Intertemporal savings strategies, such as bulk buying or accelerating purchase timing to take advantage of a good deal, provide long-term savings in exchange for an increase in immediate spending. Although households with limited financial resources stand to benefit the most from these strategies, they are less likely to make use of them. The authors provide causal evidence that liquidity constraints impede low-income households’ ability to use these strategies, above and beyond the impact of other constraints. Exploiting recurring variation in household liquidity, this study shows that when low-income households have more liquidity, they partially catch up to higher-income households’ ability to use intertemporal savings strategies. The findings provide guidance to marketing managers and researchers regarding targeted promotional design and measurement of deal-proneness. For policy makers, they suggest a new path for decreasing the higher prices low-income households have been documented to pay for everyday goods. Policies have traditionally focused on increasing financial literacy or access to supermarkets. Our work suggests that providing greater liquidity can help low-income households make better use of savings opportunities already available to them.
AgarwalSumitLiuChunlinSoulelesNicholas S. (2007), “The Reaction of Consumer Spending and Debt to Tax Rebates—Evidence from Consumer Credit Data,” Journal of Political Economy, 115 (6), 986–1019.
2.
AguiarMarkHurstErik (2007), “Life-Cycle Prices and Production,” American Economic Review, 97 (5), 1533–59.
3.
AilawadiKusum L.GedenkKarenLutzkyChristianNeslinScott A. (2007), “Decomposition of the Sales Impact of Promotion-Induced Stockpiling,” Journal of Marketing Research, 44 (3), 450–67.
4.
AilawadiKusum L.MaYuGrewalDhruv (2018), “The Club Store Effect: Impact of Shopping in Warehouse Club Stores on Consumers’ Packaged Food Purchases,” Journal of Marketing Research, 55 (2), 193–207.
5.
AilawadiKusum L.NeslinScott A. (1998), “The Effect of Promotion on Consumption: Buying More and Consuming It Faster,” Journal of Marketing Research, 35 (3), 390–8.
6.
AilawadiKusum L.NeslinScott A.GedenkKaren (2001), “Pursuing the Value-Conscious Consumer: Store Brands Versus National Brand Promotions,” Journal of Marketing, 65 (1), 71–89.
7.
AkbayCumaJonesEugene (2005), “Food Consumption Behavior of Socioeconomic Groups for Private Labels and National Brands,” Food Quality and Preference, 16 (7), 621–31.
8.
AttanasioOrazioFrayneChristine (2006), “Do the Poor Pay More?” in Proceedings from Eighth Bureau of Research and Economic Analysis of Development Conference. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University.
9.
BawaKapilShoemakerRobert W. (1987), “The Coupon-Prone Consumer: Some Findings Based on Purchase Behavior Across Product Classes,” Journal of Marketing, 51 (4), 99–110.
10.
BeattyTimothy K. M. (2010), “Do the Poor Pay More for Food? Evidence from the United Kingdom,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 92 (3), 608–21.
11.
BeattyTimothy K. M.TuttleCharlotte J. (2014), “Expenditure Response to Increases in In-Kind Transfers: Evidence from the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 97 (2), 390–404.
12.
BellDavid R.HilberChristian AL (2006), “An Empirical Test of the Theory of Sales: Do Household Storage Constraints Affect Consumer and Store Behavior?” Quantitative Marketing and Economics, 4 (2), 87–117.
13.
BertrandMarianneMorseAdair (2009), “What Do High-Interest Borrowers Do with Their Tax Rebate?” The American Economic Review, 99 (2), 418–23.
14.
BlattbergRobertBuesingThomasPeacockPeterSenSubrata (1978), “Identifying the Deal Prone Segment,” Journal of Marketing Research, 15 (3), 369–77.
15.
BrodaChristianParkerJonathan A. (2014), “The Economic Stimulus Payments of 2008 and the Aggregate Demand for Consumption,” Journal of Monetary Economics, 68, S20–36.
16.
CarvalhoLeandro S.MeierStephanWangStephanie W. (2016), “Poverty and Economic Decision-Making: Evidence from Changes in Financial Resources at Payday,” American Economic Review, 106 (2), 260–84.
17.
ChandonPierreWansinkBrian (2002), “When Are Stockpiled Products Consumed Faster? A Convenience-Salience Framework of Postpurchase Consumption Incidence and Quantity,” Journal of Marketing Research, 39 (3), 321–35.
18.
ChungChanjinMyersSamuel L. (1999), “Do the Poor Pay More for Food? An Analysis of Grocery Store Availability and Food Price Disparities,” The Journal of Consumer Affairs, 33 (2), 276–96.
19.
DelaneyLiamDoyleOrla (2012), “Socioeconomic Differences in Early Childhood Time Preferences,” Journal of Economic Psychology, 33 (1), 237–47.
20.
DubéJean-PierreHitschGünter J.RossiPeter E. (2018), “Income and Wealth Effects on Private-Label Demand: Evidence from the Great Recession,” Marketing Science, 37 (1), 22–53.
21.
EinavLiranLeibtagEphraimNevoAviv (2010), “Recording Discrepancies in Nielsen Homescan Data: Are They Present and Do They Matter?” Quantitative Marketing and Economics, 8 (2), 207–239.
22.
ErdemTülinImaiSusumuKeaneMichael P. (2003), “Brand and Quantity Choice Dynamics Under Price Uncertainty,” Quantitative Marketing and Economics, 1 (1), 5–64.
23.
FernandesDanielLynchJohn G.JrNetemeyerRichard G. (2014), “Financial Literacy, Financial Education, and Downstream Financial Behaviors,” Management Science, 60 (8), 1861–83.
24.
FrankRonald E.DouglasSusan P.PolliRolando E. (1967), “Household Correlates of Package-Size Proneness for Grocery Products,” Journal of Marketing Research, 4 (4), 381–4.
25.
GriffithRachelLeibtagEphraimLeicesterAndrewNevoAviv (2009), “Consumer Shopping Behavior: How Much Do Consumers Save?” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 23 (2), 99–120.
26.
GriskeviciusVladasTyburJoshua M.DeltonAndrew W.RobertsonTheresa E. (2011), “The Influence of Mortality and Socioeconomic Status on Risk and Delayed Rewards: A Life History Theory Approach,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100 (6), 1015–26.
27.
HastingsJustine S.ShapiroJesse M. (2017), “How are SNAP Benefits Spent? Evidence from a Retail Panel,” Working Paper No. w23112, National Bureau of Economic Research.
28.
HendelIgalNevoAviv (2006), “Sales and Consumer Inventory,” RAND Journal of Economics, 37 (3), 543–61.
29.
JohnsonDavid S.ParkerJonathan A.SoulelesNicholas S. (2006), “Household Expenditure and the Income Tax Rebates of 2001,” The American Economic Review, 96 (5), 1589–610.
30.
KalyanamKirthiPutlerDaniel S. (1997), “Incorporating Demographic Variables in Brand Choice Models: An Indivisible Alternatives Framework,” Marketing Science, 16 (2), 166–81.
31.
KaufmanPhil R.MacDonaldJamesLutzSteve M.SmallwoodDavid (1997), “Do the Poor Pay More for Food? Item Selection and Price Differences Affect Low-Income Household Food Costs,” Economic Research Service No. 34065, United States Department of Agriculture, http://purl.umn.edu/34065.
32.
KunreutherHoward (1973), “Why the Poor May Pay More for Food: Theoretical and Empirical Evidence,” Journal of Business, 46 (3), 368–83.
33.
LichtensteinDonald R.BurtonScotNetemeyerRichard G. (1997), “An Examination of Deal Proneness Across Sales Promotion Types: A Consumer Segmentation Perspective,” Journal of Retailing, 73 (2), 283–97.
MisraKanishkaSuricoPaolo (2014), “Consumption, Income Changes, and Heterogeneity: Evidence from Two Fiscal Stimulus Programs,” American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 6 (4), 84–106.
36.
NeslinScott A.HendersonCarolineQuelchJohn (1985), “Consumer Promotions and the Acceleration of Product Purchases,” Marketing Science, 4 (2), 147–65.
37.
NevoAvivWongArlene (2015), “The Elasticity of Substitution Between Time and Market Goods: Evidence From the Great Recession,” Working Paper No. w21318, National Bureau of Economic Research.
38.
ParkerJonathan A.SoulelesNicholas S.JohnsonDavid S.McClellandRobert (2013), “Consumer Spending and the Economic Stimulus Payments of 2008,” American Economic Review, 103 (6), 2530–53.
39.
RaoVijayendra (2000), “Price Heterogeneity and ‘Real’ Inequality: A Case Study of Prices and Poverty in Rural South India,” Review of Income and Wealth, 46 (2), 201–11.
40.
ShapiroMatthew D.SlemrodJoel (1995), “Consumer Response to the Timing of Income: Evidence from a Change in Tax Withholding,” The American Economic Review, 85 (1), 274–83.
41.
Silva-RissoJorge M.BucklinRandolph E.MorrisonDonald G. (1999), “A Decision Support System for Planning Manufacturers’ Sales Promotion Calendars,” Marketing Science, 18 (3), 274–300.
42.
StephensMelvinJr (2003), “‘3rd of Tha Month’: Do Social Security Recipients Smooth Consumption Between Checks?” The American Economic Review, 93 (1), 406–22.
43.
StephensMelvinJr (2006), “Paycheque Receipt and the Timing of Consumption,” The Economic Journal, 116 (513), 680–701.
44.
StilleyKaren M.InmanJ. JeffreyWakefieldKirk L. (2010), “Spending on the Fly: Mental Budgets, Promotions, and Spending Behavior,” Journal of Marketing, 74 (3), 34–47.
45.
TalukdarDebabrata (2008), “Cost of Being Poor: Retail Price and Consumer Price Search Differences Across Inner-City and Suburban Neighborhoods,” Journal of Consumer Research, 35 (3), 457–71.
46.
ZhangYiwei (2017), “Consumption Responses to Pay Frequency: Evidence from ‘Extra’ Paychecks,” in NA—Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 45, GneezyAyeletGriskeviciusVladasWilliamsPatti, eds. Duluth, MN: Association for Consumer Research, 170–74.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
