This article reviews the results of a meta-analysis of the experimental published literature that compares the academic, cognitive, and behavioral performance of adults with reading disabilities (RD) with average achieving adult readers. The meta-analysis shows that deficits independent of the classification measures emerged for adults with RD on measures of vocabulary, math, spelling, and specific cognitive process related to naming speed, phonological processing, and verbal memory. The results also showed that adults with high verbal IQs (scores > 100) but low word recognition standard scores (< 90) yielded greater deficits related to their average reading counterparts when compared to studies that included adults with RD with verbal IQ and reading scores in the same low range. Implications of the findings related to assessment and intervention are discussed.
American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed., text revision). Washington, DC: Author.
2.
BaronR. M.KennyD. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.117310.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
BrykA. S.RaudenbushS. W. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). London, UK: SAGE.
5.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
6.
CorleyM.TaymansJ. (2002). Adults with learning disabilities: A review of the literature. In ComingsJ.GarnerB.SmithC. (Eds.), Annual review of adult learning and literacy (Vol. 3, pp. 44–83). San Francisco, CA: John Wiley.
7.
CronbachL.FurbyL. (1970). How we should measure “change”—Or should we?Psychological Bulletin, 74, 68–80. doi:10.1037/h002938210.1037/h0029382
8.
CunninghamA. E.StanovichK. E. (1990). Assessing print exposure and orthographic processing skill in children: A quick measure of reading experience. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 733–740. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.82.4.73310.1037/0022-0663.82.4.733
9.
DencklaM. B.RudelR. G. (1976). Rapid automatized naming (R.A.N.): Dyslexia differentiated from other learning disabilities. Neuropsychologia, 14, 471–479. doi:10.1016/0028-3932(76)90075-010.1016/0028-3932(76)90075-0
10.
FletcherJ. M. (2010). Construct validity of reading measures in adults with significant reading difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 43, 166–168. doi:10.1177/002221940935934610.1177/0022219409359346
11.
FletcherJ. M.LyonG. R.BarnesM.StuebingK. K.FrancisD. J.OlsonR. K.. . . ShaywitzB. A. (2002). Classification of learning disabilities: An evidenced-based evaluation. In BradleyR.DanielsonL.HallahanD. (Eds.), Identification of learning disabilities: Research to practice (pp. 185–250). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
12.
FletcherJ. M.MorrisR. D.LyonG. R. (2003). Classification and definition of learning disabilities: An integrative perspective. In SwansonH. L.HarrisK. R.GrahamS. (Eds.), Handbook of learning disabilities (pp. 30–56). New York, NY: Guilford.
13.
FrancesD.ShaywitzS.StuebingK.ShaywitzB.FletcherJ. (1996). Developmental lag versus deficit models of reading disability: A longitudinal, individual growth curve analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 3-17.
14.
FuchsD.FuchsL.MathesP. G.LipseyM. (2000). Reading differences between low achieving students with and without learning disabilities. In GerstenR.SchillerE. P.VaughnS. (Eds.), Contemporary special education research: Synthesis of knowledge base of critical issues (pp. 81–104). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
15.
GilgerJ. W.BoreeckiI. B.SmithS. D.DeFriesJ. C.PenningtonB. F. (1996). The etiology of extreme scores for complex phenotypes: An illustration of reading performance. In ChaseC.RosenG. D.ShermanG. F. (Eds.), Developmental dyslexia: Neural, cognitive, and genetic mechanisms (pp. 63–85). Baltimore, MD: York Press.
16.
GreggN.ColemanC.DavidM.LindstromW.HartwigJ. (2006). Critical issues for the diagnosis of learning disabilities in the adult population. Psychology in the Schools, 43, 889–899.
17.
GreggN.NelsonJ. (2010). Meta-analysis on the effectiveness of extra time as a test accommodation for transitioning adolescents with learning disabilities: More questions than answers. Journal of Learning Disabilities. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/002221940935548410.1177/0022219409355484
18.
GrigorenkoE. L. (2001). Developmental dyslexia: An update on genes, brains, and environments. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 42, 91–125. doi:10.1111/1469-7610.0070410.1111/1469-7610.00704
19.
HedgesL. V.OlkinI. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
20.
HockM. (2009). Teaching methods: Instructional methods and arrangements effective for adults with learning disabilities. In TaymanJ. M. (Ed.), Learning to achieve: A review of the research literature on serving adults with learning disabilities (pp. 183–208). Washington, DC. National Institute for Literacy.
21.
HoskynM.SwansonH. L (2000). Cognitive processing of low achievers and children with reading disabilities: A selective meta-analytic review of the published literature. School Psychology Review, 29, 102–119.
22.
KruidenierJ. (2002). Research-based principles of adult basic education reading instruction. Washington, DC: National Institute for Literacy.
23.
KutnerM.GreenbergE.JinY.BoyleB.HsuY.DunleavyE. (2007). Literacy in everyday life: Results from the 2003 National Assessment of Adult Literacy (NCES 2007–480). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Research.
24.
MacArthurC. A.KonoldT. R.GluttingJ. J.AlampreseJ. A. (2010). Reading component skills of learners in adult basic education. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 43, 108–121. doi:10.1177/002221940935934210.1177/0022219409359342
25.
MellardD. F.PattersonM. B. (2008). Contrasting adult literacy learners with and without specific learning disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 29, 133–144. doi:10.1177/074193250831505310.1177/0741932508315053
26.
MellardD.PattersonM. B.PrewettS. (2007). Reading practices among adult education participants. Reading Research Quarterly, 42, 188–213. doi:10.1598/RRQ.42.2.110.1598/RRQ.42.2.1
27.
MellardD.ScanlonD. (2006). Feasibility of explicit instruction in adult basic education: Instructor-learner interaction patterns. Adult Basic Education, 16, 21–37.
28.
MillerB.McCardleP.HernandezR. (2010). Advances and remaining challenges in adult literacy research. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 43, 101–109. doi:10.1177/002221940935934110.1177/0022219409359341
29.
MorrisR. D.StuebingK. K.FletcherJ. M.ShaywitzS. E.LyonG. R.ShankweilerD. P.. . . ShaywitzB. A. (1998). Subtypes of reading disability: Variability around a phonological core. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 347–373. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.90.3.34710.1037/0022-0663.90.3.347
30.
National Adult Literacy Survey. (1992). National Adult Literacy Survey. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education.
31.
SabatiniJ. P.SawakiY.ShoreJ. R.ScarboroughH. S. (2010). Relationships among reading skills of adults with low literacy. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 43, 122–138. doi:10.1177/002221940935934310.1177/0022219409359343
32.
ScarboroughH. S.EhriL. C.OlsonR. K.FowlerA. E. (1998). The role of phonemic awareness beyond the elementary school years. Scientific Studies of Reading, 2, 115–142. doi:10.1207/s1532799xssr0202_210.1207/s1532799xssr0202_2
33.
ShankweilerD.CrainS.KatzL.FowlerA. E.LibermanA. M.BradyS. A.. . . ShaywitzB. A. (1995). Cognitive profiles of reading disabled children: Comparison of language skills in phonology, morphology, and syntax. Psychological Science, 6, 149–156. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1995.tb00324.x10.1111/j.1467-9280.1995.tb00324.x
34.
ShaywitzS. E.EscobarM. D.ShaywitzB. A.FletcherJ. M.MakuchR. (1992). Evidence that dyslexia may represent the lower tail of a normal distribution of reading ability. New England Journal of Medicine, 326, 145–150. doi:10.1056/NEJM19920116326030110.1056/NEJM199201163260301
35.
ShaywitzS. E.FletcherJ. M.HolahanJ. M.SchneiderA. E.MarchioneK. E.StuebingK. K.. . . ShaywitzB. A. (1999). Persistence of dyslexia: The Connecticut Longitudinal Study at Adolescence. Pediatrics, 104, 1351–1359. doi:10.1542/peds.104.6.135110.1542/peds.104.6.1351
ShuyT. (2003). Screening and measuring learning disabilities for adult education students. Washington, DC: National Institute for Literacy.
38.
SiegelL. S. (1993). Phonological processing deficits as the basis of a reading disability. Developmental Review, 13, 246–257. doi:10.1006/drev.1993.101110.1006/drev.1993.1011
39.
SnowlingM.BishopD. V. M.StothardS. E. (2000). Is pre-school language impairment a risk factor for dyslexics in adolescence. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 41, 587–600. doi:10.1111/1469–7610.0065110.1111/1469–7610.00651
40.
StanovichK. E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 360–407. doi:10.1598/RRQ.21.4.110.1598/RRQ.21.4.1
41.
StanovichK. E.SiegelL. S. (1994). Phenotypic performance profile of children with reading disabilities: A regression based test of the phonological-core difference model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 24–53. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.86.1.2410.1037/0022-0663.86.1.24
42.
StuebingK. K.FletcherJ. M.LeDouxJ. M.LyonG. R.ShaywitzS. E.ShaywitzB. A. (2002). Validity of IQ-discrepancy classifications of reading disabilities: A meta-analysis. American Educational Research Journal, 39, 469–518. doi:10.3102/0002831203900246910.3102/00028312039002469
43.
SwansonH. L. (1991). Operational definitions of learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 14, 242–254. doi:10.2307/151066110.2307/1510661
44.
SwansonH. L. (1999a). Instructional components that predict treatment outcomes for students with learning disabilities: Support for a combined strategy and direct instruction model. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 14, 129–140. doi:10.1207/sldrp1403_110.1207/sldrp1403_1
45.
SwansonH. L. (1999b). Reading research for students with LD: A meta-analysis in intervention outcomes. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 32, 504–532. http://www.csa.com/ doi:10.1177/00222194990320060510.1177/002221949903200605
46.
SwansonH. L. (2000a). Searching for the best cognitive model for instructing students with learning disabilities: A component and composite analysis. Educational and Child Psychology, 17(3), 101–121.
47.
SwansonH. L. (2000b). What instruction works for students with learning disabilities? Summarizing the results from a meta-analysis of intervention studies. In GerstenR. M.SchillerE. P.VaughnS. (Eds.), Contemporary special education research: Syntheses of the knowledge base on critical instructional issues (pp. 1–30). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
48.
SwansonH. L. (2001). Research on interventions for adolescents with learning disabilities: A meta-analysis of outcomes related to higher-order processing. Elementary School Journal, 101, 331–348. doi:10.1086/49967110.1086/499671
49.
SwansonH. L. (2009). Assessment of adults with learning disabilities. In TaymansJ. M. (Ed.), Learning to achieve: A review of the research literature on serving adults with learning disabilities (pp. 15–70). Washington, DC: National Institute for Literacy.
50.
SwansonH. L.AlexanderJ. (1997). Cognitive processes that predict reading in learning disabled readers: Revisiting the specificity hypothesis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 128–158. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.89.1.12810.1037/0022-0663.89.1.128
51.
SwansonH. L.DeshlerD. (2003). Instructing adolescents with learning disabilities: Converting a meta-analysis to practice. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 36, 124–135. doi:10.1177/00222194030360020510.1177/002221940303600205
52.
SwansonH. L.HoskynM. (1998). Experimental intervention research on students with learning disabilities: A meta-analysis of treatment outcomes. Review of Educational Research, 68, 277–321.
53.
SwansonH. L.HoskynM. (1999). Definition × treatment interactions for students with learning disabilities. School Psychology Review, 28, 644–658.
54.
SwansonH. L.HoskynM. (2001). Instructing adolescents with learning disabilities: A component and composite analysis. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 16, 109–119. doi:10.1111/0938-8982.0001210.1111/0938-8982.00012
55.
SwansonH. L.HoskynM.LeeC. (1999). Interventions for students with learning disabilities: A meta-analysis of treatment outcomes. New York, NY: Guilford.
56.
SwansonH. L.HsiehC. (2009). Reading disabilities in adults: A selective meta-analysis of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 79, 1391–1390. doi:10.3102/003465430935093110.3102/0034654309350931
57.
SwansonH. L.Sachse-LeeC. (2000). A meta-analysis of single-subject-design intervention research for students with LD. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 114–136. doi:10.1177/00222194000330020110.1177/002221940003300201
58.
SwansonH. L.SiegelL. (2001). Learning disabilities as a working memory deficit. Issues in Education: Contributions for Educational Psychology, 7, 1–48.
59.
VellutinoF. R.ScanlonD. M.LyonG. R. (2000). Differentiating between difficult-to remediate and readily remediated poor readers: More evidence against the IQ achievement discrepancy definition for reading disability. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 223–238. doi:10.1177/00222194000330030210.1177/002221940003300302
60.
WolffU.LundbergI. (2003). A technique for group screening of dyslexia among adults. Annals of Dyslexia, 53, 324–339. doi:10.1007/s11881-003-0015-310.1007/s11881-003-0015-3
