The purpose of this research was to systematically review the effects of repeated reading (RR) interventions on reading fluency to provide instructional strategies for students with reading disabilities (RD). Correct words per minute were coded as an outcome variable in a search that yielded 34 RR intervention studies from 1990 to 2014 for students with RD in K-12. The estimated overall Hedges’ g of the 39 independent effect sizes indicated the positive effects of RR on gains in reading fluency for students with RD, especially at the elementary grade level. The current findings also suggested that a combination of RR and a listening passage preview would be the most effective method for students with RD.
ArdoinS. P.McCallM.KlubnikC. (2007). Promoting generalization of oral reading fluency: Providing drill versus practice opportunities. Journal of Behavioral Education, 16, 55–70. doi: 10.1007/s10864-006-9020-z
2.
ArdoinS. P.MorenaL. S.BinderK. S.FosterT. E. (2013). Examining the impact of feedback and repeated readings on oral reading fluency: Let’s not forget prosody. School Psychology Quarterly, 28, 391–404. doi: 10.1037/spq0000027
3.
*ArdoinS. P.WailliamsJ. C.KlubnikC.McCallM. (2009). Three versus six rereadings of practice passages. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 42, 375–380. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2009.42-375
4.
BarbaresiW. J.KatusicS. K.ColliganR. C.WeaverA. L.JacobsenS. J. (2007). Modifiers of long-term school outcomes for children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: Does treatment with stimulant medication make a difference? Results from a population-based study. Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 28, 274–287. doi: 10.1097/DBP.0b013e3180cabc28
5.
*Barger-AndersonR. A. (2002). Impact on fluency: Endurance and the use of repeated reading (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertation and Theses database. (UMI No. 3049616)
6.
*BegenyJ. C.KrouseH. E.RossS. G.MitchellR. C. (2009). Increasing elementary aged students’ fluency with small-group instructions: A comparison of repeated reading, listening passage preview, and listening only strategies. Journal of Behavioral Education, 18, 211–228. doi: 10.1007/s10864-009-9090-9
7.
BegneyJ. C.SilberJ. M. (2006). An examination of group-based treatment packages for increasing elementary aged students’ reading fluency. Psychology in the Schools, 43, 183–195. doi: 10.1002/pits.20138
8.
BorensteinM. (2009). Effect sizes for continuous data. In CooperH.HedgesL. V.ValentineJ. C. (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis (2nd ed., pp. 221–235). New York, NY: Russell Sage.
9.
ChafouleasS. M.MartensB. K.DobsonR. L.WeinsteinK. S.GardnerK. B. (2004). Fluent reading as the improvement of stimulus control: Additive effects of performance-based interventions to repeated reading on students’ reading and error rates. Journal of Behavioral Education, 13, 67–81. doi: 10.1023/B:JOBE.0000023656.45233.6f
10.
ChardD. J.Ketterlin-GellerL. R.BakerS. K.DoablerC.ApichatabutraC. (2009). Repeated reading interventions for students with learning disabilities: Status of the evidence. Exceptional Children, 75, 263–281.
11.
ChardD. J.VaughnS.TylerB. (2002). A synthesis of research on effective interventions for building reading fluency with elementary students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35, 386–406. doi: 10.1177/00222194020350050101
12.
*ChristnerB. A. R. (2009). Videotaped oral reading fluency lab: An alternative approach to one-to-one interventions for intermediate elementary students with learning disabilities (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertation and Theses database. (UMI No. 3383688)
DalyE. J.BonfiglioC. M.MattsonT.PersampieriM.Foreman-YatesK. (2005). Refining the experimental analysis of academic skills deficits: Part I. An investigation of variables that affect generalized oral reading performance. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 38, 485–497. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2005.113-04
15.
*EckertT. L.ArdoinS. P.DaiseyD. M.ScarolaM. D. (2000). Empirically evaluating the effectiveness of reading interventions: The use of brief experimental analysis and single case designs. Psychology in the Schools, 37(5), 463–473.
16.
EckertT. L.ArdoinS. P.DalyE. J.MartensB. K. (2002). Improving oral reading fluency: A brief experimental analysis of combining an antecedent intervention with consequences. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 35, 271–281. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2002.35-271
17.
EpsteinM. A.ShaywitzS. E.ShaywitzB. A.WoolstonJ. L. (1991). The boundaries of attention deficit disorder. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 24, 78–86. doi: 10.1177/002221949102400204
18.
*Fascio-VereenS. T. (2004). A comparison of reading interventions using social studies text to improve oral reading fluency of middle school students (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertation and Theses database. (UMI No. 3120809)
19.
*GlazerA. D. (2007). The effects of a skill-based intervention package including repeated reading and error correction on the oral reading fluency of at-risk readers (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertation and Theses database. (UMI No. 3252582)
20.
*HawkinsR. O.HaleA. D.SheeleyW.LingS. (2011). Repeated reading and vocabulary-previewing interventions to improve fluency and comprehension for struggling high-school readers. Psychology in the Schools, 48, 59–77. doi: 10.1002/pits.20545
21.
*HeathJ. S. S. (2008). Improving oral reading fluency in elementary students of American Indian heritage with learning disabilities using the repeated readings method (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertation and Theses database. (UMI No. 3351181)
22.
HedgesL. V. (1981). Distribution theory for Glass’s estimator of effect size and related estimators. Journal of Educational Statistics, 6, 107–128. doi: 10.3102/10769986006002107
23.
HedgesL. V.OlkinI. (1985). Statistical model of meta-analysis. New York, NY: Academic.
24.
HigginsJ.ThompsonS. G.DeeksJ. J.AltmanD. G. (2003). Measuring inconsistency in meta-analysis. British Medical Journal, 327, 557–560. doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557.
25.
HomanS. P.KlesiusJ. P.HiteC. (1993). Effects of repeated readings and nonrepetitive strategies on students’ fluency and comprehension. Journal of Educational Research, 87, 94–99. doi: 10.1080/00220671.1993.9941172
26.
*JonesA. G. (2010). The effects of duet reading on the reading fluency and comprehension of high school students with learning disabilities (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertation and Theses database. (UMI No. 3434146)
27.
*JonesK. M.WickstromK. F.NoltemeyerA. L.BrownS. M.SchukaJ. R.TherrienW. J. (2009). An experimental analysis of reading fluency. Journal of Behavioral Education, 18, 35–55. doi: 10.1007/s10864-009-9082-9
28.
*JosephsN. L. (2010). Using peer-mediated fluency instruction of adolescent struggling readers (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertation and Theses database. (UMI No. 3411025)
29.
KlaudaS. L.GuthrieJ. T. (2014). Comparing relations of motivation, engagement, and achievement among struggling and advanced adolescent readers. Reading and Writing. Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11145-014-9523-2. doi: 10.1007/s11145-014-9523-2
30.
*KlubnikC. A. (2009). Evaluating a group repeated reading intervention (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertation and Theses database. (UMI No. 3367522)
31.
*KostewiczD. E.KubinaR. M. (2011). Building science reading fluency for students with disabilities with repeated reading to a fluency criterion. Learning Disabilities: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 17, 89–104.
32.
LaBergeD.SamuelsS. J. (1974). Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 293–323. doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(74)90015-2
33.
LeeJ.ZentallS. S. (2012). Reading motivational differences among groups: Reading disability (RD), attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), RD+ADHD, and typical comparison. Learning and Individual Differences, 22, 778–785. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2012.05.010
34.
LernerJ. (2003). Learning disabilities: Theories, diagnosis, and teaching strategies. New York, NY: Houghton Mifflin.
35.
LipseyM. W. (2009). Identifying interesting variables and analysis opportunities. In CooperH.HedgesL. V.ValentineJ. C. (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis (2nd ed., pp. 147–158). New York, NY: Sage.
36.
*LoY.CookeN. L.StarlingA. (2011). Using a repeated reading program to improve generalization of oral reading fluency. Education and Treatment of Children, 34, 115–140. doi: 10.1353/etc.2011.0007
37.
LoganG. D. (1988). Toward an instance theory of automatization. Psychological Review, 95, 492–527. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.95.4.492
38.
LoganG. D. (1997). Automaticity and reading: Perspectives from the instance theory of automatization. Reading & Writing Quarterly: Overcoming Learning Difficulties, 13, 123–146. doi: 10.1080/1057356970130203
39.
LyonG. R. (1996). Learning disabilities. Future of Children, 6, 54–76. doi: 10.2307/1602494
40.
*MalangaP. (2003). Using repeated readings and error correction to build reading fluency with at risk elementary students. Journal of Precision Teaching and Celeration, 19, 19–27.
41.
MathesP. G.FuchsL. S. (1993). Peer-mediated reading instruction in special education resource rooms. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 8, 233–243.
42.
*MercerC. D.CampbellK. U.MillerM. D.MercerK. D.LaneH. B. (2000). Effects of a reading fluency intervention for middle schoolers with specific learning disabilities. Learning Disability Research & Practice, 15, 179–189. doi: 10.1207/SLDRP1504_2
43.
MorrisS. B. (2008). Estimating effect sizes from the pretest-posttest-control group designs. Organizational Research Methods, 11(2), 364–386. doi: 10.1177/1094428106291059
44.
*MoyerR. M. (2012). An investigation of the influence of the theory of automaticity and the impact of repeated reading on the fluency and comprehension skills of eighth grade students with and without learning disabilities (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertation and Theses database. (UMI No. 3532687)
45.
*Musti-RaoS.HawkinsR. O.BarkleyE. A. (2009). Effects of repeated readings on the oral reading fluency of urban fourth-grade students: Implications for practice. Preventing School Failure, 54(1), 12–23. doi: 10.3200/PSFL.54.1.12-23
46.
National Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction: Reports of the subgroups (NIH Publication No. 00-4754). Washington, DC: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.
47.
NelsonJ. M.Manset-WilliamsonG. (2006). The impact of explicit, self-regulatory reading comprehension strategy instruction on the reading specific self-efficacy, attributions, and affect of students with reading disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 29, 213–230. doi: 10.2307/30035507
48.
*NelsonJ. S.AlberS. R.GordyA. (2004). Effects of systematic error correction and repeated readings on the reading accuracy and proficiency of second graders with disabilities. Education & Treatment of Children, 27(3), 186–198.
49.
O’ConnorR. E.WhiteA.SwansonH. L. (2007). Repeated reading versus continuous reading: Influences on reading fluency and comprehension. Exceptional Children, 74, 31–46.
50.
*PaigeD. D. (2006). Increasing fluency in disabled middle school readers: Repeated reading utilizing above grade level reading passages. Reading Horizons, 46, 167–181.
51.
*ScarboroughA. C. (2012). Using empirically validated reading strategies to improve middle school students’ reading fluency of classroom textbooks (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertation and Theses database. (UMI No. 3501104)
52.
ShaywitzS. E.MorrisR.ShaywitzB. A. (2008). The education of dyslexic children from childhood to young adulthood. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 451–475. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093633
53.
*ShimabukuroS. M. (2006). The effects of assisted repeated reading on the oral reading fluency and prosody of adolescents with reading difficulties (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertation and Theses database. (UMI No. 3288329)
54.
SilberJ. M.MartensB. K. (2010). Programming for the generalization of oral reading fluency: Repeated readings of entire text versus multiple exemplars. Journal of Behavioral Education, 19, 30–46. doi: 10.1007/s10864-010-9099-0
55.
SindelarP. T.MondaL. E.O’SheaL. J. (1990). Effects of repeated readings on instructional- and mastery-level readers. Journal of Educational Research, 83, 220–226.
56.
*StoutT. W. (1997). An investigation of the effects of a repeated reading intervention on the fluency and comprehension of students with language-learning disabilities (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertation and Theses database. (UMI No. 9804400)
57.
*SukhramD. P. (2008). The effects of oral repeated reading with and without corrective feedback on the fluency and comprehension of narrative and expository text for struggling readers (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertation and Theses database. (UMI No. 3314908)
58.
*SwainK. D.AllinderR. M. (1996). The effects of repeated reading on two types of CBM: Computer maze and oral reading with second-grade students with learning disabilities. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 21, 51–66. doi: 10.1177/073724779602100204
59.
SwainK. D.Leader-JanssenE. M.ConleyP. (2013). Effects of repeated reading and listening passage preview on oral reading fluency. Reading Improvement, 50, 12–18.
60.
TherrienW. J. (2004). Fluency and comprehension gains as a result of repeated reading: A meta-analysis. Remedial and Special Education, 25, 252–261. doi: 10.1177/07419325040250040801
61.
TherrienW. J.HughesC. (2008). Comparison of repeated reading and question generation on students’ reading fluency and comprehension. Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal, 6, 1–16.
62.
TherrienW. J.KirkJ. F.Wood-GrovesS. (2012). Comparison of a reading fluency intervention with and without passage repetition on reading achievement. Remedial and Special Education, 33, 309–319. doi: 10.1177/0741932511410360
63.
*VadasyP. F.SandersE. A. (2008). Benefits of repeated reading intervention for low-achieving fourth- and fifth-grade students. Remedial and Special Education, 29, 235–249. doi: 10.1177/0741932507312013
64.
*ValleleyR. J.ShriverM. D. (2003). An examination of the effects of repeated readings with secondary students. Journal of Behavioral Education, 12, 55–76. doi: 10.1023/A:1022322422324
65.
*VanAukenT. L.ChafouleasS. M.BradleyT. A.MartensB. K. (2002). Using brief experimental analysis to select oral reading interventions: An investigation of treatment utility. Journal of Behavioral Education, 11, 163–179. doi: 10.1023/A:1020126003221
66.
*VandenbergA. C.BoonR. T.ForeC.BenderW. N. (2008). The effects of repeated readings on the reading fluency and comprehension for high school students with specific learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 15, 11–20.
67.
VaughnS.GerstenR.ChardD. J. (2000). The underlying message in LD intervention research: Findings from research syntheses. Exceptional Children, 67, 99–114.
68.
*ViningO. G. (2007). Response outcomes of low achieving students and students with learning disabilities (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertation and Theses database. (UMI No. 3300880)
69.
*WeinsteinG.CookeN. L. (1992). The effects of two repeated reading interventions on generalization of fluency. Learning Disability Quarterly, 15, 21–28. doi: 10.2307/1510562
70.
WelschR. G. (2007). Using experimental analysis to determine interventions for reading fluency and recalls of students with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 30, 115–129. doi: 10.2307/30035546
71.
WexlerJ.VaughnS.EdmondsM.ReutebuchC. K. (2008). A synthesis of fluency interventions for secondary struggling readers. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 21, 317–347. doi: 10.1007/s11145-007-9085-7
72.
WexlerJ.VaughnS.RobertsG.DentonC. A. (2010). The efficacy of repeated reading and wide reading practice for high school students with severe reading disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 25, 2–10. doi: 10.1111/j.15405826.2009.00296.x
WilsonD. B. (2009). Systematic coding. In CooperH.HedgesL. V.ValentineJ. C. (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis (2nd ed., pp. 159–176). New York, NY: Sage.
75.
*WilsonL. D. (2008). Improving fluency through instructional synergy in special day class students in an alternative school (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertation and Theses database. (UMI No. 3337328)
76.
*YurickA. L.RobinsonP. D.CartledgeG.LoY.EvansT. L. (2006). Using peer-mediated repeated readings as a fluency-building activity for urban learners. Education and Treatment of Children, 29(3), 469–506.
77.
ZentallS. S. (2014). Students with mild exceptionalities: Characteristics and applications. London, UK: Sage.
