The prevalence of strong brands such as Coca-Cola, McDonald’s, Budweiser, and Marlboro in “vice” categories has important implications for regulators and consumers. While researchers in multiple disciplines have studied the effectiveness of antitobacco countermarketing strategies, little attention has been given to how brand strength may moderate the efficacy of tactics such as excise taxes, usage restrictions, and educational advertising campaigns. In this research, the authors use a multiple discrete-continuous model to study the impact of antismoking techniques on smokers’ choices of brands and quantities. The results suggest that although cigarette excise taxes decrease smoking rates, these taxes also result in a shift in market share toward stronger brands. Market leaders may be less affected by tax policies because their market power allows strong brands such as Marlboro to absorb rather than pass through increased taxes. In contrast, smoke-free restrictions cause a shift away from stronger brands. In terms of antismoking advertising, the authors find minimal effects on brand choice and consumption. The findings highlight the importance of considering brand asymmetries when designing a policy portfolio on cigarette tax hikes, smoke-free restrictions, and antismoking advertising campaigns.
AakerDavid A. (1996), “Measuring Brand Equity Across Products and Markets,” California Management Review, 38 (3), 102–20.
2.
AakerJennifer L. (1997), “Dimensions of Brand Personality,” Journal of Marketing Research, 34 (3) 347–56.
3.
AddaJeromeCornagliaFrancesca (2010), “The Effect of Bans and Taxes on Passive Smoking,” American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 2 (1), 1–32.
4.
AgarwalManoj K.RaoVithala (1996), “An Empirical Comparison of Consumer-Based Measures of Brand Equity,” Marketing Letters, 7 (3), 237–47.
5.
AilawadiKusum L.LehmannDonald R.NeslinScott A. (2003), “Revenue Premium as an Outcome Measure of Brand Equity,” Journal of Marketing, 67 (4), 1–17.
6.
AndrewsCraig J.NetemeyerRichard G.BurtonScotMobergPaul D.ChristiansenAnn (2004), “Understanding Adolescent Intentions to Smoke: An Examination of Relationships Among Social Influence, Prior Trial Behavior, and Antitobacco Campaign Advertising,” Journal of Marketing, 68 (3), 110–23.
7.
BagwellLaurie SimonBernheimDouglas B. (1996), “Veblen Effects in a Theory of Conspicuous Consumption,” American Economic Review, 86 (3), 349–73.
8.
BalmfordJamesBorlandRon J.YongHua-Hie (2016), “Impact of the Introduction of Standardised Packaging on Smokers’ Brand Awareness and Identification in Australia,” Drug and Alcohol Review, 35 (1), 102–09.
9.
BeckerGary S.MurphyKevin M. (1988), “A Theory of Rational Addiction,” Journal of Political Economy, 96 (4), 675–700.
10.
BeckerGary S.GrossmanMichaelMurphyKevin M. (1994), “An Empirical Analysis of Cigarette Addiction,” American Economic Review, 84 (3), 396–418.
11.
BellDavid R.LattinJames M. (2000), “Looking for Loss Aversion in Scanner Panel Data: The Confounding Effect of Price Response Heterogeneity,” Marketing Science, 19 (2), 185–200.
12.
BhatChandra R. (2008), “The Multiple Discrete-Continuous Extreme Value (MDCEV) Model: Role of Utility Function Parameters, Identification Considerations, and Model Extensions,” Transportation Research Part B, 42 (3), 274–303.
13.
BhatChandra R. (2018), “A New Flexible Multiple Discrete-Continuous Extreme Value (MDCEV) Choice Model,” Transportation Research Part B, 110, 261–79.
14.
BitlerMarianne P.CarpenterChristopher S.ZavodnyMadeline (2010), “Effects of Venue-Specific State Clean Indoor Air Laws on Smoking-Related Outcomes,” Health Economics, 19 (12), 1425–40.
15.
BonfrerAndreChintaguntaPradeep K.CorkindaleDavidRobertsJohn H. (2020), “Assessing the Sales Impact of Plain Packaging Regulation for Cigarettes: Evidence from Australia,” Marketing Science, 39 (1), 234–52.
ChaloupkaFrank (1991), “Rational Addictive Behavior and Cigarette Smoking,” Journal of Political Economy, 99 (4), 722–42.
18.
ChaloupkaFrankWarnerKenneth E. (2000), “The Economics of Smoking,” in Handbook of Health Economics, Vol. 1b, CulyerAnthony J.NewhouseJoseph P., eds. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science, 1539–1726.
19.
ChenJiajieRaoVithala R. (2020), “A Dynamic Model of Rational Addiction with Stockpiling and Learning: An Empirical Examination of E-cigarettes,” Management Science,66(12), 5886–905.
20.
ChenTaoSunBaohongSinghVishal (2009), “An Empirical Investigation of the Dynamic Effect of Marlboro’s Permanent Pricing Shift,” Marketing Science, 28 (4), 740–58.
21.
ChettyRajLooneyAdamKroftKory (2009), “Salience and Taxation: Theory and Evidence,” American Economic Review, 99 (4), 1145–77.
22.
ConlonChristopher T.RaoNirupama I. (2020), “Discrete Prices and the Incidence and Efficiency of Excise Taxes,” American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 12 (4), 111–43.
23.
CoppejansMarkGilleskieDonnaSiegHolgerStrumpfKoleman (2007), “Consumer Demand Under Price Uncertainty: Empirical Evidence from the Market for Cigarettes,” Review of Economics and Statistics, 89 (3), 510–21.
24.
DunlopSally M.DobbinsTimothyYoungJane M.PerezDonnaCurrowDavid C. (2014), “Impact of Australia’s Introduction of Tobacco Plain Packs on Adult Smokers’ Pack-Related Perceptions and Responses: Results from a Continuous Tracking Survey,” BMJ Open, 4 (12), https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/4/12/e005836.
FullertonDonMetcalfGilbert E. (2002), “Tax Incidence,” working paper, National Bureau of Economic Research.
30.
GoliAliChintaguntaPradeep K. (2018), “Selling Smokes or Smoking Sales: Investigating the Consequences of Ending Tobacco Sales,” working paper, University of Chicago.
31.
GordonBrett R.SunBaohong (2015), “A Dynamic Model of Rational Addiction: Evaluating Cigarette Taxes,” Marketing Science, 34 (3), 452–70.
32.
HardingMatthewLeibtagEphraimLovenheimMichael F. (2012), “The Heterogeneous Geographic and Socioeconomic Incidence of Cigarette Taxes: Evidence from Nielsen Homescan Data,” American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 4 (4), 169–98.
33.
HoltDouglas B. (2002), “Why Do Brands Cause Trouble? A Dialectical Theory of Consumer Culture and Branding,” Journal of Consumer Research, 29 (1), 70–90.
34.
KellerKevin L. (1993), “Conceptualizing, Measuring, and Managing Customer-Based Brand Equity,” Journal of Marketing, 57 (1), 1–22.
35.
KellerKevin L.LehmannDonald R. (2006), “Brands and Branding: Research Findings and Future Priorities,” Marketing Science, 25 (6), 740–59.
LucasRobert E. (1976), “Econometric Policy Evaluation: A Critique,” Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, 1 (1), 19–46.
38.
MaYuAilawadiKusum L.GrewalDhruv (2013), “Soda Versus Cereal and Sugar Versus Fat: Drivers of Healthful Food Intake and the Impact of Diabetes Diagnosis,” Journal of Marketing, 77 (3), 101–20.
39.
McAlexanderJames H.SchoutenJohn W.KoenigHarold F. (2002), “Building Brand Community,” Journal of Marketing, 66 (1), 38–54.
40.
MooreSarahDahlDarren W.GornGerald J.WeinbergCharles B. (2006), “Coping with Condom Embarrassment,” Psychology, Health & Medicine, 11 (1), 70–79.
41.
MoormanChristineFerraroRosellinaHuberJoel (2012), “Unintended Nutrition Consequences: Firm Responses to the Nutrition Labeling and Education Act,” Marketing Science, 31 (5), 717–37.
42.
MuñizAlbert M.O’GuinnThomas C. (2001), “Brand Community,” Journal of Consumer Research, 27 (4), 412–32.
PechmannCorneliaShihChuan-Fong (1999), “Smoking Scenes in Movies and Antismoking Advertisements Before Movies: Effects on Youth,” Journal of Marketing, 63 (3), 1–13.
45.
PechmannCorneliaZhaoGuangzhiGoldbergMarvin E.ReiblingEllen T. (2003), “What to Convey in Antismoking Advertisements for Adolescents: The Use of Protection Motivation Theory to Identify Effective Message Themes,” Journal of Marketing, 67 (2), 1–18.
46.
PinjariAbdul R.BhatChandra (2011), “Computationally Efficient Forecasting Procedures for Kuhn-Tucker Consumer Demand Model Systems: Application to Residential Energy Consumption Analysis,” working paper, University of Texas at Austin.
47.
PollayRichard W.SiddarthS.SiegelMichaelHaddixAnneMerrittRobert K.GiovinoGary A., et al. (1996), “The Last Straw? Cigarette Advertising and Realized Market Shares Among Youths and Adults, 1979–1993,” Journal of Marketing, 60 (2), 1–16.
48.
RyanRichard M.DeciEdward L. (2000), “Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations: Classic Definitions and New Directions,” Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25 (1), 54–67.
49.
SekarRajuRajagopalPriyaliGilbrideTimothy J. (2010), “Marketing Healthful Eating to Children: The Effectiveness of Incentives, Pledges, and Competitions,” Journal of Marketing, 74 (3), 93–106.
50.
ShriverScottBollingerBryan (2017), “Consideration and Cannibalization Effects from Retail Entry: A Structural Analysis of Multi-Channel Demand,” working paper, New York University.
51.
SeilerStephanTuchmanAnnaYaoSong (2021), “The Impact of Soda Taxes: Pass-Through, Tax Avoidance, and Nutritional Effects,” Journal of Marketing Research, 58 (1), 22–49.
52.
TalukdarDebabrataLindseyCharles (2013), “To Buy or Not to Buy: Consumers’ Demand Response Patterns for Healthy Versus Unhealthy Food,” Journal of Marketing, 77 (2), 124–38.
53.
ThalerRichard H.SusteinCass R. (2008), “Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness,” Constitutional Political Economy, 19 (4), 356–60.
54.
ThomassenØyvindSmithHowardSeilerStephanSchiraldiPasquale (2017), “Multi-Category Competition and Market Power: A Model of Supermarket Pricing,” American Economic Review, 107 (8), 2308–51.
ToubiaOlivierStephenAndrew T. (2013), “Intrinsic vs. Image-related Utility in Social Media: Why Do People Contribute Content to Twitter?” Marketing Science, 32 (3), 368–92.
57.
TuchmanAnna (2019), “Advertising and Demand for Addictive Goods: The Effects of E-Cigarette Advertising,” Marketing Science, 38 (6), 913–1084.
58.
WakefieldMelanie A.HayesLindaDurkinSarahBorlandRon (2013), “Introduction Effects of the Australian Plain Packaging Policy on Adult Smokers: A Cross-Sectional Study,” BMJ Open, 3 (7), 1–9.
59.
WakefieldMelanieCoomberKerriZacherMeghanDurkinSarahBrennanEmilyScolloMichelle (2015), “Australian Adult Smokers’ Responses to Plain Packaging with Larger Graphic Health Warnings 1 Year After Implementation: Results from a National Cross-Sectional Tracking Survey,” Tobacco Control, 24 (Suppl 2), ii17–ii25.
60.
WakefieldMelanieDurkinSarahSpittalMatthew J.SiahpushMohammadScolloMichelleSimpsonJulie A., et al. (2008), “Impact of Tobacco Control Policies and Mass Media Campaigns on Monthly Adult Smoking Prevalence,” American Journal of Public Health, 98 (8), 1443–50.
61.
WangYanwenLewisMichaelSinghVishal (2016), “The Unintended Consequences of Countermarketing Strategies: How Particular Antismoking Measures May Shift Consumers to More Dangerous Cigarettes,” Marketing Science, 35 (1), 55–72.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
