Student use of pop-up text windows that support or extend information found in a high school social studies text provides a detailed look into the instructional effectiveness of a set of hypermedia study guides. Twenty-five students, 19 male and 6 female, with a mean age of 14.6 years participated in this study. Thirteen were students with learning disabilities and 12 were remedial students. Findings from the study indicate that hypertext (text-only) support provides adequate reinforcement to move remedial students and students with learning disabilities toward continued, unprompted use of a hypermedia study guide, and that short-term and long-term retention of information can be expected from text-only information support. Students who had access to the hypermedia study guides exhibited better information retention than students who did not use the hypermedia study guides.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Alexander, P. A., Kulikowich, J. M., & Jetton, T. L. (1994). The role of subject-matter knowledge and interest in the processing of linear and nonlinear texts. Review of Educational Research, 64(2), 201–252.
2.
Anderson, T. H., & Armbruster, B. B. (1984). Content area textbooks. In R. C. Anderson, J. Osborn, & R. J. Tierney (Eds.), Learning to read in American schools (pp. 193–226). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
3.
Apple Computer. (1989). HyperCard 2.0 for the Macintosh computer [Computer program]. Cupertino, CA: Author.
4.
Armbruster, B. B., & Anderson, T. H. (1988). On selecting “considerate” content area textbooks. Remedial and Special Education, 9, 47–52.
5.
Becker, D. A., & Dwyer, M. M. (1994). Using hypermedia to provide learner control. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 3(2), 155–171.
6.
Boone, R., Higgins, K., Falba, C., & Langley, W. (1993). Cooperative text: Reading and writing in a hypermedia environment. LD Forum, 19(1), 28–37.
7.
Carnine, D., Kameenui, E., & Dixon, B. (1993). NCITE's role in informing publishers and developers. The NCITE Network, 1(1), 1–8.
8.
Chapman, W. (1993). Color coding and the interactivity of multimedia. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 2(1), 3–23.
9.
Cohen, R. (1993, October). Browsers get BookWorm for Mac. MacWeek.
10.
Gillet, J. W., & Temple, C. (1994). Understanding reading problems: Assessment and instruction.New York: HarperCollins.
11.
Grimm, P. (1983). Attention, perception, and memory: Screen design for CBT. Data Training, 3(1), 41–42.
12.
Harris, J. B., & Grandgenett, N. F. (1993). A developmental sequence of children's semantic relationships: Implications for the design of interactive hypermedia materials. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 2(1), 83–101.
13.
Heines, J. M. (1983). Screen design strategies for computer aided instruction.Bedford, MA: Digital Press.
14.
Lee, Y. B., & Lehman, J. D. (1993). Instructional cuing in hypermedia: A study with active and passive learners. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 2(1), 25–37.
15.
Lorch, R. F., & Lorch, E. P. (1986). On-line processing of summary and importance signals in reading. Discourse Processes, 9, 489–496.
16.
Lovitt, T. C., & Horton, S. V. (1994). Strategies for adapting science textbooks for youth with learning disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 15, 105–116.
17.
Macmillan/McGraw-Hill. (1994). Interactive multimedia literature program.New York: Author.
18.
Mastropieri, M. A., & Scruggs, T. E. (1994). Effective instruction for special education.Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
19.
Mayer, M. (1992). Just grandma and me[Computer program]. Novato, CA: Broderbund Software.
20.
Meyer, B. J. F. (1979). A selected review and discussion of basic research on prose comprehension (Prose Learning Series: Research Report No. 4). Tempe: Arizona State University.
21.
Nagy, W. (1988). Teaching vocabulary to improve reading comprehension. Unpublished manuscript.
22.
Owl International. (1987). Guide: Hypertext for the Macintosh [Computer program]. Seattle, WA: Author.
23.
Pelz, R. (1979). The Washington story: A history of our state.Seattle, WA: Seattle Public Schools.
24.
Potter, B. (1990). The tale of Peter Rabbit [Computer program]. Toronto, Canada: Discis Knowledge Research.
25.
Prescott G. A., Balow, I. H., Hogan, T. P., & Farr, R. C. (1984). The metropolitan achievement test.San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corp.
26.
Prickett, E. M., Higgins, K., & Boone, R. (1994). Technology for learning. not learning about technology. Teaching Exceptional Children, 26(4), 56–60.
27.
Sarnacki, R. E. (1979). An examination of test-wiseness in the cognitive test domain. Review of Educational Research, 49(2), 252–279.
28.
Shimmerlik, S. M. (1978). Organization theory and memory for prose: A review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 48, 103–120.
29.
Tyree, R. B., Fiore, T. A., & Cook, R. A. (1994). Instructional materials for diverse learners. Remedial and Special Education, 15, 363–376.
30.
Wagner, R. (1990). Hyperstudio [Computer program]. Los Angeles: Roger Wagner Publishing.
