Abstract In this paper, we derive, based on a simple microeconomic model, under what conditions free-TV can more profitable than pay-TV in sports broadcasting. The most important factors here are the level, not the elasticity, of the demand for televised sports, as well as the advertisers’ willingness to pay. Also the spectators’ aversion to interruptions for advertising can play a role.
AndersonS., & CoateS. (2005). Market provision of broadcasting: A welfare analysis.Review of Economic Studies, 72, 947–972.
2.
AndersonS., & GabszewiczJ. (2006). The media and advertising: A tale of two-sided markets.Handbook on the Economics of Art and Culture, 1, 567–614.
3.
ArmstrongM. (2005). Public service broadcasting.Fiscal Studies, 26(3), 281–299.
4.
DietlH., & HasanT. (2007). Pay-TV versus free-TV: A model of sports broadcasting rights sales.Eastern Economic Journal, 33(3), 1–24.
5.
HoehnT., & LancefieldD. (2003). Broadcasting in sport.Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 19(4), 552–568.
6.
HoldenS. (1993). Network or pay-per-view? A welfare analysis.Economics Letters, 43, 59–64.
7.
KesenneS. (2007). The economic theory of professional team sports, an analytical treatment. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
8.
PeitzM., & VallettiT. M. (2008). Content and advertising in the media: Pay-tv versus free-toair.International Journal of Industrial Organization, 26, 949–965.
9.
SzymanskiS. (2003). The economic design of sporting contests.Journal of Economic Literature, 41(4), 1137–1187.
10.
Van der BurgT. (1996). Het voetbal-monopolie.ESB, 81, 710–711.
