This study centered on emergent bilingual (EB) students with specific reading comprehension deficits (S-RCD), that is, with poor reading comprehension despite solid word identification skills. The participants were 209 students in Grades 2 to 4, including both EBs and English monolinguals (EMs) with and without S-RCD. Mean comparisons indicated that EBs and EMs with S-RCD showed weaknesses relative to typically developing (TD) readers in oral language, word identification, inference making, and reading engagement, but not in executive functioning. Longitudinal analyses indicated that across two academic years S-RCD persisted for 41% of EBs and EMs alike. Altogether, the study extends research on EBs with S-RCD by identifying variables beyond oral language that may account for their reading comprehension difficulties and providing insight into the extent to which their reading comprehension and word identification performance levels evolve during elementary school. Furthermore, the findings point to the importance of early identification and intervention for weaknesses in reading comprehension and its component elements in both EBs and EMS.
AaronP. G.JoshiR. M.Boulware-GoodenR.BentumK. (2008). Diagnosis and treatment of reading disabilities based on the component model of reading: An alternative to the discrepancy model of learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 41(1), 67–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219407310838
AikenL. S.WestS. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. SAGE.
4.
BarnesM. A.FaulknerH.WilkinsonM.DennisM. (2004). Meaning construction and integration in children with hydrocephalus. Brain and Language, 89(1), 47–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00295-5
5.
BialystokE. (2015). Bilingualism and the development of executive function: The role of attention. Child Development Perspectives, 9(2), 117–121. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12116
6.
BialystokE.BaracR. (2012). Emerging bilingualism: Dissociating advantages for metalinguistic awareness and executive control. Cognition, 122(1), 67–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2011.08.003
7.
BockA. M.GallawayK. C.HundA. M. (2015). Specifying links between executive functioning and theory of mind during middle childhood: Cognitive flexibility predicts social understanding. Journal of Cognition and Development, 16(3), 509–521. https://doi.org/10.1080/15248372.2014.888350
8.
BorellaE.CarrettiB.PelegrinaS. (2010). The specific role of inhibition in reading comprehension in good and poor comprehenders. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 43(6), 541–552. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0022219410371676
9.
BrooksB. L.ShermanE. M. S.StraussE. (2010). Test review: NEPSY-II: A developmental neuropsychological assessment, second edition. Child Neuropsychology, 16, 80–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/09297040903146966
10.
CainK.OakhillJ. V. (1999). Inference making ability and its relation to comprehension failure in young children. Reading and Writing, 11, 489–503. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008084120205
11.
CainK.OakhillJ. (2006). Profiles of children with specific reading comprehension difficulties. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(4), 683–696. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709905X67610
12.
CainK.OakhillJ. (2009). Reading comprehension development from 8 to 14 years. In WagnerR. K.SchatsneiderC.Phythian-SenceC. (Eds.), Beyond decoding: The behavioral and biological foundations of reading comprehension (pp. 143–175). Guilford.
13.
CainK.OakhillJ. (2011). Matthew effects in young readers: Reading comprehension and reading experience aid vocabulary development. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 44(5), 431–443. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219411410042
14.
CainK.OakhillJ.LemmonK. (2004). Individual differences in the inference of word meanings from context: The influence of reading comprehension, vocabulary knowledge, and memory capacity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(4), 671–681. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.96.4.671
15.
CainK.OakhillJ. V.BarnesM. A.BryantP. E. (2001). Comprehension skill, inference making ability, and the relation to knowledge. Memory & Cognition, 29(6), 850–859. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196414
16.
CalvoA.BialystokE. (2014). Independent effects of bilingualism and socioeconomic status on language ability and executive functioning. Cognition, 130, 278–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2015.09.004
CarrettiB.BorellaE.CornoldiC.De BeniR. (2009). Role of working memory in explaining the performance of individuals with specific reading comprehension difficulties: A meta-analysis. Learning and Individual Differences, 19(2), 246–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2008.10.002
19.
CartwrightK. B.CoppageE. A.LaneA. B.SingletonT.MarshallT. R.BentivegnaC. (2017). Cognitive flexibility deficits in children with specific reading comprehension difficulties. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 50, 33–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2016.01.003
20.
CartwrightK. B.MarshallT. R.DandyK. L.IsaacM. C. (2010). The development of graphophonological-semantic cognitive flexibility and its contribution to reading comprehension in beginning readers. Journal of Cognition and Development, 11(1), 61–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/15248370903453584
CuttingL. E.MaterekA.ColeC. A. S.LevineT. M.MahoneE. M. (2009). Effects of fluency, oral language, and executive function on reading comprehension performance. Annals of Dyslexia, 59(1), 34–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-009-0022-0
23.
CuttingL. E.ScarboroughH. S. (2006). Prediction of reading comprehension: Relative contributions of word recognition, language proficiency, and other cognitive skills can depend on how comprehension is measured. Scientific Studies of Reading, 10(3), 277–299. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532799xssr1003_5
24.
De NaeghelJ.Van KeerH.VansteenkisteM.RosseelY. (2012). The relation between elementary students’ recreational and academic reading motivation, reading frequency, engagement, and comprehension: A self-determination theory perspective. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(4), 1006–1021. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027800
EtmanskieJ. M.PartanenM.SiegelL. S. (2016). A longitudinal examination of the persistence of late emerging reading disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 49(1), 21–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219414522706
27.
FarniaF.GevaE. (2013). Growth and predictors of change in English language learners’ reading comprehension. Journal of Research in Reading, 36(4), 389–421. https://doi.org/10.1111/jrir.12003
GevaE.Massey-GarrisonA. (2013). A comparison of the language skills of ELLs and monolinguals who are poor decoders, poor comprehenders, or normal readers. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 46(5), 387–401. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219412466651
31.
GraesserA. C.SingerM.TrabassoT. (1994). Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension. Psychological Review, 101(3), 371–395. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.101.3.371
32.
GuthrieJ. T.HoaA. L. W.WigfieldA.TonksS. M.HumenickN. M.LittlesE. (2007). Reading motivation and reading comprehension growth in the later elementary years. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 32(3), 282–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2006.05.004
33.
GuthrieJ. T.KlaudaS. L. (2016). Engagement and motivational processes in reading. In AfflerbachP. (Ed.), Handbook of individual differences in reading: Reader, text, and context (pp. 41–53). Routledge.
34.
HammerC. S.JiaG.UchikoshiY. (2011). Language and literacy development of dual language learners growing up in the United States: A call for research. Child Development Perspectives, 5(1), 4–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-8606.2010.00140.x
35.
KiefferM. J. (2014). Morphological awareness and reading difficulties in adolescent Spanish-speaking language minority learners and their classmates. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 47(1), 44–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219413509968
36.
KiefferM. J.VukovicR. K. (2013). Growth in reading-related skills of language minority learners and their classmates: More evidence for early identification and intervention. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 26(7), 1159–1194. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-012-9410-7
37.
KimY. S.WagnerR. K.LopezD. (2012). Developmental relations between reading fluency and reading comprehension: A longitudinal study from Grade 1 to Grade 2. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 113(1), 93–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2012.03.002
38.
KorkmanM.KirkU.KempS. (2007). NEPSY II. Clinical and interpretative manual. Psychological Corporation.
39.
LandiN.RyherdK. (2017). Understanding specific reading comprehension deficit: A review. Language and Linguistics Compass, 11(2), Article e12234. https://doi.org/10.1111/lnc3.12234
40.
Language and Reading Research Consortium, & MuijselaarM. M. (2018). The dimensionality of inference making: Are local and global inferences distinguishable?Scientific Studies of Reading, 22(2), 117–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2017.1371179
41.
LeeK.BullR.HoR. M. (2013). Developmental changes in executive functioning. Child Development, 84(6), 1933–1953. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12096
42.
LesauxN. K.KiefferM. J. (2010). Exploring sources of reading comprehension difficulties among language minority learners and their classmates in adolescence. American Educational Research Journal, 47(3), 596–632. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831209355469
43.
LesauxN. K.LipkaO.SiegelL. S. (2006). Investigating cognitive and linguistic abilities that influence the reading comprehension skills of children from diverse linguistic backgrounds. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 19, 99–131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-005-4713-6
LocascioG.MahoneE. M.EasonS. H.CuttingL. E. (2010). Executive dysfunction among children with reading comprehension deficits. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 43(5), 441–454. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219409355476
46.
LoganJ. K.KiefferM. J. (2017). Evaluating the role of polysemous word knowledge in reading comprehension among bilingual adolescents. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 30(8), 1687–1704. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-017-9745-1
47.
LukG.GreenD. W.AbutalebiJ.GradyC. (2012). Cognitive control for language switching in bilinguals: A quantitative meta-analysis of functional neuroimaging studies. Language and Cognitive Processes, 27(10), 1479–1488. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690965.2011.613209
48.
LuriaR. (1966). Higher cortical functions in man. Basic Books.
49.
MacGinitieW. H.MacGinitieR. K.MariaK.DreyerL. G. (2000). Gates-MacGinitie reading tests. Riverside.
50.
Mancilla-MartinezJ.HwangJ. K.OhM. H.McClainJ. B. (2020). Early elementary grade dual language learners from Spanish-speaking homes struggling with English reading comprehension: The dormant role of language skills. Journal of Educational Psychology, 112(5), 880–894. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000402
51.
Mancilla-MartinezJ.LesauxN. K. (2010). Predictors of reading comprehension for struggling readers: The case of Spanish-speaking language minority learners. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(3), 701–711. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019135
52.
MariaK.HughesK. E. (2008). Gates-MacGinitie reading tests: Technical report supplement. Riverside.
53.
MatherN.WendlingB. J. (2014). Examiner’s manual. Woodcock-Johnson IV tests of achievement. Riverside.
54.
McGrewK. S.LaForteE. M.SchrankF. A. (2014). Woodcock Johnson IV technical manual. Riverside.
55.
MiyakeA.FriedmanN. P.EmersonM. J.WitzkiA. H.HowerterA.WagerT. D. (2000). The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “frontal lobe” tasks: A latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 41(1), 49–100. https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1999.0734
56.
MuthénL. K.MuthénB. O. (2018). Mplus (Version 8.1).[Computer software].
57.
NakamotoJ.LindseyK. A.ManisF. R. (2007). A longitudinal analysis of English language learners’ word decoding and reading comprehension. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 20, 691–719. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9045-7
58.
NationK.SnowlingM. (1997). Assessing reading difficulties: the validity and utility of current measures of reading skill. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 67(3), 359–370. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.1997.tb01250.x
59.
NationK.SnowlingM. J. (2000). Factors influencing syntactic awareness skills in normal readers and poor comprehenders. Applied Psycholinguistics, 21(2), 229–241. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716400002046
60.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2018, April10). 2017 NAEP mathematics and reading assessments: Highlighted results at grades 4 and 8 for the nation, states, and districts. https://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2018037
61.
OakhillJ. V.CainK. (2012). The precursors of reading ability in young readers: Evidence from a four-year longitudinal study. Scientific Studies of Reading, 16(2), 91–121. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2010.529219
62.
PerfettiC. A.HartL. (2001). The lexical bases of comprehension skill. In GorflenD. (Ed.), On the consequences of meaning selection (pp. 67–86). American Psychological Association.
63.
ReynoldsC. R.VoressJ. K. (2007). Test of memory and learning second edition: Examiner’s manual. Pro-Ed.
64.
RonbergL.PetersenD. K. (2016). How specific are specific comprehension difficulties? An investigation of poor reading comprehension in nine-year-olds. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 60(1), 72–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2014.996594
65.
SchrankF. A.DaileyD. (2014). Woodcock-Johnson online scoring and reporting program. Riverside.
66.
SchrankF. A.MatherN.McGrewK. S. (2014). Woodcock-Johnson IV tests of achievement. Riverside.
67.
SesmaH. W.MahoneE. M.LevineT.EasonS. H.CuttingL. E. (2009). The contribution of executive skills to reading comprehension. Child Neuropsychology, 15(3), 232–246. https://doi.org/10.1080/09297040802220029
68.
SpencerM.QuinnJ. M.WagnerR. K. (2014). Specific reading comprehension disability: Major problem, myth, or misnomer?Learning Disabilities: Research & Practice, 29(1), 3–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12024
69.
SpencerM.WagnerR. K. (2017). The comprehension problems for second-language learners with poor reading comprehension despite adequate decoding: A meta-analysis. Journal of Research in Reading, 40(2), 199–217. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12080
70.
StothardS. E.HulmeC. (1995). A comparison of phonological skills in children with reading comprehension difficulties and children with decoding difficulties. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 36, 399–408. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1995.tb01298.x
71.
TaboadaA.TonksS. M.WigfieldA.GuthrieJ. T. (2009). Effects of motivational and cognitive variables on reading comprehension. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 22, 85–106. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-008-9133-y
72.
Taboada BarberA.BuehlM. M.BeckJ. S.RamirezE. M.GallagherM.Richey NulandL. N.ArcherC. J. (2018). Literacy in social studies: The influence of cognitive and motivational practices on the reading comprehension of English learners and non-English learners. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 34(1), 79–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2017.1344942
73.
Taboada BarberA.CartwrightK. B.StapletonL. M.KlaudaS. L.ArcherC. J.SmithP. (2020). Direct and indirect effects of executive functions, reading engagement, and higher order strategic processes in the reading comprehension of Dual Language Learners and English Monolinguals. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, 101848. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101848
74.
WiebeS. A.EspyK. A.CharakD. (2008). Using confirmatory factor analysis to understand executive control in preschool children: I. Latent structure. Developmental Psychology, 44(2), 575–587. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.44.2.575
75.
WigfieldA.Mason-SinghA.HoA. N.GuthrieJ. T. (2014). Intervening to improve children’s reading motivation and comprehension: Concept-oriented reading instruction. In KarabenickS.UrdanT. C. (Eds.), Motivational interventions. Advances in motivation and achievement (Vol. 18, pp. 37–70). Emerald Group. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0749-742320140000018001
76.
XuF.HanY.SabbaghM. A.WangT.RenX.LiC. (2013). Developmental differences in the structure of executive function in middle childhood and adolescence. PLOS ONE, 8(10), Article e77770. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0077770
77.
YuillN.OakhillJ. V. (1991). Children problems in text comprehension. Cambridge University Press.
78.
ZipkeM.EhriL. C.CairnsH. S. (2009). Using semantic ambiguity instruction to improve third graders’ metalinguistic awareness and reading comprehension: An experimental study. Reading Research Quarterly, 44(3), 300–321. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.44.3.4
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
