Numerous studies have found that visual deficits are associated with dyslexia. The prevailing theory regarding this association is that dyslexia is the result of a deficit in the magnocellular system (earlier called the transient system) in the visual pathway. An essential assumption of this theory is that the parvocellular system (formerly called the sustained system) is suppressed by the magnocellular system at the time of saccadic eye movements. This assumption is examined on the basis of published studies of saccadic suppression. The evidence from six studies indicates quite unequivocally that the magnocellular system, not the parvocellular system, is suppressed during saccadic eye movements. It seems, therefore, that an essential premise of the magnocellular deficit theory of dyslexia is incorrect.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Anand, S., & Bridgeman, B. (1995). Chromatic and luminance cues about motion during fixation and saccadic eye movements. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, 36(Supplement), 356.
2.
Borsting, E., Ridder, W.H., Dudeck, K., Kelley, C., Matsui, L., & Motoyama, J. (1996) The presence of a magnocellular defect depends on the type of dyslexia. Vision Research,36, 1047-1053.
3.
Breitmeyer, B.G. (1993). The roles of sustained (P) and transient (M) channels in reading and reading disability. In S. F. Wright & R. Groner (Eds.), Facets of dyslexia and its remediation (pp. 13-31). Amsterdam : Elsevier.
4.
Bridgeman, B., & Macknik, S.L. (1995). Saccadic suppression relies on luminance information . Psychological Research, 58, 163-168.
5.
Burr, D.C., Holt, J., Johnstone, J.R., & Ross, J. (1982). Selective depression of motion sensitivity during saccades. Journal of Physiology (London ), 333, 1-15.
6.
Burr, D.C., Morrone, M.C., & Ross, J. (1994). Selective suppression of the magnocellular visual pathway during saccadic eye movements. Nature, 371, 511-513.
7.
Cornsweet, T.N. (1970). Visual perception. New York : Academic Press.
8.
De Valois, R.L., & De Valois, K.K. (1988). Spatial vision. New York: Oxford University Press.
9.
Gross-Glenn, K., Skottun, B.C., Glenn, W., Kushch, A., Lingua, R., Dunbar, M., Jallad, B., Lubs, H.A., Levin, B., Rabin, M., Parke, L.A., & Duara, R. (1995). Contrast sensitivity in dyslexia. Visual Neuroscience, 12, 153-163.
10.
Hogben, J.H. (1997). How does a visual transient deficit affect reading? In C. Hulme & M. Snowling (Eds.), Dyslexia: Biology, cognition and intervention (pp. 59-71). London: Whurr.
11.
Livingstone, M., & Hubel, D. (1988). Segregation of form, color, movement, and depth: Anatomy, physiology, and perception. Science, 240, 740-749.
12.
Livingstone, M.S., Rosen, G.D., Drislane, F.W., & Galaburda, A.M. (1991). Physiological and anatomical evidence for a magnocellular defect in developmental dyslexia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 88, 7943-7947.
13.
Lovegrove, W.J., Garzia, R.P., & Nicholson, S.B. (1990). Experimental evidence for a transient system deficit in specific reading disability. American Optometric Association Journal,61, 137-146.
14.
Lovegrove, W., Martin, F., Bowling, A., Blackwood, M., Badcock, D., & Paxton, S. (1982). Contrast sensitivity functions and specific reading disability. Neuropsychologia,20, 309-315.
15.
Lovegrove, W., Martin, F., & Slaghuis, W. (1986). A theoretical and experimental case for a visual deficit in specific reading disability. Cognitive Neuropsychology,3, 225-267.
16.
Matin, E. (1974). Saccadic suppression: A review and an analysis . Psychological Bulletin,81, 899-917.
17.
Merigan, W.H., & Maunsell, J.H.R. (1993). How parallel are the primate visual pathways ?Annual Review of Neuroscience,16, 369-402.
18.
Schiller, P.H., & Logothetis, N.K. (1990). The color-opponent and broad-band channels of the primate visual system. Trends in Neuroscience, 13, 392-398.
19.
Shapley, R. (1990). Visual sensitivity and parallel retinocortical channels. Annual Review ofPsychology, 41, 635-658.
20.
Shapley, R., & Perry, V.H. (1986). Cat and monkey retinal ganglion cells and their visual functional roles. Trends in Neuroscience, 9, 229-235.
21.
Skottun, B.C. (1997a). Some remarks on the magnocellular deficit theory of dyslexia. Vision Research,37, 965-966.
22.
Skottun, B.C. (1997b). The magnocellular deficit theory of dyslexia . Trends in Neuroscience, 20, 397-398.
Uchikawa, K., & Sato, M. (1995). Saccadic suppression of achromatic and chromatic responses measured by increment-threshold spectral sensitivity. Journal of the Optical Society ofAmerica A, 12, 661-666.
26.
Victor, J.D., Conte, M.M., Burton, L., & Nass, R.D. (1993). Visual evoked potentials in dyslexics and normals: Failure to find a difference in transient or steady-state responses. Visual Neuroscience, 10, 939-946.
27.
Volkman, F.C. (1986). Human visual suppression. Vision Research,26, 1401-1416.
