Preliminary efficacy data are reported for a research-based reading intervention designed for struggling readers in high school. PHAST PACES teaches (a) word identification strategies, (b) knowledge of text structures, and (c) reading comprehension strategies. In a quasi-experimental design, 268 intervention and 83 waiting list control students meeting criteria for reading disability were assessed before and after their semester. After 60 to 70 hours of PHAST PACES instruction, struggling readers demonstrated significant gains on standardized tests of word attack, word reading, and passage comprehension and on experimental measures of letter–sound knowledge and multisyllabic word identification relative to control students. An average effect size of .68 was revealed across these outcome measures. One year follow-up data on 197 PHAST PACES students revealed an average trend to decelerated growth after the intervention, except for passage comprehension outcomes that demonstrated continued growth over follow-up.
ApthorpH.ClarkT. (2007). Using strategy instruction to help struggling high schoolers understand what they read (ED498785). Denver, CO: Regional Educational Laboratory Central at McREL.
2.
ArmbrusterB. B.AndersonT. H.OstertagJ. (1987). Does text structure/summarization instruction facilitate learning from expository text?Reading Research Quarterly, 22, 331–346.
3.
BeitchmanJ. H.WilsonB.DouglasL.YoungA.AdlafE. (2001). Substance use disorders in young adults with and without LD: Predictive and concurrent relationships. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 34, 317–332.
4.
BorkowskiJ. G.WeyhingR. S.CarrM. (1988). Effects of attributional retraining on strategy-based reading comprehension in learning disabled students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 46–53.
5.
BrownA. L.CampioneJ. C. (1984). Three faces of transfer: Implications for early competence, individual differences, and instruction. In LambM.BrownA.RogoffB. (Eds.), Advances in developmental psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 143–194). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
BruckM. (1998). Outcomes of adults with childhood histories of dyslexia. In HulmeC.JoshiR. M. (Eds.), Reading and spelling: Development and disorders (pp. 179–200). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
8.
BrykA. S.RaudenbushS. W. (1987). Application of hierarchical linear models to assessing change. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 147–158.
9.
CalamaiP. (1987). Southam Survey—Broken words: Why five million Canadians are illiterate. The Southam literacy report: A special Southam survey. Toronto, Canada: Southam.
10.
Canadian Language and Literacy Research Network. (2003-2004). Annual report. London, Canada: University of Western of Ontario. Retrieved from http://www.cllrnet.ca/news/publications
11.
CarlisleJ. F.RiceM. S. (2002). Improving reading comprehension: Research-based principles and practices. Baltimore, MD: York Press.
12.
CatoneW. V.BradyS. A. (2005). The inadequacy of individual educational program (IEP) goals for high school students with word-level reading difficulties. Annals of Dyslexia, 55, 53–78.
13.
ChanL. K.ColeP. G.BarfettS. (1987). Comprehension monitoring: Detection and identification of text inconsistencies by learning disabled and normal students. Learning Disability Quarterly, 10, 114–124.
14.
CirinoP. T.RashidF. L.SevcikR. A.LovettM. W.FrijtersJ. C.WolfM.MorrisR. D. (2002). Psychometric stability of nationally normed and experimental decoding and related measures in children with reading disability. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35, 525–538.
15.
CorrinW.SomersM.-A.KempleJ. J.NelsonE.SepanikS. (2008). The Enhanced Reading Opportunities Study: Findings from the second year of implementation (NCEE 2009-4036). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences.
16.
DunnL. M.DunnL. M. (1997). Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test (3rd Ed.)—PPVT-III. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
17.
EdmondsM. S.VaughnS.WexlerJ.ReutebuchC. K.CableA.TackettK. K.SchnakenbergJ. W. (2009). A synthesis of reading interventions and effects on reading comprehension outcomes for older struggling readers. Review of Educational Research, 79(1), 262–300.
EngelmannS.CarnineL.JohnsonG. (1988). Corrective Reading: Word Attack Basics, Decoding A. Chicago, IL: Science Research Associates, Inc.
20.
EngelmannS.JohnsonG.CarnineL.MeyerL.BeckerW.EiseleJ. (1988). Corrective Reading: Decoding Strategies, Decoding B1. Chicago, IL: Science Research Associates, Inc.
21.
EngelmannS.MeyerL.JohnsonG.CarnineL. (1988). Corrective Reading: Skills Applications, Decoding C. Chicago, IL: Science Research Associates, Inc.
22.
FisherJ. B.SchumakerJ. B.DeshlerD. D. (2002). Improving the reading comprehension of at-risk adolescents. In BlockC. C.PressleyM. (Eds.), Comprehension instruction: Research-based best practices (pp. 351–364). New York, NY: Guilford.
23.
FletcherJ. M.DentonC. A.FuchsL. S.VaughnS. R. (2005). Multi-tiered reading instruction: Linking general education and special education. In GilgerJ.RichardsonS. (Eds.), Research-based education and intervention: What we need to know (pp. 21–43). Baltimore, MD: International Dyslexia Association.
24.
FoormanB. R.FrancisD. J.FletcherJ. M.SchatschneiderC.MehtaP. (1998). The role of instruction in learning to read: Preventing reading failure in at-risk children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 37–55.
25.
FoormanB. R.MoatsL. C. (2004). Conditions for sustaining research-based practices in early reading instruction. Remedial and Special Education, 25, 51–60.
26.
FornessS. R.KavaleK. A.BlumI. M.LloydJ. W. (1997). What works in special education and related services: Using meta-analysis to guide practice. Teaching Exceptional Children, 29(6), 4–9.
27.
FoxN. V. (1989). Providing effective inservice education. Journal of Reading, 33, 214–215.
28.
FrancisD. J.ShaywitzS. E.StuebingK. K.ShaywitzB. A.FletcherJ. M. (1994). The measurement of change: Assessing behavior over time and within a developmental context. In LyonG. R. (Ed.), Frames of reference for the assessment of learning disabilities: New views on measurement issues (pp. 29–58). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
29.
FuchsL. S.FuchsD.KazdanS. (1999). Effects of peer-assisted learning strategies on high-school students with serious reading problems. Remedial and Special Education, 20, 309–318.
30.
GaskinsI. W.DownerM. A.GaskinsR. W. (1986). Introduction to the Benchmark School Word Identification/Vocabulary Development Program. Media, PA: Benchmark School.
31.
JosephL. M.SchislerR. (2009). Should adolescents go back to the basics? A review of teaching word reading skills to middle and high school students. Remedial and Special Education, 30, 131–147.
32.
KamilM. L. (2004). The current state of quantitative research. Reading Research Quarterly, 39, 100–108.
33.
KeenanJ. M.BetjemannR. S. (2006). Comprehending the Gray Oral Reading Test without reading it: Why comprehension tests should not include passage-independent items. Scientific Studies of Reading, 10, 363–380.
34.
KeenanJ. M.BetjemannR. S.OlsonR. K. (2008). Reading comprehension tests vary in the skills they assess: Differential dependence on decoding and oral comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 12, 281–300.
35.
KempleJ.CorrinW.NelsonE.SalingerT.HerrmannS.DrummondK. (2008). The Enhanced Reading Opportunities Study: Early impact and implementation findings (NCEE 2008-4015). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences.
36.
LipkaO.SiegelL. S. (2007). The development of reading skills in children with English as a second language. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11, 105–131.
37.
LovettM. W.BordenS. L.DeLucaT.LacerenzaL.BensonN. J.BrackstoneD. (1994). Treating the core deficits of developmental dyslexia: Evidence of transfer-of-learning following phonologically- and strategy-based reading training programs. Developmental Psychology, 30, 805–822.
38.
LovettM. W.BordenS. L.Warren-ChaplinP. M.LacerenzaL.DeLucaT.GiovinazzoR. (1996). Text comprehension training for disabled readers: An evaluation of reciprocal teaching and text analysis training programs. Brain and Language, 54, 447–480.
39.
LovettM. W.De PalmaM.FrijtersJ. C.SteinbachK. A.TempleM.BensonN. J.LacerenzaL. (2008). Interventions for reading difficulties: A comparison of response to intervention by ELL and EFL struggling readers. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 41, 333–352.
40.
LovettM. W.LacerenzaL.BordenS. L. (2000). Putting struggling readers on the PHAST track: A program to integrate phonological and strategy-based remedial reading instruction and maximize outcomes. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 458–476.
41.
LovettM. W.LacerenzaL.BordenS. L.FrijtersJ. C.SteinbachK. A.De PalmaM. (2000). Components of effective remediation for developmental reading disabilities: Combining phonological and strategy-based instruction to improve outcomes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 263–283.
42.
LovettM. W.LacerenzaL.De PalmaM.BensonN. J.SteinbachK. A.FrijtersJ. C. (2008). Preparing teachers to remediate reading disabilities in high school: What is needed for effective professional development?Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(4), 1083–1097.
43.
LovettM. W.LacerenzaL.MurphyD.SteinbachK. A.De PalmaM.FrijtersJ. C. (2005). The importance of multiple-component interventions for children and adolescents who are struggling readers. In GilgerJ.RichardsonS. (Eds.), Research-based education and intervention: What we need to know (pp. 67–102). Baltimore, MD: International Dyslexia Association.
44.
LovettM. W.SteinbachK. A. (1997). The effectiveness of remedial programs for reading disabled children of different ages: Is there decreased benefit for older children?Learning Disability Quarterly, 20, 189–210.
45.
LovettM. W.SteinbachK. A.FrijtersJ. C. (2000). Remediating the core deficits of developmental reading disability: A double deficit perspective. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 334–358.
46.
MaloneL. D.MastropieriM. A. (1992). Reading comprehension instruction: Summarization and self-monitoring training for students with learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 58, 270–279.
47.
MasonL. H. (2004). Explicit self-regulated strategy development versus reciprocal questioning: Effects on expository reading comprehension among struggling readers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 283–296.
48.
MoatsL. C. (2001). When older students can’t read. Educational Leadership, 58(6), 36–40.
49.
MorrisR. D.LovettM. W.WolfM.SevcikR. A.SteinbachK. A.FrijtersJ. C.ShapiroM. B. (2010). Multiple-component remediation for developmental reading disabilities: IQ, socioeconomic status, and race as factors on remedial outcome. Journal of Learning Disabilities. doi:10.1177/002221940935547210.1177/0022219409355472
50.
National Reading Panel, Report of the Subgroups. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction (NIH 004754). Washington, DC: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.
51.
OlsonR. K.WiseB.RingJ.JohnsonM. (1997). Computer-based remedial training in phoneme awareness and phonological decoding: Effects on the posttraining development of word recognition. Scientific Studies of Reading, 1, 235–254.
52.
PalincsarA. S.BrownA. L. (1984). The reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1, 117–175.
53.
PressleyM.GoodchildF.FleetJ.ZajchowskiR.EvansE. D. (1989). The challenges of classroom strategy instruction. Elementary School Journal, 89, 301–342.
54.
PressleyM.JohnsonC. J.SymonsS.McGoldrickJ. A.KuritaJ. A. (1989). Strategies that improve children’s memory and comprehension of text. Elementary School Journal, 90, 3–32.
55.
PressleyM.Wharton-McDonaldR. (1997). Skilled comprehension and its development through instruction. School Psychology Review, 26, 448–466.
56.
RappD. N.van den BroekP.McMasterK. N.KendeouP.EspinC. A. (2007). Higher-order comprehension processes in struggling readers: A perspective for research and intervention. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11(4), 289-312.
57.
RaynerK.FoormanB. R.PerfettiC. A.PesetskyD.SeidenbergM. S. (2001). How psychological science informs the teaching of reading. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 2(2), 31–74.
58.
RobertsJ. K.MonacoJ. P. (2006, April). Effect size measures for the two-level linear multilevel model. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.
59.
ScammaccaN.RobertsG.VaughnS.EdmondsM.WexlerJ.ReutebuchC. K.TorgesenJ. K. (2007). Interventions for adolescent struggling readers: A meta-analysis with implications for practice. Portsmouth, NH: RMC Research Corporation, Center on Instruction.
60.
RogosaD.BrandtD.ZimowskiM. (1982). A growth curve approach to the measurement of change. Psychological Bulletin, 92, 726–748.
61.
ScarboroughH. S. (1984). Continuity between childhood dyslexia and adult reading. British Journal of Psychology, 75, 329–348.
62.
SchunkD. H.RiceJ. M. (1992). Influence of reading-comprehension strategy information on children’s achievement outcomes. Learning Disability Quarterly, 15, 51–64.
63.
ScruggsT. E.MastropieriM. A. (2004). Science and schooling for students with LD: A discussion of the symposium. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 37, 270–276.
64.
ShaywitzS. E.FletcherJ. M.HolahanJ. M.ShneiderA. E.MarchioneK. E.StuebingK. K.FrancisD.J.PughK.R.ShaywitzB. A. (1999). Persistence of dyslexia: The Connecticut Longitudinal Study at Adolescence. Pediatrics, 104(6), 1351–1359.
65.
SinatraG. M.BrownK. J.ReynoldsR. E. (2002). Implications of cognitive resources allocation for comprehension strategies instruction. In BlockC. C.PressleyM. (Eds.), Comprehension instruction: Research-based best practices (pp. 62–76). New York, NY: Guilford.
66.
SingerJ. D.WilletJ. B. (2003). Applied longitudinal data analysis: Modeling change and event occurrence. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
67.
SlavinR. E.MaddenN. A. (2008, March). Understanding bias due to measures inherent to treatments in systematic reviews in education. Paper presented at the annual meetings of the Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness, Crystal City, VA.
68.
SnijdersT.BoskerR. (1999). Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling. London, UK: Sage.
69.
SnowC. E.BurnsM. S.GriffinP. (1998) Preventing Reading Difficulties in Young Children. Washington, DC: National Academy Press
70.
SnowR. E.LohmanD. F. (1984). Toward a theory of cognitive aptitude for learning from instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 347–376.
71.
SomersM.-A.CorrinW.SepanikS. T. S.LevinJ.ZmachC. (2010). The Enhanced Reading Opportunities Final Report: The Impact of Supplemental Literacy Courses for Struggling Ninth-Grade Readers (NCEE 2010-4022). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, US Department of Education.
72.
Statistics Canada. (1990). Adult literacy in Canada: Results of a national survey. Ottawa, Canada: Author.
73.
Statistics Canada. (1995). Adult literacy in Canada: Results of a national survey. Ottawa, Canada: Author.
74.
SwansonH. L.HoskynM.LeeC. (1999). Interventions for students with learning disabilities: A meta-analysis of treatment outcomes. New York, NY: Guilford.
75.
TorgesenJ. K. (2005). Remedial interventions for students with dyslexia: National goals and current accomplishments. In GilgerJ.RichardsonS. (Eds.), Research-based education and intervention: What we need to know (pp. 103–123). Baltimore, MD: International Dyslexia Association.
76.
TorgesenJ. K.WagnerR. K.RashotteC. A. (1997). Approaches to the prevention and remediation of phonologically-based reading disabilities. In BlachmanB. A. (Ed.), Foundations of reading acquisition and dyslexia: Implications for early intervention (pp. 287–304). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
77.
U.S. Department of Education. (2006). $30 million in Striving Readers grants awarded to help struggling readers: First grants to support president’s Striving Readers program (Press release). Washington, DC: Office of Elementary and Secondary Education. Retrieved from http://www.ed.gov/news/pressreleases/2006/03/03222006.html
78.
U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (2003). National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) 2003 reading report card. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences.
VaughnS.ChardD. J.Pedrotty-BryantD.ColemanM.TylerB.-J.Linan-ThompsonS.KouzekananiK. (2000). Fluency and comprehension interventions for third-grade students. Remedial and Special Education, 21, 325–335.
81.
VellutinoF. R.ScanlonD. M.SipayE. R.SmallS. G.PrattA.ChenR.DencklaM.B. (1996). Cognitive profiles of difficult-to-remediate and readily remediated poor readers: Early intervention as a vehicle for distinguishing between cognitive and experiential deficits as basic causes of specific reading disability. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88(4), 601–638.
82.
WagnerR.TorgesenJ. K.RashotteC. A. (1999). Comprehensive Test of Phonological Processing (CTOPP). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
83.
WilkinsonG. S. (1993). Wide Range Achievement Test (3rd ed.). Wilmington, DE: Jastak Associates.
84.
WilliamsK. T. (2001). Group Reading Assessment and Diagnostic Evaluation (GRADE). Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
85.
WiseB. W.RingJ.SessionsL.OlsonR. K. (1997). Phonological awareness with and without articulation: A preliminary study. Learning Disability Quarterly, 20, 211–225.
86.
WoodcockR. W. (1987). Woodcock Reading Mastery Tests–Revised. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
