Participative pricing strategies may influence consumer purchase decisions; this research proposes specifically that firms’ delegation of pricing decisions to consumers can create a control–effort trade-off. Consumers favor greater pricing control but are deterred by the effort involved in deciding what to pay. Strategies such as pay what you want in turn might reduce purchase intentions due to the effort involved. In contrast, strategies that increase feelings of control but not perceived effort, such as pick your price options that let consumers choose from a limited set of prices, could enhance pricing outcomes. A field study and four laboratory experiments confirm these propositions. The findings demonstrate the mixed effects of participative pricing, identify mediating mechanisms that explain these effects, and specify common moderating conditions that shape the outcomes of participative pricing. These results have notable implications for pricing theory and practice.
AllenRoy G. (1938), Mathematical Analysis for Economists. New York: MacMillan.
2.
AndersonEric T.SimesterDuncan I. (2001), “Price Discrimination as an Adverse Signal: Why an Offer to Spread Payments May Hurt Demand,” Marketing Science, 20 (3), 315–27.
3.
ArentzeTheo A.OppewalHarmenTimmermansHarry J. (2005), “A Multipurpose Shopping Trip Model to Assess Retail Agglomeration Effects,” Journal of Marketing Research, 42(1), 109–15.
4.
BeckJoshua T.RahinelRyanBleierAlexander (2020), “Company Worth Keeping: Personal Control and Preferences for Brand Leaders,” Journal of Consumer Research, 46 (5), 871–86.
5.
BettmanJames R.LuceMary FrancesPayneJohn W. (1998), “Constructive Consumer Choice Processes,” Journal of Consumer Research, 25 (3), 187–217.
CacioppoJohn T.PettyRichard E. (1981), “Social Psychological Procedures for Cognitive Response Assessment: The Thought-Listing Technique,” Cognitive Assessment (11), 309–342.
8.
ChandranSucharitaMorwitzVicki G. (2005), “Effects of Participative Pricing on Consumers’ Cognitions and Actions: A Goal Theoretic Perspective,” Journal of Consumer Research, 32 (2), 249–59.
9.
CharnessGaryCheungTsz (2013), “A Restaurant Field Experiment in Charitable Contributions,” Economics Letters, 119 (1), 48–9.
ChernevAlexanderBöckenholtUlfGoodmanJoseph (2015), “Choice Overload: A Conceptual Review and Meta-Analysis,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 25 (2), 333–58.
12.
ChildersTerryCarrChristopherPeckJoannCarsonStephen (2011), “Hedonic and Utilitarian Motivations for Online Retail Shopping Behavior,” Journal of Retailing, 77 (4), 511–35.
13.
ChristopherRanjit M.MachadoFernando S. (2019), “Consumer Response to Design Variations in Pay-What-You-Want Pricing,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 47 (5), 879–98.
14.
DardenWilliam R.ReynoldsFred D. (1971), “Shopping Orientations and Product Usage Rates,” Journal of Marketing Research, 8 (4), 505–08.
15.
DarkePeter R.DahlDarren W. (2003), “Fairness and Discounts: The Subjective Value of a Bargain,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 13 (3), 328–38.
16.
DharSanjay K.HochStephen J. (1996), “Price Discrimination Using In-Store Merchandising,” Journal of Marketing, 60 (1), 17–30.
17.
DuxburyDarrenKeaseyKevinZhangHaoChowShue Loong (2005), “Mental Accounting and Decision Making: Evidence under Reverse Conditions Where Money Is Spent for Time Saved,” Journal of Economic Psychology, 26 (4), 567–80.
18.
FornellClaesLarckerDavid F. (1981), “Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error,” Journal of Marketing Research, 18 (1), 39–50.
19.
GerpottTorsten J.SchneiderChristina (2016), “Buying Behaviors When Similar Products Are Available Under Pay-What-You-Want and Posted Price Conditions: Field-Experimental Evidence,” Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 65, 135–45.
GneezyAyeletGneezyUriNelsonLeif D.BrownAmber (2010), “Shared Social Responsibility: A Field Experiment in Pay-What-You-Want Pricing and Charitable Giving,” Science, 329 (5989), 325–27.
22.
GneezyAyeletGneezyUriRienerGerhardNelsonLeif D. (2012), “Pay-What-You-Want, Identity, and Self-Signaling in Markets,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109 (19), 7236–40.
23.
HarlamBari A.LodishLeonard M. (1995), “Modeling Consumers’ Choices of Multiple Items,” Journal of Marketing Research, 32 (4), 404–18.
24.
HawsKelly L.BeardenWilliam O. (2006), “Dynamic Pricing and Consumer Fairness Perceptions,” Journal of Consumer Research, 33 (3), 304–11.
25.
HayesAndrew F. (2017), Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach. New York: The Guilford Press.
26.
HendersonConor M.BeckJoshua T.PalmatierRobert W. (2011), “Review of the Theoretical Underpinnings of Loyalty Programs,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 21 (3), 256–76.
IyengarSheenaLepperMark (2000), “When Choice Is Demotivating: Can One Desire Too Much of a Good Thing?” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,79 (6), 995–1006.
30.
JasperCynthia R.LanPi-Nan Rosa (1992), “Apparel Catalog Patronage: Demographic, Lifestyle and Motivational Factors,” Psychology & Marketing, 9 (4), 275–96.
31.
JinLiyinHeYanqunZhangYing (2014), “How Power States Influence Consumers’ Perceptions of Price Unfairness,” Journal of Consumer Research,40 (5), 818–33.
KahnemanDanielMillerDale T. (1986), “Norm Theory: Comparing Reality to Its Alternatives,” Psychological Review, 93 (2), 136–53.
34.
KimJu-YoungKaufmannKatharinaStegemannManuel (2014), “The Impact of Buyer–Seller Relationships and Reference Prices on the Effectiveness of the Pay What You Want Pricing Mechanism,” Marketing Letters, 25 (4), 409–23.
35.
KimJu-YoungNatterMartinSpannMartin (2009), “Pay What You Want: A New Participative Pricing Mechanism,” Journal of Marketing, 73 (1), 44–58.
36.
KivetzRan (2003), “The Effects of Effort and Intrinsic Motivation on Risky Choice,” Marketing Science, 22 (4), 477–502.
37.
KoriatAsherLichtensteinSarahFischhoffBaruch (1980), “Reasons for Confidence,” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6 (2), 107–18.
38.
KrishnaAradhnaBrieschRichardLehmannDonald R.YuanHong (2002), “A Meta-Analysis of the Impact of Price Presentation on Perceived Savings,” Journal of Retailing, 78 (2), 101–18.
39.
KrishnaVijay (2002), Auction Theory. San Diego: Academic Press.
40.
KunterMarcus (2015), “Exploring the Pay-What-You-Want Payment Motivation,” Journal of Business Research, 68 (11), 2347–57.
41.
LangerEllen J.RodinJudith (1976), “The Effects of Choice and Enhanced Personal Responsibility for the Aged: A Field Experiment in an Institutional Setting,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34 (2), 191–98.
42.
LeclercFranceSchmittBernd H.DubéLaurette (1995), “Waiting Time and Decision Making: Is Time Like Money?” Journal of Consumer Research, 22 (1), 110–19.
43.
ListJohn A.Lucking-ReileyDavid (2000), “Demand Reduction in Multiunit Auctions: Evidence from a Sportscard Field Experiment,” American Economic Review, 90 (4), 961–72.
44.
MehtaNitinRajivSurendraSrinivasanKannan (2003), “Price Uncertainty and Consumer Search: A Structural Model of Consideration Set Formation,” Marketing Science, 22 (1), 58–84.
45.
MelaCarl F.GuptaSunilLehmannDonald R. (1997), “The Long-Term Impact of Promotion and Advertising on Consumer Brand Choice,” Journal of Marketing Research, 34 (2), 248–61.
46.
MulhernFrancis J.PadgettDaniel T. (1995), “The Relationship Between Retail Price Promotions and Regular Price Purchases,” Journal of Marketing, 59 (4), 83–90.
47.
SchmidtKlaus M.SpannMartinZeithammerRobert (2015), “Pay What You Want as a Marketing Strategy in Monopolistic and Competitive Markets,” Management Science, 61 (6), 1217–36.
48.
SchneiderLinda G.CurrimImran S. (1991), “Consumer Purchase Behaviors Associated with Active and Passive Deal-Proneness,” International Journal of Research in Marketing, 8 (3), 205–22.
49.
SchwartzBarry (2004), The Paradox of Choice: Why More Is Less. New York: Ecco.
SpannMartinTellisGerard J. (2006), “Does the Internet Promote Better Consumer Decisions? The Case of Name-Your-Own-Price Auctions,” Journal of Marketing, 70 (1), 65–78.
52.
StanglBrigitteKastnerMargitPrayagGirish (2017), “Pay-What-You-Want for High-Value Priced Services: Differences Between Potential, New, and Repeat Customers,” Journal of Business Research, 74 (May), 168–74.
53.
StrotzRobert H. (1955), “Myopia and Inconsistency in Dynamic Utility Maximization,” Review of Economic Studies, 23 (3), 165–80.
WaltersRockney G.RinneHeikki J. (1986), “An Empirical-Investigation into the Impact of Price Promotions on Retail Store Performance,” Journal of Retailing, 62 (3), 237–66.
59.
WarrenNathanHansonSaraYuanHong (2021), “Feeling Manipulated: How Tip Request Sequence Impacts Customers and Service Providers” Journal of Service Research, 24 (1), 66–83.
XiaLanKukar-KinneyMonikaMonroeKent B. (2010), “Effects of Consumers’ Efforts on Price and Promotion Fairness Perceptions,” Journal of Retailing, 86 (1), 1–10.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
