Which Motoric Condition Is Most Effective for Teaching Spelling to Students With and Without Learning Disabilities?

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy of three motoric conditions (writing, tracing, and computer keyboarding) on the spelling performance of 24 third- and fourth-grade students without learning disabilities (NLD) (15 males, 9 females) and 24 third- and fourth-grade students with learning disabilities (LD) (16 males, 8 females). This study applied empirically based procedures for teaching spelling, examined student performance over time, and incorporated student interviews concerning their preference for motoric condition. For number of words spelled and proportion of bi-grams (correct letter sequences) used correctly, significant differences were found between the LD and NLD groups, both at posttest and follow-up, with the NLD students learning to spell more words and apply more correct bi-grams than the students with LD. There was no significant effect for condition for either words spelled or bi-grams, indicating that students did not learn significantly more words in the writing, tracing, or computer condition. There was also a significant time effect indicating that the accuracy of both groups decreased over time from posttest to follow-up for both words and bi-grams. Interviews revealed that students in both groups preferred the computer condition; however, they believed that they learned best in the writing and tracing conditions.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bookman, M.O. (1984). Spelling as a cognitive developmental linguistic process. Academic Therapy, 20, 21–32.

Bos, C.S. , & Vaughn, S. (1991). Strategies for teaching students with learning and behavior problems. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

Bradley, L. (1981). The organization of motor patterns for spelling: An effective remedial strategy for backward readers. Developmental Medical Child Neurology, 23, 83–91.

Bryant, N.D. , Drabin, I.R. , & Gettinger, M. (1981). Effects of varying unit size on spelling achievement in learning disabled children. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 14, 200–203.

Carpenter, D. , & Miller, L.J. (1982). Spelling ability of reading disabled LD students and able readers. Learning Disability Quarterly, 5, 65–70.

Cunningham, A.E. , & Stanovich, K.E. (1990). Early spelling acquisition: Writing beats the computer. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 159–162.

DeMaster, V.K. , Crossland, C.L. , & Hasselbring, T.S. (1986). Consistency of learning disabled students' spelling performance. Learning Disability Quarterly, 9, 89–96.

Deno, S.L. , Marston, D. , & Mirkin, P.K. (1982). Valid measurement procedures for continuous evaluation of written expression. Exceptional Children, 48, 368–371.

Deno, S.L. , Mirkin, P.K. , Lowry, L. , & Kuehnle, K. (1980). Relationships among simple measures of written expression and performance on standardized achievement tests (Research Report No. 21). Minneapolis: Institute for Research on Learning Disabilities, University of Minnesota.

10.

Gerber, M.M. (1984a). Techniques to teach generalizable spelling skills. Academic Therapy, 20, 49–58.

11.

Gerber, M.M. (1984b). Orthographic problem-solving ability of learning disabled and normally achieving students. Learning Disability Quarterly, 7, 157–164.

12.

Gerber, M.M. (1986). Generalization of spelling strategies by learning disabled students as a result of contingent imitation/modeling and mastery criteria. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 19, 530–537.

13.

Gettinger, M. , Bryant, N.D. , & Fayne, H.R. (1982). Designing spelling instruction for learning disabled students: An emphasis on unit size, distributed practice, and training for transfer. The Journal of Special Education, 16, 439–448.

14.

Graham, S. , & Freeman, S. (1986). Strategy training and teacher- vs. student-controlled study conditions: Effects on LD students' spelling performance. Learning Disability Quarterly, 9, 15–22.

15.

Hulme, C. (1981). Reading retardation and multi-sensory teaching. London: Routledge & Keegan Paul.

16.

Hulme, C. , & Bradley, L. (1984). An experimental study of multi-sensory teaching with normal and retarded readers. In R. Malatesha & V. Whitaker (Eds.), Dyslexia: A global issue (pp. 431–443). The Hague: Martinun Nijhoff.

17.

Hulme, C. , Monk, A. , & Ives, S. (1987). Some experimental studies of multi-sensory teaching: The effects of manual tracing on children's paired-associate learning. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 5, 299–307.

18.

Kauffman, J.M. , Hallahan, D.R. , Haas, K. , Brame, T. , & Boren, R. (1978). Imitating children's errors to improve their spelling performance. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 11, 217–222.

19.

Keogh, B.K. , Becker, L.D. , Kubic, M. , & Kubic, S. (1973). Programs of EH and EMR pupils: Review and recommendations (Part I). Academic Therapy, 9, 187–198.

20.

Kirk, S. , & Elkins, J. (1975). Characteristics of children enrolled in Child Service Demonstration Centers. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 8, 31–38.

21.

Madden, R. , Gardner, E.F. , & Collins, C.S. (1982). Stanford early school achievement test. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corp.

22.

Nulman, J.H. , & Gerber, M.M. (1984). Improving spelling performance by imitating a child's errors. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 17, 328–333.

23.

Poplin, M. , Gray, R. , Larsen, S. , Banikowski, A. , & Mehring, T. (1980). A comparison of components of written expression abilities in learning disabled and non-disabled students at three grade levels. Learning Disability Quarterly, 3(4), 46–53.

24.

Stanovich, K.E. (1991). Discrepancy definitions of reading disability: Has intelligence led us astray? Reading Research Quarterly, 26, 7–29.

25.

Stodolsky, S.S. , Salk, S. , & Glaessner, B. (1991). Student views about learning math and social studies. American Educational Research Journal, 28(1), 89–116.

26.

Tiegs, E.W. , & Clark, W.W. (1977). California achievement tests. Monterey, CA: McGraw-Hill.

27.

Vallecorsa, A.L. , Zigmond, N. , & Henderson, L.M. (1985). Spelling instruction in special education classrooms: A survey of practices. Exceptional Children, 52, 19–24.

28.

Vaughn, S. , & Bos, C.S. (1987). Research in learning disabilities: Issues and future directions. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.

29.

Vaughn, S. , Schumm, J.S. , & Gordon, J. (1992). Early spelling acquisition: Does writing really beat the computer? Learning Disability Quarterly, 15, 223–228.

30.

Wechsler, D. (1974). Manual for the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corp.

31.

White, O.R. , & Haring, N.G. (1980). Exceptional teaching (2nd ed.). Columbus, OH: Merrill.

32.

Woodcock, R.W. , & Johnson, M.B. (1989). Woodcock-Johnson psycho-educational battery-Revised. Allen, TX: DLM.