The teaching strategies used by mothers of sons with learning disabilities (LD) (n = 30) and normally achieving sons (NLD) (n = 30) were examined. The children were matched for age (8- to 11-year-olds) and for parents' socioeconomic status. The behavior of mother-child pairs was videotaped in a teaching task that was constructed to resemble a homework assignment. The results showed that the mothers of children with LD used fewer high-level strategies, and their total time used in teaching was less than that of the mothers of NLD children. The mothers of children with LD exhibited more dominance and less emotionality and cooperation than did the mothers of NLD children; however, the mothers did not differ in task motivation. The children with LD seemed to have more inactive learning strategies, evident in their weaker initiative and greater dependence on their mothers. Analyses concerning the variation of maternal strategies within the LD group revealed that the mothers' motivation, combined with their emotionality and proportion of high-level strategies, had a strong positive association with their children'S success in learning.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bryan, T., Donahue, M., Pearl, R., & Her-zog, A. (1984). Conversational interactions between mothers and learning disabled or nondisabled children during a problem solving task. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 49, 64–71.
2.
Bryan, T., Pearl, R., Zimmerman, D., & Matthews, F. (1982). Mothers' evaluation of their learning-disabled children. The Journal of Special Education, 16, 217–222.
3.
Campbell, S. (1975). Mother-child interaction: A comparison of hyperactive, learning disabled, and normal boys. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 45, 51–57.
4.
Denckla, M., & Rudel, R. (1974). Rapid automatic naming of pictured objects, colors, letters and numbers by normal children. Cortex, 10, 186–202.
5.
DeRenzi, E., & Faglioni, P. (1978). Development of a shortened version of the Token Test. Cortex, 14, 41–49.
6.
Diaz, R., Neal, C., & Vachio, A. (1991). Maternal teaching in the zone of proximal development: A comparison of low- and high-risk dyads. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 1, 83–107.
7.
Ditton, P., Green, R., & Singer, M. (1987). Communication deviances: A comparison between parents of learning-disabled and normally achieving students. Family Process, 26(1), 75–87.
8.
Dunn, L., & Dunn, C. (1981). Peabody picture vocabulary test-Revised.Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
9.
Elias, C., Ubriaco, M., & Gray, J. (1985). A cognitive-behavioral analysis of parental facilitation of children's social-cognitive problem solving. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 6(1), 57–72.
10.
Green, R.-J. (1989). “Learning to learn” and the family system: New perspectives on underachievement and learning disorders. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 15, 187–203.
11.
Green, R.-J. (1990). Family communication and children's learning disabilities: Evidence for Coles's theory of interactivity. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 23, 145–148.
12.
Grolnick, W., & Ryan, R. (1989). Parent styles associated with children's self-regulation and competence in school. Journal of Education Psychology, 81, 143–154.
13.
Hammill, D., Leigh, J., McNutt, G., & Larsen, S. (1981). A new definition of learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 4, 336–342.
14.
Hess, R., & Holloway, S. (1984). Family and schools as educational institutions. In R. Parke (Ed.), Review of child development research (Vol. 7, pp. 177–222). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
15.
Kaplan, E., Goodglass, H., & Weintraub, S. (1983). The Boston naming test (2nd ed.). Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger.
16.
Kistner, J., & Torgesen, J. (1987). Motivational and cognitive aspects of learning disabilities. In A. Kazdin & B. Lahey (Eds.), Advances in clinical child psychology (pp. 289–333). New York: Plenum.
17.
McGillicuddy-De Lisi, A. (1992). Correlates of parental teaching strategies in families of children evidencing normal and atypical development. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 13, 215–234.
18.
Närhi, V., & Ahonen, T. (1992). How does clinical diagnosis of LB subtypes match with psychometric test evidence: A research plan. NMI-Bulletin, 2, 24–25.
19.
Pellegrini, A., Brody, G., & Sigel, I. (1985). Parents' teaching strategies with their children: The effects of parental and child status variables. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 6, 509–521.
20.
Pellegrini, A., McGillicuddy-De Lisi, A., Sigel, I., & Brody, G. (1986). The effects of children's communicative status and task on parents' teaching strategies. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 11, 240–252.
21.
Pennington, B., & Smith, S. (1988). Genetic influences on learning disabilities: An update. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 56, 817–823.
22.
Rasku-Puttonen, H., Lyytinen, P., & Vilk-man, E. (1991). Communication between mothers and their normal or develop-mentally dysphasic children in experimental sessions. Scandinavian Journal of Logopedics and Phoniatrics, 16, 17–24.
23.
Raven, J. (1956). Coloured progressive matrices sets A, Ab, B.London: Lewis.
24.
Sigel, I. (1982). The relationship between parental distancing strategies and the child's cognitive behavior. In L. Laosa & I. Sigel (Eds.), Families as learning environments for children (pp. 47–86). New York: Plenum.
25.
Sigel, I., & Cocking, R. (1977). Cognitive development from childhood to adolescence: A constructive perspective.New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
26.
Sigel, I., Stinson, E., & Flaugher, J. (1991). Socialization of representational competence in the family: The distancing paradigm. In L. Okagaki & R. Sternberg (Eds.), Directors of development: Influences on the development of children's thinking (pp. 121–144). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
27.
Steinert, Y., Campbell, S., & Kiely, M. (1981). A comparison of maternal and remedial teacher teaching styles with good and poor readers. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 14, 38–42.
28.
Tollison, P., Palmer, D., & Stowe, M. (1987). Mothers' expectations, interactions, and achievement attributions for their learning disabled or normally achieving sons. The Journal of Special Education, 21, 83–92.
29.
Wechsler, D. (1974). Manual for the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised.San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corp.
30.
Wolf, M. (1986). Rapid alternating stimulus (R.A.S.) naming in the developmental dyslexias: A developmental, process-differentiated account of rate deficits. Brain and Language, 27, 360–379.
