Is There Really a WISC Profile for Poor Readers?

Abstract

The Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children is viewed by reading specialists as a significant test instrument in diagnosing reading problems. A number of studies have been conducted to find out how poor readers perform on the WISC — more specifically, to determine if a WISC profile for poor readers exists. This paper looks at some of the research to determine if any valid generalizations can be made about a WISC profile for poor readers Eight studies that are representative of the work that has been done are reviewed. The varied nature of the studies, however, does not permit generalizations about a WISC profile for poor readers. The value of studying average scores is questioned. It is suggested that the focus of the research be shifted from studying the performances of groups of poor readers to attempting to understand the implications that the WISC subtests have for the reading process itself.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ackerman, P. T. , Peters, J. E. and Dykman, R. A. : Children with specific learning disabilities: WISC profiles. J. Learning Disabil., 1971, 4, 150-166.

Altus, G. : A WISC profile for retarded readers. J. Consulting Psychology, 1956, 20, 155–156.

Burks, H. F. , and Bruce, P. : The characteristics of poor and good readers as disclosed by the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children. J. Educ. Psychology, 1955, 46, 483–495.

Graham, E. E. : Wechsler-Bellevue and WISC scatter-grams of unsuccessful readers. J. Consulting Psychology, 1952, 6, 268–271.

Kallos, G. L. , Grabow, J. M. , and Guarino, E. A. : The WISC profile of disabled readers. Personnel and Guidance J., 1961, 39, 476–478.

Neville, D. : A comparison of the WISC patterns of male retarded and non-retarded readers. J. Educ. Research, 1961, 54, 195–197.

Reid, W. R. , and Schoer, L. A. : Reading achievement, social class and subtest pattern on the WISC. J. Educ. Research, 1966, 59, 469–472.

Robeck, M. C. : Intellectual strengths and weaknesses shown by reading clinic subjects on the WISC. J. Develop. Reading, 1964, 120-129.