The purpose of this study was to examine the amount of attention devoted to data-based decision-making in Curriculum-Based Measurement (CBM) professional development materials. Sixty-nine CBM instructional sources were reviewed, including 45 presentations, 22 manuals, and two books. The content of the presentations and manuals/books was coded into one of four categories: (a) general CBM information, (b) conducting CBM, (c) data-based decision-making, and (d) other. Results revealed that only a small proportion of information in the CBM instructional materials was devoted to data-based decision-making (12% for presentations and 14% for manuals/books), and that this proportion was significantly smaller than (a) that devoted to other instructional topics, (b) that expected were information to be equally distributed across major instructional topics, and (c) that recommended by experienced CBM trainers. Results suggest a need for increased attention to data-based decision-making in CBM professional development.
DanielsonL.RosenquistC. (2014). Introduction to the TEC special issue on data-based individualization. Teaching for Exceptional Children, 46(4), 6–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/0040059914522965
DenoS. L.MirkinP. (1977). Data-based program modification: A manual. Leadership Training Institute for Special Education.
5.
Endrew, F., v. Douglas County School District RE-1, 580 U.S. (2017).
6.
EspinC. A.WaymanM. M.DenoS. L.McMasterK. L.De RooijM. (2017). Data-based decision-making: Developing a method for capturing teachers’ understanding of CBM graphs. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 32, 8–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12123
7.
FildermanM. J.TosteJ. R.DidionL. A.PengP.ClemensN. H. (2018). Data-based decision making in reading interventions: A synthesis and meta-analysis of the effects for struggling readers. The Journal of Special Education, 52, 174–187. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466918790001
8.
FleissJ. L. (1981). Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions (2nd ed.). Wiley.
9.
FrielS. N.CurcioF. R.BrightG. W. (2001). Making sense of graphs: Critical factors influencing comprehension and instructional implications. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 32, 124–158. https://doi.org/10.2307/749671
10.
FuchsL. S.FuchsD. (1989). Enhancing curriculum-based measurement through computer applications: Review of research and practice. School Psychology Review, 18, 317–327. https://doi.org/10.1080/02796015.1989.12085429
11.
FuchsL. S.FuchsD. (2002). Computer applications to curriculum-based measurement. Special Services in the Schools, 17(1–2), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1300/J008v17n01_01
12.
FuchsL. S.FuchsD.HamlettC. L. (1989). Effects of alternative goal structures within curriculum-based measurement. Exceptional Children, 55, 429–438. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440298905500506
13.
FuchsL. S.FuchsD.HamlettC. L. (1994). Strengthening the connection between assessment and instructional planning with expert systems. Exceptional Children, 61, 138–146.
14.
FuchsL. S.FuchsD.HamlettC. L. (2007). Using curriculum-based measurement to inform reading instruction. Reading and Writing, 20, 553–567. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9051-4
15.
FuchsL. S.FuchsD.HamlettC. L.SteckerP. (2020). Bringing data-based individualization to scale: A call for the next-generation technology of teacher supports. Journal of Learning Disabilities.
16.
GeselS. A.LeJeuneL. M.ChowJ. C.SinclairA. C.LemonsC. J. (2020). A meta-analysis of the impact of professional development on teachers’ knowledge, skill, and self-efficacy in data-based decision-making. Journal of Learning Disabilities. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219420970196
17.
GleasonP.CrisseyS.ChojnackiG.ZukiewiczM.SilvaT.CostelloeS.O’ReillyF.JohnsonE. (2019). Evaluation of support for using student data to inform teachers’ instruction (NCEE 2019-4008). U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance.
18.
HospM. K.HospJ. L.HowellK. W. (2016). The ABC’s of CBM: A practical guide to curriculum-based measurement (2nd ed.). Guilford.
19.
JenkinsJ. R.FuchsL. S. (2012). Curriculum-based measurement: The paradigm, history, and legacy. In EspinC. A.McMasterK. L.RoseS. (Eds.), A measure of success: The influence of curriculum-based measurement in education (pp. 7–26). University of Minnesota Press.
20.
JungP.-G.McMasterK. L.KunkelA. K.ShinJ.SteckerP. M. (2018). Effects of data-based individualization for students with intensive learning needs: A meta-analysis. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 33, 144–155. https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12172
21.
KratochwillT. R.LevinJ. R.HornerR. H.SwobodaC. M. (2014). Visual analysis of single-case intervention research: Conceptual and methodological issues. In KratochwillT. R.LevinJ. R. (Eds.), Single-case intervention research: Statistical and methodological advances (pp. 91–125). American Psychological Association.
22.
LemonsC. J.VaughnS.WexlerJ.KearnsD. M.SinclairA. C. (2018). Envisioning an improved continuum of special education services for students with learning disabilities: Considering intervention intensity. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 33, 131–143. https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12173
23.
MandinachE. B.SchildkampK. (2020). The complexity of data-based decision making: An introduction to the special issue. Studies in Educational Evaluation. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100906
24.
SayeskiK. L.BatemanD. F.YellM. L. (2019). Re-envisioning teacher preparation in an era of Endrew F.: Instruction over access. Intervention in School and Clinic, 54, 264–271. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053451218819157
25.
SteckerP. M.FuchsL. S.FuchsD. (2005). Using curriculum-based measurement to improve student achievement: Review of research. Psychology in the Schools, 42(8), 795–819. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20113
26.
van den BoschR. M.EspinC. A.ChungS.SaabN. (2017). Data-based decision-making: Teachers’ comprehension of curriculum-based measurement progress-monitoring graphs. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 32, 46–60. https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12122
27.
van den BoschR. M.EspinC. A.Pat-ElR. J.SaabN. (2019). Improving teachers’ comprehension of curriculum-based measurement progress-monitoring graphs. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 52, 413–427. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219419856013
28.
van den BoschR. M.EspinC. A.Sikkema-de JongM. T.ChungS.BoenderP.SaabN. (in press). Teachers’ inspection patterns of curriculum-based measurement progress monitoring graphs: An eye-tracking study [Unpublished manuscript]. Department of Education and Child Studies, Leiden University.
29.
Van KuijkM. F.DeunkM. I.BoskerR. J.RitzemaE. S. (2016). Goals, data use, and instruction: The effect of a teacher professional development program on reading achievement. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 17, 135–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2015.1026268
30.
WagnerD. L.Hammerschmidt-SnidarichS. M.EspinC. A.SeifertK.McMasterK. L. (2017). Pre-service teachers’ interpretation of CBM progress monitoring data. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 32, 22–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12125
YellM. L.BatemanD. F. (2019). Free appropriate public education and Endrew F. v. Douglas County School System (2017): Implications for personnel preparation. Teacher Education and Special Education, 42, 6–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888840617754239
34.
ZeuchN.FörsterN.SouvignierE. (2017). Assessing teachers’ competencies to read and interpret graphs from learning progress assessment: Results from tests and interviews. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 32, 61–70. https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12123
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
