Sustaining the Use of Evidence-Based Tier 1 Literacy Practices That Benefit Students With Disabilities

Abstract

The adoption and sustainability of evidence-based Tier 1 literacy practices in secondary content-area classes is important to improve reading success for students with learning disabilities. We conducted an exploratory multiple-case study investigating teachers’ adoption and sustained use of evidence-based Tier 1 literacy practices that benefit students with learning disabilities. The study was conducted within the context of an adolescent literacy model demonstration project funded by the U.S. Office of Special Education Programs (i.e., Promoting Adolescents’ Comprehension of Text [PACT] Plus). Interviews were conducted with two administrators and seven teachers who sustained implementation of the PACT practices beyond 1 year of researcher support. Analyses revealed practice and school-level factors that influenced teachers’ sustained use of the practices. We used findings from this study to propose a model of sustainability of Tier 1 evidence-based literacy practices used to improve outcomes for students with learning disabilities. Limitations and implications for future research are provided.

Keywords

adolescents literacy professional development sustainability

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

ACT. (2008). The forgotten middle: Ensuring that all students are on track for college and career readiness before high school.

Andreou

T. E.

McIntosh

Ross

S. W.

Kahn

J. D.

(2015). Critical incidents in sustaining school-wide positive behavioral interventions and supports. The Journal of Special Education, 49(3), 157–167. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466914554298

Archer

A. L.

Hughes

C. A.

(2011). Explicit instruction: Effective and efficient teaching. Guilford Press.

Brantlinger

Jimenez

Klingner

Pugach

Richardson

(2005). Qualitative studies in special education. Exceptional Children, 71(2), 195–207. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290507100205

Coburn

C. E.

(2003). Rethinking scale: Moving beyond numbers to deep and lasting change. Educational Researcher, 32(6), 3–12. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X032006003

Cook

B. G.

Cook

S. C.

(2013). Unraveling evidence-based practices in special education. The Journal of Special Education, 47(2), 71–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466911420877

Darling-Hammond

Wei

R. C.

Andree

Richardson

Orphanos

(2009). Professional learning in the learning profession. National Staff Development Council.

Desimone

L. M.

(2009). Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher, 38(3), 181–199. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X08331140

Desimone

L. M.

Garet

M. S.

(2015). Best practices in teachers’ professional development in the United States. Psychology, Society and Education, 7, 252–263. http://doi.org/10.25115/psye.v7i3.515

10.

DiPaola

M. F.

Hoy

W. K.

(2013). Principals improving instruction: Supervision, evaluation, and professional development. Pearson/Allyn & Bacon.

11.

Donovan

M. S.

(2013). Generating improvement through research and development in education systems. Science, 340(6130), 317–319.

12.

Drago-Severson

(2012). New opportunities for principal leadership: Shaping school climates for enhanced teacher development. Teachers College Record, 114(3), 1–44.

13.

Fixsen

D. L.

Naoom

S. F.

Blase

K. A.

Friedman

R. M.

Wallace

(2005). Implementation research: A synthesis of the literature. National Implementation Research Network, University of South Florida. www.activeimplemntation.org

14.

Forman

S. G.

Barakat

N. M.

(2011). Cognitive-behavioral therapy in the schools: Bringing research to practice through effective implementation. Psychology in the Schools, 48(3), 283–296. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20547

15.

Fuchs

L. S.

Fuchs

Compton

D. L.

(2010). Rethinking response to intervention at middle and high school. School Psychology Review, 39(1), 22–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/02796015.2010.12087787

16.

Garet

M. S.

Heppen

Walters

Smith

Yang

(2016). NCEE evaluation brief: Does content-focused teacher professional development work? Findings from three Institute of Education Science studies. Institute of Education Sciences.

17.

Gersten

Chard

Baker

(2000). Factors enhancing sustained use of research-based instructional practices. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33(5), 445–456. https://doi.org/10.1177/002221940003300505

18.

Gersten

Dimino

(2001). The realities of translating research into classroom practice. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 16(2), 120–130. https://doi.org/10.1111/0938-8982.00013

19.

Gilmour

A. F.

Fuchs

Wehby

J. H.

(2019). Are students with disabilities accessing the curriculum? A meta-analysis of the reading achievement gap between students with and without disabilities. Exceptional Children, 85(3), 329–346. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402918795830

20.

Han

S. S.

Weiss

(2005). Sustainability of teacher implementation of school-based mental health programs. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 33(6), 665–679. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-005-7646-2

21.

Harn

Parisi

Stoolmiller

(2013). Balancing fidelity with flexibility and fit: What do we really know about fidelity of implementation in schools? Exceptional Children, 79(3), 181–193. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440291307900204

22.

Kamil

M. L.

Borman

G. D.

Dole

Kral

C. C.

Salinger

Torgesen

(2008). Improving adolescent literacy: Effective classroom and intervention practices. IES practice guide. NCEE 2008-4027. National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance.

23.

Klingner

Vaughn

Hughes

M. T.

Arguelles

M. E.

(1999). Sustaining research-based practices in reading: A 3-year follow-up. Remedial and Special Education, 20(5), 263–274. https://doi.org/10.1177/074193259902000502

24.

Marzano

R. J.

Frontier

Livingston

(2011). Effective supervision: Supporting the art and science of teaching. ASCD.

25.

McCormick

L. K.

Steckler

A. B.

McLeroy

K. R.

(1995). Diffusion of innovations in schools: A study of adoption and implementation of school-based tobacco prevention curricula. American Journal of Health Promotion, 9, 210–219. https://doi.org/10.4278/0890-1171-9.3.210

26.

McIntosh

Horner

R. H.

Sugai

(2009). Sustainability of systems-level evidence-based practices in schools: Current knowledge and future directions. In: Sailor

Dunlap

Sugai

Horner

(Eds.). Handbook of positive behavior support (pp. 327–352). Springer.

27.

McLaughlin

M. W.

Mitra

(2001). Theory-based change and change-based theory: Going deeper, going broader. Journal of Educational Change, 2(4), 301–323. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014616908334

28.

Miles

M. B.

Huberman

A. M.

Saldana

(2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE.

29.

Newman

(2006). Facts from NLTS2: General education participation and academic performance of students with learning disabilities. SRI International. http://www.nlts2.org/fact_sheets/nlts2_fact_sheet_2006_07.pdf

30.

Reed

D. K.

Wexler

Vaughn

(2012). RTI for reading at the secondary level: Recommended literacy practices and remaining questions. Guilford Press.

31.

Rogers

(2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). Free Press.

32.

Rotermund

DeRoche

Ottem

(2017). Teacher professional development by selected teacher and school characteristics: 2011-12 (Stats in Brief, NCES 2017-200). National Center for Education Statistics.

33.

Scheirer

M. A.

Dearing

J. W.

(2011). An agenda for research on the sustainability of public health programs. American Journal of Public Health, 101(11), 2059–2067. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2011.300193

34.

Skinner

C. H.

Fletcher

P. A.

Henington

(1996). Increasing learning trial rates by increasing student response rates. School Psychology Quarterly, 11(4), 313–325. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0088937

35.

Stirman

S. W.

Kimberly

Cook

Calloway

Castro

Charns

(2012). The sustainability of new programs and innovations: A review of the empirical literature and recommendations for future research. Implementation Science, 7(1), 17. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-7-17

36.

Strauss

Corbin

(1990). Basics of qualitative research. SAGE.

37.

Sutherland

K. S.

Wehby

J. H.

(2001). Exploring the relationship between increased opportunities to respond to academic requests and the academic and behavioral outcomes of students with EBD: A review. Remedial and Special Education, 22(2), 113–121. https://doi.org/10.1177/074193250102200205

38.

Swanson

Stevens

E. A.

Scammacca

N. K.

Capin

Stewart

A. A.

Austin

C. R.

(2017). The impact of Tier 1 reading instruction on reading outcomes for students in Grades 4–12: A meta-analysis. Reading and Writing, 30(8), 1639–1665.

39.

Swanson

Wanzek

McCulley

Stillman

Vaughn

Simmons

Hairrell

(2015). Literacy and text reading in middle and high school social studies and English language arts classrooms. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 32, 199–222. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2014.910718

40.

Swanson

Wanzek

Vaughn

Fall

A.-M.

Roberts

Hall

Miller

(2017). Middle school reading comprehension and content learning intervention for below average readers. Reading and Writing Quarterly: Overcoming Learning Difficulties, 33, 37–53.

41.

Swanson

Wanzek

Vaughn

Roberts

Fall

A. M.

(2015). Improving reading comprehension and social studies knowledge among middle school students with disabilities. Exceptional Children, 81(4), 426–442.

42.

U.S. Department of Education. (2015). Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA). http://www.ed.gov/essa

43.

U.S. Department of Education. (2021). Digest of education statistics 2020. https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/

44.

U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress. (2019). 2019 reading assessment. https://www.nationsreportcard.gov/highlights/reading/2019/

45.

Vaughn

Klingner

Hughes

(2000). Sustainability of research-based practices. Exceptional Children, 66(2), 163–171. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290006600202

46.

Vaughn

Martinez

L. R.

Wanzek

Roberts

Swanson

Fall

A. M.

(2017). Improving content knowledge and comprehension for English language learners: Findings from a randomized control trial. Journal of Educational Psychology, 109(1), 22–34.

47.

Vaughn

Roberts

Swanson

E. A.

Wanzek

Fall

A. M.

Stillman-Spisak

S. J.

(2015). Improving middle-school students’ knowledge and comprehension in social studies: A replication. Educational Psychology Review, 27(1), 31–50.

48.

Vaughn

Swanson

E. A.

Roberts

Wanzek

Stillman-Spisak

S. J.

Solis

Simmons

(2013). Improving reading comprehension and social studies knowledge in middle school. Reading Research Quarterly, 48(1), 77–93.

49.

Vaughn

Wexler

Leroux

Roberts

Denton

Barth

Fletcher

(2012). Effects of intensive reading intervention for eighth-grade students with persistently inadequate response to intervention. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 45(6), 515–525.

50.

Wanzek

Swanson

Vaughn

Roberts

Fall

A. M.

(2016). English learner and non-English learner students with disabilities: Content acquisition and comprehension. Exceptional Children, 82(4), 428–442.

51.

Wexler

Kearns

D. M.

Lemons

C. J.

Mitchell

Clancy

Davidson

K. A.

Sinclair

A. C.

Wei

(2018). Reading comprehension and co-teaching practices in middle school English language arts classrooms. Exceptional Children, 84(4), 384–402. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402918771543

52.

Wexler

Mitchell

M. A.

Clancy

Silverman

R. D.

(2016). An investigation of literacy practices in science classrooms. Reading & Writing Quarterly: Overcoming Learning Difficulties, 33(3), 258–277. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2016.1193832