A wide share of secondary school children does not reach the expected competence level in reading. These children could benefit from more efficient intervention responses, providing a better understanding of their cognitive weaknesses/deficits. Our aim was to explore the cognitive heterogeneity of a population of poor readers identified from a large sample of 948 sixth-grade children. We first assessed the contribution of phoneme awareness (PA), rapid automatized naming (RAN), and visual attention span (VAS) to reading performance in a subset of 281 children including poor and average readers/spellers. We show that all three skills are unique and significant predictors of reading fluency. We then restricted the analysis to participants with normal Raven’s score (IQ) and oral language skills to focus on 110 children with more specific reading difficulties. A unique VAS deficit was found in 18% of these poor readers while 20% and 15.5% showed a unique PA or RAN deficit. Children with multiple or no deficit were further identified. The overall findings provide evidence for a variety of cognitive profiles in poor readers. They suggest that, in addition to PA interventions, training programs targeting VAS might be useful for the nontrivial share of poor readers who exhibit a VAS deficit.
AntzakaA.LallierM.MeyerS.DiardJ.CarreirasM.ValdoisS. (2017). Enhancing reading performance through action video games: The role of visual attention span. Scientific Reports, 7, Article 14563. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-15119-9
2.
AraujoS.PachecoA.FaiscaL.PeterssonK. M.ReisA. (2010). Visual rapid naming and phonological abilities: Different subtypes in dyslexic children. International Journal of Psychology, 45, 443–452. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207594.2010.499949
3.
BediouB.AdamsD. M.MayerR. E.TiptonE.GreenC. S.BavelierD. (2018). Meta-analysis of action video game impact on perceptual, attentional and cognitive skills. Psychological Bulletin, 144(1), 77–110. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000130
BesnerD.RiskoE. F.StolzJ. A.WhiteD.ReynoldsM.O’MalleyS.RobidouxS. (2016). Varieties of attention: Their roles in visual word identification. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 25(3), 162–168. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721416639351
6.
BogonJ.FinkeK.StennekenP. (2014). TVA-based assessment of visual attention functions in developmental dyslexia. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, Article 1172. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01172
BosseM. L.ValdoisS. (2009). Influence of the visual attention span on child reading performance: A cross-sectional study. Journal of Research in Reading, 32(2), 230–253. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2008.01387.x
9.
BusA. G.van IJzendoornM. H. (1999). Phonological awareness and early reading: A meta-analysis of experimental training studies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(3), 403–414. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.91.3.403
10.
CallensM.WhitneyC.TopsW.BrysbaertM. (2013). No deficiency in left-to-right processing of words in dyslexia but evidence for enhanced visual crowding. The quarterly. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66(9), 1803–1817. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2013.766898
11.
CaravolasM.LervågA.MousikouP.EfrimC.LitavskýM.Onochie-QuintanillaE.SalasN.SchoffelovaM.DefiorS.MikulajovaM.Seidlova-MalkovaG.HulmeC. (2012). Common patterns of prediction of literacy development in different alphabetic orthographies. Psychological Science, 23, 678–686. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611434536
12.
CarrollJ. M.SolityJ.ShapiroL. R. (2016). Predicting dyslexia using prereading skills: The role of sensorimotor and cognitive abilities. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 57(6), 750–758. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12488
13.
ChenN. T.ZhengM.ConnieS. H. (2019). Examining the visual attention span deficit hypothesis in Chinese developmental dyslexia. Reading and Writing, 32(3), 639–662. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-018-9882-1
14.
CunninghamA. E.StanovichK. E. (1997). Early reading acquisition and its relation to reading experience and abilities ten years later. Developmental Psychology, 33(6), 934–945. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.33.6.934
15.
DeckerS. L.RobertsA. M.EnglundJ. A. (2013). Cognitive predictors of rapid picture naming. Learning and Individual Differences, 25, 141–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2013.03.009
16.
EhriL. C.NunesS. R.WillowsD. M.SchusterB. V.Yaghoub ZadehZ.ShanahanT. (2001). Phonemic awareness instruction helps children learn to read: Evidence from the National Reading Panel’s meta-analysis. Reading Research Quarterly, 36, 250–287. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.36.3.2
17.
FacoettiA.TrussardiA. N.RuffinoM.LorussoM. L.CattaneoC.GalliR.MolteniM.ZorciM. (2010). Multisensory spatial attention deficits are predictive of phonological decoding skills in developmental dyslexia. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22, 1011–1025. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2009.21232
18.
FayolM.ZormanM.BernardM. (2009). Associations and dissociations in reading and spelling French. BJEP Monographs Series II, Number 6: Teaching and Learning Writings, 13, 63–75. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709909X421973
19.
FranceschiniS.GoriS.RuffinoM.PedrolliK.FacoettiA. (2012). A causal link between visual spatial attention and reading acquisition. Current Biology, 22, 814–819. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2012.03.013
20.
FranceschiniS.GoriS.RuffinoM.ViolaS.MolteniM.FacoettiA. (2013). Action video games make dyslexic children read better. Current Biology, 23, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2013.01.044
21.
FranceschiniS.TrevisanP.RonconiL.BertoniS.ColmarS.DoubleK.FacoettiA.GoriS. (2017). Action video games improve reading abilities and visual-to-auditory attentional shifting in English-speaking children with dyslexia. Scientific Reports, 7, Article 5863. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-05826-8
22.
GaluschkaK.IseE.KrickK.Schulte-KorneG. (2014). Effectiveness of treatment approaches for children and adolescents with reading disabilities: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. PLOS ONE, 9(2), Article e89900. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0089900
23.
GermanoG. D.ReilhacC.CapelliniS. A.ValdoisS. (2014). The phonological and visual basis of developmental dyslexia in Brazilian Portuguese reading children. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, Article 1169. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01169
24.
GinestetE.PhénixT.DiardJ.ValdoisS. (2019). Modelling the length effect for words in lexical decision: The role of visual attention. Vision Research, 159, 10–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2019.03.003
25.
GoswamiU. (2015). Sensory theories of developmental dyslexia: Three challenges for research. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 16, 43–54. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3836
HemmerechtsK.AgirdagO.KavadiasD. (2017). The relationship between parental literacy involvement, socio-economic status and reading literacy. Educational Review, 69(1), 85–101. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2016.1164667
28.
HolmS. (1979). A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 6(2), 65–70. www.jstor.org/stable/4615733
29.
HulmeC.Bowyer-CraneC.CarrollJ. M.DuffF. J.SnowlingM. J. (2012). The causal role of phoneme awareness and letter-sound knowledge in learning to read: Combining intervention studies with mediation analyses. Psychological Science, 23, 572–577. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611435921
30.
Jacquier-RouxM.ValdoisS.ZormanM. (2002). Odédys, un outil de dépistage des dyslexies [Odédys, a tool for the early detection of developmental dyslexia]. Laboratoire Cognisciences, IUFM de Grenoble.
LallierM.DonnadieuS.BergerC.ValdoisS. (2010). A case study of developmental phonological dyslexia: Is the attentional deficit in rapid stimuli sequences processing amodal?Cortex, 46, 231–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2009.03.014
33.
LallierM.ThierryG.TainturierM. J. (2013). On the importance of considering individual profiles when investigating the role of auditory sequential deficits in developmental dyslexia. Cognition, 126, 121–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2012.09.008
34.
LanderlK.FreudenthalerH. H.HeeneM.de JongP. F.DesrochersA.ManolitsisG.ParrilaR.GeorgiouG. K. (2019). Phonological awareness and rapid automatized naming as longitudinal predictors of reading in five alphabetic orthographies with varying degrees of consistency. Scientific Studies of Reading, 23(3), 220–234. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2018.1510936
35.
LecocqP. (1996). L’ÉCOSSE-Une batterie de compréhension syntaxico-sémantique. Presses Universitaires du Septentrion.
36.
LefavraisP. (1965). Test de l’Alouette (The Alouette Reading Test). Editions du Centre de Psychologie Appliquée.
37.
LervågA.HulmeC. (2009). Rapid automatized naming taps a mechanism that places constraints on the development of early reading fluency. Psychological Science, 20(8), 1040–1048. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02405.x
LobierM.PeyrinC.Le BasJ. F.ValdoisS. (2012). Pre-orthographic character string processing and parietal cortex: A role for visual attention in reading?Neuropsychologia, 50, 2195–2204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.05.023
40.
LobierM.PeyrinC.PichatC.Le BasJ. F.ValdoisS. (2014). Visual processing of multiple elements in the dyslexic brain: Evidence for a superior parietal dysfunction. Frontiers in Human Neurosciences, 8, Article 479. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00479
41.
LobierM.ValdoisS. (2015). Visual attention deficits in developmental dyslexia cannot be ascribed solely to poor reading experience. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 16(4), Article 225. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3836-c1
42.
MartelliM.Di FilippoG.SpinelliD.ZoccolottiP. (2009). Crowding, reading, and developmental dyslexia. Journal of Vision, 9(4), 14.1–18. https://doi.org/10.1167/9.4.14
43.
Melby-LervågM.LysterS. A. H.HulmeC. (2012). Phonological skills and their role in learning to read: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 138(2), 322–352. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026744
44.
MollK.RamusF.BartlingJ.BruderJ.KunzeS.NeuhoffN.. . . LanderlK. (2014). Cognitive mechanisms underlying reading and spelling development in five European orthographies. Learning and Instruction, 29, 65–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.09.003
45.
O’BrienB.A.WolfM.LovettM.W. (2012). A taxometric investigation of developmental dyslexia subtypes. Dyslexia, 18, 16–39. https://doi.org/10.1002/dys.1431
46.
PenningtonB. F.Santerre-LemmonL.RosenbergJ.McDonaldB.BoadaR.FriendA.LeopoldD. R.SamuelsonS.ByrneB.WillcuttE. G.OlsonR. K. (2012). Individual prediction of dyslexia by single versus multiple deficits models. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 121(1), 212–224. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025823
47.
PeyrinC.DémonetJ. F.BaciuM.Le BasJ. F.ValdoisS. (2011). Superior parietal lobe dysfunction in a homogeneous group of dyslexic children with a single visual attention span disorder. Brain & Language, 118, 128–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2010.06.005
48.
PeyrinC.LallierM.DémonetJ. F.PernetC.BaciuM.LeBasJ. F.ValdoisS. (2012). Neural dissociation of phonological and visual attention span disorders in developmental dyslexia: fMRI evidence from two case studies. Brain & Language, 120(3), 381–394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2011.12.015
49.
PowellD.StainthorpR.StuartM.GarwoodH.QuinlanP. (2007). An experimental comparison between rival theories of rapid automatized naming performance and its relationship to reading. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 98(1), 46–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2007.04.003
50.
ReilhacC.PeyrinC.DémonetJ. F.ValdoisS. (2013). Role of the superior parietal lobules in letter-identity processing within strings: fMRI evidence from skilled and dyslexic readers. Neuropsychologia, 51(4), 601–612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.12.010
ShapiroL. R.CarrollJ. M.SolityJ. E. (2013). Separating the influences of prereading skills on early word and nonword reading. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 116, 278–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2013.05.011
53.
SpinelliD.De LucaM.JudicaA.ZoccolottiP. (2002). Crowding effects on word identification in developmental dyslexia. Cortex, 38, 179–200.
54.
SteinJ. F. (2014). Dyslexia: The role of vision and visual attention. Current Developmental Disorders Reports, 1(4), 267–280. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40474-014-0030-6
55.
SuggateS. P. (2016). A meta-analysis of the long-term effects of phonological awareness, phonics, fluency and reading comprehension interventions. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 49(1), 77–96. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219414528540
56.
SwansonH. L.TraininG.NecoecheaD. M.HammillD. D. (2003). Rapid naming, phonological awareness, and reading: A meta-analysis of the correlation evidence. Review of Education Research, 73(4), 407–440. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543073004407
ValdoisS.BosseM. L.TainturierM. J. (2004). Cognitive correlates of developmental dyslexia: Review of evidence for a selective visual attentional deficit. Dyslexia, 10, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1002/dys.284
ValdoisS.Lassus-SangosseD.LallierM.MoreaudO.PisellaL. (2019b). What bilateral damage of the superior parietal lobes tells us about visual attention disorders in developmental dyslexia?Neuropsychologia, 130, 78–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.08.001
62.
ValdoisS.PeyrinC.Lassus-SangosseD.LallierM.DémonetJ. F.KandelS. (2014). Dyslexia in a French-Spanish bilingual girl: Behavioral and neural modulations following a specific visual-attention span intervention program. Cortex, 53, 120–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2013.11.006
63.
Van den BoerM.de JongP. F. (2018). Stability of visual attention span performance and its relation with reading over time. Scientific Studies of Reading, 22(5), 434–445. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2018.1472266
64.
Van den BoerM.de JongP. F.Haentjens-van MeeterenM. M. (2013). Modeling the length effect: Specifying the relation with visual and phonological correlates of reading. Scientific Studies of Reading, 17(4), 243–256. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2012.683222
65.
Van den BoerM.van BergenE.de JongP. F. (2014). Underlying skills of oral and silent reading. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 128, 138–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2014.07.008
66.
Van den BoerM.van BergenE.de JongP. F. (2015). The specific relation of visual attention span with reading and spelling in Dutch. Learning and Individual Differences, 39, 141–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2015.03.017
67.
VidyasagarT. R.PammerK. (2010). Dyslexia: A deficit in visuo-spatial attention, not in phonological processing. Trends in Cognitive Science, 14, 57–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2009.12.003
68.
WolfM.Goldberg O’RourkeA.GidneyC.LovettM.CirinoP.MorrisR. (2002). The second deficit: An investigation of the independence of phonological and naming-speed deficits in developmental dyslexia. Reading and Writing, 15, 43–72. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013816320290
69.
ZhaoJ.LiuM.HuangC. (2018). Increased deficit of visual attention span with development in Chinese children with developmental dyslexia. Scientific Reports, 8, Article 3153. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-21578-5
70.
ZoubrinetzkyR.BielleF.ValdoisS. (2014). New insights on developmental dyslexia subtypes: Heterogeneity of mixed reading profiles. PLOS ONE, 9(6), Article e99337. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0099337
71.
ZoubrinetzkyR.ColletG.SerniclaesW.N’Guyen-MorelM. A.ValdoisS. (2016). Relationships between categorical perception of phonemes, phonological awareness, and visual attention span in developmental dyslexia. PLOS ONE, 11(3), Article e0151015. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0151015
72.
ZoubrinetzkyR.ColletG.N’Guyen-MorelM. A.ValdoisS.SerniclaesW. (2019). Remediation of allophonic perception and visual attention span in developmental dyslexia: A joint assay. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, Article 1502. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01502
