The current research examines consumers’ responses to sensory endorsements from virtual influencers. The authors reveal that consumers perceive virtual and human influencers to have similar distal sensory (i.e., visual and auditory) capacities. Consumers, however, perceive virtual influencers as having lower proximal sensory (i.e., haptic, olfactory, and gustatory) capacities. Consequently, when endorsements focus on proximal sensory experiences, consumers have lower purchase intention toward products and services endorsed by a virtual (vs. human) influencer. The findings further reveal that imagery difficulty and perceived sensory capacity serially mediate this effect. Importantly, this effect is mitigated when endorsements focus on distal sensory experiences, when sensory information is not explicitly mentioned, and when consumers are informed of new technology that enables virtual influencers to have proximal sensory experiences. These findings offer actionable insights for marketers to effectively utilize virtual influencers in sensory-driven campaigns, providing practical strategies to improve consumer responses to sensory endorsements and enhance marketing effectiveness.
AbdallahMagdy S. (2015), “Indirect Marketing Through Influencers on Social Media,” master’s thesis, Department of Industrial Economics and Management, School of Industrial Engineering and Management, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2:825206.
2.
AggarwalPankajMcGillAnn L. (2007), “Is That Car Smiling at Me? Schema Congruity as a Basis for Evaluating Anthropomorphized Products,” Journal of Consumer Research, 34 (4), 468–79.
3.
AhnRegina J.ChoSu Y.TsaiWanhsiu S. (2022), “Demystifying Computer-Generated Imagery (CGI) Influencers: The Effect of Perceived Anthropomorphism and Social Presence on Brand Outcomes,” Journal of Interactive Advertising, 22 (3), 327–35.
4.
AlbaJosephLynchJohnWeitzBartonJaniszewskiChrisLutzRichardSawyerAlanWoodStacy (1997), “Interactive Home Shopping: Consumer, Retailer, and Manufacturer Incentives to Participate in Electronic Marketplaces,” Journal of Marketing, 61 (3), 38–53.
ArsenyanJbidMirowskaAgata (2021), “Almost Human? A Comparative Case Study on the Social Media Presence of Virtual Influencers,” International Journal of Human–Computer Studies, 155, 102694.
7.
Batista da Silva OliveiraAntonioChimentiPaula (2021), “‘Humanized Robots’: A Proposition of Categories to Understand Virtual Influencers,” Australasian Journal of Information Systems, 25, 1–27.
8.
BickartBarbaraSchindlerRobert M. (2001), “Internet Forums as Influential Sources of Consumer Information,” Journal of Interactive Marketing, 15 (3), 31–40.
9.
BiswasDipayanLabrecqueLauren I.LehmannDonald R.MarkosEreni (2014), “Making Choices While Smelling, Tasting, and Listening: The Role of Sensory (Dis)similarity When Sequentially Sampling Products,” Journal of Marketing, 78 (1), 112–26.
10.
CallcottMargaret F.LeeWei-Na (1995), “Establishing the Spokes-Character in Academic Inquiry: Historical Overview and Framework for Definition,” in Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 22, KardesFrank R.SujanMita, eds. Association for Consumer Research, 144–51.
11.
CampbellMargaret C.KirmaniAmna (2000), “Consumers’ Use of Persuasion Knowledge: The Effects of Accessibility and Cognitive Capacity on Perceptions of an Influence Agent,” Journal of Consumer Research, 27 (1), 69–83.
12.
Cascio RizzoGiovanni LucaBergerJonahDe AngelisMatteoPozharlievRumen (2023), “How Sensory Language Shapes Influencer’s Impact,” Journal of Consumer Research, 50 (4), 810–25.
13.
CheungFannyLeungWing-Fai (2021), “Virtual Influencer as Celebrity Endorsers,” inAdvances in Global Services and Retail Management,CobanogluCihanandDella CorteValentina, eds.USF M3 Publishing, 1–7.
14.
CitrinAlka V.StemDonald E.SpangenbergEric R.ClarkMichael J. (2003), “Consumer Need for Tactile Input: An Internet Retailing Challenge,” Journal of Business Research, 56 (11), 915–22.
CrolicCammyThomazFelipeHadiRhondaStephenAndrew T. (2022), “Blame the Bot: Anthropomorphism and Anger in Customer–Chatbot Interactions,” Journal of Marketing, 86 (1), 132–48.
17.
DarnerAnnaArvidssonNickie (2019), “Virtual Influencers: Anonymous Celebrities on Social Media,” bachelor’s thesis, Computer Science and Informatics, School of Engineering, Jönköping University, https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2:1335875.
18.
DecetyJeanGrèzesJulie (2006), “The Power of Simulation: Imagining One’s Own and Other’s Behavior,” Brain Research, 1079 (1), 4–14.
19.
DengFengyiJiangXia (2023), “Effects of Human Versus Virtual Human Influencers on the Appearance Anxiety of Social Media Users,” Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 71, 103233.
20.
ElderRyan S.KrishnaAradhna (2010), “The Effects of Advertising Copy on Sensory Thoughts and Perceived Taste,” Journal of Consumer Research, 36 (5), 748–56.
21.
ElderRyan S.SchlosserAnne E.PoorMorganXuLidan (2017), “So Close I Can Almost Sense It: The Interplay Between Sensory Imagery and Psychological Distance,” Journal of Consumer Research, 44 (4), 877–94.
22.
El HedhliKamelZourrigHaithemAl KhateebAmrAlnawasIbrahim (2023), “Stereotyping Human-Like Virtual Influencers in Retailing: Does Warmth Prevail over Competence?” Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 75, 103459.
23.
FaddoulGuillaumeChatterjeeSamir (2020), “A Quantitative Measurement Model for Persuasive Technologies Using Storytelling via a Virtual Narrator,” International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 36 (17), 1585–604.
24.
Farrera SaldañaDaniel (2021), “Cartoon Influencers: The Influencer Media Format as a Potential Mainstream Alternative for Animated Media,” master’s thesis, Media Management, Arcada University of Applied Sciences, https://www.theseus.fi/handle/10024/502466.
25.
FerriAnthony J. (2007), Willing Suspension of Disbelief: Poetic Faith in Film. Lexington Books.
26.
FrankeClaudiaGroeppel-KleinAndreaMüllerKatrin (2023), “Consumers’ Responses to Virtual Influencers as Advertising Endorsers: Novel and Effective or Uncanny and Deceiving?” Journal of Advertising, 52 (4), 523–39.
27.
GrayHeather M.GrayKurtWegnerDaniel M. (2007), “Dimensions of Mind Perception,” Science, 315 (5812), 619.
28.
HamJeongminLiSitanShahPratikEastinMatthew S. (2023), “The ‘Mixed’ Reality of Virtual Brand Endorsers: Understanding the Effect of Brand Engagement and Social Cues on Technological Perceptions and Advertising Effectiveness,” Journal of Interactive Advertising, 23 (2), 98–113.
29.
HarrisPaul L. (1992), “From Simulation to Folk Psychology: The Case for Development,” Mind and Language, 7 (1–2), 120–44.
30.
HayesAndrew F. (2015), “An Index and Test of Linear Moderated Mediation,” Multivariate Behavioral Research, 50 (1), 1–22.
31.
HerbstKenneth C.FinkelEli J.AllanDavidFitzsimonsGráinne M. (2012), “On the Dangers of Pulling a Fast One: Advertisement Disclaimer Speed, Brand Trust, and Purchase Intention,” Journal of Consumer Research, 38 (5), 909–19.
HofeditzLennartNissenAnikaSchütteReinhardMirbabaieMilad (2022), “Trust Me, I’m an Influencer! – A Comparison of Perceived Trust in Human and Virtual Influencers,” ECIS Research-in-Progress Papers, 27, https://aisel.aisnet.org/ecis2022_rip/27.
34.
HuangQianqianQuHongjianLiPei (2022), “The Influence of Virtual Idol Characteristics on Consumers’ Clothing Purchase Intention,” Sustainability, 14 (14), 8964.
35.
HughesChristianSwaminathanVanithaBrooksGillian (2019), “Driving Brand Engagement Through Online Social Influencers: An Empirical Investigation of Sponsored Blogging Campaigns,” Journal of Marketing, 83 (5), 78–96.
36.
KimEunjinKimDonggyuZihangE.ShoenbergerHeather (2023), “The Next Hype in Social Media Advertising: Examining Virtual Influencers’ Brand Endorsement Effectiveness,” Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1089051.
37.
KimHankyungNamHoyeonLeeUichinLimYoun-kyung (2021), “Utilitarian or Relational? Exploring Indicators of User Orientation Towards Intelligent Agents,” in 23rd International Conference on Human–Computer Interaction. Springer, 448–55.
38.
KimHyeongmin C.KramerThomas (2015), “Do Materialists Prefer the ‘Brand-as-Servant’? The Interactive Effect of Anthropomorphized Brand Roles and Materialism on Consumer Responses,” Journal of Consumer Research, 42 (2), 284–99.
39.
KimHyojungParkMinjung (2023), “Virtual Influencers’ Attractiveness Effect on Purchase Intention: A Moderated Mediation Model of the Product–Endorser Fit with the Brand,” Computers in Human Behavior, 143, 107703.
40.
KimJiyeonForsytheSandra (2008), “Adoption of Virtual Try-On Technology for Online Apparel Shopping,” Journal of Interactive Marketing, 22 (2), 45–59.
41.
KorsmeyerCarolyn (2019), “A Tour of the Senses,” British Journal of Aesthetics, 59 (4), 357–71.
42.
KostykAlenaLeonhardtJames M.NiculescuMihai (2021), “Processing Fluency Scale Development for Consumer Research,” International Journal of Market Research, 63 (3), 353–67.
43.
KrishnaAradhna (2012), “An Integrative Review of Sensory Marketing: Engaging the Senses to Affect Perception, Judgment and Behavior,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 22 (3), 332–51.
44.
KrishnaAradhnaMorrinMaureen (2008), “Does Touch Affect Taste? The Perceptual Transfer of Product Container Haptic Cues,” Journal of Consumer Research, 34 (6), 807–18.
45.
KrishnaAradhnaMorrinMaureenSayinEda (2014), “Smellizing Cooking and Salivating: A Focus on Olfactory Imagery,” Journal of Consumer Research, 41 (1), 18–34.
46.
KwakHyokjinPuzakovaMarinaRoceretoJoseph F. (2015), “Better Not Smile at the Price: The Differential Role of Brand Anthropomorphization on Price Fairness,” Journal of Marketing, 79 (4), 56–76.
47.
LamKa Y. (2016), “The Hatsune Miku Phenomenon: More Than a Virtual J-Pop Diva,” Journal of Popular Culture, 49 (5), 1107–24.
48.
LeungFine F.GuFlora F.LiYiweiZhangJonathan Z.PalmatierRobert W. (2022), “Influencer Marketing Effectiveness,” Journal of Marketing, 86 (6), 93–115.
49.
LiHuajunLeiYueqiuZhouQiYuanHong (2023), “Can You Sense Without Being Human? Comparing Virtual and Human Influencers Endorsement Effectiveness,” Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 75, 103456.
50.
LiJianHuangJinsongLiYaqi (2023), “Examining the Effects of Authenticity Fit and Association Fit: A Digital Human Avatar Endorsement Model,” Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 71, 103230.
51.
LindstromMartin (2010), Brand Sense: Sensory Secrets Behind the Stuff We Buy. Free Press.
52.
LiuFanjueLeeYu-Hao (2022), “Unveiling Behind-the-Scenes Human Interventions and Examining Source Orientation in Virtual Influencer Endorsements,” in IMX '22: Proceedings of the 2022 ACM International Conference on Interactive Media Experiences.Association for Computing Machinery, 175–92.
53.
LuangrathAndrea W.PeckJoannHedgcockWilliamXuYixiang (2022), “Observing Product Touch: The Vicarious Haptic Effect in Digital Marketing and Virtual Reality,” Journal of Marketing Research, 59 (2), 306–26.
54.
MarksLaura U. (2008), “Thinking Multisensory Culture,” Paragraph, 31 (2), 123–37.
55.
MirowskaAgataArsenyanJbid (2023), “Sweet Escape: The Role of Empathy in Social Media Engagement with Human Versus Virtual Influencers,” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 174, 103008.
56.
MolinVictoriaNordgrenSofia (2019), “Robot or Human? – The Marketing Phenomenon of Virtual Influencers,” master’s thesis, Department of Business Studies, Faculty of Social Sciences, Uppsala University, https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2:1334486.
57.
MoustakasEvangelosLambaNishthaMahmoudDinaRanganathanC. (2020), “Blurring Lines Between Fiction and Reality: Perspectives of Experts on Marketing Effectiveness of Virtual Influencers,” International Conference on Cyber Security and Protection of Digital Services, https://doi.org/10.1109/CyberSecurity49315.2020.9138861.
58.
OraziDavide C.JohnstonAllen C. (2020), “Running Field Experiments Using Facebook Split Test,” Journal of Business Research, 118, 189–98.
59.
ParkGyeongbinNanDongyanParkEunilKimKi J.HanJinyoungPobilAngel P. (2021), “Computers as Social Actors? Examining How Users Perceive and Interact with Virtual Influencers on Social Media,” 15th International Conference on Ubiquitous Information Management and Communication, https://doi.org/10.1109/IMCOM51814.2021.9377397.
60.
PeckJoannChildersTerry L. (2003), “To Have and to Hold: The Influence of Haptic Information on Product Judgments,” Journal of Marketing, 67 (2), 35–48.
61.
PeckJoannChildersTerry L. (2008), “Effects of Sensory Factors on Consumer Behaviors,” in Handbook of Consumer Psychology, HaugtvedtCurtis P.HerrPaul M.KardesFrank R., eds. Psychology Press, 193–219.
62.
PetitOliviaVelascoCarlosSpenceCharles (2019), “Digital Sensory Marketing: Integrating New Technologies into Multisensory Online Experience,” Journal of Interactive Marketing, 45 (1), 42–61.
63.
PhillipsBarbara J.GyoerickBarbara (1999), “The Cow, the Cook, and the Quaker: Fifty Years of Spokes-Character Advertising,” Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 76 (4), 713–28.
64.
PrallDavid W. (1929), Aesthetic Judgment. Thomas Y. Crowell.
65.
PuzakovaMarinaKwakHyokjinRoceretoJoseph F. (2013), “When Humanizing Brands Goes Wrong: The Detrimental Effect of Brand Anthropomorphization Amid Product Wrongdoings,” Journal of Marketing, 77 (3), 81–100.
66.
RiedlRenéMohrPeter N.C.KenningPeter H.DavisFred D.HeekerenHauke R. (2014), “Trusting Humans and Avatars: A Brain Imaging Study Based on Evolution Theory,” Journal of Management Information Systems, 30 (4), 83–114.
RossMichaelSicolyFiore (1979), “Egocentric Biases in Availability and Attribution,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37 (3), 322–36.
69.
SandsSeanCampbellColinPlanggerKirkFerraroCarla (2022), “Unreal Influence: Leveraging AI in Influencer Marketing,” European Journal of Marketing, 56 (6), 1721–47.
70.
SandsSeanFerraroCarlaDemsarVladChandlerGarreth (2022), “False Idols: Unpacking the Opportunities and Challenges of Falsity in the Context of Virtual Influencers,” Business Horizons, 65 (6), 777–88.
71.
SantayanaGeorge (1896), The Sense of Beauty. Charles Scribner’s Sons.
72.
SimmonsJoseph P.NelsonLeif D.SimonsohnUri (2011), “False-Positive Psychology: Undisclosed Flexibility in Data Collection and Analysis Allows Presenting Anything as Significant,” Psychological Science, 22 (11), 1359–66.
SteinJan-PhilippBrevesPriska L.AndersNora (2022), “Parasocial Interactions with Real and Virtual Influencers: The Role of Perceived Similarity and Human-Likeness,” New Media & Society(published online June 13), https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448221102900.
75.
TanYulan (2023), “More Attached, Less Stressed: Viewers’ Parasocial Attachment to Virtual Youtubers and Its Influence on the Stress of Viewers During the COVID-19 Pandemic,” SHS Web of Conferences, 155, 03012.
WangXiaoyiQiuXingyi (2023), “The Influence of Image Realism of Digital Endorsers on the Purchase Intention of Gift Products for the Elderly,” Behavioral Sciences, 13 (1), 74.
Xie-CarsonLiMagorThomasBenckendorffPierreHughesKaren (2023), “All Hype or the Real Deal? Investigating User Engagement with Virtual Influencers in Tourism,” Tourism Management, 99, 104779.
80.
YanLiKehHean TatChenJiemiao (2021), “Assimilating and Differentiating: The Curvilinear Effect of Social Class on Green Consumption,” Journal of Consumer Research, 47 (6), 914–36.
81.
YanXiaoMoTiantianZhouXinyue (2024), “The Influence of Cultural Differences Between China and the West on Moral Responsibility Judgment of Virtual Humans,” Acta Psychologica Sinica, 56 (2), 161–78.
82.
YoonGunwooVargasPatrick T. (2016), “I See Myself Through My Avatar: Evidence from East Asia and North America for Acculturated Effects on Virtual Representation Preference,” Asiascape: Digital Asia, 3 (1–2), 79–96.
83.
ZhaoMinHoefflerSteveDahlDarren W. (2012), “Imagination Difficulty and New Product Evaluation,” Journal of Product Innovation Management, 29 (S1), 76–90.
84.
ZhouXinyueKimSaraWangLili (2019), “Money Helps When Money Feels: Money Anthropomorphism Increases Charitable Giving,” Journal of Consumer Research, 45 (5), 953–72.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
