Pattern Analysis of an Actuarial Strategy for Computerized Diagnosis of Childhood Exceptionality

Abstract

The construct and predictive validity of a computerized diagnostic decision-making system, known as multidimensional actuarial classification (MAC), is investigated through a unique pattern analysis procedure. The MAC diagnostic system applies a series of actuarial decision rules to differentially classify children's mental retardation, learning disabilities, academic achievement problems, social and behavioral maladjustment, and other related disorders. Using a selected set of the decision routines available through MAC, the computerized system was used to classify 200 children referred for psychological services. A cross-products agreement matrix was constructed from the resultant multidimensional classifications produced for each child and was subjected thereafter to factor pattern analysis. Seven distinct and recognizable patterns emerged, supporting the verity and utility of the systems-actuarial approach to classification of child exceptionality. Moreover, pattern scores indicating the extent of children's similarity to the classification pattern named learning disability were found to be significantly good predictors of the actual severity of learning impairment.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Achenbach, T.M. The Child Behavior Profile: An empirically based system for assessing children's behavioral problems and competencies. International Journal of Mental Health, 1979, 7, 24–42.

Achenbach, T.M. , & Edelbrock, C.S. The classification of child psychopathology: A review and analysis of research efforts. Psychological Bulletin, 1978, 85, 1275–1301.

Bateman, B. An educator's view of a diagnostic approach to learning disorders. In J. Hullmuth (Ed.), Learning Disorders. Seattle: Special Child Publications, 1965.

Bersoff, D.N. Regarding psychologists testily: Legal regulation of psychological assessment in the public schools. Maryland Law Review, 1979, 39, 27–120.

Cook, V.J. , & Patterson, J.G. Psychologists in the schools of Nebraska: Professional functions. Psychology in the Schools, 1977, 14, 371–376.

Doll, E.A. Vineland Social Maturity Scale. Circle Pines, Minn: American Guidance Service, 1965.

Hobbs, N. (Ed.), Issues in the Classification of Children (Vol. 1). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. 1975.

Jastak, J.E. , & Jastak, S.R. Manual: The Wide Range Achievement Test. Wilmington, Del.: Guidance Associates, 1976.

Kaiser, H.F. The varimax criterion for analytic rotation in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 1958, 23, 187–200.

10.

Keogh, B.K. , Kukic, S.J. , Becker, L.D. , McLaughlin, R.J. , & Kukic, M.B. School psychologists' services in special education programs. Journal of School Psychology, 1975, 13, 142–147.

11.

Killen, J.R. , & Myklebust, H.R. Evaluation in special education: A computer based approach. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1980, 13, 440-444.

12.

Kirp, D.L. Student classification, public policy, and the courts. Harvard Educational Review. 1974, 44, 1–52.

13.

Maslow, A. Resistance to being rubricized. In B. Kaplan & S. Wapner (Eds.), Perspectives in Psychological Theory. New York: International Universities Press, 1960.

14.

McDermott, P.A. A computerized system for the classification of developmental, learning, and adjustment disorders in school children. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1980, 40, 761–768. (a)

15.

McDermott, P.A. A systems-actuorial method for the differential diagnosis of handicapped children. Journal of Special Education, 1980, 14, 7–22, (b).

16.

McDermott, P.A. Actuarial assessment systems for the grouping and classification of school children. In C.R. Reynolds & T.B. Gutkin (Eds.), The Handbook of School Psychology. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1981, (a).

17.

McDermott, P.A. Sources of error in the psycho-educational diagnosis of children. Journal of School Psychology, 1981, 19, in press. (b).

18.

McLeod, J. Educational underachievement: Toward a defensible psychometric definition. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1979, 12, 322–330.

19.

Nunnally, J.C. Psychometric Theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill, 1978.

20.

Petersen, C.R. , & Hart, D.H. Use of multiple discriminant function analysis in evaluation of a state-wide system for identification of educationally handicapped children. Psychological Reports, 1978, 43, 743–755.

21.

Quay, H.C. Classification. In H.C. Quay & J.S. Werry (Eds.), Psychopathological Disorders of Childhood (2nd ed.), New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1979.

22.

Quay, H.C. & Werry, J.S. (Eds.). Psychopathological Disorders of Childhood (2nd ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1979.

23.

Rogers, C.R. Client Centered Therapy. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1951.

24.

Sabatino, D.A. , & Miller, T.L. The dilemma of diagnosis in learning disabilities: Problems and potential directions. Psychology in the Schools, 1980, 17, 76–86.

25.

Sarbin, T.R. A contribution to the study of actuarial and individual methods of prediction. American Journal of Sociology, 1943, 48, 593–602.

26.

Shepard, L. An evaluation of the regression discrepancy method for identifying children with learning disabilities. The Journal of Special Education, 1980, 14, 79–91.

27.

Slosson, R.L. Slosson Intelligence Test for Children and Adults. East Aurora, N.Y.: Slosson Educational Publications, 1971.

28.

Stott, D.H. Manual to the Bristol Social Adjustment Guides. San Diego: Educational and Industrial Testing, 1980.

29.

Thorndike, R.L. The Concepts of Over- and Underachievement. New York: Teachers College Press, Columbia University, 1963.

30.

Tryon, R.C. , & Bailey, D.E. Cluster Analysis. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1970.

31.

Wallace, G. , & McLaughlin, J. A. Learning Disabilities: Concepts and Characteristics. Columbus, Ohio: Charles Merrill, 1979.