Firms often attribute their service employees’ competent performance to either dedicated effort or natural talent. However, it is unclear how such practices affect customer evaluations of service employees and customer outcomes. Moreover, prior work has primarily examined attributions of one’s own performance, providing little insight on the impact of attributions of others’ performance. Drawing on research regarding the warmth–competence framework and performance attributions, the current research proposes and finds that consumers expect a more communal-oriented and less exchange-oriented relationship when a service employee’s competent performance is attributed to dedicated effort rather than natural talent, as effort (vs. talent) attribution leads consumers to perceive the employee as warmer. The authors further propose customer helping behaviors as downstream consequences of relationship expectations, finding that effort (vs. talent) attribution is more likely to induce customers’ word-of-mouth and idea provision behaviors. The findings enrich existing literature by identifying performance attributions as a managerially meaningful antecedent of relationship expectations and offer practical guidance on how marketers can influence consumers’ relationship expectations and helping behaviors.
AakerJenniferVohsKathleen D.MogilnerCassie (2010), “Nonprofits Are Seen as Warm and For-Profits as Competent: Firm Stereotypes Matter,” Journal of Consumer Research, 37 (2), 224–37.
2.
AbeleAndrea E.WojciszkeBogdan (2014), “Communal and Agentic Content in Social Cognition: A Dual Perspective Model,” Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 50, 195–255.
3.
AggarwalPankaj (2004), “The Effects of Brand Relationship Norms on Consumer Attitudes and Behavior,” Journal of Consumer Research, 31 (1), 87–101.
4.
AggarwalPankajLawSharmistha (2005), “Role of Relationship Norms in Processing Brand Information,” Journal of Consumer Research, 32 (3), 453–64.
5.
AggarwalPankajZhangMeng (2006), “The Moderating Effect of Relationship Norm Salience on Consumers’ Loss Aversion,” Journal of Consumer Research, 33 (3), 413–19.
6.
BabićRosarioAnaSotgiuFrancescaDeValckKristineBijmoltTammo H.A. (2016), “The Effect of Electronic Word of Mouth on Sales: A Meta-Analytic Review of Platform, Product, and Metric Factors,” Journal of Marketing Research, 53 (3), 297–318.
7.
BaudsonTanja GabrielePreckelFranzis (2013), “Teachers’ Implicit Personality Theories About the Gifted: An Experimental Approach,” School Psychology Quarterly, 28 (1), 37–46.
8.
BettencourtLance A. (1997), “Customer Voluntary Performance: Customers as Partners in Service Delivery,” Journal of Retailing, 73 (3), 383–406.
9.
BitnerMary Jo (1995), “Building Service Relationships: It’s All About Promises,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 23 (4), 246–51.
10.
BoveLiliana L.PervanSimon J.BeattySharon E.ShiuEdward (2009), “Service Worker Role in Encouraging Customer Organizational Citizenship Behaviors,” Journal of Business Research, 62 (7), 698–705.
11.
BrownChristina M.TroyNicole S.JobsonKatie R.LinkJennifer K. (2018), “Contextual and Personal Determinants of Preferring Success Attributed to Natural Talent or Striving,” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 78, 134–47.
12.
ChangWoojungTaylorSteven A. (2016), “The Effectiveness of Customer Participation in New Product Development: A Meta-Analysis,” Journal of Marketing, 80 (1), 47–64.
13.
ClarkMargaret S.MillsJudson (1993), “The Difference Between Communal and Exchange Relationships: What It Is and Is Not,” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19 (6), 684–91.
14.
ConsiglioIreneAngelisMatteo DeCostabileMichele (2018), “The Effect of Social Density on Word of Mouth,” Journal of Consumer Research, 45 (3), 511–28.
15.
CoxeStefanyWestStephen G.AikenLeona S. (2009), “The Analysis of Count Data: A Gentle Introduction to Poisson Regression and Its Alternatives,” Journal of Personality Assessment, 91 (2), 121–36.
16.
DweckCarol S. (2000), Self-Theories: Their Role in Motivation, Personality and Development. Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
17.
DweckCarol S.LeggettEllen L. (1988), “A Social-Cognitive Approach to Motivation and Personality,” Psychological Review, 95 (2), 256–73.
18.
EmersonKatherine T.U.MurphyMary C. (2015), “A Company I Can Trust? Organizational Lay Theories Moderate Stereotype Threat for Women,” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41 (2), 295–307.
19.
FiskeSusan T.CuddyAmy J.C.GlickPeterXuJun (2002), “A Model of (Often Mixed) Stereotype Content: Competence and Warmth Respectively Follow from Perceived Status and Competition,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82 (6), 878–902.
20.
FornellClaesLarckerDavid F. (1981), “Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error: Algebra and Statistics,” Journal of Marketing Research, 18 (3), 382–88.
21.
FournierSusan (1998), “Consumers and Their Brands: Developing Relationship Theory in Consumer Research,” Journal of Consumer Research, 24 (4), 343–53.
GarmaRomanaBoveLiliana L. (2011), “Contributing to Well-Being: Customer Citizenship Behaviors Directed to Service Personnel,” Journal of Strategic Marketing, 19 (7), 633–49.
GershonRachelCryderCynthia (2018), “Goods Donations Increase Charitable Credit for Low-Warmth Donors,” Journal of Consumer Research, 45 (2), 451–69.
26.
GrothMarkus (2005), “Customers as Good Soldiers: Examining Citizenship Behaviors in Internet Service Deliveries,” Journal of Management, 31 (1), 7–27.
27.
HarrisLasana T.FiskeSusan T. (2006), “Dehumanizing the Lowest of the Low—Neuroimaging Responses to Extreme Out-Groups,” Psychological Science, 17 (10), 847–53.
28.
HaslamNick (2006), “Dehumanization: An Integrative Review,” Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10 (3), 252–64.
29.
HaslamNickLoughnanSteve (2014), “Dehumanization and Infrahumanization,” Annual Review of Psychology, 65, 399−423.
30.
HongHuang-YaoLin-SieglerXiaodong (2012), “How Learning About Scientists’ Struggles Influences Students’ Interest and Learning in Physics,” Journal of Educational Psychology, 104 (2), 469–84.
31.
HongYing-YiChiuChi-YueDweckCarol S.LinDerrick M.-S.WanWendy (1999), “Implicit Theories, Attributions, and Coping: A Meaning System Approach,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77 (3), 588−99.
32.
JuddCharles M.James-HawkinsLaurieYzerbytVincentKashimaYoshihisa (2005), “Fundamental Dimensions of Social Judgment: Understanding the Relations Between Judgments of Competence and Warmth,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89 (6), 899–913.
33.
KervynNicolasFiskeSusan T.MaloneChris (2012), “Brands as Intentional Agents Framework: How Perceived Intentions and Ability Can Map Brand Perception,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 22 (2), 166–76.
34.
KingGaryZengLangche (2001), “Logistic Regression in Rare Events Data,” Political Analysis, 9 (2), 137–63.
35.
KleinNadavEdO’Brien (2017), “The Power and Limits of Personal Change: When a Bad Past Does (and Does Not) Inspire in the Present,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113 (2), 210–29.
36.
KwakHyokjinPuzakovaMarinaRoceretoJoseph F. (2015), “Better Not Smile at the Price: The Differential Role of Brand Anthropomorphization on Perceived Price Fairness,” Journal of Marketing, 79 (4), 56–76.
37.
LeyensJacques-PhilippePaladinoPaola M.Rodriguez-TorresRamonVaesJeroenDemoulinStéphanieRodriguez-PerezArmando, et al. (2000), “The Emotional Side of Prejudice: The Attribution of Secondary Emotions to Ingroups and Outgroups,” Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4 (2), 186–97.
38.
Lin-SieglerXiaodongAhnJanet N.ChenJondouFangFu-Fen AnnyLuna-LuceroMyra (2016), “Even Einstein Struggled: Effects of Learning About Great Scientists’ Struggles on High School Students’ Motivation to Learn Science,” Journal of Educational Psychology, 108 (3), 314–28.
39.
MacInnisDeborah J.FolkesValerie S. (2017), “Humanizing Brands: When Brands Seem to Be Like Me, Part of Me, and in a Relationship with Me,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 27 (3), 355–74.
40.
MathurPragyaBlockLaurenOzgeYucel-Aybat (2014), “The Effects of Goal Progress Cues: An Implicit Theory Perspective,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 24 (4), 484–96.
41.
McGrawA. PeterSchwartzJanet A.TetlockPhilip E. (2012), “From the Commercial to the Communal: Reframing Taboo Trade-Offs in Religious and Pharmaceutical Marketing,” Journal of Consumer Research, 39 (1), 157–73.
42.
MurphyMary C.DweckCarol S. (2016), “Mindsets Shape Consumer Behavior,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 26 (1), 127–36.
43.
PerssonRoland S. (2007), “The Myth of the Antisocial Genius: A Survey Study of the Socio-Emotional Aspects of High-IQ Individuals,” Gifted and Talented International, 22 (2), 19−34.
44.
PlassmannHilkeMormannMilica (2017), “An Interdisciplinary Lens on Consciousness: The Consciousness Continuum and How to (Not) Study It in the Brain and the Gut, A Commentary on Williams and Poehlman,” Journal of Consumer Research44 (2), 258–65.
45.
PreacherKristopher J.HayesAndrew F. (2008), “Asymptotic and Resampling Strategies for Assessing and Comparing Indirect Effects in Multiple Mediator Models,” Behavior Research Methods, 40 (3), 879–91.
46.
RosenbergSeymourNelsonCarnotVivekananthanP.S. (1968), “A Multidimensional Approach to the Structure of Personality Impressions,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9 (4), 283–94.
47.
SchroederJulianaFishbachAyelet (2015), “The ‘Empty Vessel’ Physician: Physicians’ Instrumentality Makes Them Seem Personally Empty,” Social Psychological and Personality Science, 6 (8), 940−49.
48.
ScottMaura L.MendeMartinBoltonLisa E. (2013), “Judging the Book by Its Cover? How Consumers Decode Conspicuous Consumption Cues in Buyer–Seller Relationships,” Journal of Marketing Research, 50 (3), 334–47.
49.
SpalekThomas M.HammadSherief (2005), “The Left-to-Right Bias in Inhibition of Return is Due to the Direction of Reading,” Psychological Science, 16 (1), 15–18.
50.
SpencerSteven J.ZannaMark P.FongGeoffrey T. (2005), “Establishing a Causal Chain: Why Experiments Are Often More Effective Than Mediational Analyses in Examining Psychological Processes,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89 (6), 845–51.
51.
SuitnerCaterinaMaassAnne (2008), “The Role of Valence in the Perception of Agency and Communion,” European Journal of Social Psychology, 38 (7), 1073–82.
52.
TsayChia-Jung (2016), “Privileging Naturals over Strivers: The Costs of the Naturalness Bias,” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 42 (1), 40–53.
53.
TsayChia-JungBanajiMahzarin R. (2011), “Naturals and Strivers: Preferences and Beliefs About Sources of Achievement,” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47 (2), 460–65.
54.
WanLisa C.HuiMichael K.WyerRobert S.Jr. (2011), “The Role of Relationship Norms in Responses to Service Failures,” Journal of Consumer Research, 38 (2), 260–77.
55.
WangChao-HungHsuLi-ChangFangShyh-Rong (2009), “Constructing a Relationship-Based Brand Equity Model,” Service Business, 3, 275–92.
56.
WeinerBernard (1972), “Attribution Theory, Achievement Motivation, and the Educational Process,” Review of Educational Research, 42 (2), 203–15.
57.
WeinerBernard (2005), “Motivation from an Attribution Perspective and the Social Psychology of Perceived Competence,” in Handbook of Competence and Motivation, ElliotAndrew J.DweckCarol S., eds. New York: Guilford Publications.
58.
YzerbytVincentKervynNicolasJuddCharles M. (2008), “Compensation Versus Halo: The Unique Relations Between the Fundamental Dimensions of Social Judgment,” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34 (8), 1110–23.
59.
YzerbytVincentProvostValerieCorneilleOlivier (2005), “Not Competent but Warm…Really? Compensatory Stereotypes in the French-Speaking World,” Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 8 (3), 291–308.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
