Baum, D.D.: A comparison of the WRAT and the PIAT with learning disability children. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1975, 35, 487–93.
2.
Bray, N.M., Estes, R.E.: A comparison of the PIAT, CAT, and WRAT scores and teacher ratings for learning disabled students. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1975, 8, 519–23.
3.
Dunn, L.M., Markwardt, F.C.: Manual of instruction. Peabody Individual Achievement Test.Circle Pines, Minn.: American Guidance Service, Inc., 1970.
4.
Harmer, W.R., Williams, F.: The Wide Range Achievement Test and the Peabody Individual Achievement Test: A comparative study. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1978, 11, 667–70.
5.
Jastak, J.F.: Manual of instructions. Wide Range Achievement Test.Wilmington, Del.: Guidance Associates, 1937, 1946.
6.
Jastak, J.F., Jastak, S.R.: Manual of instructions. Wide Range Achievement Test.Wilmington, Del.: Guidance Associates, 1965, 1976.
7.
Salvia, J., Ysseldyke, J.E.: Assessment in Special and Remedial Education.Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company, 1978.
8.
Sitlington, P.L.: Validity of the Peabody Individual Achievement Test with educable mentally retarded adolescents. Unpublished masters thesis, University of Hawaii, 1970. In L.M. Dunn, F.C. Markwardt, Manual of Instruction. Peabody Individual Achievement Test.Circle Pines, Minn.: American Guidance Service, Inc., 1970.
9.
Soethe, J.W.: Concurrent validity of the Peabody individual Achievement Test. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1972, 5, 560–62.
Wetter, J., French, R.W.: Comparison of the Peabody Individual Achievement Test and the Wide Range Achievement Test on a learning disabilities clinic. Psychology in the Schools, 1973, 10, 285–86.