Consumers who are uninterested in or annoyed by a TV ad may avoid the ad, limiting the effectiveness of not only the ad but also the remaining commercial break. Active avoidance of ads by changing the channel—known as “zapping”—is potentially a major concern for both advertisers and broadcasters. In two studies, the authors investigate whether and why ad content drives or mitigates zapping and develop a conceptual framework linking multiple content factors to psychological reactions that then affect zapping. They test the content–zapping relationship by drawing on a data set reflecting the zapping behavior of over 2,500 German television viewers combined with advertising data and content information for 1,315 spots representing 308 brands from 96 categories. The results of the first study show that ad creativity is associated with less zapping, whereas a strong information focus and a prominent or early integration of branding elements are associated with more zapping. The findings also reveal that the effects differ significantly for products with a utilitarian (vs. hedonic) consumption purpose and for search (vs. experience) goods. The results of the second study show that irritation (determined by feeling, e.g., annoyed, offended, or overwhelmed), relative to enjoyment, acts as the central mechanism in explaining why ad content affects zapping.
AldenDana L.MukherjeeAsheshHoyerWayne D. (2000), “The Effects of Incongruity, Surprise and Positive Moderators on Perceived Humor in Television Advertising,” Journal of Advertising, 29 (2), 1–15.
BakerWilliam E.HoneaHeatherRussellCristel A. (2004), “Do Not Wait to Reveal the Brand Name: The Effect of Brand-Name Placement on Television Advertising Effectiveness,” Journal of Advertising, 33 (3), 77–85.
7.
BeckerMarenWiegandNicoReinartzWerner J. (2019), “Does It Pay to Be Real? Understanding Authenticity in TV Advertising,” Journal of Marketing, 83 (1), 24–50.
8.
BelchGeorge E.BelchMichael A. (2015), Advertising and Promotion: An Integrated Marketing Communications Perspective. McGraw-Hill International Edition.
9.
BruceNorris I.BeckerMarenReinartzWerner J. (2020), “Communicating Brands in Television Advertising,” Journal of Marketing Research, 57 (2), 236–56.
10.
BurgoonJudee K. (1993), “Interpersonal Expectations, Expectancy Violations, and Emotional Communication,” Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 12 (1/2), 30–48.
11.
ChandrasekaranDeepaSrinivasanRajiSihiDebika (2018), “Effects of Offline Ad Content on Online Brand Search: Insights from Super Bowl Advertising,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 46 (3), 403–30.
12.
ChandyRajesh K.TellisGerard J.MacInnisDeborah J.ThaivanichPattana (2001), “What to Say When: Advertising Appeals in Evolving Markets,” Journal of Marketing Research, 38 (4), 399–414.
13.
ChattopadhyayAmitavaBasuKunal (1990), “Humor in Advertising: The Moderating Role of Prior Brand Evaluation,” Journal of Marketing Research, 27 (4), 466–76.
14.
DanaherPeter J. (1995), “What Happens to Television Ratings During Commercial Breaks?” Journal of Advertising Research, 35 (1), 37–47.
15.
DengYitingMelaCarl F. (2018), “TV Viewing and Advertising Targeting,” Journal of Marketing Research, 55 (1), 99–118.
16.
DixStephen R.PhauIan (2017), “Predictors of Commercial Zapping During Live Prime-Time Television: An Observation-Based Study Identifies Factors That Drive TV Channel Switching,” Journal of Advertising Research, 57 (1), 15–27.
17.
EisendMartin (2009), “A Meta-Analysis of Humor in Advertising,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 37 (2), 191–203.
18.
FrankeGeorge R.HuhmannBruce A.MothersbaughDavid L. (2004), “Information Content and Consumer Readership of Print Ads: A Comparison of Search and Experience Products,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 32 (1), 20–31.
19.
GeuensMaggieDe PelsmackerPatrickFaseurTine (2011), “Emotional Advertising: Revisiting the Role of Product Category,” Journal of Business Research, 64 (4), 418–26.
20.
GoldfarbAviTuckerCatherine E. (2011), “Online Display Advertising: Targeting and Obtrusiveness,” Marketing Science, 30 (3), 389–404.
21.
GoodrichKendallSchillerShu Z.GallettaDennis (2015), “Consumer Reactions to Intrusiveness of Online-Video Advertisements,” Journal of Advertising Research, 55 (1), 37–50.
22.
GuitartIvan A.StremerschStefan (2021), “The Impact of Informational and Emotional Television Ad Content on Online Search and Sales,” Journal of Marketing Research, 58 (2), 299–320.
23.
GustafsonPaulSiddarthSivaramakrishnan (2007), “Describing the Dynamics of Attention to TV Commercials: A Hierarchical Bayes Analysis of the Time to Zap an Ad,” Journal of Applied Statistics, 34 (5), 585–609.
24.
HairJoseph F.BlackWilliam C.BabinBarry J.AndersonRolph E. (2010), Multivariate Data Analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
25.
HirschmanElizabeth C.HolbrookMorris B. (1982), “Hedonic Consumption: Emerging Concepts, Methods and Propositions,” Journal of Marketing, 46 (3), 92–101.
26.
HolbrookMorris B. (1986), “Emotion in the Consumption Experience: Toward a New Model of the Human Consumer,” in The Role of Affect in Consumer Behavior: Emerging Theories and Applications, PetersonRobert A.HoyerWayne D.WilsonWilliam R., eds. D.C. Heath and Company, 17–52.
JaniszewskiChrisWarlopLuk (1993), “The Influence of Classical Conditioning Procedures on Subsequent Attention to the Conditioned Brand,” Journal of Consumer Research, 20 (2), 171–89.
29.
JoharJotindar S.SirgyM. Joseph (1991), “Value-Expressive Versus Utilitarian Advertising Appeals: When and Why to Use Which Appeal,” Journal of Advertising, 20 (3), 23–33.
30.
KingMaryon F.BalasubramanianSiva K. (1994), “The Effects of Expertise, End Goal, and Product Type on Adoption of Preference Formation Strategy,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 22 (2), 146–59.
31.
KooTerry KLiMae Y. (2016), “A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research,” Journal of Chiropractic Medicine, 15 (2), 155–63.
32.
LiaukonyteJuraTeixeiraThalesWilburKenneth C. (2015), “Television Advertising and Online Shopping,” Marketing Science, 34 (3), 311–30.
33.
MacInnisDeborah J.RaoAmbar G.WeissAllen M. (2002), “Assessing When Increased Media Weight of Real-World Advertisements Helps Sales,” Journal of Marketing Research, 39 (4), 391–407.
34.
McGranaghanMatthewLiaukonyteJuraWilburKenneth C. (2022), “How Viewer Tuning, Presence, and Attention Respond to Ad Content and Predict Brand Search Lift,” Marketing Science (published online February 9), https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.2021.1344.
35.
MizeTrenton D.DoanLongScott LongJ. (2019), “A General Framework for Comparing Predictions and Marginal Effects Across Models,” Sociological Methodology, 49 (1), 152–89.
36.
MurrayKeith B.SchlacterJohn L. (1990), “The Impact of Services Versus Goods on Consumers’ Assessment of Perceived Risk and Variability,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 18 (1), 51–65.
37.
NeelameghamRamyaJainDipak (1999), “Consumer Choice Process for Experience Goods: An Econometric Model and Analysis,” Journal of Marketing Research, 36 (3), 373–86.
38.
NelsonPhillip (1970), “Information and Consumer Behavior,” Journal of Political Economy, 78 (2), 311–29.
39.
NyilasyGergelyReidLeonard N. (2009), “Agency Practitioner Theories of How Advertising Works,” Journal of Advertising, 38 (3), 81–96.
40.
OlneyThomas J.HolbrookMorris B.BatraRajeev (1991), “Consumer Responses to Advertising: The Effects of Ad Content, Emotions, and Attitude Toward the Ad on Viewing Time,” Journal of Consumer Research, 17 (4), 440–53.
41.
ParkC. WhanYoungS. Mark (1986), “Consumer Response to Television Commercials: The Impact of Involvement and Background Music on Brand Attitude Formation,” Journal of Marketing Research, 23 (1), 11–24.
42.
PettyRichard E.CacioppoJohn T. (1981), Attitudes and Persuasion: Classic and Contemporary Approaches. Wm. C. Brown.
43.
PhamMichel Tuan (1998), “Representativeness, Relevance, and the Use of Feelings in Decision Making,” Journal of Consumer Research, 25 (2), 144–59.
44.
PhamMichel TuanGeuensMaggieDe PelsmackerPatrick (2013), “The Influence of Ad-Evoked Feelings on Brand Evaluations: Empirical Generalizations from Consumer Responses to More Than 1000 TV Commercials,” International Journal of Research in Marketing, 30 (4), 383–94.
45.
PietersRikWarlopLukWedelMichel (2002), “Breaking Through the Clutter: Benefits of Advertisement Originality and Familiarity for Brand Attention and Memory,” Management Science, 48 (6), 765–81.
46.
PreacherKristopher J.HayesAndrew F. (2008), “Asymptotic and Resampling Strategies for Assessing and Comparing Indirect Effects in Multiple Mediator Models,” Behavior Research Methods, 40 (3), 879–91.
47.
RosengrenSaraEisendMartinKoslowScottDahlenMichael (2020), “A Meta-Analysis of When and How Advertising Creativity Works,” Journal of Marketing, 84 (6), 39–56.
48.
RossiterJohn R.BellmanSteven (2005), Marketing Communications: Theory and Applications. Pearson Education.
49.
SchweidelDavid A.FoutzNatasha ZhangTannerRobin J. (2014), “Synergy or Interference: The Effect of Product Placement on Commercial Break Audience Decline,” Marketing Science, 33 (6), 763–80.
50.
SchweidelDavid A.KentRobert J. (2010), “Predictors of the Gap Between Program and Commercial Audiences: An Investigation Using Live Tuning Data,” Journal of Marketing, 74 (3), 18–33.
51.
SiddarthSivaramakrishnanChattopadhyayAmitava (1998), “To Zap or Not to Zap: A Study of the Determinants of Channel Switching During Commercials,” Marketing Science, 17 (2), 124–38.
52.
SirgyM. Joseph (1982), “Self-Concept in Consumer Behavior: A Critical Review,” Journal of Consumer Research, 9 (3), 287–300.
53.
SmithRobert E.MacKenzieScott B.YangXiaojingBuchholzLaura M.DarleyWilliam K. (2007), “Modeling the Determinants and Effects of Creativity in Advertising,” Marketing Science, 26 (6), 819–33.
54.
SpottsHarlan E.WeinbergerMarc G.ParsonsAmy L. (1997), “Assessing the Use and Impact of Humor on Advertising Effectiveness: A Contingency Approach,” Journal of Advertising, 26 (3), 17–32.
55.
StewartDavid W.FurseDavid H. (1986), Effective Television Advertising: A Study of 1000 Commercials. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
56.
StrahilevitzMichalMyersJohn G. (1998), “Donations to Charity as Purchase Incentives: How Well They Work May Depend on What You Are Trying to Sell,” Journal of Consumer Research, 24 (4), 434–46.
TeixeiraThales S.PicardRosalindel KalioubyRana (2014), “Why, When, and How Much to Entertain Consumers in Advertisements? A Web-Based Facial Tracking Field Study,” Marketing Science, 33 (6), 809–27.
59.
TeixeiraThales S.StippHorst (2013), “Optimizing the Amount of Entertainment in Advertising: What’s So Funny About Tracking Reactions to Humor?” Journal of Advertising Research, 53 (3), 286–97.
60.
TeixeiraThales S.WedelMichelPietersRik (2010), “Moment-to-Moment Optimal Branding in TV Commercials: Preventing Avoidance by Pulsing,” Marketing Science, 29 (5), 783–804.
61.
TeixeiraThales S.WedelMichelPietersRik (2012), “Emotion-Induced Engagement in Internet Video Advertisements,” Journal of Marketing Research, 49 (2), 144–59.
62.
TellisGerard J. (2004), Effective Advertising: Understanding When, How, and Why Advertising Works. SAGE Publications.
63.
TellisGerard J.MacInnisDeborah J.TirunillaiSeshadriZhangYanwei (2019), “What Drives Virality (Sharing) of Online Digital Content? The Critical Role of Information, Emotion, and Brand Prominence,” Journal of Marketing, 83 (4), 1–20.
64.
TuchmanAnna E.NairHarikesh S.GardetePedro M. (2018), “Television Ad-Skipping, Consumption Complementarities and the Consumer Demand for Advertising,” Quantitative Marketing and Economics, 16 (2), 111–74.
65.
TuckerCatherine E. (2015), “The Reach and Persuasiveness of Viral Video Ads,” Marketing Science, 34 (2), 281–96.
66.
Van MeursLex (1998), “Zapp! A Study on Switching Behavior During Commercial Breaks,” Journal of Advertising Research, 38 (1), 43–53.
67.
VossKevin E.SpangenbergEric R.GrohmannBianca (2003), “Measuring the Hedonic and Utilitarian Dimensions of Consumer Attitude,” Journal of Marketing Research, 40 (3), 310–20.
68.
WarrenCalebMcGrawPeter A. (2016a), “Differentiating What Is Humorous from What Is Not,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 110 (3), 407–30.
69.
WarrenCalebMcGrawPeter A. (2016b), “When Does Humorous Marketing Hurt Brands?” Journal of Marketing Behavior, 2 (1), 39–67.
70.
WetzelHauke A.HammerschmidtMaikZablahAlex R. (2014), “Gratitude Versus Entitlement: A Dual Process Model of the Profitability Implications of Customer Prioritization,” Journal of Marketing, 78 (2), 1–19.
71.
WilburKenneth C. (2008), “How the Digital Video Recorder (DVR) Changes Traditional Television Advertising,” Journal of Advertising, 37 (1), 143–49.
72.
WilburKenneth C. (2016), “Advertising Content and Television Advertising Avoidance,” Journal of Media Economics, 29 (2), 51–72.
73.
WilburKenneth C.XuLinliKempeDavid (2013), “Correcting Audience Externalities in Television Advertising,” Marketing Science, 32 (6), 892–912.
74.
Woltman ElpersJosephine L.C.M.MukherjeeAsheshHoyerWayne D. (2004), “Humor in Television Advertising: A Moment-to-Moment Analysis,” Journal of Consumer Research, 31 (3), 592–98.
75.
Woltman ElpersJosephine L.C.M.WedelMichelPietersRik G. M. (2003), “Why Do Consumers Stop Viewing Television Commercials? Two Experiments on the Influence of Moment-to-Moment Entertainment and Information Value,” Journal of Marketing Research, 40 (4), 437–53.
76.
WoodsWalter A. (1960), “Psychological Dimensions of Consumer Decision,” Journal of Marketing, 24 (3), 15–19.
77.
YangXiaojingSmithRobert E. (2009), “Beyond Attention Effects: Modeling the Persuasive and Emotional Effects of Advertising Creativity,” Marketing Science, 28 (5), 935–49.
78.
YounSeounmi (1998), “Product and User Personalities Projected by TV Commercials,” paper presented at the 1998 American Academy of Advertising Conference, Lexington, KY.
79.
ZhaoXinshuLynchJohn G.Jr.ChenQimei (2010), “Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and Truths About Mediation Analysis,” Journal of Consumer Research, 37 (2), 197–206.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
