Looking Through Other Lenses and Listening to Other Voices

Abstract

The articles in this special series have drawn on publications and research outside the traditional special education literature in order to take a fresh look at learning disabilities. The authors have sought to use these different lenses and to listen to different voices, including student voices, to examine our current assumptions---theoretical, practical, and legal. Some of the authors have stood back and asked difficult questions about what purposes are served by the field of learning disabilities in the larger context of schooling and society. On the other hand, many of the authors have sought to get closer to children and youth who are labeled learning disabled and to get a better view from the tiny, yet critical, moments that make up a life and a classroom. Together these telescopic and microscopic views offer us ways to challenge our assumptions and practices, and ways to create new ones.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Five, C. L. (1991). Special voices. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Continuum.

Freire, P. , & Macedo, D. (1987). Literacy: Reading the word and the world. South Hadley, MA: Continuum.

Horton, M. , & Freire, P. (1990). We make the road by walking. New York: Continuum.

Howard, P. (1994). The death of common sense: How law is suffocating America. New York: Random House.

Mallory, B. L. , & New, R. S. (1994). Social constructivist theory and principles of inclusion: Challenges for early childhood special education. The Journal of Special Education, 28, 322–337.

Mehan, H. , Hertweck, K. , & Meihls, J. (1986). Handicapping the handicapped. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.

Moll, L. C. (Ed.). (1990). Vygotsky and education: Instructional implications and applications of sociohistorical psychology. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

Pine, N. (1992). Three personal theories that suggest models for teacher research. Teachers College Record, 93, 657–672.

10.

Poplin, M. , & Weeres, J. (1992). Voices from the inside: A report on schooling from inside the classroom. Claremont, CA: The Claremont Graduate School, Institute for Education in Transformation.

11.

Poplin, M. , Wiest, D. , & Thorson, S. (1995). Alternative instructional strategies to reductionism: Constructive, multicultural, feminine and critical pedagogies. In W. Stainback & S. Stainback (Eds.), Controversial issues confronting special education: Divergent perspectives (2nd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

12.

Rivera, J. , & Poplin, M. (1995). Multicultural, critical, feminine and constructive pedagogies seen through the lives of youth: A call for the revisioning of these and beyond---Toward a pedagogy for the next century. In C. Sleeter & P. McLaren (Eds.), Multicultural education, critical pedagogy, and the politics of difference (pp. 300–338). Albany, NY: SUNY Press.

13.

Taylor, D. (1990). Learning denied. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

14.

Thorson, S. (1995). Special education and general secondary students' talk about discipline procedures. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The Claremont Graduate School.

15.

Valdes, G. , & Figueroa, R. A. (1994). The nature of bilingualism and the nature of testing. New York: ABLEX.

16.

West, T. (1991). In the mind's eye. Buffalo, NY: Prometheus Books.