At the time of an initial public offering (IPO), firms seek to maximize their stock market value. The authors theorize and show that a firm's innovation potential—firm outputs and activities that contribute to the development of future new products—can be used by the managers of IPO firms as a credible signal of the quality of the firm. Using a sample of 370 IPO firms from the consumer-packaged goods and pharmaceutical industries, and three metrics of innovation potential, the authors show that firms’ innovation potential is (1) positively associated with the initial value of the IPO and with the first-day IPO returns and (2) negatively associated with the extent to which insiders sell their shares at the time of the IPO. The effectiveness of the three metrics of innovation potential as a signal of firm quality varies: patents have a stronger impact on insider sales than preannouncements and generic references to future innovation, while preannouncements have the strongest impact on first-day IPO returns. The article presents a nuanced view of the extent to which various firm stakeholders consider information about firms’ innovation potential to be a credible signal that reduces the adverse selection present in IPO deals with insider sales.
AngJames S.BrauJames C. (2003), “Concealing and Confounding Adverse Signals: Insider Wealth-Maximizing Behavior in the IPO Process,” Journal of Financial Economics, 67 (1), 149–72.
9.
ArthursJonathan D.HoskissonRobert E.BusenitzLowell W.JohnsonRichard A. (2008), “Managerial Agents Watching Other Agents: Multiple Agency Conflicts Regarding Underpricing in IPO Firms,” Academy of Management Journal, 51 (2), 277–94.
10.
AudretschDavid B., BönteWernerMahagaonkarPrashanth (2012), “Financial Signaling by Innovative Nascent Ventures: The Relevance of Patents and Prototypes,” Research Policy, 41 (8), 1407–21.
11.
BahadirS. CemDeKinderJade S.KohliAjay K. (2015), “Marketing an IPO Issuer in Early Stages of The IPO Process,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43 (1), 14–31.
12.
BeckerJan-MichaelProkschDorianRingleChristian (2022), “Revisiting Gaussian Copulas to Handle Endogenous Regressors,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 50 (1), 46–66.
13.
BernsteinShai (2015), “Does Going Public Affect Innovation?” Journal of Finance, 70 (4), 1365–1403.
14.
BhattacharyaUtpalMarshallCassandra D. (2012), “Do They Do It for the Money?” Journal of Corporate Finance, 18 (1), 92–104.
15.
BodnarukAndriyKandelEugeneMassaMassimoSimonovAndrei (2008), “Shareholder Diversification and the Decision to Go Public,” Review of Financial Studies, 21 (6), 2779–2824.
16.
BooneAudra L.FlorosIoannis V.JohnsonShane A. (2016), “Redacting Proprietary Information at the Initial Public Offering,” Journal of Financial Economics, 120 (1), 102–23.
17.
BradleyDaniel JJordanBradford D.RitterJay R. (2003), “The Quiet Period Goes out with a Bang,” Journal of Finance, 58 (1), 1–36.
18.
BranswijckDeborahEveraertPatricia (2012), “Intellectual Capital Disclosure Commitment: Myth or Reality?” Journal of Intellectual Capital, 13 (1), 39–56.
19.
BrauJames C.LiMingshengShiJing. (2007), “Do Secondary Shares in the IPO Process Have a Negative Effect on Aftermarket Performance?” Journal of Banking Finance, 31 (9), 2612–31.
20.
BravAlonGompersPaul A. (2003), “The Role of Lock-Ups in Initial Public Offerings,” Review of Financial Studies, 16 (1), 1–29.
21.
BurmesterAlexa B.BeckerJan U.van HeerdeHarald J.ClementMichel (2015), “The Impact of Pre-and Post-Launch Publicity and Advertising on New Product Sales,” International Journal of Research in Marketing, 32 (4), 408–17.
22.
ButlerAlexander W.O’Connor KeefeMichaelKieschnickRobert (2014), “Robust Determinants of IPO Underpricing and Their Implications for IPO Research,” Journal of Corporate Finance, 27, 367–83.
23.
CaoZixiaSorescuAlina (2013), “Wedded Bliss or Tainted Love? Stock Market Reactions to the Introduction of Cobranded Products,” Marketing Science, 32 (6), 939–59.
24.
ChandyRajesh K.TellisGerard J. (1998), “The Overlooked Role of Willingness to Cannibalize,” Journal of Marketing Research, 35 (4), 474–87.
25.
ChinChen-LungLeePichengKleinmanGaryChenPei-Yu (2006), “IPO Anomalies and Innovation Capital,” Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 27 (1), 67–91.
26.
ChuaAnsleyNasserTareque (2016), “Insider Sales in IPOs: Consequences of Liquidity Needs,” Journal of Corporate Finance, 39, 1–17.
CordazzoMichela (2007), “Intangibles and Italian IPO Prospectuses: A Disclosure Analysis,” Journal of Intellectual Capital, 8 (2), 288–305.
29.
CorwinShane A.HarrisJeffrey H. (2001), “The Initial Listing Decisions of Firms That Go Public,” Financial Management, 30 (1), 35–55.
30.
CzarnitzkiDirkHallBronwyn HHottenrottHanna (2014), “Patents as Quality Signals? The Implications for Financing Constraints on R&D,” Working Paper No. w19947, National Bureau of Economic Research.
31.
DailyCatherine M.CertoS. TrevisDaltonDan R.RoengpityaRungpen (2003), “IPO Underpricing: A Meta-Analysis and Research Synthesis,” Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 27 (3), 271–95.
32.
DattaHannesFoubertBramVan HeerdeHarald J. (2015), “The Challenge of Retaining Customers Acquired with Free Trials,” Journal of Marketing Research, 52 (2), 217–34.
33.
DeedsDavid L.DecarolisDonaCoombsJoseph E. (1997), “The Impact of Firm Specific Capabilities on The Amount of Capital Raised in an Initial Public Offering: Evidence from the Biotechnology Industry,” Journal of Business Venturing, 12 (1), 31–46.
34.
DhaliwalDan S.RadhakrishnanSureshTsangAlbertYangYong George (2012), “Nonfinancial Disclosure and Analyst Forecast Accuracy: International Evidence on Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure,” Accounting Review, 87 (3), 723–59.
FangEricPalmatierRobert W.SteenkampJan-Benedict E.M. (2008), “Effect of Service Transition Strategies on Firm Value,” Journal of Marketing, 72 (5), 1–15.
37.
FieldLaura C.KarpoffJonathan (2002), “Takeover Defenses of IPO Firms,” Journal of Finance, 57 (5), 1857–89.
GompersPaulLernerJosh (1999), The Venture Capital Cycle. MIT Press.
40.
GrinblattMarkHwangChuan Yang (1989), “Signaling and the Pricing of New Issues,” Journal of Finance, 44 (2), 393–420.
41.
GulatiRanjayHigginsMonica C. (2003), “Which Ties Matter When? The Contingent Effects of Interorganizational Partnerships on IPO Success,” Strategic Management Journal, 24 (2), 127–44.
42.
GuoHui (2011), “IPO First-Day Return and Ex Ante Equity Premium,” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 46 (3), 871–905.
43.
GuoRe-JinLevBaruchShiCharles (2006), “Explaining the Short- and Long-Term IPO Anomalies in the US by R&D,” Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 33 (3), 550–79.
44.
HabibMichel A.LjungqvistAlexander P. (2001), “Underpricing and Entrepreneurial Wealth Losses in IPOs: Theory and Evidence,” Review of Financial Studies, 14 (2), 433–58.
45.
HallBronwyn H., JaffeAdamTrajtenbergManuel (2005), “Market Value and Patent Citations,” RAND Journal of Economics, 36 (1), 16–38.
46.
HayesAndrew F. (2013), Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis. New York: Guilford.
47.
HeeleyMichael B.MatusikSharonJainNeelam (2007), “Innovation, Appropriability, and the Underpricing of Initial Public Offerings,” Academy of Management Journal, 50 (1), 209–25.
48.
HendricksK.B.SinghalVinod R. (1997), “Delays in New Product Introductions and the Market Value of the Firm: The Consequences of Being Late to the Market,” Management Science, 43 (4), 422–36.
49.
HermSteffen (2013), “When Things Go Wrong, Don’t Rely on Committed Consumers: Effects of Delayed Product Launches on Brand Trust,” Journal of Product Innovation Management, 30 (1), 70–81.
50.
HessAndrew M.RothaermelFrank T. (2011), “When Are Assets Complementary? Star Scientists, Strategic Alliances, and Innovation in the Pharmaceutical Industry,” Strategic Management Journal, 32 (8), 895–909.
51.
IbbotsonRoger G.RitterJay R. (1995), Initial Public Offerings. Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science, Vol. 9. Elsevier, 993–1016.
52.
JaffeAdam B., TrajtenbergManuelHendersonRebecca (1993), “Geographic Localization of Knowledge Spillovers as Evidenced by Patent Citations,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108 (3), 577–98.
JunkuncMarc T.EckhardtJonathan T. (2009), “Technical Specialized Knowledge and Secondary Shares in Initial Public Offerings,” Management Science, 55 (10), 1670–87.
55.
KapoorRahulKlueterThomas (2015), “Decoding the Adaptability-Rigidity Puzzle: Evidence from Pharmaceutical Incumbents’ Pursuit of Gene Therapy and Monoclonal Antibodies,” Academy of Management Journal, 58 (4), 1180–1207.
KrippendorffKlaus (2013), Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology, 3rd ed.SAGE Publications.
58.
KurtDidemHullandJohn (2013), “Aggressive Marketing Strategy Following Equity Offerings and Firm Value: The Role of Relative Strategic Flexibility,” Journal of Marketing, 77 (5), 57–74.
59.
LampeRyanMoserPetra (2015), “Patent Pools, Competition, And Innovation—Evidence From 20 US Industries Under the New Deal,” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 32 (1), 1–36.
60.
LimLeon GimTuliKapil R.GrewalRajdeep (2020), “Customer Satisfaction and Its Impact on the Future Costs of Selling,” Journal of Marketing, 84 (4), 23–44
61.
LizińskaJoannaCzapiewskiLeszek (2019), “Is Window-Dressing Around Going Public Beneficial? Evidence from Poland,” Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 12 (1), 1–16.
62.
LjungqvistAlexanderWilhelmWilliam J. (2003), “IPO Pricing in the Dot-Com Bubble,” Journal of Finance, 58 (2), 723–52.
63.
LoughranTimRitterJay R. (2004), “Why Has IPO Underpricing Increased over Time,” Financial Management, 33 (3), 5–37.
64.
LundholmRussellMyersLinda A. (2002), “Bringing the Future Forward: The Effect of Disclosure on the Returns-Earnings Relation,” Journal of Accounting Research, 40 (3), 809–39.
65.
LuoXueming (2008), “When Marketing Strategy First Meets Wall Street: Marketing Spendings and Firm’s Initial Public Offerings,” Journal of Marketing, 72 (5), 98–109.
MichaelyRoniShawWayne H. (1994), “The Pricing of Initial Public Offerings: Tests of Adverse-Selection and Signaling Theories,” Review of Financial Studies, 7 (2), 279–319.
68.
OfekEliYermackDavid (2000), “Taking Stock: Equity-Based Compensation and the Evolution of Managerial Ownership,” Journal of Finance, 55 (3), 1367–84.
69.
PapiesDominikEbbesPetervan HeerdeHarald J. (2016), “Addressing Endogeneity in Marketing Models,” inAdvanced Methods in Modeling Markets,” LeeflangPeter S.H.WieringaJaap E.BijmoltTammo H.A., et al., eds. Springer, 581–627.
70.
ParkSunghoGuptaSachin (2012), “Handling Endogenous Regressors by Joint Estimation Using Copulas,” Marketing Science, 31 (4), 567–86.
71.
PorterMichael E. (1985), “Technology and Competitive Advantage,” Journal of Business Strategy, 5 (3), 60–78.
72.
RitterJay R. (1991), “The Long-Run Performance of Initial Public Offerings,” Journal of Finance, 46 (1), 3–27.
73.
RitterJay R.WelchIvo (2002), “A Review of IPO Activity, Pricing, and Allocations,” Journal of Finance, 57 (4), 1795–1828.
74.
RutzOliver J.WatsonGeorge F. (2019), “Endogeneity and Marketing Strategy Research: An Overview,”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 47 (3), 479–98.
75.
SabooAlok R.ChakravartyAninditaGrewalRajdeep (2016), “Organizational Debut on the Public Stage: Marketing Myopia and Initial Public Offerings,” Marketing Science, 35 (4), 656–75.
76.
SabooAlok R.GrewalRajdeep (2013), “Stock Market Reactions to Customer and Competitor Orientations: The Case of Initial Public Offerings,” Marketing Science, 32 (1), 70–88.
77.
SabooAlok R.KumarV.AnandAnkit (2017), “Assessing the Impact of Customer Concentration on Initial Public Offering and Balance Sheet–Based Outcomes,” Journal of Marketing, 81 (6), 42–61.
78.
SaxenianAnnalee (1994), Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128. Harvard University Press.
SoodAshishTellisGerard J. (2009), “Do Innovations Really Pay Off? Total Stock Market Returns to Innovation,” Marketing Science, 28 (3), 442–56.
81.
SorescuAlina B.ChandyRajesh K.PrabhuJaideep C. (2003), “Sources and Financial Consequences of Radical Innovation: Insights from Pharmaceuticals,” Journal of Marketing, 67 (4), 82–102.
82.
SorescuAlinaShankarVenkateshKushwahaTarun (2007), “New Product Preannouncements and Shareholder Value: Don’t Make Promises You Can’t Keep,” Journal of Marketing Research, 44 (3), 468–89.
TrajtenbergManuel (1990), “A Penny for Your Quotes: Patent Citations and the Value of Innovations,” RAND Journal of Economics, 21 (1), 172–87.
85.
WiesSimoneMoormanChristine (2015), “Going Public: How Stock Market Listing Changes Firm Innovation Behavior,” Journal of Marketing Research, 52 (5), 694–709.
86.
WiesSimoneMoormanChristineChandyRajesh K. (2022), “Innovation Imprinting: Why Some Firms Beat the Post-IPO Innovation Slump,” Journal of Marketing(published online July 5), https://doi.org/10.1177/00222429221114317.
87.
WuGeraldine A. (2012), “The Effect of Going Public on Innovative Productivity and Exploratory Search,” Organization Science, 23 (4), 928–50.
88.
XiongGuiyangBharadwajSundar (2011), “Social Capital of Young Technology Firms and Their IPO Values: The Complementary Role of Relevant Absorptive Capacity,” Journal of Marketing, 75 (6), 87–104.
89.
YadavManjit S.PrabhuJaideep C.ChandyRajesh K. (2007), “Managing the Future: CEO Attention and Innovation Outcomes,” Journal of Marketing, 71 (4), 84–101.
90.
YuChuanpengZhangZhengangLinChunpeiWuYenchun Jim (2017). “Knowledge Creation Process and Sustainable Competitive Advantage: The Role of Technological Innovation Capabilities,” Sustainability, 9 (12), 2280.
91.
ZingalesLuigi (1995), “Insider Ownership and the Decision to Go Public,” Review of Economic Studies, 62, 425–48.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
