There is a wide gap between what research evidence identifies as effective reading intervention and what is currently offered in schools. This effectiveness study reports the results of a long-term research/school system partnership that is implementing reading intervention for children with reading difficulties in Canadian community schools. In Study 1, growth-curve analyses revealed significant long-term shifts in the reading trajectories of children (n = 731) from Kindergarten to Grade 5 as a function of receiving the Empower™ Reading: Decoding and Spelling intervention. Long-term outcomes were higher in children who received intervention in Grade 2 than in Grade 3, supporting the benefit of earlier intervention. In Study 2, we compare reading outcomes before and after children participated in school system-led intervention (Empower™ Reading, n = 341) to results from previously reported researcher-led intervention and business-as-usual controls. Children in both school system-led and researcher-led interventions showed greater improvement than controls on standardized measures of decoding and reading comprehension. Among school system participants, greater gains were seen for those with stronger reading skills at pre-test. Findings demonstrate successful school system implementation of research-originated and validated reading intervention. Researcher/school system partnerships may be integral in closing the research–practice gap.
AngristJ.-S.PischkeJ. E. (2009). Mostly harmless econometrics: An empiricist’s companion. Princeton University Press.
3.
AvalosB. (2011). Teacher professional development in teaching and teacher education over ten years. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(1), 10–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.08.007
4.
BaileyD. H.DuncanG. J.CunhaF.FoormanB. R.YeagerD. S. (2020). Persistence and fade-out of educational-intervention effects: Mechanisms and potential solutions. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 21(2), 55–97. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1177/1529100620915848
5.
BennerG. J.NelsonJ. R.StageS. A.RalstonN. C. (2011). The influence of fidelity of implementation on the reading outcomes of middle school students experiencing reading difficulties. Remedial and Special Education, 32(1), 79–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932510361265
6.
BonettD. G. (2008). Confidence intervals for standardized linear contrasts of means. Psychological Methods, 13(2), 99–109. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.13.2.99
7.
CoburnC. E. (2003). Rethinking scale: Moving beyond numbers to deep and lasting change. Educational Researcher, 32(6), 3–12. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X032006003
8.
CoyneM. D.OldhamA.DoughertyS. M.LeonardK.KoriakinT.GageN. A.GillisM. (2018). Evaluating the effects of supplemental reading intervention within an MTSS or RTI reading reform initiative using a regression discontinuity design. Exceptional Children, 84(4), 350–367. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402918772791
9.
CoyneM. D.OldhamA.LeonardK.BurnsD.GageN. (2016). Delving into the details: Implementing multitiered K–3 reading supports in high-priority schools. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 2016(154), 67–85. https://doi.org/10.1002/cad.20175
10.
DentonC. A.HallC.ChoE.CannonG.ScammaccaN.WanzekJ. (2022). A meta-analysis of the effects of foundational skills and multicomponent reading interventions on reading comprehension for primary-grade students. Learning and Individual Differences, 93, 102062. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2021.102062
11.
DentonC. A.HockerJ. L. (2006). Responsive reading instruction: Flexible intervention for struggling readers in the early grades. Sopris West.
12.
DentonC. A.NimonK.MathesP. G.SwansonE. A.KethleyC.KurzT. B.ShihM. (2010). Effectiveness of a supplemental early reading intervention scaled up in multiple schools. Exceptional Children, 76(4), 394–416. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440291007600402
13.
DentonC. A.TolarT. D.FletcherJ. M.BarthA. E.VaughnS.FrancisD. J. (2013). Effects of tier 3 intervention for students with persistent reading difficulties and characteristics of inadequate responders. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(3), 633. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032581
14.
DurlakJ. A.DuPreE. P. (2008). Implementation matters: A review of research on the influence of implementation on program outcomes and the factors affecting implementation. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41(3–4), 327–350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-008-9165-0
FletcherJ. M.LyonG. R.FuchsL. S.BarnesM. A. (2019). Learning disabilities: From identification to intervention (2nd ed.). Guilford.
18.
FletcherJ. M.VaughnS. (2009). Response to intervention: Preventing and remediating academic difficulties. Child Development Perspectives, 3(1), 30–37. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-8606.2008.00072.x
19.
FoormanB. (2016). Introduction to the special issue: Challenges and solutions to implementing effective reading intervention in schools. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 154, 7–10. https://doi.org/10.1002/cad.20172
20.
FoormanB.BeylerN.BorradaileK.CoyneM.DentonC.DiminoJ.FurgesonJ.HayesL.HenkeJ.JusticeL.KeatingB.LewisW.SattarS.StrekeA.WagnerR.WisselS. (2016). Foundational skills to support reading for understanding in kindergarten through 3rd grade (NCEE 2016-4008). National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance (NCEE), Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
21.
FoormanB.DombekJ.SmithK. (2016). Seven elements important to successful implementation of early literacy intervention. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 154, 49–65. https://doi.org/10.1002/cad.20178
22.
FrijtersJ. C.LovettM. W.SevcikR. A.MorrisR. D. (2013). Four methods of identifying change in the context of a multiple component reading intervention for struggling middleschool readers. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 26(4), 539–563. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-012-9418-z
23.
GerstenR.ComptonD.ConnorC. M.DiminoJ.SantoroL.Linan-ThompsonS.TillyW. D. (2008). Assisting students struggling with reading: Response to Intervention and multi-tier intervention for reading in the primary grades A practice guide. (NCEE 2009-4045). National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
24.
GrøverV. (2016). Commentary: Implementing interventions: Building a shared understanding of why. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 2016(154), 109–112. https://doi.org/10.1002/cad.20174
HallC.Dahl-LeonardK.ChoE.SolariE. J.CapinP.ConnerC. L.HenryA. R.CookL.HayesL.VargasI.RichmondC. L. (2023). Forty years of reading intervention research for elementary students with or at risk for dyslexia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Reading Research Quarterly, 58(2), 285–312. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.477
27.
HarnB.ParisiD.StoolmillerM. (2013). Balancing fidelity with flexibility and fit: What do we really know about fidelity of implementation in schools?Exceptional Children, 79(2), 181–193. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440291307900204
28.
HoxJ. J.MoerbeekM.van de SchootR. (2010). Multilevel analysis: Techniques and applications (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203852279
JuelC. (1988). Learning to read and write: A longitudinal study of 54 children from first through fourth grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(4), 437–447. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.80.4.437
31.
KearnsD.FuchsD.McMasterK.SáenzL.FuchsL.YenL.MeyersC.SteinM.ComptonD.BerendsM.SmithT. (2010). Factors contributing to teachers’ sustained use of kindergarten peer-assisted learning strategies. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 3, 315–342. https://doi.org/10.1080/19345747.2010.491151
32.
KimJ.BurkhauserM.QuinnD.GuryanJ.KingstonH.AlemanK. (2017). Effectiveness of structured teacher adaptations to an evidence-based summer literacy program. Reading Research Quarterly, 52(4), 443–467. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.178
33.
KimJ. S.HemphillL.TroyerM.ThomsonJ. M.JonesS. M.LaRussoM. D.DonovanS. (2017). Engaging struggling adolescent readers to improve reading skills. Reading Research Quarterly, 52(3), 357–382. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.171
34.
KlingnerJ. K.AhweeS.PilonietaP.MenendezR. (2003). Barriers and facilitators in scaling up research-based practices. Exceptional Children, 69(4), 411–429. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290306900402
35.
KlingnerJ. K.BoardmanA. G.McMasterK. L. (2013). What does it take to scale up and sustain evidence-based practices?Exceptional Children, 79(2), 195–211. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440291307900205
36.
LaRussoM. D.DonovanS.SnowC. (2016). Implementation challenges for tier one and tier two school-based programs for early adolescents. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 154, 11–30. https://doi.org/10.1002/cad.20179
37.
LemonsC. J.Al OtaibaS.ConwayS. J.MelladoDeLa CruzV. (2016). Improving professional development to enhance reading outcomes for students in special education. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 154, 87–104. https://doi.org/10.1002/cad.20177
38.
LovettM. W.BarronR. W.FrijtersJ. C. (2013). Word identification difficulties in children and adolescents with reading disabilities: Intervention research findings. In SwansonH. L.HarrisK.GrahamS. (Eds.), Handbook of learning disabilities (2nd ed., pp. 329 –360). Guilford Press.
39.
LovettM. W.De PalmaM.FrijtersJ.SteinbachK.TempleM.BensonN.LacerenzaL. (2008). Interventions for reading difficulties: A comparison of response to intervention by ELL and EFL struggling readers. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 41(4), 333–352. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219408317859
40.
LovettM. W.FrijtersJ. C.SteinbachK. A.SevcikR. A.MorrisR. D. (2021). Effective intervention for adolescents with reading disabilities: Combining reading and motivational remediation to improve outcomes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 113(4), 656–689. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000639
41.
LovettM. W.FrijtersJ. C.WolfM.SteinbachK. A.SevcikR. A.MorrisR. D. (2017). Early intervention for children at risk for reading disabilities: The impact of grade at intervention and individual differences on intervention outcomes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 109(7), 889–914. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000181
42.
LovettM. W.LacerenzaL.BordenS. L. (2000). Putting struggling readers on the PHAST track a program to integrate phonological and strategy-based remedial reading instruction and maximize outcomes. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33(5), 458–476. https://doi.org/10.1177/002221940003300507
43.
LovettM. W.LacerenzaL.BordenS. L.FrijtersJ. C.SteinbachK. A.De PalmaM. (2000). Components of effective remediation for developmental reading disabilities: Combining phonological and strategy-based instruction to improve outcomes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(2), 263–283. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.92.2.263
44.
LovettM. W.LacerenzaL.De PalmaM.BensonN. J.SteinbachK. A.FrijtersJ. C. (2008). Preparing teachers to remediate reading disabilities in high school: What is needed for effective professional development?Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(4), 1083–1097. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2007.10.005
45.
LovettM. W.LacerenzaL.De PalmaM.FrijtersJ. C. (2012). Evaluating the efficacy of remediation for struggling readers in high school. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 45(2), 151–169. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219410371678
46.
LovettM. W.LacerenzaL.SteinbachK. A.De PalmaM. (2014). Development and evaluation of a research-based intervention program for children with reading disabilities. Perspectives on Language and Literacy, 40, 21–31.
47.
LovettM. W.SteinbachK. A.De PalmaM. (2020). Scaling up evidence-based interventions for reading disorders: Bringing research-based interventions to community practice in diverse settings. In WashingtonJ.ComptonD.McCardleP. (Eds.), Dyslexia: Revisiting etiology, diagnosis, treatment, and policy (pp. 216–229). Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.
48.
McCarthyA. M.ChristT. J. (2010). Test review: Beaver, JM, & Carter, MA (2006). The developmental reading assessment—Second edition (DRA2). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 35(3), 182–185. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534508410363127
49.
MorrisR. D.LovettM. W.WolfM.SevcikR. A.SteinbachK. A.FrijtersJ. C.ShapiroM. B. (2012). Multiple-component remediation for developmental reading disabilities: IQ, socioeconomic status, and race as factors in remedial outcome. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 45(2), 99–127. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219409355472
50.
National Centre for Educational Statistics. (2019). The nation’s report card [Data tools: NAEP data explorer]. National Assessment of Educational Progress. https://www.nationsreportcard.gov/ndecore/xplore/NDE
51.
National Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching students to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction: Reports of the subgroups. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health.
52.
PaeH. P.WiseJ. C.CirinoP. T.SevcikR. A.LovettM. W.WolfM.MorrisR. (2005). The woodcock reading master test: Impact of normative changes. Assessment, 12(3), 347–357. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191105277006
53.
ParkerD. C.ZaslofskyA. F.BurnsM. K.KaniveR.HodgsonJ.ScholinS. E.KlingbeilD. A. (2015). A brief report of the diagnostic accuracy of oral reading fluency and reading inventory levels for reading failure risk among second-and third-grade students. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 31(1), 56–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2013.857970
54.
PearsonP. D.PalincsarA. S.BiancarosaG.BermanA. I. (Eds.). (2020). Reaping the rewards of the reading for understanding initiative. National Academy of Education.
RosnowR. L.RosenthalR. (1996). Computing contrasts, effect sizes, and counternulls on other people's published data: General procedures for research consumers. Psychological Methods, 1(4), 331–340. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.1.4.331
57.
ScammaccaN. K.RobertsG.VaughnS.StuebingK. K. (2015). A meta-analysis of interventions for struggling readers in Grades 4–12: 1980–2011. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 48(4), 369–390. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219413504995
58.
SeidenbergM. (2017). Language at the speed of sight: How we read, why so many can’t, and what can be done about it. Basic Books.
59.
ShaywitzS. E.FletcherJ. M.HolahanJ. M.ShneiderA. E.MarchioneK. E.StuebingK. K.ShaywitzB. A. (1999). Persistence of dyslexia: The Connecticut longitudinal study at adolescence. Pediatrics, 104(6), 1351–1359. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.104.6.1351
SiegelmanN.RuecklJ. G.van den BuntM.FrijtersJ. C.ZevinJ. D.LovettM. W.MorrisR. D. (2022). How you read affects what you gain: Individual differences in the functional organization of the reading system predict intervention gains in children with reading disabilities. Journal of Educational Psychology, 114(4), 855–869. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000672
62.
SnijdersT. A. B.BoskerR. J. (2012). Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling (2nd ed.). Sage Publishers.
63.
SnowC. E. (2015). 2014 Wallace foundation distinguished lecture: Rigor and realism: Doing educational science in the real world. Educational Researcher, 44(9), 460–466. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X15619166
SolariE. J.TerryN. P.GaabN.HoganT. P.NelsonN. J.PentimontiJ. M.SaykoS. (2020). Translational science: A road map for the science of reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 55, S347–S360. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.357
66.
Spear-SwerlingL. (Ed.). (2022). Structured literacy interventions: Teaching students with reading difficulties, Grades K-6. Guilford Press.
67.
StanovichK. E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 360–407. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022057409189001-204
68.
StataCorp. (2017). Stata statistical software: Release 15.
StuebingK. K.BarthA. E.TrahanL. H.ReddyR. R.MiciakJ.FletcherJ. M. (2015). Are child cognitive characteristics strong predictors of responses to intervention? A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 85(3), 395–429. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654314555996
72.
SuggateS. P. (2016). A meta-analysis of the long-term effects of phonemic awareness, phonics, fluency, and reading comprehension interventions. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 49(1), 77–96. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219414528540
73.
TannockR.FrijtersJ. C.MartinussenR.WhiteE. J.IckowiczA.BensonN. J.LovettM. W. (2018). Combined modality intervention for ADHD with comorbid reading disorders: A proof of concept study. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 51(1), 55–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219416678409
74.
VaughnS.CapinP.ScammaccaN.RobertsG.CirinoP.FletcherJ. M. (2020). The critical role of word reading as a predictor of response to intervention. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 53(6), 415–427. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219419891412
75.
VellutinoF. R.FletcherJ. M.SnowlingM. J.ScanlonD. M. (2004). Specific reading disability (dyslexia): What have we learned in the past four decades?Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 45(1), 2–40. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0021-9630.2003.00305.x
76.
WanzekJ.StevensE. A.WilliamsK. J.ScammaccaN.VaughnS.SargentK. (2018). Current evidence on the effects of intensive early reading interventions. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 51(6), 612–624. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222194187751
77.
WanzekJ.VaughnS. (2007). Research-based implications from extensive early reading interventions. School Psychology Review, 36(4), 541–561. https://doi.org/10.1080/02796015.2007.12087917
78.
WanzekJ.VaughnS. (2016). Implementation of a text-based content intervention in secondary social studies classes. In FoormanB. (Ed.). Challenges to implementing effective reading intervention in schools, New directions for child and adolescent development (Vol. 154, pp. 31–48). Wiley.
79.
WanzekJ.VaughnS.ScammaccaN. K.GatlinB.WalkerM. A.CapinP. (2016). Meta-analyses of the effects of tier 2 type reading interventions in Grades K-3. Educational Psychology Review, 28(3), 551–576. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9321-7
80.
WanzekJ.VaughnS.ScammaccaN. K.MetzK.MurrayC. S.RobertsG.DanielsonL. (2013). Extensive reading interventions for students with reading difficulties after grade 3. Review of Educational Research, 83(2), 163–195. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465431347721
81.
WillcuttE. G.BetjemannR. S.PenningtonB. F.OlsonR. K.DeFriesJ. C.WadsworthS. J. (2007). Longitudinal study of reading disability and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: Implications for education. Mind, Brain, and Education, 1(4), 181–192. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-228X.2007.00019.x
YoonK. S.DuncanT.LeeS. W.-Y.ScarlossB.ShapleyK. (2007). Reviewing the evidence on how teacher professional development affects student achievement (Issues & Answers Report, REL 2007-No.033). (REL 2007–No. 033). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Regional Educational Laboratory Southwest. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
