Using Spelling to Screen Bilingual Kindergarteners At Risk for Reading Difficulties

Abstract

For bilingual children, the results of language and literacy screening tools are often hard to interpret. This leads to late referral for specialized assessment or inappropriate interventions. To facilitate the early identification of reading difficulties in English, we developed a method of screening that is theory-driven yet suitable for first-language (L1) and second-language learners of English. We administered five conventional tests (phonological awareness, vocabulary, Wide Range Achievement Test–4 [WRAT-4] spelling, letter identification, rapid naming of digits) to 127 five-year-olds (60 English-L1, 67 Mandarin-L1) about 6 months after they started kindergarten, and used the WRAT-4 word reading score 6 months later as the outcome measure. Consistent with previous research, and with children with reading disabilities defined as below the 25 percentile on the reading outcome, logistic regression revealed that the full set of screening measures predicted reading disability status. However, when each predictor was taken as a single measure, spelling scores provided the best fit in terms of the compromise between sensitivity (.75) and specificity (.73) for an optimal cutoff point. Based on this exploratory study, group-administered spelling tasks could provide an efficient solution to screening difficulties in large classes of bilingual children.

Keywords

RTI second language learners ESL bilinguals reading disability

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abbott

R. D.

Berninger

V. W.

Fayol

(2010). Longitudinal relationships of levels of language in writing and between writing and reading in Grades 1 to 7. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 281–298.

Albers

C. A.

Glover

T. A.

(2007). How can universal screening enhance educational and mental health outcomes? Journal of School Psychology, 45, 113–116.

Andrews

Hersch

(2010). Lexical precision in skilled readers: Individual differences in masked neighbor priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 139, 299–318.

Berninger

V. W.

Abbott

R. D.

Thomson

J. B.

Raskind

W. H.

(2001). Language phenotype for reading and writing disability: A family approach. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5, 59–106.

Berninger

V. W.

Nielsen

K. H.

Abbott

R. D.

Wijsman

Raskind

(2008). Writing problems in developmental dyslexia: Under-recognized and under-treated. Journal of School Psychology, 46, 1–21.

Bishop

A. G.

League

M. B.

(2006). Identifying a multivariate screening model to predict reading difficulties at the onset of kindergarten: A longitudinal analysis. Learning Disability Quarterly, 29, 235–252.

Bishop

D. V. M.

Clarkson

(2003). Written language as a window into residual language deficits: A study of children with persistent and residual speech and language impairments. Cortex, 39, 215–237.

Byrne

(1998). The foundation of literacy: The child’s acquisition of the alphabetic principle. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.

Caravolas

Bruck

(1993). The effect of oral and written language input on children’s phonological awareness: A cross-linguistic study. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 55, 1–30.

10.

Caravolas

Hulme

Snowling

M. J.

(2001). The foundations of spelling ability: Evidence from a 3-year longitudinal study. Journal of Memory & Language, 45, 751–774.

11.

Cataldo

Ellis

(1988). Interactions in the development of spelling, reading and phonological skills. Journal of Research in Reading, 11, 86–109.

12.

Catts

H. W.

Fey

M. E.

Zhang

Tomblin

J. B.

(2001). Estimating the risk of future reading difficulties in kindergarten children: A research-based model and its clinical implementation. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 32, 38–50.

13.

Chiappe

Siegel

L. S.

Wade-Woolley

(2002). Linguistic diversity and the development of reading skills: A longitudinal study. Scientific Studies of Reading, 6, 369–400.

14.

De Jong

P. F

. (2006). Understanding normal and impaired reading development: A working memory perspective. In Pickering

S. J.

(Ed.), Working memory and processes of reading (pp. 34–61). London, UK: Academic Press.

15.

Dickinson

D. K.

McCabe

Anastasopoulos

Peisner-Feinberg

Poe

(2003). The comprehensive language approach to early literacy: The interrelationships among vocabulary, phonological sensitivity, and print knowledge among preschool-aged children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 465–481.

16.

Ehri

(2000). Learning to read and learning to spell: Two sides of a coin. Topics in Language Disorders, 20, 19–36.

17.

Foorman

Petscher

(2010). Development of spelling and differential relations to text reading in Grades 3–12. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 36, 7–20.

18.

Frith

(1980). Unexpected spelling problems. In Frith

(Ed.), Cognitive processes in spelling (pp. 495–515). London, UK: Academic Press.

19.

Georgiou

G. K.

Parrila

Kirby

J. R.

Stephenson

(2008). Development of rapid naming components and their relationship with phonological awareness, orthographic knowledge, speed of processing, and reading. Scientific Studies of Reading, 12, 325–350.

20.

Geva

(2000). Issues in the assessment of reading disabilities in L2 children: Beliefs and research evidence. Dyslexia, 6, 13–28.

21.

Gijsel

M. A. R.

Bosman

A. M. T.

Verhoeven

(2006). Kindergarten risk factors, cognitive factors, and teacher judgments as predictors of early reading in Dutch. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39, 558–571.

22.

Gupta

A. F.

(1998). The situation of English in Singapore. In Foley

J. A.

(Ed.), English in new cultural contexts: Reflections from Singapore (pp. 106–126). Singapore: Oxford University Press.

23.

Hindson

Byrne

Fielding-Barnsley

Newman

Hine

D. W.

Shankweiler

(2005). Assessment and early instruction of pre-school children at risk for reading disability. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 687–704.

24.

Invernizzi

Sullivan

A. K.

Meier

(2001). Phonological Awareness Literacy Screening—Pre-Kindergarten. Charlottesville: University of Virginia.

25.

Jalil

Rickard Liow

S. J.

(2008). How does home language influence early spellings? Phonologically plausible errors of diglossic Malay children. Applied Psycholinguistics, 29, 535–552.

26.

Jenkins

J. R.

Hudson

R. F.

Johnson

E. S.

(2007). Screening for at-risk readers in a response-to-intervention (RTI) framework. School Psychology Review, 36, 582–600.

27.

Jongejan

Verhoeven

Siegel

L. S.

(2007). Predictors of reading and spelling abilities in first- and second-language learners. Journal of Educational Psychology, 4, 835–851.

28.

Kirby

J. R.

Parrila

R. K.

Pfeiffer

S. L.

(2003). Naming speed and phonological awareness as predictors of reading development. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 453–464.

29.

Lervåg

Hulme

(2010). Predicting the growth of early spelling skills: Are there heterogeneous developmental trajectories? Scientific Studies of Reading, 14, 485–513.

30.

Lesaux

N. K.

Rupp

A. A.

Siegel

L. S.

(2007). Growth in reading skills of children from diverse linguistic backgrounds: Findings from a 5-year longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 821–834.

31.

Lesaux

N. K

Siegel

L. S

. (2003). The development of reading in children who speak English as a second language (ESL). Developmental Psychology, 39, 1005–1019.

32.

Leslie

Caldwell

(1995). Qualitative Reading Inventory (Vol. 2). New York, NY: Addison Wesley Longman.

33.

Lipka

Siegel

L. S.

(2007). The development of reading skills in children with English as a second language. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11, 105–131.

34.

Lopez-Raton

Rodriguez-Alvarez

M. X.

(2013). OptimalCutpoints: Computing optimal cutpoints in diagnostic tests (R package, Version 1.1). Retrieved from http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=OptimalCutpoints

35.

McBride-Chang

Manis

F. R.

(1996). Structural invariance in the associations of naming speed, phonological awareness, and verbal reasoning in good and poor readers: A test of the double deficit hypothesis. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 8, 323–339.

36.

Mehta

P. D.

Foorman

B. R.

Branum-Martin

Taylor

W. P.

(2005). Literacy as a unidimensional multilevel construct: Validation, sources of influence, and implications in a longitudinal study in grades 1 to 4. Scientific Studies of Reading, 9, 85–116.

37.

Newcomer

P. L.

(1990). Diagnostic Achievement Battery–2 (DAB-2). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.

38.

Nicolson

Fawcett

(2004). Dyslexia Early Screening Test–Second Edition (DEST-2). San Antonio, TX: Pearson.

39.

O’Connor

R. E.

Jenkins

J. R.

(1999). The prediction of reading disabilities in kindergarten and first grade. Scientific Studies of Reading, 3, 159–197.

40.

Peng

C.-Y. J.

T.-K. H.

(2002). Logistic regression analysis and reporting: A primer. Understanding Statistics, 1, 31–70.

41.

Perfetti

C. A.

(1992). The representation problem in reading acquisition. In Gough

P. B.

Ehri

L. C.

Treiman

(Eds.), Reading acquisition (pp. 145–174). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

42.

Perfetti

C. A.

(1997). The psycholinguistics of spelling and reading. In Perfetti

C. A.

Rieben

Fayol

(Eds.), Learning to spell: Research, theory, and practice across languages (pp. 21–38). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

43.

Puolakanaho

Ahonen

Aro

Eklund

Leppänen

P. H. T.

Poikkeus

A.-M.

. . . Lyytinen

(2007). Very early phonological and language skills: Estimating individual risk of reading disability. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 48, 923–931.

44.

Rayner

Foorman

B. R.

Perfetti

C. A.

Pesetsky

Seidenberg

(2001). How psychological science informs the teaching of reading. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 2, 31–74.

45.

Rickard Liow

S. J.

Lau

H.-S. L.

(2006). The development of bilingual children’s early spellings in English. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 868–878.

46.

Rickard Liow

S. J.

Sze

W. P.

(2009). Bilingual Language Assessment Battery (BLAB) (Unpublished measure). Singapore: National University of Singapore, Department of Psychology and Division of Graduate Medical Studies.

47.

Scarborough

H. S.

(2001). Connecting early language and literacy to later reading (dis)abilities: Evidence, theory, and practice. In Neuman

Dickinson

(Eds.), Handbook for research in early literacy (pp. 97–110). New York, NY: Guilford.

48.

Schisterman

E. F.

Perkins

N. J.

Liu

Bondell

(2005). Optimal cut-point and its corresponding Youden Index to discriminate individuals using pooled blood samples. Epidemiology, 16, 73–81.

49.

Shahar-Yames

D. L.

(2008). Spelling as a self-teaching mechanism in orthographic learning. Journal of Research in Reading, 31, 22–39.

50.

Speece

D. L.

Ritchey

K. D.

Cooper

D. H.

Roth

F. P.

Schatschneider

(2004). Growth in early reading skills from kindergarten to third grade. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29, 312–332.

51.

Swanson

H. L.

Saez

Gerber

(2006). Growth in literacy and cognition in bilingual children at risk for reading disabilities. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 247–264.

52.

Swanson

H. L.

Trainin

Necoechea

D. M.

Hammill

D. D.

(2003). Rapid naming, phonological awareness, and reading: A meta-analysis of the correlational evidence. Review of Educational Research, 73, 407–440.

53.

Tabachnick

B. G.

Fidell

L. S.

(2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

54.

Torgesen

J. K.

Wagner

R. W.

Rashotte

C. A.

(1999). Test of Word Reading Efficiency (TOWRE). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.

55.

Treiman

Bourassa

(2000). Children’s written and oral spelling. Applied Psycholinguistics, 21, 183–204.

56.

Treiman

Goswami

Tincoff

Leevers

(1997). Effects of dialect on American and British children’s spelling. Child Development, 68, 229–245.

57.

Vaessen

Blomert

(2013). The cognitive linkage and divergence of spelling and reading development. Scientific Studies of Reading, 17, 89–107.

58.

Vellutino

F. R.

Fletcher

J. M.

Snowling

M. J.

Scanlon

D. M.

(2004). Specific reading disability (dyslexia): What have we learned in the past four decades? Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 45, 2–40.

59.

Vellutino

F. R.

Scanlon

D. M.

Small

Fanuele

D. P.

(2006). Response to intervention as a vehicle for distinguishing between children with and without reading disabilities: Evidence for the role of kindergarten and first grade intervention. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39, 157–169.

60.

Vellutino

F. R.

Scanlon

D. M.

Zhang

Schatschneider

(2008). Using response to kindergarten and first grade intervention to identify children at-risk for long-term reading difficulties. Reading and Writing, 21, 437–480.

61.

Vellutino

F. R.

Tunmer

W. E.

Jaccard

J. J.

Chen

(2007). Components of reading ability: Multivariate evidence for a convergent skill model of reading development. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11, 3–32.

62.

Wechsler

(1992). Wechsler Individual Achievement Test (WIAT). London, UK: Psychological Corp.

63.

Wiederholt

J. L.

Bryant

B. R.

(1992). Gray Oral Reading Tests (3rd ed.). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.

64.

Wilkinson

G. S.

Robertson

G. J.

(2006). Wide Range Achievement Test–4 (WRAT-4). Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.

65.

Wolf

Bowers

Biddle

(2000). Naming-speed processes, timing, and reading: A conceptual review. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 387–407.

66.

Woodcock

R. N.

(1987). Woodcock Reading Mastery Tests–Revised examiner’s manual. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.

67.

Yeong

H.-M. S.

Rickard Liow

S. J.

(2010). Phonemic representation and early spelling errors in Mandarin-English bilingual children. Scientific Studies of Reading, 14, 387–406.

68.

Yeong

H.-M. S.

Rickard Liow

S. J.

(2011). Predictors of early spelling development in English: Comparison of English-L1 and Mandarin-L1 bilingual children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103, 470–488.

69.

Yeong

H.-M. S.

Rickard Liow

S. J.

(2012). Development of phonological awareness in English–Mandarin bilinguals: A comparison of English-L1 and Mandarin-L1 kindergarten children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 112, 111–126.