In recent years, many news providers have begun monetizing online content through paywalls. While the premise behind paywalls is that the subscription revenue can be a new source of income, the externalities that might arise from this pricing change are unclear. The authors study two potential externalities of newspaper paywalls: (1) the effect of a paywall on the engagement of its online reader base and (2) the spillover effect on the print version of the newspaper. The engagement effect considers how the paywall altered the various engagement metrics among light and heavy readers of online news. The spillover effect is likely to arise if readers view print and online versions of a newspaper as substitutes, implying that increasing the price of the latter is likely to increase the demand for the former. Moreover, many newspaper paywalls offer bundles wherein print subscribers are provided free access to the online newspaper. Therefore, the value that a reader derives from the print subscription could be higher after the erection of the paywall. As a result, paywalls are likely to have a positive spillover effect on print subscription and, consequently, circulation. The authors document the sizes of the two externalities for the New York Times paywall and compare them with the direct subscription revenue generated. They comment on implications for newspapers and online content providers that are seeking mechanisms to monetize digital content.
AbadieAlbertoDiamondAlexisHainmuellerJens (2010), “Synthetic Control Methods for Comparative Case Studies: Estimating the Effect of California’s Tobacco Control Program,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 105 (490), 493–505.
2.
AbadieAlbertoGardeazabalJavier (2003), “The Economic Costs of Conflict: A Case Study of the Basque Country,” American Economic Review, 93 (1), 113–32.
3.
AtheySusanImbensGuido W. (2017), “The State of Applied Econometrics: Causality and Policy Evaluation,” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 31 (2), 3–32.
4.
BaiJushan (2009), “Panel Data Models with Interactive Fixed Effects,” Econometrica, 77 (4), 1229–79.
GabszewiczJean J.GarellaP.G.SonnacNathalie (2007), “Newspapers’ Market Shares and the Theory of the Circulation Spiral,” Information Economics & Policy, 19 (3/4), 405–13.
16.
GoldfarbAviTuckerCatherine E. (2011), “Advertising Bans and the Substitutability of Online and Offline Advertising,” Journal of Marketing Research, 48 (2), 207–27.
17.
GoldfarbAviTuckerCatherine E. (2014), “Conducting Research with Quasi-Experiments: A Guide for Marketers,” SSRN, http://www.ssrn.com/abstract=2420920
IngramMatthew (2015), “New York Times Ad Revenue Slides, but Digital Subs and Native Ads Are Growing,” Fortune(October 30), http://fortune.com/2015/10/30/new-york-times/.
OhHyelimAnimeshAnimeshPinsonneaultAlain (2015), “Free Versus For-a-Fee: The Impact of a Paywall on the Pattern and Effectiveness of Word-of-Mouth via Social Media,” MIS Quarterly, 40 (1), 31–56.
Van NieropJ.E.M. (Erjen)LeeflangPeter S.H.TeerlingMarije L.HuizinghEelko K.R.E. (2011), “The Impact of the Introduction and Use of an Informational Website on Offline Customer Buying Behavior,” International Journal of Research in Marketing, 28 (2), 155–65.
XuYixing (2017), “Generalized Synthetic Control Method: Causal Inference with Interactive Fixed Effects Models,” Political Analysis, 25 (1), 57–76.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
