Technological innovations are creating new products, services, and markets that satisfy enduring consumer needs. These technological innovations create value for consumers and firms in many ways, but they also disrupt psychological ownership––the feeling that a thing is “MINE.” The authors describe two key dimensions of this technology-driven evolution of consumption pertaining to psychological ownership: (1) replacing legal ownership of private goods with legal access rights to goods and services owned and used by others and (2) replacing “solid” material goods with “liquid” experiential goods. They propose that these consumption changes can have three effects on psychological ownership: they can threaten it, cause it to transfer to other targets, and create new opportunities to preserve it. These changes and their effects are organized in a framework and examined across three macro trends in marketing: (1) growth of the sharing economy, (2) digitization of goods and services, and (3) expansion of personal data. This psychological ownership framework generates future research opportunities and actionable marketing strategies for firms aiming to preserve the positive consequences of psychological ownership and navigate cases for which it is a liability.
AcquistiAlessandroJohnLeslie K.LoewensteinGeorge (2013), “What Is Privacy Worth?” Journal of Legal Studies, 42 (2), 249–74.
2.
ArgoJennifer J.DahlDarren W.MoralesAndrea C. (2008), “Positive Consumer Contagion: Responding to Attractive Others in a Retail Context,” Journal of Marketing Research, 45 (6), 690–701.
3.
AsatryanVahagn S.OhHaemoon (2008), “Psychological Ownership Theory: An Exploratory Application in the Restaurant Industry,” Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 32 (3), 363–86.
4.
AtasoyOzgunMorewedgeCarey K. (2018), “Digital Goods Are Valued Less Than Physical Goods,” Journal of Consumer Research, 44 (6), 1343–57.
5.
BaggaCharan K.BendleNeilCotteJune (2019), “Object Valuation and Non-Ownership Possession: How Renting and Borrowing Impact Willingness-to-Pay,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 47 (1), 97–117.
6.
BaraschAlixandraBergerJonah (2014), “Broadcasting and Narrowcasting: How Audience Size Affects What People Share,” Journal of Marketing Research, 51 (3), 286–99.
7.
BardhiFleuraEckhardtGiana M. (2012), “Access-Based Consumption: The Case of Car Charing,” Journal of Consumer Research, 39 (4), 881–98.
8.
BardhiFleuraEckhardtGiana M. (2017), “Liquid Consumption,” Journal of Consumer Research, 44 (3), 582–97.
BastosWilsonBrucksMerrie (2017), “How and Why Conversational Value Leads to Happiness for Experiential and Material Purchases,” Journal of Consumer Research, 44 (3), 598–612.
BaxterWeston L.AurisicchioMarco (2018), “Ownership by Design,” in Psychological Ownership and Consumer Behavior, PeckJoannShuSuzanne B., eds. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 119–35.
13.
BaxterWeston L.AurisicchioMarcoChildsPeter R.N. (2015), “A Psychological Ownership Approach to Designing Object Attachment,” Journal of Engineering Design, 26 (4–6), 140–56.
14.
BegganJames K. (1992), “On the Social Nature of Nonsocial Perception: The Mere Ownership Effect,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62 (2), 229–37.
15.
BelkRussell W. (1988), “Possessions and the Extended Self,” Journal of Consumer Research, 15 (2), 139–68.
16.
BelkRussell W. (2010), “Sharing,” Journal of Consumer Research, 36 (5), 715–34.
17.
BelkRussell W. (2013), “Extended Self in a Digital World,” Journal of Consumer Research, 40 (3), 477–500.
18.
BelkRussell W. (2014), “You Are What You Can Access: Sharing and Collaborative Consumption Online,” Journal of Business Research, 67 (8), 1595–1600.
19.
BhattacharjeeAmitBergerJonahMenonGeeta (2014), “When Identity Marketing Backfires: Consumer Agency in Identity Expression,” Journal of Consumer Research, 41 (2), 294–309.
BraselS. AdamGipsJames (2014), “Tablets, Touchscreens, and Touchpads: How Varying Touch Interfaces Trigger Psychological Ownership and Endowment,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 24 (2), 226–33.
22.
BrynjolfssonErikCollisAvinashEggersFelix (2019), “Using Massive Online Choice Experiments to Measure Changes in Well-Being,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116 (15), 7250–55.
CampbellDavid F.JHanschitzGeorg (2018), “Digitalization of Tax: Epistemic Tax Policy,” in Handbook of Cyber-Development, CarayannisElias G.CampbellDavid F.J.EfthymiopoulosMarios Panagiotis, eds. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International.
25.
CarterTravis J.GilovichThomas (2010), “The Relative Relativity of Material and Experiential Purchases,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98 (1), 146.
26.
ChaudhuriM.VoorheesClay M.BeckJoshua M. (2019), “The Effects of Loyalty Program Introduction and Design on Short- and Long-Term Sales and Gross Profits,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 47, 640–58.
27.
CoyleKaren (2006), “Mass Digitization of Books,” Journal of Academic Librarianship, 32 (6), 641–45.
EckhardtGiana M.HoustonMark B.JiangBaojunLambertonCatherineRindfleischAricZervasGiorgos (2019), “Marketing in the Sharing Economy,” Journal of Marketing, 83 (5), 5–27.
31.
EricsonKeith M.FüsterAndreas (2011), “Expectations as Endowments: Evidence on Reference-Dependent Preferences from Exchange and Valuation Experiments,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 126 (4), 1879–1907.
32.
EscalasJennifer EdsonBettmanJames R. (2005), “Self-Construal, Reference Groups, and Brand Meaning,” Journal of Consumer Research, 32 (3), 378–89.
FarronatoChiaraFradkinAndrey (2018), “The Welfare Effects of Peer Entry in the Accommodation Market: The Case of Airbnb,” Working Paper No. 24361, National Bureau of Economic Research.
36.
FerraroRosellinaEscalasJennifer EdsonBettmanJames R. (2011), “Our Possessions, Our Selves: Domains of Self-Worth and the Possession–Self Link,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 21 (2), 169–77.
37.
FigueiredoBernardoScarabotoDaiane (2016), “The Systemic Creation of Value Through Circulation in Collaborative Consumer Networks,” Journal of Consumer Research, 43 (4), 509–33.
38.
FindlayIsobel M. (2018), “Precursors to the Sharing Economy: Cooperatives,” in The Rise of the Sharing Economy: Exploring the Challenges and Opportunities of Collaborative Consumption, AlbinssonPia A.Yasanthi PereraB., eds. Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger, 9–28.
39.
FournierSusan (1998), “Consumers and Their Brands: Developing Relationship Theory in Consumer Research,” Journal of Consumer Research, 24 (4), 343–73.
40.
FrankeNikolausSchreierMartinKaiserUlrike (2010), “The ‘I Designed It Myself’ Effect in Mass Customization,” Management Science, 56 (1), 125–40.
41.
FritzeMartin P.MarchandAndréEisingerichAndreas B.BenkensteinMartin (2020), “Access-Based Services as Substitutes for Material Possessions: The Role of Psychological Ownership,” Journal of Service Research, 23 (3), 368–85.
42.
FuchsChristophPrandelliEmanuelaSchreierMartin (2010), “The Psychological Effects of Empowerment Strategies on Consumers’ Product Demand,” Journal of Marketing, 74 (1), 65–79.
43.
FurbyLita (1991), “Understanding the Psychology of Possession and Ownership: A Personal Memoir and an Appraisal of Our Progress,” Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 6 (6), 457–63.
44.
GanesanShankarGeorgeMorrisJapSandyPalmatierRobert W.WeitzBarton (2009), “Supply Chain Management and Retailer Performance: Emerging Trends, Issues, and Implications for Research and Practice,” Journal of Retailing, 85 (1), 84–94.
45.
GawronskiBertramBodenhausenGalen V.BeckerAndrew P. (2007), “I Like It, Because I Like Myself: Associative Self-Anchoring and Post-Decisional Change of Implicit Evaluations,” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43 (2), 221–32.
46.
GilovichThomasKumarAmit (2015), “We’ll Always Have Paris: The Hedonic Payoff from Experiential and Material Investments,” Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 51, 147–87.
47.
GilovichThomasKumarAmitJampolLily (2015), “A Wonderful Life: Experiential Consumption and the Pursuit of Happiness,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 25 (1), 152–65.
48.
GoldfarbAviGreensteinShane M.TuckerCatherine E. (2015), Economic Analysis of the Digital Economy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
49.
GraysonKentMartinecRadan (2004), “Consumer Perceptions of Iconicity and Indexicality and Their Influence on Assessments of Authentic Market Offerings,” Journal of Consumer Research, 31 (2), 296–312.
50.
GraysonKentShulmanDavid (2000), “Indexicality and the Verification Function of Irreplaceable Possessions: A Semiotic Analysis,” Journal of Consumer Research, 27 (1), 17–30.
51.
GriffithsMerlyn A.GillyMary C. (2012), “Dibs! Customer Territorial Behaviors,” Journal of Service Research, 15(2), 131–49.
52.
HaaseMichaelaKleinaltenkampMichael (2011), “Property Rights Design and Market Process: Implications for Market Theory, Marketing Theory, and SD Logic,” Journal of Macromarketing, 31 (2), 148–59.
53.
HamiltonRyanFerraroRosellinaHawsKelly L.MukhopadhyayAnirban (2021), “Traveling with Companions: The Social Customer Journey,” Journal of Marketing, 85 (1), 68–92.
54.
HardinGarrett (1968), “The Tragedy of the Commons,” Science, 162 (3859), 1243–48.
55.
HeDanielMelumadShiriPhamMichel Tuan (2018), “The Pleasure of Assessing and Expressing Our Likes and Dislikes,” Journal of Consumer Research, 46 (3), 545–63.
56.
HelmSabrina V.LigonVictoriaStovallTonyRiperSilvia Van (2018), “Consumer Interpretations of Digital Ownership in the Book Market,” Electronic Markets, 28 (2), 177–89.
57.
HodderIan (2012), Entangled: An Archaeology of the Relationships Between Humans and Things. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
58.
HonoréAnthony M. (1961), “Ownership,” in Oxford Essays in Jurisprudence. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 107–147.
59.
HuangYunhuiWangLeiShiJunqi (2009), “When Do Objects Become More Attractive? The Individual and Interactive Effects of Choice and Ownership on Object Evaluation,” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35 (6), 713–22.
KarahannaElenaXuSean XinZhangNan (2015), “Psychological Ownership Motivation and Use of Social Media,” Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 23 (2), 185–207.
62.
KarakayaliNedimKostemBurcGalipIdil (2018), “Recommendation Systems as Technologies of the Self: Algorithmic Control and the Formation of Music Taste,” Theory, Culture & Society, 35 (2), 3–24.
63.
KeinanAnatKivetzRan (2010), “Productivity Orientation and the Consumption of Collectable Experiences,” Journal of Consumer Research, 37 (6), 935–50.
64.
KimJungkeun (2017), “The Ownership Distance Effect: The Impact of Traces Left by Previous Owners on the Evaluation of Used Goods,” Marketing Letters, 28 (4), 591–605.
65.
KirkColleen P.PeckJoannSwainScott D. (2018), “Property Lines in the Mind: Consumers’ Psychological Ownership and Their Territorial Responses,” Journal of Consumer Research, 45 (1), 148–68.
66.
KoivistoJonnaHamariJuho (2019), “The Rise of Motivational Information Systems: A Review of Gamification Research,” International Journal of Information Management, 45, 191–210.
67.
KuehnKathleen M (2016), “Branding the Self on Yelp: Consumer Reviewing as Image Entrepreneurship,” Social Media + Society, 2 (4), 1–9.
68.
LambertonCait (2016), “Collaborative Consumption: A Goal-Based Framework,” Current Opinion in Psychology, 10, 55–9.
69.
LambertonCait P.RoseRandall L. (2012), “When Is Ours Better Than Mine? A Framework for Understanding and Altering Participation in Commercial Sharing Systems,” Journal of Marketing, 76 (4), 109–25.
70.
LernerJennifer S.SmallDeborah A.LoewensteinGeorge (2004), “Heart Strings and Purse Strings: Carryover Effects of Emotions on Economic Decisions,” Psychological Science, 15 (5), 337–41.
71.
LiCharis X.LutzRichard J. (2019), “Object History Value in the Sharing Economy,” in Handbook of the Sharing Economy, BelkRussell W.EckhardtGiana M.BardhiFleura, eds. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
72.
ListJohn A. (2003), “Does Market Experience Eliminate Market Anomalies?” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118 (1), 41–71.
73.
LoewensteinGeorgeIssacharoffSamuel (1994), “Source Dependence in the Valuation of Objects,” Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 7 (3), 157–68.
74.
LurieNicholas H.MasonCharlotte H. (2007), “Visual Representation: Implications for Decision Making,” Journal of Marketing, 71 (1), 160–77.
75.
MadduxWilliam W.YangHaiyangFalkCarlAdamHajoAdairWendiEndoYumi, et al. (2010), “For Whom Is Parting with Possessions More Painful? Cultural Differences in the Endowment Effect,” Psychological Science, 21 (12), 1910–17.
76.
MarthewsAlexTuckerCatherine E. (2017), “Government Surveillance and Internet Search Behavior,” working paper, doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2412564.
77.
MartinKelly D.BorahAbhishekPalmatierRobert W. (2017), “Data Privacy: Effects on Customer and Firm Performance,” Journal of Marketing, 81 (1), 36–58.
78.
MasonElizabeth C.RichardsonRick (2012), “Treating Disgust in Anxiety Disorders,” Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 19 (2), 180–94.
79.
MatzlerKurtVeiderViktoriaKathanWolfgang (2015), “Adapting to the Sharing Economy,” MIT Sloan Management Review, 56 (2), 71–77.
80.
McEwanStephaniePesowskiMadison L.FriedmanOri (2016), “Identical but Not Interchangeable: Preschoolers View Owned Objects as Non-Fungible,” Cognition, 146, 16–21.
81.
MelumadShiriPhamMichel Tuan (2020), “The Smartphone as a Pacifying Technology,” Journal of Consumer Research, 47 (2), 237–55.
MishraGouri S.ClewlowRegina R.MokhtarianPatricia L.WidamanKeith F. (2015), “The Effect of Carsharing on Vehicle Holdings and Travel Behavior: A Propensity Score and Causal Mediation Analysis of the San Francisco Bay Area,” Research in Transportation Economics, 52, 46–55.
84.
MolesworthMikeWatkinsRebeccaDenegri-KnottJanice (2016), “Possession Work on Hosted Digital Consumption Objects as Consumer Ensnarement.” Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, 1 (2), 246–61.
85.
MorewedgeCarey K. (2020), “Psychological Ownership: Implicit and Explicit,” working paper.
86.
MorewedgeCarey K.GiblinColleen E. (2015), “Explanations of the Endowment Effect: An Integrative Review,” Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19 (6), 339–48.
87.
MorewedgeCarey K.GrayKurtWegnerDaniel M. (2010), “Perish the Forethought: Premeditation Engenders Misperceptions of Personal Control,” in Self-Control in Brain, Mind, and Society, HassinRan R.OchsnerKevin N.TropeYaacov, eds. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 260–78.
88.
MorewedgeCarey K.ShuLisa L.GilbertDaniel T.WilsonTimothy D. (2009), “Bad Riddance or Good Rubbish? Ownership and Not Loss Aversion Causes the Endowment Effect,” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45 (4), 947–51.
89.
NashJane GradwohlRosenthalRobert A. (2014), “An Investigation of the Endowment Effect in the Context of a College Housing Lottery,” Journal of Economic Psychology, 42, 74–82.
NortonMichael I.MochonDanielArielyDan (2012), “The IKEA Effect: When Labor Leads to Love,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 22 (3), 453–60.
92.
OramJon H. (1997), “The Costs of Confusion in Cyberspace,” Yale Law Journal, 107 (3), 869–74.
93.
PalmatierRobert. W.MartinKelly D. (2018), An Intelligent Marketer’s Guide to Data Privacy, working draft of forthcoming book, in press, Palgrave Macmillan.
94.
ParkC. WhanMacInnisDeborah J.PriesterJoseph (2008), Brand Attachment: Construct, Consequences and Causes. Boston: Now Publishers.
95.
PeckJoannShuSuzanne B. (2009), “The Effect of Mere Touch on Perceived Ownership,” Journal of Consumer Research, 36 (3), 434–47.
96.
PeckJoannShuSuzanne B. (2018), Psychological Ownership and Consumer Behavior. New York: Springer Publishing.
97.
PierceJon L.JussilaIiro (2010), “Collective Psychological Ownership Within the Work and Organizational Context: Construct Introduction and Elaboration,” Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31 (6), 810–34.
98.
PierceJon L.RubenfeldStephen A.MorganSusan (1991), “Employee Ownership: A Conceptual Model of Process and Effects,” Academy of Management Review, 16 (1), 121–44.
RebJochenConnollyTerry (2007), “Possession, Feelings of Ownership, and the Endowment Effect,” Judgment and Decision Making, 2 (2), 107–14.
101.
RifkinJeremy (2001), The Age of Access: How the Shift from Ownership to Access is Transforming Modern Life. New York: Penguin Business.
102.
RitzerGeorgeJurgensonNathan (2010), “Production, Consumption, Prosumption: The Nature of Capitalism in the Age of the Digital ‘Prosumer’,” Journal of Consumer Culture, 10 (1), 13–36.
103.
SchmittBernd H. (2010), Customer Experience Management: A Revolutionary Approach to Connecting with your Customers. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
SchultzP. WesleyNolanJessica M.CialdiniRobert B.GoldsteinNoah J.GriskeviciusVladas (2007), “The Constructive, Destructive, and Reconstructive Power of Social Norms,” Psychological Science, 18 (5), 429–34.
106.
ShawAlexLiVivianOlsonKristina R. (2012), “Children Apply Principles of Physical Ownership to Ideas,” Cognitive Science, 36 (8), 1383–1403.
107.
ShuSuzanne B.PeckJoann (2011), “Psychological Ownership and Affective Reaction: Emotional Attachment Process Variables and the Endowment Effect,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 21 (4), 439–52.
108.
SiddiquiShakeelTurleyDarach (2006),”Extending the Self in a Virtual World,” in Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 33, PechmannConniePriceLinda, eds. Duluth, MN: Association for Consumer Research, 647–48.
109.
SinclairGaryTinsonJulie (2017), “Psychological Ownership and Music Streaming Consumption,” Journal of Business Research, 71, 1–9.
110.
StrahilevitzMichal A.LoewensteinGeorge (1998), “The Effect of Ownership History on the Valuation of Objects,” Journal of Consumer Research, 25 (3), 276–89.
111.
SunNaRauPatrick Pei-LuenMaLiang (2014), “Understanding Lurkers in Online Communities: A Literature Review,” Computers in Human Behavior, 38, 110–17.
112.
TadelisSteven (2016), “Reputation and Feedback Systems in Online Platform Markets,” Annual Review of Economics, 8, 321–40.
113.
TanisMartin (2008), “Health-Related On-Line Forums: What’s the Big Attraction?” Journal of Health Communication, 13 (7), 698–714.
ThomsonMatthewMacInnisDeborah J.ParkWhan C. (2015), “The Ties That Bind: Measuring the Strength of Consumers’ Emotional Attachments to Brands,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 15 (1), 77–91.
116.
TrudelRemiArgoJennifer J.MengMatthew D.. (2016), “The Recycled Self: Consumers’ Disposal Decisions of Identity-Linked Products,” Journal of Consumer Research, 43 (2), 246–64.
117.
TsirosMichaelMittalVikasRossWilliam T.Jr. (2004), “The Role of Attributions in Customer Satisfaction: A Reexamination,” Journal of Consumer Research, 31 (2), 476–83.
VandewalleDonDyneLinn VanKostovaTatiana (1995), “Psychological Ownership: An Empirical Examination of Its Consequences,” Group & Organization Management, 20 (2), 210–26.
120.
VerkuytenMaykelMartinovicBorja (2017), “Collective Psychological Ownership and Intergroup Relations,” Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12 (6), 1021–39.
121.
WallendorfMelanieArnouldEric J. (1988), “‘My Favorite Things’: A Cross-Cultural Inquiry into Object Attachment, Possessiveness, and Social Linkage,” Journal of Consumer Research, 14 (4), 531–47.
122.
WardAdrian F. (2013), “Supernormal: How the Internet Is Changing Our Memories and Our Minds,” Psychological Inquiry, 24 (4), 341–48.
123.
WatkinsRebecca D.Denegri-KnottJaniceMolesworthMike (2016), “The Relationship Between Ownership and Possession: Observations from the Context of Digital Virtual Goods,” Journal of Marketing Management, 32 (1/2), 44–70.
124.
WedelMichelKannanP.K. (2016), “Marketing Analytics for Data-Rich Environments,” Journal of Marketing, 80 (6), 97–121.
125.
WeissLiadJoharGita Venkataramani (2016), “Products as Self-Evaluation Standards: When Owned and Unowned Products Have Opposite Effects on Self-Judgment,” Journal of Consumer Research, 42 (6), 915–30.
126.
YeYangGawronskiBertram (2016), “When Possessions become Part of the Self: Ownership and Implicit Self-Object Linking,” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 64, 72–87.
127.
ZaubermanGalRatnerRebecca K.KimKyu B. (2008), “Memories as Assets: Strategic Memory Protection in Choice over Time,” Journal of Consumer Research, 35 (5), 715–28.
128.
ZyskindGuyNathanOzPentlandAlex (2015), “Decentralizing Privacy: Using Blockchain to Protect Personal Data,” 2015 IEEE Security and Privacy Workshops, 180–84.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
