Twenty-nine seventh- and eighth-grade (21 males and 8 females) and 10 fourth- and fifth-grade (7 males and 3 females) students with learning disabilities, as well as 18 seventh- and eighth-grade (14 males and 4 females) and 11 fourth- and fifth-grade (7 males and 4 females) normally achieving students, were administered an interview designed to assess their knowledge of writing and the composing process, attitude toward writing, and self-efficacy as a writer. Students with learning disabilities were found to have less mature conceptualizations of writing than their normally achieving counterparts. Furthermore, while students with learning disabilities were generally positive about writing, they viewed it less favorably than their regular classmates. Finally, there were no differences between the two groups of students in their evaluations of their competence in either writing or carrying out the processes underlying effective composing.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Alvarez, V., & Adelman, H. (1986). Overstatements of self-evaluations by students with psychoeducational problems. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 19, 567–571.
2.
Bandura, A., & Schunk, D. (1981). Cultivating competence, self-efficacy, and intrinsic interest through proximal self-motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 586–598.
3.
Barenbaum, E. (1983). Writing in the special class. Topics in Learning & Learning Disabilities, 3, 12–20.
4.
Bridwell, L. (1980). Revising strategies in twelfth grade students' transactional writing. Research in the Teaching of English, 14, 197–222.
5.
Brown, A.L., Campione, J.C., & Day, J.D. (1981). Learning to learn: On training students to learn from tests. Educational Researcher, 10, 14–21.
6.
Bryson, M., & Siegel, L. (1986, June). The development of written language production in normally achieving and learning disabled children. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Canadian Psychological Association, Toronto.
7.
Cooper, C. (1977). Holistic evaluation of writing. In C. Cooper & L. Odell (Eds.), Evaluating writing (pp. 3–31). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
8.
CTB/McGraw Hill. (1977). The California achievement tests. Monterey, CA: Author.
9.
Daly, J., & Shamo, W. (1978). Academic decisions as a function of writing apprehension. Research in the Teaching of English, 12, 55–56.
10.
Deno, S., Marston, D., & Mirkin, P. (1982). Valid measurement procedures for continuous evaluation of written expression. Exceptional Children, 48, 368–371.
11.
Englert, C., Raphael, T., Fear, K., & Anderson, L. (1988). Students' metacognitive knowledge about how to write informational texts. Learning Disability Quarterly, 11, 18–46.
12.
Englert, C., & Thomas, C. (1987). Sensitivity to text structure in reading and writing: A comparison of learning disabled and non-disabled students. Learning Disability Quarterly, 11, 18–46.
13.
Faigley, L., Cherry, R., Jolliffe, D., & Skinner, A. (1985). Assessing writers' knowledge and processes of composing. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
14.
Faigley, L., Daly, J., & Witte, S. (1981). The role of writing apprehension in writing performance and competence. Journal of Educational Research, 75, 16–21.
15.
Faigley, L., & Witte, S. (1981). Analyzing revision. College Composition and Communication, 32, 400–414.
16.
Goldman, B. (1972). Review of California Short Form Test of Mental Maturity. In O. Buros (Ed.), The seventh mental measurement yearbook (pp. 623–634). Highland, NJ: Gryphon Press.
17.
Graham, S. (1990). The role of production factors in learning disabled students' compositions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 781–791.
18.
Graham, S., & Harris, K.R. (1989a). A components analysis of cognitive strategy instruction: Effects on learning disabled students' compositions and self-efficacy. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 353–361.
19.
Graham, S., & Harris, K.R. (1989b). Cognitive training: Implications for written language. In J. Hughes & R. Hall (Eds.), Cognitive behavioral psychology in the schools: A comprehensive handbook (pp. 247–279). New York: Guilford Press.
20.
Graham, S., & Harris, K.R. (1992). Cognitive strategy instruction in written language for learning disabled students. In S. Vogel (Ed.), Educational alternatives for students with learning disabilities (pp. 91–115). New York: Springer-Verlag.
21.
Graham, S., Harris, K.R., MacArthur, C., & Schwartz, S. (1991). Writing and writing instruction with students with learning disabilities: A review of a program of research. Learning Disability Quarterly, 14, 89–114.
22.
Harris, K.R., Graham, S., & Freeman, S. (1988). Effects of strategy training on meta-memory among learning disabled students. Exceptional Children, 54, 332–338.
23.
Hayes, J., & Flower, L. (1986). Writing research and the writer. American Psychologist, 41, 1106–1113.
24.
Karlsen, B., Madden, R., & Gardner, E. (1977). Stanford diagnostic reading test. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
25.
MacArthur, C., & Graham, S. (1987). Learning disabled students' composing with three methods: Handwriting, dictation, and word processing. The Journal of Special Education, 21, 22–42.
26.
MacArthur, C., Graham, S., & Schwartz, S. (1991). Knowledge of revision and revising behavior among learning disabled students. Learning Disability Quarterly, 14, 61–74.
27.
Montague, M., Maddox, C., & Dereshiwsky, M. (1988, April). Story grammar and learning disabled students' comprehension and production of narrative prose. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans.
28.
Moran, M. (1981). A comparison of formal features of written language of learning disabled, low-achieving and achieving secondary students (Research Rep. No. 34). Lawrence: University of Kansas Institute in Learning Disabilities.
29.
Myklebust, H. (1973). Development and disorders of written language. Vol. 2: Studies of normal and exceptional children. New York: Grune & Stratton.
30.
Nodine, B., Barenbaum, E., & Newcomer, P. (1985). Story composition by learning disabled, reading disabled, and normal children. Learning Disability Quarterly, 8, 167–179.
31.
Sawyer, R., Graham, S., & Harris, K.R. (1992). Direct teaching, strategy instruction, and strategy instruction with explicit self-regulation: Effects on learning disabled students' composition skills and self-efficacy. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 340–352.
32.
Slosson, R. (1971). Slosson intelligence test. East Aurora, NY: Slosson Educational Publications.
33.
Thomas, C., Englert, C., & Gregg, S. (1987). An analysis of errors and strategies in the expository writing of learning disabled students. Remedial and Special Education, 8(1), 21–30.
34.
Wechsler, D. (1974). Manual for the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corp.
35.
Wong, B., Wong, R., & Blenkinsop, J. (1989). Cognitive and metacognitive aspects of learning disabled adolescents' composing problems. Learning Disability Quarterly, 12, 310–323.
36.
Woodcock, R. (1973). Woodcock reading mastery tests. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
37.
Woodcock, R. (1978). Woodcock-Johnson psycho-educational battery. Boston: Teaching Resources.
38.
Zimmerman, B., & Pons, M. (1986). Development of a structured interview for assessing student use of self-regulated learning strategies. American Educational Research Journal, 23, 614–628.
