The authors develop an incentive-aligned experimental paradigm to study how consumer purchase dynamics are affected by the interplay between competing firms’ loyalty programs and their pricing and promotional strategies. In this experiment, participants made sequential choices between two competing airlines in a stylized frequent traveler task for which an optimal dynamic decision policy can be numerically computed. The authors find that, on average, participants are able to partially realize the long-term benefits from loyalty programs, though most are sensitive to price. They also find that participants’ preferences and levels of bounded rationality depend on the nature of the competitive environment, the particular state of each decision scenario, and the type of optimal action. Accordingly, the authors use an approximate dynamic programming model to incorporate boundedly rational decision making. The model classifies participants into five segments that exhibit variation in their performance and decision strategies. Importantly, they find that participants are able to adapt their decision strategies to the environment they face, and thus the overall market outcome and the performance of each firm are influenced by both the competitive environment and the assumption on the extent of consumer optimality.
BeckerGordon M.DeGrootMorris H.MarschakJacob (1964), “Measuring Utility by a Single-Response Sequential Method,” Behavioral Science, 9 (3), 226–32.
4.
CaminalRamonMatutesCarmen (1990), “Endogenous Switching Costs in a Duopoly Model,” International Journal of Industrial Organization, 8 (3), 353–73.
5.
ChingAndrew T.ErdemTülinKeaneMichael P. (2014), “A Simple Method to Estimate the Roles of Learning, Inventories and Category Consideration in Consumer Choice,” Journal of Choice Modelling, 13, 60–72.
6.
ChingAndrew T.IshiharaMasakazu (2017), “Identification of Dynamic Models of Rewards Program,” Japanese Economic Review, 69 (3), 306–23.
7.
ChingAndrew T.OsborneMatthew (2019), “Identification and Estimation of Forward-Looking Behavior: The Case of Consumer Stockpiling,” Marketing Science (forthcoming), https://ssrn.com/abstract=2594032.
8.
ChunSo YeonOvchinnikovAnton (2019), “Strategic Consumers, Revenue Management, and the Design of Loyalty Programs,” Management Science, 65 (9), 3949–4450.
9.
DanaherPeter J.SajtosLaszloDanaherTracey S. (2017), “Dynamic Management of Rewards in Coalition Loyalty Programs,” technical report, working paper (May 17).
10.
DingMin (2007), “An Incentive-Aligned Mechanism for Conjoint Analysis,” Journal of Marketing Research, 44 (2), 214–23.
EricsonKeith MarzilliLaibsonDavid (2019), “Intertemporal Choice,” in Handbook of Behavioral Economics: Foundations and Applications 2Douglas BernheimB.Della VignaStefanoLaibsonDavid, eds. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
13.
EvanschitzkyHeinerRamaseshanBalasubramanianWoisetschlägerDavid M.RichelsenVerenaBlutMarkusBackhausChristof (2012), “Consequences of Customer Loyalty to the Loyalty Program and to the Company,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40 (5), 625–38.
GelmanAndrewMengXiao-LiSternHal (1996), “Posterior Predictive Assessment of Model Fitness via Realized Discrepancies,” Statistica Sinica, 6 (4), 733–60.
16.
GewekeJohnKeaneMichael P. (2000), “Bayesian Inference for Dynamic Discrete Choice Models Without the Need for Dynamic Programming,” in Simulation-Based Inference in Econometrics: Methods and Applications, MarianoRoberto S.SchuermannTilWeeksMelvyn J., eds. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 100–131.
17.
GewekeJohnKeaneMichael P. (2001), “Computationally Intensive Methods for Integration in Econometrics,” in Handbook of Econometrics, Vol. 5, HeckmanJames J.LeamerEdward E., eds. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 3463–3568.
18.
GilbrideTimothy J.AllenbyGreg M. (2004), “A Choice Model with Conjunctive, Disjunctive, and Compensatory Screening Rules,” Marketing Science, 23 (3), 391–406.
19.
HaraKotaroAdamsAbigailMillandKristySavageSaiphCallison-BurchChrisBighamJeffrey P. (2018), “A Data-Driven Analysis of Workers’ Earnings on Amazon Mechanical Turk,” in Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Association for Computing Machinery, https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3173574.3174023.
20.
HartmannWesley R.ViardV.Brian (2008), “Do Frequency Reward Programs Create Switching Costs? A Dynamic Structural Analysis of Demand in a Reward Program,” Quantitative Marketing and Economics, 6 (2), 109–37.
21.
HouserDanielKeaneMichaelMcCabeKevin (2004), “Behavior in a Dynamic Decision Problem: An Analysis of Experimental Evidence Using a Bayesian Type Classification Algorithm,” Econometrica, 72 (3), 781–822.
22.
ImaiSusumuKeaneMichael P. (2004), “Intertemporal Labor Supply and Human Capital Accumulation,” International Economic Review, 45 (2), 601–41.
23.
KeaneMichael P.WolpinKenneth I. (1994), “The Solution and Estimation of Discrete Choice Dynamic Programming Models by Simulation and Interpolation: Monte Carlo Evidence,” Review of Economics and Statistics, 76 (4), 648–72.
KivetzRanUrminskyOlegZhengYuhuang (2006), “The Goal-Gradient Hypothesis Resurrected: Purchase Acceleration, Illusionary Goal Progress, and Customer Retention,” Journal of Marketing Research, 43 (1), 39–58.
26.
KlempererPaul (1995), “Competition When Consumers Have Switching Costs: An Overview with Applications to Industrial Organization, Macroeconomics, and International Trade,” Review of Economic Studies, 62 (4), 515–39.
27.
KopallePraveen K.SunYachengNeslinScott A.SunBaohongSwaminathanVanitha (2012), “The Joint Sales Impact of Frequency Reward and Customer Tier Components of Loyalty Programs,” Marketing Science, 31 (2), 216–35.
28.
KrusellPerSmithAnthony A.Jr. (1996), “Rules of Thumb in Macroeconomic Equilibrium: A Quantitative Analysis,” Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 20 (4), 527–58.
29.
LewisMichael (2004), “The Influence of Loyalty Programs and Short-Term Promotions on Customer Retention,” Journal of Marketing Research, 41 (3), 281–92.
30.
LiuYupingYangRong (2009), “Competing Loyalty Programs: Impact of Market Saturation, Market Share, and Category Expandability,” Journal of Marketing, 73 (1), 93–108.
31.
MetropolisNicholasRosenbluthArianna W.RosenbluthMarshall N.TellerAugusta H.TellerEdward (1953), “Equation of State Calculations by Fast Computing Machines,” Journal of Chemical Physics, 21 (6), 1087–92.
32.
MeyerRobert J.HutchinsonJ.Wesley (2016), “(When) Are We Dynamically Optimal? A Psychological Field Guide for Marketing Modelers,” Journal of Marketing, 80 (5), 20–33.
33.
NealRadford M. (2011), “MCMC Using Hamiltonian Dynamics,” in Handbook of Markov Chain Monte Carlo, BrooksSteveGelmanAndrewJonesGalinMengXiao-Li, eds. New York: Chapman and Hall/CRC, 113–62.
34.
NunesJoseph C.DrèzeXavier (2006), “The Endowed Progress Effect: How Artificial Advancement Increases Effort,” Journal of Consumer Research, 32 (4), 504–12.
ShuSuzanne B.GneezyAyelet (2010), “Procrastination of Enjoyable Experiences,” Journal of Marketing Research, 47 (5), 933–44.
40.
SinghSiddharth S.JainDipak C.KrishnanTrichy V. (2008), “Research Note: Customer Loyalty Programs: Are They Profitable?” Management Science, 54 (6), 1205–11.
41.
SpiegelhalterDavid J.BestNicola G.CarlinBradley P.Van Der LindeAngelika (2002), “Bayesian Measures of Model Complexity and Fit,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology), 64 (4), 583–639.
42.
StourmValeriaBradlowEricFaderPeter (2015), “Stockpiling Points in Linear Loyalty Programs,” Journal of Marketing Research, 52 (2), 253–67.
43.
StourmValeriaBradlowEricFaderPeter (2017), “Market Positioning Using Cross-Reward Effects in a Coalition Loyalty Program,” HEC Paris Research Paper No. MKG-2017-1242.
44.
SunYachengZhangDan (2019), “A Model of Customer Reward Programs with Finite Expiration Terms,” Management Science, 65 (8), 3889–3903.
45.
WangYanwenLewisMichaelCryderCynthiaSpriggJim (2016), “Enduring Effects of Goal Achievement and Failure Within Customer Loyalty Programs: A Large-Scale Field Experiment,” Marketing Science, 35 (4), 565–75.
46.
ZhangJieBreugelmansEls (2012), “The Impact of an Item-Based Loyalty Program on Consumer Purchase Behavior,” Journal of Marketing Research, 49 (1), 50–65.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
