolomonDaniel H.JacksonJohn W.GagneJoshua J.GlynnRobert J., et al. (2017), “Matching Weights to Simultaneously Compare Three Treatment Groups: Comparison to Three-Way Matching,” Epidemiology, 28 (3), 387–95.
80.
ZhaoQingyuanPercivalDaniel (2017), “Entropy Balancing is Doubly Robust,” Journal of Causal Inference, 5 (1).
81.
ZhuRuiChenXinleiDasguptaSrabana (2008), “Can Trade-Ins Hurt You? Exploring the Effect of a Trade-In on Consumers’ Willingness to Pay for a New Product,” Journal of Marketing Research, 45 (2), 159–70.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
