Despite the ubiquity of pets in consumers’ lives, scant research has examined how exposure to them (e.g., recalling past interactions with dogs and cats, viewing ads featuring a dog or a cat) influences consumer behavior. The authors demonstrate that exposure to dogs (cats) reminds consumers of the stereotypical temperaments and behaviors of the pet species, which activates a promotion- (prevention-) focused motivational mindset among consumers. Using secondary data, Study 1 shows that people in states with a higher percentage of dog (cat) owners Google more promotion- (prevention-) focused words and report a higher COVID-19 transmission rate. Using multiple products, Studies 2 and 3 demonstrate that these regulatory mindsets, when activated by pet exposure, carry over to influence downstream consumer judgments, purchase intentions, and behaviors, even in pet-unrelated consumption contexts. Study 4 shows that pet stereotypicality moderates the proposed effect such that the relationship between pet exposure and regulatory orientations persists to the extent consumers are reminded of the stereotypical temperaments and behaviors of the pet species. Studies 5–7 examine the role of regulatory fit and evince that exposure to dogs (cats) leads to more favorable responses toward advertising messages featuring promotion- (prevention-) focused appeals.
American Veterinary Medical Association (2018), US Pet Ownership & Demographics Sourcebook. Schaumburg, IL: American Veterinary Medical Association.
2.
AmiotCatherine E.BastianBrock (2015), “Toward a Psychology of Human–Animal Relations,” Psychological Bulletin, 141 (1), 6–47.
3.
AndsagerJulie L.BemkerVictoriaChoiHong-LimTorwelVitalis (2006), “Perceived Similarity of Exemplar Traits and Behavior: Effects on Message Evaluation,” Communication Research, 33 (1), 3–18.
4.
APPA (2018), APPA National Pet Owners Survey 2017-2018. Greenwich, CT: APPA.
5.
ArgoJennifer J.WhiteKatherineDahlDarren W. (2006), “Social Comparison Theory and Deception in the Interpersonal Exchange of Consumption Information,” Journal of Consumer Research, 33 (1), 99–108.
AvnetTamarHigginsE. Tory (2006), “How Regulatory Fit Affects Value in Consumer Choices and Opinions,” Journal of Marketing Research, 43 (1), 1–10.
8.
BanduraAlbert (2002), “Social Cognitive Theory in Cultural Context,” Applied Psychology, 51 (2), 269–90.
9.
BeverlandMichael B.FarrellyFrancisLimElison Ai Ching (2008), “Exploring the Dark Side of Pet Ownership: Status- and Control-Based Pet Consumption,” Journal of Business Research, 61 (5), 490–96.
10.
BolderoJennifer M.HigginsE. Tory (2011), “Regulatory Focus and Political Decision Making: When People Favor Reform Over the Status Quo,” Political Psychology, 32 (3), 399–418.
11.
BradshawJohn (2012), Dog Sense: How the New Science of Dog Behavior Can Make You a Better Friend to Your Pet. New York: Basic Books.
12.
BradshawJohn (2013), Cat Sense: How the New Feline Science Can Make You a Better Friend to Your Pet. New York: Basic Books.
13.
CavanaughLisa A.LeonardHillary A.ScammonDebra L. (2008), “A Tail of Two Personalities: How Canine Companions Shape Relationships and Well-Being,” Journal of Business Research, 61 (5), 469–79.
CesarioJosephGrantHeidiHigginsE. Tory (2004), “Regulatory Fit and Persuasion: Transfer from ‘Feeling Right,’” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86 (3), 388–404.
16.
ChanElaineSenguptaJaideep (2010), “Insincere Flattery Actually Works: A Dual Attitudes Perspective,” Journal of Marketing Research, 47 (1), 122–33.
17.
ChernevAlexander (2004), “Goal Orientation and Consumer Preference for the Status Quo,” Journal of Consumer Research, 31 (3), 557–65.
18.
CroweEllenHigginsE. Tory (1997), “Regulatory Focus and Strategic Inclinations: Promotion and Prevention in Decision-Making,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 69 (2), 117–32.
19.
DuRex YuxingHuYeDamangirSina (2015), “Leveraging Trends in Online Searches for Product Features in Market Response Modeling,” Journal of Marketing, 79 (1), 29–43.
20.
DuclosRodWanEcho WenJiangYuwei (2013), “Show Me the Honey! Effects of Social Exclusion on Financial Risk-Taking,” Journal of Consumer Research, 40 (1), 122–35.
FeiXianzhengYouYanfenYangXiaojing (2020), “‘We’ Are Different: Exploring the Diverse Effects of Friend and Family Accessibility on Consumers’ Product Preferences,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 39 (3), 543–50.
23.
GornGerald J.JiangYuweiJoharGita Venkataramani (2008), “Babyfaces, Trait Inferences, and Company Evaluations in a Public Relations Crisis,” Journal of Consumer Research, 35 (1), 36–49.
24.
HayesAndrew F. (2018), Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach. New York: Guilford Press.
HigginsE. Tory (1987), “Self-Discrepancy: A Theory Relating Self and Affect,” Psychological Review, 94 (3), 319–40.
27.
HigginsE. Tory (1996), “The ‘Self Digest’: Self-Knowledge Serving Self-Regulatory Functions,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71 (6), 1062–83.
28.
HigginsE. Tory (1997), “Beyond Pleasure and Pain,” American Psychologist, 52 (12), 1280–1300.
29.
HigginsE. Tory (2000), “Making a Good Decision: Value from Fit,” American Psychologist, 55 (11), 1217–30.
30.
HigginsE. Tory (2002), “How Self-Regulation Creates Distinct Values: The Case of Promotion and Prevention Decision Making,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 12 (3), 177–91.
31.
HirschmanElizabeth C. (1994), “Consumers and Their Animal Companions,” Journal of Consumer Research, 20 (4), 616–32.
32.
HolbrookMorris B.WoodsideArch G. (2008), “Animal Companions, Consumption Experiences, and the Marketing of Pets: Transcending Boundaries in the Animal-Human Distinction,” Journal of Business Research, 61 (5), 377–81.
33.
HongJiewenLeeAngela Y. (2007), “Be Fit and Be Strong: Mastering Self-Regulation Through Regulatory Fit,” Journal of Consumer Research, 34 (5), 682–95.
34.
Jardim-MessederDéboraLambertKellyNoctorStephenPestanaFernanda M.de Castro LealMaria E.BertelsenMads F., et al. (2017), “Dogs Have the Most Neurons, Though Not the Largest Brain: Trade-Off Between Body Mass and Number of Neurons in the Cerebral Cortex of Large Carnivoran Species,” Frontiers in Neuroanatomy, 11, https://doi.org/10.3389/fnana.2017.00118.
35.
KiddAline H.KiddRobert M.ZasloffR. Lee (1995), “Developmental Factors in Positive Attitudes Toward Zoo Animals,” Psychological Reports, 76 (1), 71–81.
36.
KozinetsRobertPattersonAnthonyAshmanRachel (2017), “Networks of Desire: How Technology Increases Our Passion to Consume,” Journal of Consumer Research, 43 (5), 659–83.
37.
LabrooAparna A.LeeAngela Y. (2006), “Between Two Brands: A Goal Fluency Account of Brand Evaluation,” Journal of Marketing Research, 43 (3), 374–85.
LeeAngela Y.AakerJennifer L. (2004), “Bringing the Frame into Focus: The Influence of Regulatory Fit on Processing Fluency and Persuasion,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86 (2), 205–18.
40.
LeeAngela Y.AakerJennifer L.GardnerWendi L. (2000), “The Pleasures and Pains of Distinct Self-Construals: The Role of Interdependence in Regulatory Focus,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78 (6), 1122–34.
41.
LeeAngela Y.KellerPunam AnandSternthalBrian (2010), “Value from Regulatory Construal Fit: The Persuasive Impact of Fit Between Consumer Goals and Message Concreteness,” Journal of Consumer Research, 36 (5), 735–47.
42.
LeeJaehoonShrumL.J. (2012), “Conspicuous Consumption Versus Charitable Behavior in Response to Social Exclusion: A Differential Needs Explanation,” Journal of Consumer Research, 39 (3), 530–44.
43.
LibermanNiraIdsonLorraine ChenCamachoChristopher J.HigginsE. Tory (1999), “Promotion and Prevention Choices Between Stability and Change,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77 (6), 1135–45.
44.
LockwoodPenelopeJordanChristian H.KundaZiva (2002), “Motivation by Positive or Negative Role Models: Regulatory Focus Determines Who Will Best Inspire Us,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83 (4), 854–64.
45.
MaJingjingRoeseNeal J. (2014), “The Maximizing Mind-Set,” Journal of Consumer Research, 41 (1), 71–92.
46.
MacInnisCara C.HodsonGordon (2015), “Do American States with More Religious or Conservative Populations Search More for Sexual Content on Google?” Archives of Sexual Behavior, 44 (1), 137–47.
47.
MeadNicole L.BaumeisterRoy F.StillmanTyler F.RawnCatherine D.VohsKathleen D. (2011), “Social Exclusion Causes People to Spend and Consume Strategically in the Service of Affiliation,” Journal of Consumer Research, 37 (5), 902–19.
48.
MellonJonathan (2013), “Where and When Can We Use Google Trends to Measure Issue Salience?” Political Science & Politics, 46 (2), 280–90.
49.
MiklósiÁdámPongráczPéterLakatosGabriellaTopálJózsefCsányiVilmos (2005), “A Comparative Study of the Use of Visual Communicative Signals in Interactions Between Dogs (Canis familiaris) and Humans and Cats (Felis catus) and Humans,” Journal of Comparative Psychology, 119 (2), 179–86.
50.
MogilnerCassieAakerJennifer L.PenningtonGinger L. (2008), “Time Will Tell: The Distant Appeal of Promotion and Imminent Appeal of Prevention,” Journal of Consumer Research, 34 (5), 670–81.
51.
MontoyaAmanda K.HayesAndrew F. (2017), “Two-Condition Within-Participant Statistical Mediation Analysis: A Path-Analytic Framework,” Psychological Methods, 22 (1), 6–27.
52.
MyersEugene Olin (1999), “Human Development as Transcendence of the Animal Body and the Child-Animal Association in Psychological Thought,” Society & Animals, 7 (2), 121–40.
53.
NagasawaMihoMitsuiShouheiEnShioriOhtaniNobuyoOhtaMitsuakiSakumaYasuo, et al. (2015), “Oxytocin-Gaze Positive Loop and the Coevolution of Human-Dog Bonds,” Science, 348 (6232), 333–36.
PhamMichel TuanAvnetTamar (2004), “Ideals and Oughts and the Reliance on Affect Versus Substance in Persuasion,” Journal of Consumer Research, 30 (4), 503–18.
58.
PhamMichel TuanChangHannah H. (2010), “Regulatory Focus, Regulatory Fit, and the Search and Consideration of Choice Alternatives,” Journal of Consumer Research, 37 (4), 626–40.
59.
PolmanEvan (2012), “Self–Other Decision Making and Loss Aversion,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 119 (2), 141–50.
60.
PotterAliceMillsDaniel Simon (2015), “Domestic Cats (Felis silvestris catus) Do Not Show Signs of Secure Attachment to Their Owners,” PLoS One, 10 (9), e0135109.
61.
PurewalRebeccaChristleyRobertKordasKatarzynaJoinsonCarolMeintsKerstinGeeNancy, et al. (2017), “Companion Animals and Child/Adolescent Development: A Systematic Review of the Evidence,” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 14 (3), 234.
62.
SandersClinton R.HirschmanElizabeth C. (1996), “Guest Editors’ Introduction: Involvement with Animals as Consumer Experience,” Society & Animals, 4 (2), 111–19.
63.
ScholerAbigail A.CornwellJames F.M.HigginsE. Tory (2019), “Regulatory Focus Theory and Research: Catching up and Looking Forward After 20 Years,” in Oxford Handbook of Human Motivation, Vol. 2, RyanRichard M., ed. New York: Oxford University Press.
64.
SchultheißSebastianLewandowskiDirk (2021), “How Users’ Knowledge of Advertisements Influences Their Viewing and Selection Behavior in Search Engines,” Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 72 (3), 285–301.
65.
SenguptaJaideepZhouRongrong (2007), “Understanding Impulsive Eaters’ Choice Behaviors: The Motivational Influences of Regulatory Focus,” Journal of Marketing Research, 44 (2), 297–308.
66.
SerpellJames A.PaulElizabeth S. (2011), “Pets in the Family: An Evolutionary Perspective,” in The Oxford Handbook of Evolutionary Family Psychology, SalmonC.A.ShackelfordT.K., eds. New York: Oxford University Press, 298–309.
U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis (2019), “Per Capita Real GDP by State,” U.S. Department of Commerce (accessed November 1, 2020), https://apps.bea.gov/iTable/index_nipa.cfm.
69.
U.S. Bureau of the Census (2017), “Household Income: 2016,” American Community Survey Briefs.
70.
WangJingLeeAngela Y. (2006), “The Role of Regulatory Focus in Preference Construction,” Journal of Marketing Research, 43 (1), 28–38.
71.
WatsonDavidClarkLee AnnaTellegenAuke (1988), “Development and Validation of Brief Measures of Positive and Negative Affect: The PANAS Scales,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54 (6), 1063–70.
72.
WeeksBrianSouthwellBrian (2010), “The Symbiosis of News Coverage and Aggregate Online Search Behavior: Obama, Rumors, and Presidential Politics,” Mass Communication and Society, 13 (4), 341–60.
73.
WhiteKatherineArgoJennifer J. (2011), “When Imitation Doesn’t Flatter: The Role of Consumer Distinctiveness in Responses to Mimicry,” Journal of Consumer Research, 38 (4), 667–80.
74.
WhiteKatherineDahlDarren W. (2006), “To Be or Not Be? The Influence of Dissociative Reference Groups on Consumer Preferences,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 16 (4), 404–14.
75.
WhiteKatherineDahlDarren W. (2007), “Are All Out-Groups Created Equal? Consumer Identity and Dissociative Influence,” Journal of Consumer Research, 34 (4), 525–36.
76.
WyerRobert S.Jr.,XuAlison Jing (2010), “The Role of Behavioral Mind-Sets in Goal-Directed Activity: Conceptual Underpinnings and Empirical Evidence,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 20 (2), 107–25.
77.
WynneClive D.L.UdellMonique A.R.LordKathryn A. (2008), “Ontogeny’s Impacts on Human–Dog Communication,” Animal Behavior, 76 (4), e1–4.
78.
XuAlison JingMoormanChristineQinVivian YueRaoAkshay R. (2020), “Four More Years: Presidential Elections, Comparative Mindset, and Managerial Decisions,” Academy of Management Journal, 63 (5), 1370–94.
79.
ZeifmanDebraHazanCindy (1997), “Attachment: The Bond in Pair-Bonds,” in Evolutionary Psychology, SimpsonJeffry A.KenrickDouglas T., eds. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 237–62.
80.
ZhouRongrongPhamMichel Tuan (2004), “Promotion and Prevention Across Mental Accounts: When Financial Products Dictate Consumers’ Investment Goals,” Journal of Consumer Research, 31 (1), 125–35.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
