Mathematics-Writing Performance of Students Experiencing Mathematics Difficulties in China

Abstract

This study aimed to conduct a comprehensive investigation into the mathematics-writing (MW) performance of students with mathematics difficulties (MDs) in China. We compared the performance of students with MD with their typically developing (TD) and high-performing (HP) peers. The analysis was based on a sample of 138 sixth-grade students. Our findings revealed (a) the trend in MW performance followed the hierarchy of mathematics ability levels (HP > TD > MD), whereas all groups displayed similar performance in general writing (HP = TD = MD), (b) although all three groups were able to organize their ideas in general writing, they had difficulty structuring their ideas effectively in MW, and (c) students with MD were less likely to incorporate technical mathematics vocabulary and symbols in their MW; they were also more likely to write incomplete sentences and make punctuation mistakes in their MW. Implications for educational strategies, teaching methodologies, and targeted support interventions are discussed.

Keywords

mathematics difficulty primary school mathematics writing China

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adams

M. E.

(2014). The comparative grammaticality of the English comparative.

Adams

T. L.

(2003). Reading mathematics: More than words can say. The Reading Teacher, 56(8), 786–795.

Arsenault

T. L.

Powell

S. R.

(2022). Intensifying language supports in word-problem schema instruction. Teaching Exceptional Children, 57(2), 150–159. https://doi.org/10.1177/004005992110695

Arsenault

T. L.

Powell

S. R.

Hebert

M. A.

King

S. G.

Lin

Lang

(2022). Mathematics–writing profiles for students with mathematics difficulty. Reading and Writing, 36(8), 2025–2052. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145–022–10375–2

Arsenault

T. L.

Powell

S. R.

King

S. G.

(2025). Mathematics-writing synthesis: Kindergarten through Grade 12 mathematics-writing outcomes and instructional methods. Reading and writing, 38(4), 1039-1081. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-024-10530-x

Barnes

E. M.

Stephens

S. J.

(2019). Supporting mathematics vocabulary instruction through mathematics curricula. The Curriculum Journal, 30(3), 322–341. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585176.2019.1614470

Bernabei

Reimer

(2013). Fun-size academic writing for serious learning: 101 lessons & mentor texts—narrative, opinion/argument, & informative/explanatory, grades 4-9. Corwin Press.

Cabell

S. Q.

Hwang

(2020). Building content knowledge to boost comprehension in the primary grades. Reading Research Quarterly, 55(Suppl. 1), S99–S107. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.338

Čadež

T. H.

Kolar

V. M.

(2018). How fifth-grade pupils reason about fractions: A reliance on part-whole subconstructs. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 99(3), 335–357. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-018-9838-z

10.

Camahalan

F. M. G.

Young

K. M.

(2015). Using math journals to encourage students to communicate their understanding of math concepts. Journal of Teacher Action Research, 1(2), 38–52.

11.

Casa

T. M.

Firmender

J. M.

Cahill

Cardetti

Choppin

J. M.

Cohen

. . .Zawodniak

(2016). Types of and purposes for elementary mathematical writing: Task force recommendations. http://mathwriting.eduation.uconn.edu

12.

Charalambous

C. Y.

Pitta-Pantazi

(2007). Drawing on a theoretical model to study students’ understandings of fractions. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 64(3), 293–316. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-006-9036-2

13.

Chauhan

(2022). Fundamentals of academic writing: A literature review. Journal of NELTA, 27(1–2), 161–180. https://doi.org/10.3126/nelta.v27i1-2.53201

14.

Cirino

P. T.

Fuchs

L. S.

Elias

J. T.

Powell

S. R.

Schumacher

R. F.

(2015). Cognitive and mathematical profiles for different forms of learning difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 48(2), 156–175.

15.

Council of Chief State School Officers, & National Governors Association Center for Best Practices. (2010). Common Core State Standards. Authors.

16.

Cowan

Powell

(2014). The contributions of domain-general and numerical factors to third-grade arithmetic skills and mathematical learning disability. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(1), 214. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034097

17.

Crowhurst

(1990). Teaching and learning the writing of persuasive/argumentative discourse. Canadian Journal of Education/Revue canadienne de l’éducation, 15(4), 348–359. https://doi.org/10.2307/1495109

18.

Ferretti

R. P.

Lewis

W. E.

Andrews-Weckerly

(2009). Do goals affect the structure of students’ argumentative writing strategies? Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(3), 577–589. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014702

19.

Flowerdew

(2000). Using a genre-based framework to teach organizational structure in academic writing. ELT Journal, 54(4), 369–378. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/54.4.369

20.

Forsyth

S. R.

Powell

S. R.

(2017). Differences in the mathematics-vocabulary knowledge of fifth-grade students with and without learning difficulties. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 32(4), 231–245. https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12144

21.

Glogger

Schwonke

Holzäpfel

Nückles

Renkl

(2012). Learning strategies assessed by journal writing: Prediction of learning outcomes by quantity, quality, and combinations of learning strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(2), 452–468. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026683

22.

Hallett

Nunes

Bryant

(2010). Individual differences in conceptual and procedural knowledge when learning fractions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(2), 395–406. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017486

23.

Han

Lin

Song

(2025). The impact of mathematical content complexity on students’ mathematics-writing performance. Reading and Writing. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-025-10647-7

24.

Han

X. N.

Lin

(2024). Investigating the features of mathematics writing among Chinese students. Reading and Writing. Advance Online Publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-024-10547-2

25.

Hebert

M. A.

Powell

S. R.

(2016). Examining fourth–grade MW: Features of organization, mathematics vocabulary, and mathematical representations. Reading and Writing, 29(7), 1511–1537. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145–016–9649–5

26.

Hebert

M. A.

Powell

S. R.

Bohaty

Roehling

(2019). Piloting a mathematics-writing intervention with late elementary students at risk for learning difficulties. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 34(3), 144–157. DOI: 10.1111/ldrp.12202

27.

Hedges

L. V.

Olkin

(1984). Nonparametric estimators of effect size in meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 96(3), 573–580. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.96.3.573

28.

Hirvela

(2017). Argumentation & second language writing: Are we missing the boat? Journal of Second Language Writing, 36(8), 69–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2017.05.002

29.

Hughes

E. M.

Lee

J. Y.

(2020). Effects of a mathematical writing intervention on middle school students’ performance. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 36(2), 176–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2019.1677537

30.

Hughes

E. M.

Powell

S. R.

Stevens

E. A.

(2016). Supporting clear and concise mathematics language: Say this, not that. Teaching Exceptional Children, 49(1), 7–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/0040059916654901

31.

Hughes

E. M.

Riccomini

P. J.

Lee

J.-Y.

(2020). Investigating written expressions of mathematical reasoning for students with learning disabilities. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 58(8), Article 100775. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2020.100775

32.

Jones

Myhill

Bailey

(2013). Grammar for writing? An investigation of the effects of contextualised grammar teaching on students’ writing. Reading and Writing, 26(8), 1241–1263. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145–012–9416–1

33.

Jordan

N. C.

Hansen

Fuchs

L. S.

Siegler

R. S.

Gersten

Micklos

(2013). Developmental predictors of fraction concepts and procedures. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 116(1), 45–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2013.02.001

34.

Kiuhara

S. A.

Levin

J. R.

Tolbert

O’Keeffe

B. V.

O’Neill

R. E.

Jameson

J. M.

(2024). Teaching argument writing in math class: Challenges and solutions to improve the performance of 4th and 5th graders with disabilities. Reading and Writing, 37(6), 1515–1544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-023-10459-7

35.

Kurniati

Kusumastuti

(2019). Concept map strategy to organize ideas in writing exposition text. Journal of English Language Teaching, 6(1), 25–34. https://doi.org/10.33394/jo-elt.v6i1.2346

36.

Lin

(2021). Investigating the unique predictors of word-problem solving using meta-analytic structural equation modeling. Educational Psychology Review, 33(3), 1097–1124. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09554-w

37.

Lin

Peng

Luo

H. J.

(2021). The deficit profile of elementary students with computational difficulties versus word problem-solving difficulties. Learning Disability Quarterly, 44(2), 110–122. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731948719865499

38.

Lin

Peng

Song

X. W.

Liu

Q. L.

(2025). Examine the longitudinal association between prior and subsequent mathematics using meta-analytic structural equation modeling approach. Educational Psychology Review, 37(2), 1–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-025-10030-6

39.

Lin

Peng

Zeng

(2021). Understanding the relation between mathematics vocabulary and mathematics performance: A meta–analysis. The Elementary School Journal, 121(3), 504–540. https://doi.org/10.1086/712504

40.

Lin

Powell

(2021). Examining the relation between whole-number and fractions: A meta-analytic structural equation modeling approach. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 67(4), Article 102017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2021.102017

41.

Lin

Zhang

J. H.

Cui

H. R.

Song

X. W.

Han

X. N.

(2025). Unique and combined effects of fraction vocabulary and arithmetic instruction. Journal of Learning Disabilities. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222194251342191

42.

McCutchen

(1986). Domain knowledge and linguistic knowledge in the development of writing ability. Journal of Memory and Language, 25(4), 431–444. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(86)90036-7

43.

Milroy

(2015). Comprehension and context: Successful communication and communicative breakdown 1. In The art of listening (pp. 17–42). Routledge.

44.

Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China. (2022). Mathematics curriculum standards for compulsory education (2022 edition). Beijing Normal University Press.

45.

Monroe

E. E.

Panchyshyn

(1995). Vocabulary considerations for teaching mathematics. Childhood Education, 72(2), 80–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/00094056.1996.10521849

46.

Moran

A. S.

Swanson

H. L.

Gerber

M. M.

Fung

(2014). The effects of paraphrasing interventions on problem-solving accuracy for children at risk for math disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 29(3), 97–105. https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12035

47.

Moschkovich

(2013). Principles and guidelines for equitable mathematics teaching practices and materials for English language learners. Journal of Urban Mathematics Education, 6(1), 45–57. https://doi.org/10.21423/jume–v6i1a204

48.

Namkung

J. M.

Hebert

Powell

S. R.

Hoins

Bricko

Torchia

(2020). Comparing and validating four methods for scoring mathematics writing. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 36(2), 157–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2019.1700858

49.

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.

50.

Nelson

Powell

S. R.

(2018). A systematic review of longitudinal studies of mathematics difficulty. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 51(6), 523–539. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219417714773

51.

O’Connor

R. E.

Bocian

K. M.

Beach

K. D.

Sanchez

Flynn

L. J.

(2013). Special education in a 4-year response to intervention (RtI) environment: Characteristics of students with learning disability and grade of identification. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 28(3), 98–112. https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12013

52.

Peng

Lin

(2019). The relation between mathematics vocabulary and mathematics performance among fourth graders. Learning and Individual Differences, 69(2), 11–21. https://doi.org.libezproxy.um.edu.mo/10.1016/j.lindif.2018.11.006

53.

Pierce

M. E.

Fontaine

L. M.

(2009). Designing vocabulary instruction in mathematics. The Reading Teacher, 63(3), 239–243. https://doi.org/10.1598/RT.63.3.7

54.

Plančić

Ninčević

(2014). Transition words in academic writing. Transactions on Maritime Science, 3(1), 61–68. https://doi.org/10.7225/toms.v03.n01.007

55.

Powell

S. R.

Bos

S. E.

Lin

(2021). The assessment of mathematics vocabulary in the elementary and middle school grades. Diversity Dimensions in Mathematics and Language Learning, 24, 313–330. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110661941-016

56.

Powell

S. R.

Driver

M. K.

(2015). The influence of mathematics vocabulary instruction embedded within addition tutoring for first–grade students with mathematics difficulty. Learning Disability Quarterly, 38(4), 221–233. https://doi.org/10.1177/073194871456457

57.

Powell

S. R.

Hebert

M. A.

(2016). Influence of writing ability and computation skill on MW. The Elementary School Journal, 117(2), 310–335.

58.

Powell

S. R.

Hebert

M. A.

Cohen

J. A.

Casa

T. M.

Firmender

J. M.

(2017). A synthesis of mathematics writing: Assessments, interventions, and surveys. Journal of Writing Research, 8(3), 493–530. https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2017.08.03.04

59.

Raiker

(2002). Spoken language and mathematics. Cambridge Journal of Education, 32(1), 45–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057640220116427

60.

Riccomini

P. J.

Smith

G. W.

Hughes

E. M.

Fries

K. M.

(2015). The language of mathematics: The importance of teaching and learning mathematical vocabulary. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 31(3), 235–252. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2015.1030995

61.

Sasmaz

Çifci

(2023). Expert opinions on improving informative text writing skills through descriptive writing practices. International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies, 11(1), 50–58. http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.11n.1p.50

62.

Psychological Corporation. (2009). Wechsler individual achievement test (3rd ed.). Pearson.

63.

Spires

H. A.

Kerkhoff

S. N.

Graham

A. C.

Thompson

Lee

J. K.

(2018). Operationalizing and validating disciplinary literacy in secondary education. Reading and Writing, 31(3), 1401–1434. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-018-9839-4

64.

Stock

Desoete

Roeyers

(2010). Detecting children with arithmetic disabilities from kindergarten: Evidence from a 3–year longitudinal study on the role of preparatory arithmetic abilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 43(3), 250–268. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219409345011

65.

Teledahl

(2017). How young students communicate their mathematical problem solving in writing. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 48(4), 555–572. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2016.1256447

66.

Teledahl

Kilhamn

Ahl

L. M.

Helenius

(2024). Defining and measuring quality in students’ mathematical writing: A systematic literature review. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 37, 557–576. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-024-00501-4

67.

Tolar

T. D.

Fuchs

Fletcher

J. M.

Fuchs

Hamlett

C. L.

(2016). Cognitive profiles of mathematical problem solving learning disability for different definitions of disability. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 49(3), 240–256. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219414538520

68.

Ünal

Z. E.

Powell

S. R.

Özel

Scofield

J. E.

Geary

D. C.

(2021). Mathematics vocabulary differentially predicts mathematics achievement in eighth grade higher-versus lower-achieving students: Comparisons across two countries. Learning and Individual Differences, 92. 102061. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2021.102061

69.

Wilkinson

G. S.

Robertson

G. J.

(2006). Wide range achievement test (4th ed.). Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

3.70 MB