We examined the relations of short-term memory (STM), metalinguistic awareness (phonological, morphological, and orthographic awareness), and rapid automatized naming (RAN) to word reading in Korean, a language with a relatively transparent orthography. STM, metalinguistic awareness, and RAN have been shown to be important to word reading, but the nature of the relations of STM, metalinguistic awareness, and RAN to word reading has rarely been investigated. Two alternative models were fitted. In the indirect relation model, STM was hypothesized to be indirectly related to word reading via metalinguistic awareness and RAN. In the direct and indirect relations model, STM was hypothesized to be directly and indirectly related to word reading. Results from 207 beginning readers in South Korea showed that STM was directly related to word reading as well as indirectly via metalinguistic awareness and RAN. Although the direct effect of STM was relatively small (.16), the total effect incorporating the indirect effect was substantial (.42). These results suggest that STM is an important, foundational cognitive capacity that underpins metalinguistic awareness and RAN as well as word reading, and further indicate the importance of considering both direct and indirect effects of language and cognitive skills on word reading.
AdamsM. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: MIT. Press.
2.
AllowayT. P.GathercoleS. E.AdamsA.WillisC.EaglenR.LamontE. (2005). Working memory and phonological awareness as predictors of progress towards early learning goals at school entry. BritishJournal of Developmental Psychology, 23, 417–426. doi:10.1348/026151005X26804
3.
AllowayT. P.GathercoleS. E.KirkwoodH.ElliottJ. (2009). The cognitive and behavioral characteristics of children with low working memory. Child Development, 80, 606–621. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01282.x
4.
ApelK.Wilson-FowlerE. B.BrimoD.PerrinN. A. (2012). Metalinguistic contributions to reading and spelling in second and third grade students. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 25, 1283–1305. doi:10.1177/0022219413509964
5.
BaddeleyA. D. (1986). Working memory. London, UK: Oxford University Press.
6.
BaddeleyA. (2003). Working memory and language: An overview. Journal of Communication Disorders, 36, 189–209. doi:10.1016/S0021-9924(03)00019-4
7.
BaylissD. M.JarroldC.BaddeleyA. D.LeighE. (2005). Differential constraints on the working memory and reading abilities of individuals with learning difficulties and typically developing children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 92, 16–99. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2005.04.002
8.
BinameF.PonceletM. (2015). Order short-term memory capacity predicts nonword reading and spelling in first and second grade. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 29, 1–20. doi:10.1007/s11145-015-9577-9
9.
BurgessS. R.LoniganC. J. (1998). Bidirectional relations of phonological sensitivity and prereading abilities: Evidence from a pre-school sample. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 70, 117–141.
10.
CainK. (2007). Syntactic awareness and reading ability: Is there any evidence for a special relationship?Applied Psycholinguistics, 28, 679–694. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0142716407070361
11.
CastlesA.ColtheartM. (2004). Is there a causal link from phonological awareness to success in learning to read?Cognition, 91, 77–111. doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(03)00164-1
12.
ChoJ.-R.McBride-ChangC. (2005). Correlates of Korean hangul acquisition among kindergartners and second graders. Scientific Studies of Reading, 9, 3–16.
13.
ChoJ.-R.McBride-ChangC.ParkS.-G. (2008). Phonological awareness and morphological awareness: Differential associations to regular and irregular word recognition in early Korean hangul readers. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 21, 255–274. doi:10.1007/s11145-007-9072-z
14.
ChungK. K. H.HoC. S.-H.ChanD. W.TsangS.-M.LeeS.-H. (2009). Cognitive profiles of Chinese adolescents with dyslexia. Dyslexia, 16, 2–23. doi:10.1002/dys.392
15.
ChungK. K. H.McBride-ChangC. (2011). Executive functional skills uniquely predict Chinese word reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103, 909–921. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0024744
16.
ComptonD. L.DeFriesJ. C.OlsonR. K. (2001). Are RAN and phonological awareness deficits additive in children with reading disabilities?Dyslexia, 7, 125–149. doi:10.1002/dys.198
17.
CromleyJ. G.AzevedoR. (2007). Testing and refining the direct and inferential mediation model of reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 311–325. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0019452
18.
CuttingL. E. (1997). The relationship of rapid automatized naming and word reading in normally developing readers. Unpublished dissertation, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.
19.
DanemanM.CarpenterP. A. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 450–466.
20.
DeaconS. H.KirbyJ. R.Casselman-BellM. (2009). How robust is the contribution of morphological awareness to general spelling outcomes?Reading Psychology, 30, 301–318. doi:10.1080/02702710802412057
21.
de JongP. F.van der LeijA. (1999). Specific contributions of phonological abilities to early reading acquisition: Results from a Dutch latent variable longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 450–476.
22.
EngleR. W.TuholskiS. W.LaughlinJ. E.ConwayA. R. (1999). Working memory, short-term memory, and general fluid intelligence: A latent-variable approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128, 309–331.
23.
FloritE.RochM.LevoratoM. C. (2011). Listening text comprehension of explicit and implicit information in preschoolers: the role of verbal and inferential skills. Discourse Processes, 48, 119–138. doi:10.1080/0163853X.1010.494244
24.
GathercoleS. E. (1998). The development of memory. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 39, 3–27.
25.
GeorgiouG.ParrilaR.CuiY.PapadopoulosT. C. (2013). Why is rapid automatized naming related to reading?Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 115, 218–225. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2012.10.015
26.
GeorgiouG.ParrilaR.KirbyJ. (2009). RAN components and reading development from Grade 3 to Grade 5: What underlies their relationship?Scientific Studies of Reading, 13, 508–534. doi:10.1080/10888430903034796
27.
GibbsS. (2004). Phonological awareness: an investigation into the developmental role of vocabulary and short-term memory. Educational Psychology: An International Journal of Experimental Educational Psychology, 24, 13–25.
28.
GillamR. B.van KleeckA. (1996). Phonological awareness training and short-term working memory: Clinical implications. Topics in Language Disorders, 17, 72–81.
29.
Hoien-TengesdalI.TonnessenF. (2011). The relationship between phonological skills and word reading. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 52, 93–103. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9450.2010.00856.x
30.
KailR.HallL. K. (1994). Processing speed, naming speed, and reading. Developmental Psychology, 30, 949–954.
31.
KatzirT.KimY.–S.WolfM.MorrisR.LovettM. (2008). The varieties of pathways to dysfluent reading: Comparing subtypes of children with dyslexia at letter, word and connected text levels of reading. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 41, 47–66. doi:10.1177/0022219407311325
32.
KimY.-S. (2007). Phonological awareness and literacy skills in Korean: An examination of the unique role of body–coda units. Applied Psycholinguistics, 28, 67–93. doi:10.1017.S014271640707004X
33.
KimY.-S. (2009). The foundation of literacy skills in Korean: The relationship between letter-name knowledge and phonological awareness and their relative contribution to literacy skills. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 22, 907–931. doi:10.1007/s11145-008-9131-0
34.
KimY.-S. (2010). Componential skills of spelling in Korean. Scientific Studies of Reading, 14, 137–158. doi:10.1080/10888430903034812
35.
KimY.-S. (2011). Considering linguistic and orthographic features in early literacy acquisition: Evidence from Korean. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36, 177–189. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2010.06.003
36.
KimY.-S. (2015). Developmental, component-based model of reading fluency: An investigation of word reading fluency, text reading fluency, and reading comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 50, 459–481. doi:10.1002/rrq.107
37.
KimY.-S.ApelK.Al OtaibaS. (2013). The relation of linguistic awareness and vocabulary to word reading and spelling for first-grade students participating in response to instruction. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 44, 1–11. doi:10.1044/0161-1461(2013/12-0013)
38.
KimY.-S.ParkC.WagnerR. K. (2014). Is oral/text reading fluency a “bridge” to reading comprehension?Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 27, 79–99. doi:10.1007/s11145-013-9434-7
39.
KimY.-S. G.PetscherY. (2016). Prosodic sensitivity and reading: An investigation of pathways of relations using a latent variable approach. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108, 630–645. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/edu0000078
40.
KirbyJ. R.GeorgiouG. K.MartinussenR.ParrilaR. (2010). Naming speed and reading: From prediction to instruction. Reading Research Quarterly, 45, 341–362. doi:10.1598/RRQ.45.3.4
41.
KirbyJ.ParrilaR. K.PfeifferS. L. (2003). Naming speed and phonological awareness as predictors of reading development. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 453–464. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.95.3.453
42.
KlineR. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
43.
KobayashiM. S.HaynesC. W.MacarusoP.HookP. E.KatoJ. (2005). Effects of mora deletion, nonword repetition, rapid naming, and visual search performance on beginning reading in Japanese. Annals of Dyslexia, 55, 105–128.
44.
LaasonenM.VirsuV.OinonenS.SandbackaM.SalakariA.ServiceE. (2012). Phonological and sensory short-term memory are correlates and both affected in developmental dyslexia. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 25, 2247–2273. doi:10.1007/s11145-011-9356-1
45.
LeatherC. V.HenryL. A. (1994). Working memory span and phonological awareness tasks as predictors of early reading ability. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 58, 88–111.
46.
MannV. A.LibermanI. Y. (1984) Phonological awareness and verbal short term memory: Can they presage early reading problems?Journal of Learning Disabilities, 17, 592–599.
47.
McBride-ChangC. (1996). Models of speech perception and phonological processing in reading. Child Development, 67, 1836–1856.
48.
McBride-ChangC.ChoJ.-R.LiuH.WagnerR. K.ShuH.ZhouA. . . . MuseA. (2005). Changing models across cultures: Associations of phonological awareness and morphological structure awareness with vocabulary and word recognition in second graders from Beijing, Hong Kong, Korea, and the United States. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 92, 140–160. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2005.03.009
49.
McDougallS.HulmeC.EllisA.MonkA. (1994). The role of short-term memory and phonological skills in reading. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 58, 112–133.
50.
NagS. (2007). Early reading in Kannada: The pace of acquisition of orthographic knowledge and phonemic awareness. Journal of Research in Reading, 30(1), 7–22. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9817.2006.00329.x
51.
NagyW.BerningerV.AbbottR.VaughanK.VermeulenK. (2003). Relationship of morphology and other language skills to literacy skills in at-risk second graders and at-risk fourth grade writers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 730–742. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.95.4.730
52.
OuelletteG.SénéchalM. (2008). Pathways to Literacy: A study of invented spelling and its role in learning to read. Child Development, 79, 899–913. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01166.x
53.
PlautD. C.McClellandJ. L.SeidenbergM.PattersonK. (1996). Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains. Psychological Review, 103, 56–115.
54.
RomanA. A.KirbyJ. R.ParrilaR. K.Wade-WoolleyL.DeaconS. H. (2009). Toward a comprehensive view of the skills involved in word reading in Grades 4, 6, and 8. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 102, 96–113. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2008.01.004
55.
SavageR. S.FredericksonN.GoodwinR.PatniU.SmithN.TuersleyL. (2005). Relationships among rapid digit naming, phonological processing, motor automaticity, and speech perception in poor, average, and good readers and spellers. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38, 12–28.
56.
SavageR.LaversN.PillayV. (2007). Working memory and reading difficulties: What we know and what we don’t know about the relationship. Educational Psychology Review, 19, 185–221. doi:10.1177/00222194050380010201
57.
SeidenbergM. S. (2005). Connectionist models of word reading. Current directions in Psychological Science, 14, 238–242. doi:10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00372.x
58.
SwansonH. L.AshbakerM. H. (2000). Working memory, short-term memory, speech rate, word recognition and reading comprehension in learning disabled readers: Does executive system have a role?Intelligence, 28, 1–30.
59.
SwansonH. L.CooneyJ. B.O’ShaughnessyT. E. (1998). Learning disabilities and memory. In WongB. Y. L. (Ed.), Understanding learning and learning disabilities (pp. 107–162). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
60.
SwansonH. L.HowellM. H. (2001). Working memory, short-term memory, and speech rate as predictors of children’s reading performance at different ages. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 720–734. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.93.4.720
61.
SwansonH. L.ZhengX.JermanO. (2009). Working memory, short-term memory, and reading disabilities: A selective meta-analysis of the literature. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 42, 260–287. doi:10.1177/0022219409331958
62.
TorgesenJ. K.WagnerR. K.RashotteC. A. (1994). Longitudinal studies of phonological processing and reading. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 27, 276–286.
63.
WagnerR. K.TorgesenJ. K.LaughonP.SimmonsK.RashotteC. A. (1993). Development of young readers’ phonological processing abilities. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 83–103.
64.
WagnerR. K.TorgesenJ. K.RashotteC. A. (1994). Development of reading-related phonological processing abilities: New evidence of bidirectional causality from a latent variable longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 30, 73–87.
65.
WillisC. S.GathercoleS. E. (2001). Phonological short-term memory contributions to sentence processing in young children. Memory, 9, 349–363. doi:10.1080/09658210143000155
66.
WolfM.BowersP. (1999). The double-deficit hypothesis for the developmental dyslexias. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 415–438.
67.
WolfM.DenklaM. B. (2005). RAN/RAS: Rapid Automatized Naming and Rapid Alternating Stimulus Tests. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
68.
XueJ.ShuH.LiH.LiW.TianX. (2013). The stability of literacy-related cognitive contributions to Chinese character naming and reading fluency. Journal of Psycholinguistics Research, 42, 433–450. doi:10.1007/s10936-012-9228-0
69.
YoonY.-B.DerwingB. (2001). A language without a rhyme: Syllable structure experiments in Korean. Canadian Journal of Linguistics, 46, 187–237.
70.
ZieglerJ. C.GoswamiU. (2005). Reading acquisition, developmental dyslexia, and skilled reading across languages: A psycholinguistic grain size theory. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 3–29. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.131.1.3
