This study provides a comprehensive assessment of the impact of advertising creative strategy (ACS) on advertising elasticity, founded on an integrative framework that distinguishes between the function (content) and form (execution) of an advertising creative. The authors evaluate function using a three-dimensional representation of content (experience, affect, cognition), whereas the representation of form accounts for both executional elements and the use of creative templates. The distinction between function and form allows for the investigation of potential synergies between content and execution, previously unaccounted for in the literature. The ACS framework also facilitates the calculation of composite metrics that capture holistic aspects of the creative strategy, such as focus (i.e., the extent of the emphasis on a specific content dimension) and variation (i.e., changes in content and execution over time). The empirical application focuses on a dynamic linear model analysis of 2,251 television advertising creatives from 91 brands in 16 consumer packaged goods categories. The findings show that for function, experiential content has the greatest effect on elasticity, followed by cognitive and affective content. Function and form produce synergies that advertisers can leverage to increase returns. Finally, focus, variation, and the use of templates increase advertising elasticity.
AtamanM. Berkvan HeerdeHarald J.MelaCarl F. (2010), “The Long-Term Effect of Marketing Strategy on Brand Sales,” Journal of Marketing Research, 47 (5), 866–82.
7.
BassFrank M.BruceNorrisMajumdarSumitMurthiB.P.S. (2007), “Wearout Effects of Different Advertising Themes: A Dynamic Bayesian Model of the Advertising-Sales Relationship,” Marketing Science, 26 (2), 179–95.
8.
BatraRajeevRayMichael L. (1986), “Affective Responses Mediating Acceptance of Advertising,” Journal of Consumer Research, 13 (2), 234–49.
9.
BeckerMarenWiegandNicoReinartzWerner J. (2019), “Does It Pay to Be Real? Understanding Authenticity in TV Advertising,” Journal of Marketing, 83 (1), 24–50.
10.
BétrancourtMireilleBenetosKalliopi (2018), “Why and When Does Instructional Video Facilitate Learning? A Commentary to the Special Issue ‘Developments and Trends in Learning with Instructional Video,” Computers in Human Behavior, 89, 471–75.
11.
BlairMargaret Henderson (2000), “An Empirical Investigation of Advertising Wearin and Wearout,” Journal of Advertising Research, 40 (6), 95–100.
12.
BraunMichaelMoeWendy W. (2013), “Online Display Advertising: Modeling the Effects of Multiple Creatives and Individual Impression Histories,” Marketing Science, 32 (5), 753–67.
13.
BronnenbergBart J.KrugerMichael W.MelaCarl F. (2008), “Database Paper—The IRI Marketing Data Set,” Marketing Science, 27 (4), 745–48.
14.
BruceNorris I. (2008), “Pooling and Dynamic Forgetting Effects in Multitheme Advertising: Tracking the Advertising Sales Relationship with Particle Filters,” Marketing Science, 27 (4), 659–73.
15.
BruceNorris I.BeckerMarenReinartzWerner (2020), “Communicating Brands in Television Advertising,” Journal of Marketing Research, 57 (2), 236–56.
16.
BruceNorris I.PetersKayNaikPrasad A. (2012), “Discovering How Advertising Grows Sales and Builds Brands,” Journal of Marketing Research, 49 (6), 793–806.
ChandyRajesh K.TellisGerard J.MacInnisDeborah J.ThaivanichPattana (2001), “What to Say When: Advertising Appeals in Evolving Markets,” Journal of Marketing Research, 38 (4), 399–414.
19.
DanaherPeter J.BonfrerAndréDharSanjay (2008), “The Effect of Competitive Advertising Interference on Sales for Packaged Goods,” Journal of Marketing Research, 45 (2), 211–25.
20.
DarleyWilliam K.SmithRobert E. (1993), “Advertising Claim Objectivity: Antecedents and Effects,” Journal of Marketing, 57 (4), 100–113.
21.
DattaHannesAilawadiKusum L.Van HeerdeHarald J. (2017), “How Well Does Consumer-Based Brand Equity Align with Sales-Based Brand Equity and Marketing-Mix Response?” Journal of Marketing, 81 (3), 1–20.
22.
DeightonJohnRomerDanielMcQueenJosh (1989), “Using Drama to Persuade,” Journal of Consumer Research, 16 (3), 335–43.
23.
DrogeCornelia (1989), “Shaping the Route to Attitude Change: Central Versus Peripheral Processing Through Comparative Versus Noncomparative Advertising,” Journal of Marketing Research, 26 (2), 193–204.
24.
EastlackJosephRaoAmbar (1989), “Advertising Experiments at the Campbell Soup Company,” Marketing Science, 8 (1), 57–71.
25.
EdellJulie A.StaelinRichard (1983), “The Information Processing of Pictures in Print Advertisements,” Journal of Consumer Research, 10 (1), 45–61.
26.
ErdemTülinKeaneMichael P. (1996), “Decision-Making Under Uncertainty: Capturing Dynamic Brand Choice Processes in Turbulent Consumer Goods Markets,” Marketing Science, 15 (1), 1–20.
27.
GoldenbergJacobMazurskyDavid (2008), “When Deep Structures Surface: Design Structures That Can Repeatedly Surprise,” Journal of Advertising, 37 (4), 21–34.
28.
GoldenbergJacobMazurskyDavidSolomonSorin (1999), “The Fundamental Templates of Quality Ads,” Marketing Science, 18 (3), 333–51.
29.
GordonBrett R.HartmannWesley R. (2013), “Advertising Effects in Presidential Elections,” Marketing Science, 32 (1), 19–35.
30.
HartnettNicoleKennedyRachelSharpByronGreenacreLuke (2016), “Creative That Sells: How Advertising Execution Affects Sales,” Journal of Advertising, 45 (1), 102–12.
31.
HecklerSusan E.ChildersTerry L. (1992), “The Role of Expectancy and Relevancy in Memory for Verbal and Visual Information: What Is Incongruency?” Journal of Consumer Research, 18 (4), 475–92.
32.
HolbrookMorris B. (1978), “Beyond Attitude Structure: Toward the Informational Determinants of Attitude,” Journal of Marketing Research, 15 (4), 545–56.
33.
HoustonMichael J.ChildersTerry L.HecklerSusan E. (1987), “Picture-Word Consistency and the Elaborative Processing of Advertisements,” Journal of Marketing Research, 24 (4), 359–69.
34.
JaworskiBernard J. (2011), “On Managerial Relevance,” Journal of Marketing, 75 (4), 211–24.
35.
JohnsonGarrett A.LewisRandall A.NubbemeyerElmar I. (2017), “Ghost Ads: Improving the Economics of Measuring Online Ad Effectiveness,” Journal of Marketing Research, 54 (6), 867–84.
KellerKevin LaneHecklerSusan E.HoustonMichael J. (1998), “The Effects of Brand Name Suggestiveness on Advertising Recall,” Journal of Marketing, 62 (1), 48–57.
38.
KolsariciCerenVakratsasDemetrios (2018), “Synergistic, Antagonistic, and Asymmetric Media Interactions,” Journal of Advertising, 47 (3), 282–300.
39.
KolsariciCerenVakratsasDemetriosNaikPrasad A. (2020), “The Anatomy of the Advertising Budget Decision: How Analytics and Heuristics Drive Sales Performance,” Journal of Marketing Research, 57 (3), 468–88.
40.
LakshmananArunLindseyCharles D.KrishnanH. Shanker (2010), “Practice Makes Perfect? When Does Massed Learning Improve Product Usage Proficiency?”Journal of Consumer Research, 37 (4), 599–613.
41.
LaskeyHenry A.DayEllenCraskMelvin R. (1989), “Typology of Main Message Strategies for Television Commercials,” Journal of Advertising, 18 (1), 36–41.
42.
LeeAngela Y.KellerPunam AnandSternthalBrian (2010), “Value from Regulatory Construal Fit: The Persuasive Impact of Fit Between Consumer Goals and Message Concreteness,” Journal of Consumer Research, 36 (5), 735–47.
43.
LiaukonyteJuraTeixeiraThalesWilburKenneth C. (2015), “Television Advertising and Online Shopping,” Marketing Science, 34 (3), 311–30.
44.
LodishLeonard M.AbrahamMagidKalmensonStuartLivelsbergerJeanneLubetkinBethRichardsonBruce, et al. (1995), “How T.V. Advertising Works: A Meta-Analysis of 389 Real World Split Cable T.V. Advertising Experiments,” Journal of Marketing Research, 32 (2), 125–39.
45.
MacInnisDeborah J.JaworskiBernard J. (1989), “Information Processing from Advertisements: Toward an Integrative Framework,” Journal of Marketing, 53 (4), 1–23.
46.
MacInnisDeborah J.MoormanChristineJaworskiBernard J. (1991), “Enhancing and Measuring Consumers’ Motivation, Opportunity, and Ability to Process Brand Information from Ads,” Journal of Marketing, 55 (4), 32–53.
47.
MacInnisDeborah J.RaoAmbar G.WeissAllen M. (2002), “Assessing When Increased Media Weight of Real-World Advertisements Helps Sales,” Journal of Marketing Research, 39 (4), 391–407.
48.
MacKenzieScott B.LutzRichard J. (1989), “An Empirical Examination of the Structural Antecedents of Attitude Toward the Ad in an Advertising Pretesting Context,” Journal of Marketing, 53 (2), 48–65.
49.
MafaelAlexanderRaithelSaschaTaylorCharles R.StewartDavid W. (2021), “Measuring the Role of Uniqueness and Consistency to Develop Effective Advertising,” Journal of Advertising, 50 (4), 494–504.
50.
MayerRichard (2011), “The Advertising Agency,” in The Practice of Advertising, Adrian Mackay, ed. London: Routledge, 69–91.
51.
NaikPrasad A.MantralaMurali K.SawyerAlan G. (1998), “Planning Media Schedules in the Presence of Dynamic Advertising Quality,” Marketing Science, 17 (3), 214–35.
52.
NaikPrasad A.RamanKalyan (2003), “Understanding the Impact of Synergy in Multimedia Communications,” Journal of Marketing Research, 40 (4), 375–88.
53.
NerloveMarcArrowKenneth J. (1962), “Optimal Advertising Policy Under Dynamic Conditions,” Economica, 29 (114), 129–42.
OsingaErnst C.LeeflangPeter S.H.SrinivasanShubaWieringaJaap E. (2011), “Why Do Firms Invest in Consumer Advertising with Limited Sales Response? A Shareholder Perspective,” Journal of Marketing, 75 (1), 109–24.
56.
ParkSunghoGuptaSachin (2012), “Handling Endogenous Regressors by Joint Estimation Using Copulas,” Marketing Science, 31 (4), 567–86.
57.
PechmannConnieStewartDavid W. (1989), “The Multidimensionality of Persuasive Communications: Theoretical and Empirical Foundations,” in Cognitive and Affective Responses to Advertising, CafferataPatriciaTyboutAlice, eds. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books, 31–66.
58.
PercyLarry (1983), “A Review of the Effect of Specific Advertising Elements upon Overall Communication Response,” Current Issues and Research in Advertising, 6 (2), 77–118.
59.
PhamMichel TuanGeuensMaggieDe PelsmackerPatrick (2013), “The Influence of Ad-Evoked Feelings on Brand Evaluations: Empirical Generalizations from Consumer Responses to More Than 1000 TV Commercials,” International Journal of Research in Marketing, 30 (4), 383–94.
60.
PietersRikWarlopLukWedelMichel (2002), “Breaking Through the Clutter: Benefits of Advertisement Originality and Familiarity for Brand Attention and Memory,” Management Science, 48 (6), 765–81.
61.
PornpitakpanChanthika (2004), “The Persuasiveness of Source Credibility: A Critical Review of Five Decades’ Evidence,” Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34 (2), 243–81.
62.
RaghubirPriya (2009), “Visual Perception: An Overview,” in Sensory Marketing: Research on the Sensuality of Products, Aradhna Krishna, ed. London: Routledge, 201–17.
63.
ResnikAlanSternBruce L. (1977), “An Analysis of Information Content in Television Advertising,” Journal of Marketing, 41 (1), 50–53.
64.
RossiPeter E. (2014), “Even the Rich Can Make Themselves Poor: A Critical Examination of IV Methods in Marketing Applications,” Marketing Science, 33 (5), 655–72.
65.
SchumannDavid W.PettyRichard E.ClemonsD. Scott (1990), “Predicting the Effectiveness of Different Strategies of Advertising Variation: A Test of the Repetition-Variation Hypotheses,” Journal of Consumer Research, 17 (2), 192–202.
66.
SethuramanRajTellisGerard J.BrieschRichard A. (2011), “How Well Does Advertising Work? Generalizations from Meta-Analysis of Brand Advertising Elasticities,” Journal of Marketing Research, 48 (3), 457–71.
67.
ShapiroBradley T. (2018), “Advertising in Health Insurance Markets,” Marketing Science, 39 (3), 587–611.
68.
ShapiroBradleyHitschG.J.TuchmanAnna (2020), “Research Note: Procedure for Building Nielsen Ad Intel Data and Merging with Nielsen RMS Scanner Data,” working paper, Booth School of Business, University of Chicago.
69.
ShapiroBradleyHitschGünter J.TuchmanAnna (2021), “TV Advertising Effectiveness and Profitability: Generalizable Results from 288 Brands,” Econometrica, 89 (4), 1855–79.
70.
ShimpTerence A. (1976), “Methods of Commercial Presentation Employed by National Television Advertisers,” Journal of Advertising, 5 (4), 30–36.
71.
SmithRobert E.MacKenzieScott B.YangXiaojingBuchholzLaura M.DarleyWilliam K. (2007), “Modeling the Determinants and Effects of Creativity in Advertising,” Marketing Science, 26 (6), 819–33.
72.
StantonJohn L.BurkeJeffrey (1998), “Comparative Effectiveness of Executional Elements in TV Advertising: 15- Versus 30-Second Commercials,” Journal of Advertising Research, 38 (6), 7–14.
73.
StewartDavid W.FurseDavid H. (1986), Effective Television Advertising: A Study of 1000 Commercials. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
74.
SudhirK.RoySubrotoCherianMathew (2016), “Do Sympathy Biases Induce Charitable Giving? The Effects of Advertising Content,” Marketing Science, 35 (6), 849–69.
75.
SullivanLuke (2016), Hey, Whipple, Squeeze This: The Classic Guide to Creating Great Ads. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 31–46.
76.
SzymanowskiMaciejGijsbrechtsEls (2013), “Patterns in Consumption-Based Learning About Brand Quality for Consumer Packaged Goods,” International Journal of Research in Marketing, 30 (3), 219–35.
77.
TeixeiraThales S.StippHorst (2013), “Optimizing the Amount of Entertainment in Advertising: What’s So Funny About Tracking Reactions to Humor?” Journal of Advertising Research, 53 (3), 286–96.
78.
TellisGerard J.FornellClaes (1988), “The Relationship Between Advertising and Product Quality Over the Product Life Cycle: A Contingency Theory,” Journal of Marketing Research, 25 (1), 64–71.
79.
TellisGerard J.JohnsonJoseph (2007), “The Value of Quality,” Marketing Science, 26 (6), 758–73.
80.
ThompsonDebora VianaHamiltonRebecca W. (2006), “The Effects of Information Processing Mode on Consumers’ Responses to Comparative Advertising,” Journal of Consumer Research, 32 (4), 530–40.
81.
UlrichKarl T.EllisonDavid J. (1999), “Holistic Customer Requirements and the Design-Select Decision,” Management Science, 45 (5), 641–58.
82.
UtzSonjaWolfersLara N. (2020), “How-To Videos on YouTube: The Role of the Instructor,” Information, Communication & Society (published online August 12), https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2020.1804984.
83.
VakratsasDemetriosAmblerTim (1999), “How Advertising Works: What Do We Really Know?” Journal of Marketing, 63 (1), 26–43.
84.
VakratsasDemetriosWangXin (2021), “Artificial Intelligence in Advertising Creativity,” Journal of Advertising, 50 (1), 39–51.
85.
WansinkBrianRayMichael L. (1996), “Advertising Strategies to Increase Usage Frequency,” Journal of Marketing, 60 (1), 31–46.
86.
WedelMichelKannanP.K. (2016), “Marketing Analytics for Data-Rich Environments,” Journal of Marketing, 80 (6), 97–121.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
