This study was designed to identify and validate essential teaching practices needed by both general and special educators to successfully educate students with mild handicaps in general classrooms. An interdisciplinary panel of 105 experts, evenly divided into university-based and field-based participants from 35 states, identified 96 of 125 practices in six categories as being essential for effective teaching of mainstreamed students with mild handicaps. Based on a two-round Delphi procedure, a substantial majority (82%) of these teaching practices were seen as being essential for both general and special educators across all six rated categories. Panel ratings were significantly higher for special educators than general educators on four of the six categories. No significant differences in ratings were found for university-based versus field-based panelists, or for field-based panelists who were professionals directly involved in elementary or secondary teaching roles versus administrators, supervisors, and consultants. Based on essential teaching practices validated in this study, implications for preservice teacher preparation and staff development programs for general and special educators are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Anderson, L.M., Evertson, C. M., & Brophy, J.E. (1982). Principles of small group instruction in elementary reading.East Lansing: Michigan State University, Institute for Research on Teaching.
2.
Berliner, D., & Tikunoff, W. (1976). The California Beginning Teacher Evaluation Study: Overview of the ethnographic study. Journal of Teacher Education, 27(1), 24–30.
3.
Bickel, W.E., & Bickel, D.D. (1986). Effective schools, classrooms, and instruction: Implications for special education. Exceptional Children, 52, 489–500.
Bloom, B.S. (1980). The new direction in education: Alterable variables. Phi Delta Kappan, 61, 382–385.
6.
Bloom, B.S. (1981). All our children learning.New York: McGraw-Hill.
7.
Brookover, W., Beady, C., Flood, P., Schweitzer, J., & Wisenbaker, J. (1979). School social systems and student achievement: Schools can make a difference.New York: Praeger.
8.
Brophy, J., & Evertson, C. (1976). Learning from teaching: A developmental perspective.Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
9.
Brophy, J.E., & Good, T.L. (1986). Teacher behavior and student achievement. In M.C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 328–375). New York: Macmillan.
10.
Brundage, D. (Ed.). (1979). The Journalism Research Fellows report: What makes an effective school?Washington, DC: George Washington University.
11.
Cronbach, L.J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297–334.
12.
Deshler, D.D., Schumaker, J. B., & Lenz, B.K. (1984). Academic and cognitive interventions for LD adolescents: Part I. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 17, 108–117.
13.
Deshler, D.D., Schumaker, J. B., Lenz, B.K., & Ellis, E. (1984). Academic and cognitive interventions for LD adolescents: Part II. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 17, 170–179.
14.
Diebold, M.H., & Trentham, L.L. (1987). Special educator predictions of regular class teacher attitudes concerning mainstreaming. Teacher Education and Special Education, 10, 19–25.
15.
Evertson, C., Anderson, L., & Brophy, J. (1978). Texas Junior High School Study: Final report of process-outcome relationships (Report No. 4061). Austin: The University of Texas, R & D Center for Teacher Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 173 744)
16.
Feden, P.D., & Clabaugh, G.K. (1986). The “new breed” educator: A rationale for combining elementary and special education teacher preparation. Teacher Education and Special Education, 9, 180–189.
17.
Good, T., & Grouws, D. (1975). Process-product relationship in fourth-grade mathematics classrooms: Final report (National Institute of Education Grant No. NIEG-00-3-0123). Columbia: University of Missouri, College of Education.
18.
Good, T., & Grouws, D. (1977). Teaching effects: Process-product study in fourthgrade mathematics classrooms. Journal of Teacher Education, 28, 49–54.
19.
Goodman, L. (1985). The effective schools movement and special education. Teaching Exceptional Children, 17(2), 102–105.
20.
Haring, N.G., Lovitt, T. C., Eaton, M.D., & Hansen, C.L. (1978). The fourth R: Research in the classroom.Columbus, OH: Merrill.
21.
Harris, V., & Sherman, J. (1973). Effects of peer tutoring and consequences on the math performance of elementary class-room students. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 6, 587–597.
22.
Hawkes, K., & Paolucci-Whitcomb, P. (1980). Helping teachers use peer tutoring: A consultation model. The Pointer, 24(3), 47–55.
23.
Helmer, O. (1983). Looking forward: A guide to future research.Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
24.
Hosford, P.L. (1984a). The art of applying the science of education. In P.L. Hosford (Ed.), Using what we know about teaching (pp. 141–161). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
25.
Hosford, P.L. (1984b). Introduction: The problem, its difficulties, and our approaches. In P.L. Hosford (Ed.), Using what we know about teaching (pp. 3–12). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
26.
Hunter, M. (1984). Knowing, teaching, and supervising. In P.L. Hosford (Ed.), Using what we know about teaching (pp. 169–192). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
27.
Idol, L. (1988). Response to the January executive commentary: No more noses to the glass [Letter to the director]. Exceptional Children, 54, 472–473.
Jenkins, J.R., & Jenkins, L.M. (1981). Cross age and peer tutoring: Help for children with learning problems.Reston, VA: Council for Exceptional Children.
Larrivee, B. (1981). Effective teaching behaviors for mainstreaming. The Pointer, 25(3), 28–30.
33.
Larrivee, B. (1982). Identifying effective teaching behaviors for mainstreaming. Teacher Education and Special Education, 5(3), 2–6.
34.
Larrivee, B. (1985). Effective teaching for successful mainstreaming.New York: Longman.
35.
Larrivee, B. (1986). Effective teaching for mainstreamed students is effective teaching for all students. Teacher Education and Special Education, 9, 173–179.
36.
Leinhardt, G., Zigmond, N., & Cooley, W.W. (1981). Reading instruction and its effects. American Educational Research Journal, 18, 343–361.
37.
Linstone, H., & Turoff, M. (1975). The Delphi method: Technique and applications.Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.
38.
Lipsky, D.K., & Gartner, A. (1987). Capable of achievement and worthy of respect: Education for handicapped students as if they were full-fledged human beings. Exceptional Children, 54, 69–74.
39.
Meyen, E.L. (1988). Current instructional practices. In E.L. Meyen & T.M. Skrtic (Eds.), Exceptional children and youth: An introduction (3rd ed., pp. 49–80). Denver: Love.
40.
Morsink, C.V., Soar, R. S., Soar, R.M., & Thomas, R. (1986). Research on teaching: Opening the door to special education classrooms. Exceptional Children, 53, 32–40.
41.
Nevin, A., Johnson, R., & Johnson, D. (1982). Effects of group and individual contingencies on academic performance and social relations of special needs students. Journal of Social Psychology, 116, 41–59.
42.
Nevin, A., Skieber, E., & Polewski, C. (1984). A regular classroom teacher implements cooperative learning. The Pointer, 28(3), 19–21.
43.
Nevin, A., & Thousand, J. (1986). What the research says about limiting or avoiding referrals to special education. Teacher Education and Special Education, 9, 149–161.
44.
Reynolds, M.C. (1979, October). A common body of practice for teachers: The challenge of Public Law 94-142 to teacher education. Paper presented at the meeting of the Association of Colleges and Schools of Education in State Universities and Land Grant Colleges, Dallas, TX.
45.
Reynolds, M.C., Wang, M. C., & Walberg, H.J. (1987). The necessary restructuring of special and regular education. Exceptional Children, 53, 391–398.
46.
Salvia, J., & Ysseldyke, J.E. (1985). Assessment in special and remedial education (3rd ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
47.
Sapon-Shevin, M. (1988). Working towards merger together: Seeing beyond distrust and fear. Teacher Education and Special Education, 11, 103–110.
Slavin, R.E., Sharan, S., Kagan, S., Hertz-Lazarowitz, R., Webb, C., & Schmuck, R. (1985). Learning to cooperate, cooperating to learn.New York: Plenum Press.
50.
Soar, R.S., & Soar, R.M. (1972). An empirical analysis of selected Follow Through programs: An example of a process approach to evaluation. In I. Gordon (Ed.), Early childhood education (pp. 229–260). Chicago: National Society for the Study of Education.
51.
Solomon, D., & Kendell, A. (1979). Children in classrooms: An investigation of person-environment interaction.New York: Praeger.
52.
Squires, D.A., Huitt, W. G., & Segars, J.K. (1984). Effective schools and classrooms: A research-based perspective.Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
53.
Stainback, S., & Stainback, W. (1987). Facilitating merger through personnel preparation. Teacher Education and Special Education, 10, 185–190.
54.
Stevens, R., & Rosenshine, B. (1981). Advances in research on teaching. Exceptional Education Quarterly, 2, 1–9.
55.
U.S. Department of Education. (1990). Twelfth annual report to Congress on the implementation of the Education of the Handicapped Act.Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education and Rehabilitation Services.
56.
Wang, M.C., & Gennari, P. (1983). Analysis of the design, implementation, and effects of a data-based staff development program. Teacher Education and Special Education, 6, 211–216.
57.
Weatherman, R., & Swenson, K. (1974). Delphi technique. In S.P. Hencley & J.R. Yates (Eds.), Futurism in education: Methodologies (pp. 97–114). Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
58.
West, J.F., & Cannon, G.S. (1988). Essential collaborative consultation competencies for regular and special educators. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21, 56–63, 28.
59.
West, J.F., & Idol, L. (1990). Collaborative consultation in the education of mildly handicapped and at-risk students. Remedial and Special Education, 11(1), 22–30.
60.
West, J.F., Idol, L., & Cannon, G. (1989). Collaboration in the schools: Communicating, interacting, and problem solving.Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
61.
Will, M.C. (1986). Educating children with learning problems: A shared responsibility. Exceptional Children, 52, 411–416.
62.
Ysseldyke, J.E. (1986). The use of assessment information to make decisions about students. In R.J. Morris & B. Blatt (Eds.), Special education: Research and trends (pp. 8–26). New York: Pergamon Press.
