Designing appropriate content area instruction for secondary students with learning disabilities is a challenging endeavor. Even if these students are mainstreamed into algebra, history, or science classes, special educators are likely to expect only a minimal grasp of the material. To go beyond this, to teach higher order thinking through these subjects, would be regarded by most practitioners as too labor-intensive. The authors of this article argue that, through a comprehensive revision of traditional materials, secondary students with learning disabilities can learn content area subjects---earth science and introductory chemistry, particularly---in an integrated manner. These students can achieve a firm understanding of the subject, as well as learn how to solve complex, domain-specific problems. For this kind of integrated instruction to be feasible, the curriculum must be designed and field-tested by professional curriculum developers.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Armbruster, B.B., & Valencia, S. W. (1989, March). Do basal reading programs prepare children for reading science textbooks?Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
2.
Beck, I.L., McKeown, M.G., & Gromoll, E.W. (1989). Learning from social studies texts. Cognition and Instruction, 6, 99–158.
3.
Brandt, R. (1988/89). On learning research: A conversation with Lauren Resnick. Educational Research, 46, 12–16.
4.
Bransford, J., Sherwood, R., Vye, N., & Rieser, J. (1986). Teaching thinking and problem solving. American Psychologist, 41, 1078–1089.
5.
Bulgren, J., Schumaker, J.B., & Deshler, D.D. (1988). Effectiveness of a concept teaching routine in enhancing the performance of LD students in secondary mainstream classes. Learning Disability Quarterly, 11, 3–17.
6.
Collins, A., & Stevens, A.L. (1982). Coals and strategies of inquiry teachers. In R. Glaser (Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology: Vol 2 (pp. 65–120). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
7.
Deshler, D.D., & Schumaker, J.B. (1986). Learning strategies: An instructional alternative for low-achieving adolescents. Exceptional Children, 52, 583–590.
8.
Deshler, D.D., Schumaker, J.B., & Lenz, K. (1984). Academic and cognitive interventions for LD adolescents: Part I. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 17, 108–117.
9.
Deshler, D.D., Schumaker, J.B., Lenz, K., & Ellis, E. (1984). Academic and cognitive interventions for LD adolescents: Part II. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 17, 170–179.
10.
Eylon, B.S., & Linn, M.C. (1988). Learning and instruction: An examination of four research perspectives in science education. Review of Educational Research, 58, 251–301.
11.
Hofmeister, A., Engelmann, S., & Carnine, D. (1989). Developing and validating science education videodiscs. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 26, 665–677.
12.
Hurd, P. (1986). Analysis of biology texts. Unpublished manuscript, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA.
13.
Kelly, B., Gersten, R., & Carnine, D. (1990). Student error patterns as a function of curriculum design: Teaching fractions to remedial high school students and high school students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 23, 23–29.
14.
Mastropieri, M.A., & Scruggs, T.E. (1987). Effective instruction for special education. Boston: Little, Brown.
15.
Mastropieri, M.A., Scruggs, T.E., & Levin, J.R. (1986). Direct vs. mnemonic instruction: Relative benefits for exceptional learners. The Journal of Special Education, 20, 299–307.
16.
Mayer, R.E. (1989). Models for understanding. Review of Educational Research, 59, 43–64.
17.
Moore, L.J., & Carnine, D.W. (1989). A comparison of two approaches to teaching ratios and proportions to remedial and learning disabled students: Active teaching with either basal or empirically validated curriculum design material. Remedial and Special Education, 10(4), 28–37.
18.
Pressley, M., Johnson, C.J., & Symons, S. (1987). Elaborating to learn and learning to elaborate. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 20, 76–91.
19.
Pressley, M., Symons, S., Snyder, B.L., & Cariglia-Bull, T. (1989). Strategy instruction research comes of age. Learning Disability Quarterly, 12, 17–30.
20.
Resnick, L.B. (1987). Education and learning to think. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
21.
Swanson, H.L. (1989). Strategy instruction: Overview of principles and procedures for effective use. Learning Disability Quarterly, 12, 3–14.
22.
Systems Impact, Inc. (1987). Earth science [Videodisc program]. Washington, DC: Author.
23.
Systems Impact, Inc. (1987). Understanding chemistry and energy [Videodisc program]. Washington, DC: Author.
24.
Tyson, H., & Woodward, A. (1989). Why students aren't learning very much from textbooks. Educational Leadership, 47, 14–17.
25.
Wivagg, D. (1987). High school biology textbooks and college science teaching. The American Biology Teacher, 49, 71.
26.
Woodward, J. (1989). Causal organization and its effect on recall and understanding in science (Tech. Rep. No. 12). Eugene: University of Oregon, Instructional Research.
27.
Woodward, J., & Carnine, D. (1988). Antecedent knowledge and intelligent computer assisted instruction. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21, 131–139.
