Abstract
Presumably to reduce cyberbullying and promote mental health, online influencers often limit viewers’ ability to post social media comments. In this research, the authors find that influencers incur significant interpersonal and professional repercussions for doing so. Across seven studies, including a Twitter dataset and six experiments utilizing both consequential and hypothetical dependent measures, the authors find that consumers form more negative impressions of and are less persuaded by influencers who disable social media comments. These outcomes are driven by the perception that the influencer is less receptive to consumer voice (e.g., consumers’ thoughts, opinions, and suggestions) and, thus, less sincere. However, the authors find that this effect is mitigated in situations where consumers believe that it is reasonable for influencers to prioritize self-protection.
Keywords
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
