The purpose of this study was to investigate the recall performance of learning disabled children as a function of material organization and difficulty. Forty-eight children diagnosed as having learning disabilities were randomly subdivided into two groups receiving either organized or unorganized material. Three levels of material difficulty were used. Results indicated no influence of material organization on subjects' recall performance. Subjects did, however, perform differently as a function of material difficulty. Implications for future research and practice are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Amer. Psychiatric Assn.: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (2nd ed.). Washington, D.C.: APA, 1968.
2.
Birch, H. G.: Brain Damage in Children: The Biological and Social Aspects. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins, 1964.
3.
Bousfield, W. A.: The occurrence of clustering in the recall of randomly arranged associates, J. Genet. Psychol., 1953, 49, 229–240.
4.
Chalfant, J., Scheffelin, M.: Central Processing Dysfunctions in Children. Bethesda, Md.: Natl. Inst. Neurol. Diseases and Stroke, 1969.
5.
Drew, C. J.: Associative learning as a function of material associative strength and MA. Amer. J. Ment. Defic., 1969, 74, 369–372.
6.
Drew, C. J., Altman, R.: Effects of input organization and material difficulty on free recall. Psychol. Rep., 1970, 27, 335–337.
7.
Drew, C. J., Berard, W.: Errors of retarded and non-retarded subjects by learning stage. Psychonomic Scl., 1970, 20, 65–66.
8.
Gallagher, J. R.: A comparison of retarded and normals on subjective organization in short-term memory. Amer. J. Ment. Defic, 1969, 73, 661–665.
9.
Gerjouy, I. R., Spitz, H. H.: Associative clustering in free recall: intellectual and developmental variables. Amer. J. Ment. Defic, 1966, 70, 918–927.
10.
Johnson, D. J., Myklebust, H. R.: Learning Disabilities: Education Principles and Practices. New York: Grune & Stratton, 1967.
11.
Kass, C. E.: Psycholinguistic disabilities of children with reading problems. Exceptional Child., 1966, 32, 533–539.
12.
Simpson, R. L., King, J. D., & Drew, C. J.: Free recall by retarded and non-retarded subjects as a function of input organization. Psychonomic Sci., 1970, 19, 334.
13.
Spitz, H. H.: The role of input organization in the learning and memory of mental retardates, In N. R. Ellis (Ed.) International Review of Research in Mental Retardation, Vol. 2. New York: Academic Press, 1966.
14.
Strauss, A. A.: Psychopathology and Education of the Brain-Injured Child. N. Y.: Grune & Stratton, 1941.
15.
Thorndike, E. L., Lorge, I.: Teachers Word Book of 30,000 Words. New York: Teachers College, Columbia Univ., 1944.
16.
Underwood, B. J.: The representativeness of rote verbal learning. In A. W. Melton (Ed.), Categories of Human Learning. New York: Academic Press, 1964.
17.
Underwood, B. J., Schulz, R. W.: Meaningfulness and Verbal Learning. Chicago: Lippincott, 1960.
18.
Wallace, W. P., Underwood, B. J.: Implicit response and role of intralist similarity in verbal learning by normal and retarded subjects. J. Educ. Psychol., 1964, 55, 362–370.
19.
Winer, B. J.: Statistical Principles in Experimental Design. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1962.
