Firms often use crowdsourcing contests to develop marketing ideas and solutions. Despite the prevalence—and unique aspects—of marketing ideation crowdsourcing contests (MICCs), there has been little examination of these contests’ shareholder wealth implications. Adopting a signaling perspective, the authors conduct an event study of 508 MICC announcements and find that they are associated with higher returns, but also higher idiosyncratic risk, indicating that investors hold a mixed view of such contests. Further, the authors consider how contest design factors and firm marketing resources may signal the cultivation of intellectual and relational market-based assets to shape their stock market impact, providing firms guidance to better design their MICCs. Specifically, they find that returns are enhanced when firms use professional (vs. general public) contests, specifically scoped contests, and contests using crowd judging (vs. expert panels), and for firms with stronger marketing capabilities. However, brand factors have mixed effects on returns, with a brand's relevant stature having a positive effect and its energized differentiation having a negative effect on returns. Product MICCs and generally scoped contests heighten the negative effects on risk, whereas marketing resources have no impact. Results offer implications for practitioners, including the finding that many MICC design choices commonly used in practice (i.e., general public contests and expert panels) are viewed less favorably by investors.
AfuahAllanTucciChristopher L. (2012), “Crowdsourcing as a Solution to Distant Search,” Academy of Management Review, 37 (3), 355–75.
3.
AlbertNoelMerunkaDwight (2013), “The Role of Brand Love in Consumer-Brand Relationships,” Journal of Consumer Marketing, 30 (3), 258–66.
4.
AlesLaurenceChoSoo-HaengKörpeoğluErsin (2017), “Optimal Award Scheme in Innovation Tournaments,” Operations Research, 3 (65), 693–702.
5.
AllenB.J.ChandrasekaranDeepaBasuroySuman (2018), “Design Crowdsourcing: The Impact on New Product Performance of Sourcing Design Solutions from the ‘Crowd’,” Journal of Marketing, 82 (2), 106–23.
BayusBarry L. (2013), “Crowdsourcing New Product Ideas over Time: An Analysis of the Dell Ideastorm Community,” Management Science, 59 (1), 226–44.
8.
BellJ. JasonPescherChristianTellisGerard J.FüllerJohann (2023), “Can AI Help in Ideation? A Theory-Based Model for Idea Screening in Crowdsourcing Contests,” Marketing Science(published online April 20), https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.2023.1434.
9.
BerghDonald D.ConnellyBrian L.KetchenDavid J.Jr.ShannonLu M. (2014), “Signalling Theory and Equilibrium in Strategic Management Research: An Assessment and a Research Agenda,” Journal of Management Studies, 51 (8), 1334–60.
10.
BhagwatYashodaWarrenNooshin L.BeckJoshua T.WatsonGeorge F.IV (2020), “Corporate Sociopolitical Activism and Firm Value,” Journal of Marketing, 84 (5), 1–21.
BoegershausenJohannesDattaHannesBorahAbhishekStephenAndrew (2022), “Fields of Gold: Scraping Web Data for Marketing Insights,” Journal of Marketing, 86 (5), 1–20.
13.
BoseIndranilLeungAlvin C.M. (2019), “Adoption of Identity Theft Countermeasures and Its Short and Long-Term Impact on Firm Value,” MIS Quarterly, 43 (1), 313–27.
14.
Boudreau, Kevin J., Nicola Lacetera, and Karim R. Lakhani (2011), “Incentives and Problem Uncertainty in Innovation Contests: An Empirical Analysis,” Management Science, 57 (5), 843–63.
15.
BoudreauKevin J.LakhaniKarim R. (2013), “Using the Crowd as an Innovation Partner,” Harvard Business Review, 91 (4), 60–69.
16.
BoydD. EricKannanP.K.SlotegraafRebecca J. (2019), “Branded Apps and Their Impact on Firm Value: A Design Perspective,” Journal of Marketing Research, 56 (1), 76–88.
17.
BrabhamDaren C. (2008), “Crowdsourcing as a Model for Problem Solving: An Introduction and Cases,” Convergence, 14 (1), 75–79.
18.
BrownStephen J.WarnerJerold B. (1980), “Measuring Security Price Performance,” Journal of Financial Economics, 8 (3), 205–58.
19.
CamachoNunoNamHyoryungKannanP.K.StremerschStefan (2019), “Tournaments to Crowdsource Innovation: The Role of Moderator Feedback and Participation Intensity,” Journal of Marketing, 83 (2), 138–57.
20.
CappaFrancescoOrianiRaffaelePinelliMicheleDe MassisAlfredo (2019), “When Does Crowdsourcing Benefit Firm Stock Market Performance,” Research Policy, 48 (9), 1–11.
21.
CarhartMark M. (1997), “On Persistence in Mutual Fund Performance,” Journal of Finance, 52 (1), 57–82.
22.
CertoS. TrevisBusenbarkJohn R.WooHyun-SooSemadeniMatthew (2016), “Sample Selection Bias and Heckman Models in Strategic Management Research,” Strategic Management Journal, 37 (13), 2639–57.
23.
ChakravartyAninditaZhouChenSharmaAshish (2020), “Effect of Alliance Network Asymmetry on Firm Performance and Risk,” Journal of Marketing, 84 (6), 49–69.
24.
ChatterjeeSayanLubatkinMichael H.LyonE.M.SchulzeWilliam S. (1999), “Toward a Strategic Theory of Risk Premium: Moving Beyond CAPM,” Academic of Management Review, 24 (3), 556–67.
25.
ChenLiangXuPeiLiuDe (2020), “Effect of Crowd Voting on Participation in Crowdsourcing Contests,” Journal of Management Information Systems, 37 (2), 510–35.
26.
ChristensenClayton (1997), The Innovator’s Dilemma. Harvard Business Review Press.
27.
Coca-Cola (2010), “The Coca-Cola Company Q2 2010 Earnings Call Transcript,” Seeking Alpha (July 21), https://seekingalpha.com/article/215682-the-coca-cola-company-q2-2010-earnings-call-transcript.
28.
ConnellyBrian L.CertoS. TrevisIrelandR. DuaneReutzelChristopher R. (2011), “Signaling Theory: A Review and Assessment,” Journal of Management, 37 (1), 39–67.
29.
Cowan, Arnold R. (2010), Eventus software, version 9.0.
DasSomnathSenPradyot K.SenguptaSanjit (1998), “Impact of Strategic Alliances on Firm Valuation,” Academy of Management Journal, 41 (1), 27–41.
32.
DattaHannesAilawadiKusum L.van HeerdeHarald J. (2017), “How Well Does Consumer-Based Brand Equity Align with Sales-Based Brand Equity and Marketing-Mix Response?” Journal of Marketing, 81 (3), 1–20.
DuRex YuxingHuYeDamangirSina (2015), “Leveraging Trends in Online Searches For Product Features In Market Response Modeling,” Journal of Marketing, 79 (1), 29–43.
35.
DuttaShantanuNarasimhanO.M.RajivSurendra (1999), “Success in High Technology Markets: Is Marketing Capability Critical?” Marketing Science, 18 (4), 547–68.
36.
EscalasJennifer Edson (2004), “Imagine Yourself in The Product: Mental Simulation, Narrative Transportation, and Persuasion,” Journal of Advertising, 33 (2), 37–48.
37.
FamaEugene F.FrenchKenneth R. (1993), “Common Risk Factors in the Returns on Stocks and Bonds,” Journal of Financial Economics, 33 (1), 3–56.
38.
FengHuiMorganNeil A.RegoLopo L. (2017), “Firm Capabilities and Growth: The Moderating Role of Market Conditions,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 45 (1), 76–92.
39.
FengHuiMorganNeil A.RegoLopo L. (2020), “The Impact of Unprofitable Customer Management Strategies on Shareholder Value,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 48 (2), 246–69.
40.
FüllerJohannHutterKatjaKrögerNiclas (2020), “How to Prevent Crowdsourcing Disasters and Leverage Positive Side Effects of Open Innovation,” NIM Marketing Intelligence Review, 12 (1), 30–5.
41.
GassenheimerJule B.SiguawJudy A.HunterGary L. (2013), “Exploring Motivations and The Capacity for Business Crowdsourcing,” AMS Review, 3 (4), 205–16.
42.
GermannFrankEbbesPeterGrewalRajdeep (2015), “The Chief Marketing Officer Matters!” Journal of Marketing, 79 (3), 1–22.
43.
GirotraKaranTerwieschChristianUlrichKarl T. (2010), “Idea Generation and the Quality of the Best Idea,” Management Science, 56 (4), 591–605.
HanKyuhongMittalVikasZhangZan (2017), “Relative Strategic Emphasis and Firm-Idiosyncratic Risk: The Moderating Role of Relative Performance and Demand Instability,” Journal of Marketing, 81 (4), 25–44.
46.
HeckmanJames J. (1979), “Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error,” Econometrica, 47 (1), 153–61.
47.
HuangYanSinghParam VirSrinivasanKannan (2014), “Crowdsourcing New Product Ideas Under Consumer Learning,” Management Science, 60 (9), 2138–59.
48.
HutterKatjaFüllerJohannHautzJuliaBilgramVolkerMatzlerKurt (2015), “Machiavellianism or Morality: Which Behavior Pays Off in Online Innovation Contests?” Journal of Management Information Systems, 32 (3), 197–228.
49.
JianLianYangShaBaSulinLuLiJiangCrystal L (2019), “Managing the Crowds: The Effect of Price Guarantees and In-Process Feedback on Participation in Crowdsourcing Contests,” MIS Quarterly, 43 (1), 97–112.
50.
JosephsonBrett W.LeeYu-YeonMariadossBabu JohnJohnsonJean L. (2019), “Uncle Sam Rising: Performance Implications of Business-to-Government Relationships,” Journal of Marketing, 83 (1), 51–72.
51.
JoshiAmitHanssensDominique M. (2010), “The Direct and Indirect Effects of Advertising Spending on Firm Value,” Journal of Marketing, 74 (1), 20–33.
52.
KellerKevin Lane (2001), “Building Customer-Based Brand Equity: A Blueprint for Creating Strong Brands,” Report No. 01-107, Marketing Science Institute.
53.
KohTat Koon (2019), “Adopting Seekers’ Solution Exemplars in Crowdsourcing Ideation Contests: Antecedents and Consequences,” Information Systems Research, 30 (2), 486–506.
54.
KothariSagar P.WarnerJerold B. (2007), “Econometrics of Event Studies,” Handbook of Corporate Finance, Vol. 1, B. Espen Eckbo, ed. Elsevier, 3–36.
55.
KrasnikovAlexanderJayachandranSatish (2008), “The Relative Impact of Marketing, Research-and-Development, and Operations Capabilities on Firm Performance,” Journal of Marketing, 72 (4), 1–11.
56.
KurtDidemHullandJohn (2013), “Aggressive Marketing Strategy Following Equity Offerings and Firm Value: The Role of Relative Strategic Flexibility,” Journal of Marketing, 77 (5), 57–74.
57.
LeimeisterJan MarcoHuberMichaelBretschneiderUlrichKrcmarHelmut (2009), “Leveraging Crowdsourcing: Activation-Supporting Components for IT-Based Ideas Competition,” Journal of Management Information Systems, 26 (1), 197–224.
58.
LuiDaphneMarkovStanimirTamayoAne (2007), “What Makes a Stock Risky? Evidence from Sell Side Analysts’ Risk Ratings,” Journal of Accounting Research, 45 (3), 629–65.
59.
LiuTracy XiaoYangJiangAdamicLada A.ChenYan (2014), “Crowdsourcing with All-Pay Auctions: A Field Experiment on Taskcn,” Management Science, 60 (8), 2020–37.
60.
LukyanenkoRomanParsonsJeffreyWiersmaYolanda F.MaddahMahed (2019), “Expecting the Unexpected: Effects of Data Collection Design Choices on the Quality of Crowdsourced User-Generated Content,” MIS Quarterly, 43 (2), 634–47.
61.
LuoXuemingBhattacharyaC.B. (2009), “The Debate over Doing Good: Corporate Social Performance, Strategic Marketing Levers, and Firm-Idiosyncratic Risk,” Journal of Marketing, 73 (6), 198–213.
62.
McWilliamsAbagailSiegelDonald (1997), “Event Studies in Management Research: Theoretical and Empirical Issues,” Academy of Management Journal, 40 (3), 626–57.
MoJiahuiSarkarSumitMenonSyam (2021), “Competing Tasks and Task Quality: An Empirical Study of Crowdsourcing Contests,” MIS Quarterly, 45 (4), 1921–48.
65.
MoormanChristineSorescuAlinaTavassoliNader T. (2023), “Brands in the Labor Market: How Vertical and Horizontal Brand Differentiation Impact Pay and Profits Through Employee-Brand Matching,” Journal of Marketing Research(published online June 12), https://doi.org/10.1177/00222437231184429.
66.
MorganNeil A. (2012), “Marketing and Business Performance,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40 (1), 102–19.
67.
MorganNeil A.ZouShaomingVorhiesDouglas W.KatsikeasConstantine S. (2003), “Experiential and Informational Knowledge, Architectural Marketing Capabilities, and the Adaptive Performance of Export Ventures: A Cross-National Study,” Decision Sciences, 34 (2), 287–321.
68.
NishikawaHidehikoSchreierMartinFuchsChristophOgawaSusumu (2017), “The Value of Marketing Crowdsourced New Products as Such: Evidence from Two Randomized Field Experiments,” Journal of Marketing Research, 54 (4), 525–39.
69.
O’HernMatthew S.RindfleischAric (2009), “Customer Co-Creation: A Typology and Research Direction,” in Review of Marketing Research, MalholtraNaresh K., ed. Emerald, 84–106.
70.
PanagopoulosNikolaos G.MullinsRyanAvramidisPanagiotis (2018), “Sales Force Downsizing and Firm Idiosyncratic Risk: The Contingent Role of Investors’ Screening and Firm’s Signaling Processes,” Journal of Marketing, 82 (6), 71–88.
PillerFrank T.WalcherDominik (2006), “Toolkits for Idea Competitions: A Novel Method to Integrate Users in New Product Development,” R&D Management, 36 (3), 307–18.
RyanRichard M.DeciEdward (2000), “Self-Determination Theory and the Facilitation of Intrinsic Motivation, Social Development, and Well-Being,” American Psychologist, 55, 68–79.
75.
SegevElla (2020), “Crowdsourcing Contests,” European Journal of Operational Research, 281, 241–55.
76.
SoodAshishTellisGerard J. (2009), “Do Innovations Really Pay Off? Total Stock Market Returns to Innovation,” Marketing Science, 28 (3), 442–56.
77.
SorescuAlinaShankarVenkateshKushwahaTarun (2007), “New Product Preannouncements and Shareholder Value: Don’t Make Promises You Can’t Keep,” Journal of Marketing Research, 44 (4), 468–89.
78.
SorescuAlinaWarrenNooshinErtekinLarisa (2017), “Event Study Methodology in the Marketing Literature: An Overview,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 45 (2), 186–207.
SrinivasanShubaHanssensDominique M. (2009), “Marketing and Firm Value: Metrics, Methods, Findings, and Future Directions,” Journal of Marketing Research, 46 (3), 293–312.
81.
SrivastavaRajendra K.ShervaniTasadduq A.FaheyLiam (1998), “Market-Based Assets and Shareholder Value: A Framework for Analysis,” Journal of Marketing, 62 (1), 2–18.
82.
StahlFlorianHeitmannMarkLehmanDonald R.NeslinScott (2012), “The Impact of Brand Equity on Customer Acquisition, Retention, and Profit Margin,” Journal of Marketing, 76 (4), 44–63.
83.
SwaminathanVanithaMoormanChristine (2009), “Marketing Alliances, Firm Networks, and Firm Value Creation,” Journal of Marketing, 73 (5), 52–69.
84.
TaylorMarisa (2009), “Vitaminwater Gets Facebookers Brainstorming on a New Flavor,” The Wall Street Journal (September 8), https://www.wsj.com/articles/BL-DGB-6364.
85.
ThomazFelipeSwaminathanVanitha (2015), “What Goes Around Comes Around: The Impact of Marketing Alliances on Firm Risk and the Moderating Role of Network Density,” Journal of Marketing, 79 (5), 63–79.
86.
TirunillaiSeshadriTellisGerard J. (2012), “Does Chatter Really Matter? Dynamics of User-Generated Content and Stock Performance,” Marketing Science, 31 (2), 198–215.
87.
WangHelen SiNobleCharles H.DahlDarren W.ParkSungho (2019), “Successfully Communicating a Cocreated Innovation,” Journal of Marketing, 83 (4), 38–57.
88.
WarrenNooshin L.SorescuAlina (2017), “Interpreting the Stock Returns to New Product Announcements: How the Past Shapes Investors’ Expectations of the Future,” Journal of Marketing Research, 54 (5), 799–815.
89.
WexlerMark (2011), “Reconfiguring the Sociology of the Crowd: Exploring Crowdsourcing,” International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 31 (1–2), 6–20.
90.
WhitlaPaul (2009), “Crowdsourcing and Its Application in Marketing Activities,” Contemporary Management Research, 5 (1), 15–28.
91.
WilesMichael A.MorganNeil A.RegoLopo L. (2012), “The Effect of Brand Acquisition and Disposal on Stock Returns,” Journal of Marketing, 76 (1), 38–58.
92.
YangYiZhangKunpengKannanP.K. (2022), “Identifying Market Structure: A Deep Network Representation Learning of Social Engagement,” Journal of Marketing, 86 (4), 37–56.
93.
YeHua JonathanKankanhalliAtreyi (2015), “Investigating the Antecedents of Organizational Task Crowdsourcing,” Information & Management, 52 (1), 98–110.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
