Developmental dyscalculia (DD) is a specific learning disability in mathematics that affects around 6% of the population. Currently, the core deficit of DD remains unknown. While the number sense deficit hypothesis suggests that the core deficit of DD lies in the inability to represent nonsymbolic numerosity, the access deficit hypothesis suggests that the origin of this disability lies in the inability to associate numbers with the underlying magnitude representation. The present study compared the performance of DDs with their low-achieving (LA) and normally achieving peers in nonsymbolic numerosity processing and number-magnitude mapping over 1 year (from kindergarten to 1st grade). The results demonstrated differential impairments in different subgroups of children with mathematics difficulties. While DDs showed deficits in both nonsymbolic numerosity processing and number-magnitude mapping, LAs showed deficit only in the number-magnitude mapping. Furthermore, the deficit in number-magnitude mapping among the DD group was partially explained by their number sense deficit. The number sense deficit hypothesis is supported. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.
AnsariD. (2008). Effects of development and enculturation on number representation in the brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 9(4), 278–291. doi: 10.1038/nrn2334
2.
AunolaK.LeskinenE.LerkkanenM.-K.NurmiJ.-E. (2004). Developmental dynamics of math performance from preschool to grade 2. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(4), 699–713. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.96.4.699
3.
BoothJ. L.SieglerR. S. (2006). Developmental and individual differences in pure numerical estimation. Developmental Psychology, 42(1), 189–201. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.41.6.189
ButterworthB. (2005). Developmental dyscalculia. In CampbellJ. I. D. (Ed.), Handbook of mathematical cognition (pp. 455–468). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
6.
CareyS. (2004). Bootstrapping & the origin of concepts. Daedalus, 133, 59–68. doi: 10.1162/001152604772746701
7.
ChenQ.LiJ. (2014). Association between individual differences in non-symbolic number acuity and math performance: A meta-analysis. Acta Psychologica, 148, 163–172. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.01.016
8.
De SmedtB.GilmoreC. K. (2011). Defective number module or impaired access? Numerical magnitude processing in first graders with mathematical difficulties. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 108(2), 278–292. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2010.09.003
9.
De SmedtB.NoëlM.-P.GilmoreC.AnsariD. (2013). How do symbolic and non-symbolic numerical magnitude processing skills relate to individual differences in children’s mathematical skills? A review of evidence from brain and behavior. Trends in Neuroscience and Education, 2(2), 48–55. doi: 10.1016/j.tine.2013.06.001
10.
DehaeneS. (2001). Précis of “The number sense.”Mind and Language, 16(1), 16–36. doi: 10.1111/1468-0017.00154
11.
DehaeneS. (2005). Evolution of human cortical circuits for reading and arithmetic: The “neuronal recycling” hypothesis . In DehaeneS.DuhamelJ. R.HauserM.RizzolattiG. (Eds.), From monkey brain to human brain (pp. 133–157). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
12.
DehaeneS.PiazzaM.PinelP.CohenL. (2003). Three parietal circuits for number processing. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 20(3), 487–506. doi: 10.1080/02643290244000239
13.
FeigensonL.DehaeneS.SpelkeE. (2004). Core systems of number. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(7), 307–314. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2004.05.002
14.
FuchsL. S.GearyD. C.ComptonD. L.FuchsD.HamlettC. L.SeethalerP. M.SchatschneiderC. (2010). Do different types of school mathematics development depend on different constellations of numerical versus general cognitive abilities?Developmental Psychology, 46(6), 1731–1746. doi: 10.1037/a0020662
15.
GearyD. C.HamsonC. O.HoardM. K. (2000). Numerical and arithmetical cognition: A longitudinal study of process and concept deficits in children with learning disability. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 77(3), 236–263. doi: 10.1006/jecp.2000.2561
16.
GearyD. C.HoardM. K.Byrd-CravenJ.NugentL. (2007). Cognitive mechanisms underlying achievement deficits in children with mathematical learning disability. Child Development, 78(4), 1343–1359. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01069.x
17.
GearyD. C.HoardM. K.NugentL.Byrd-CravenJ. (2008). Development of number line representations in children with mathematical learning disability. Develop-mental Neuropsychology, 33(3), 277–299. doi: 10.1080/87565640801982361
18.
GilmoreC.AttridgeN.ClaytonS.CraggL.JohnsonS.MarlowN.InglisM. (2013). Individual differences in inhibitory control, not non-verbal number acuity, correlate with mathematics achievement. PloS One, 8(6), e67374. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0067374
19.
HalberdaJ.LyR.WilmerJ. B.NaimanD. Q.GermineL. (2012). Number sense across the lifespan as revealed by a massive Internet-based sample. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109(28), 11116–11120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1200196109
20.
HalberdaJ.MazzoccoM. M. M.FeigensonL. (2008). Individual differences in non-verbal number acuity correlate with maths achievement. Nature, 455, 665–668. doi: 10.1038/nature07246
21.
HanichL. B.JordanN. C.KaplanD.DickJ. (2001). Performance across different areas of mathematical cognition in children with learning difficulties. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 615–626. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.93.3.615
22.
Hong Kong Education Bureau. (2008). The learning and achievement measurement kit. Hong Kong: Hong Kong SAR Government.
23.
IuculanoT.TangJ.HallC. W. B.ButterworthB. (2008). Core information processing deficits in developmental dyscalculia and low numeracy. Developmental Science, 11(5), 669–680. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00716.x
24.
KucianK.GrondU.RotzerS.HenziB.SchönmannC.PlanggerF.von AsterM. (2011). Mental number line training in children with developmental dyscalculia. NeuroImage, 57(3), 782–795. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.01.070
25.
LanderlK. (2013). Development of numerical processing in children with typical and dyscalculic arithmetic skills-a longitudinal study. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 459. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00459
26.
LanderlK.BevanA.ButterworthB. (2004). Developmental dyscalculia and basic numerical capacities: A study of 8-9-year-old students. Cognition, 93(2), 99–125. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2003.11.004
27.
LanderlK.KölleC. (2009). Typical and atypical development of basic numerical skills in elementary school. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 103(4), 546–565. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2008.12.006
28.
LanderlK.MollK. (2010). Comorbidity of learning disorders: Prevalence and familial transmission. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 51(3), 287–294. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2009.02164.x
29.
LibertusM. E.FeigensonL.HalberdaJ. (2013). Is approximate number precision a stable predictor of math ability?Learning and Individual Differences, 25, 126–133. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2013.02.001
30.
MartinR. B.CirinoP. T.BarnesM. A.Ewing-CobbsL.FuchsL. S.StuebingK. K.FletcherJ. M. (2013). Prediction and stability of mathematics skill and difficulty. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 46(5), 428–443. doi: 10.1177/0022219411436214
31.
MazzoccoM. M. M.FeigensonL.HalberdaJ. (2011). Impaired acuity of the approximate number system underlies mathematical learning disability (dyscalculia). Child Development, 82(4), 1224–1237. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01608.x
32.
MorganP. L.FarkasG. (2009). Five-year growth trajectories of kindergarten children with learning difficulties in mathematics. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 42(4), 306–321. doi: 10.1177/0022219408331037
33.
MurphyM. M.MazzoccoM. M. M.HanichL. B.EarlyM. C. (2007). Cognitive characteristics of children with mathematics learning disability (MLD) vary as a function of the cutoff criterion used to define MLD. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 40(5), 458–478. doi: 10.1177/00222194070400050901
34.
MussolinC.MejiasS.NoëlM.-P. (2010). Symbolic and nonsymbolic number comparison in children with and without dyscalculia. Cognition, 115(1), 10–25. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.10.006
35.
NoëlM.-P.RousselleL. (2011). Developmental changes in the profiles of dyscalculia: An explanation based on a double exact-and-approximate number representation model. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 5, 165. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2011.00165
36.
ParkJ.BrannonE. (2013). Training the approximate number system improves math proficiency. Psychological Science, 24(10), 2013–2019. doi: 10.1177/0956797613482944
37.
ParsonsS.BynnerJ. (2005). Does numeracy matter more?London, UK: National Research and Development Centre for Adult Literacy and Numeracy.
38.
PassolunghiM. C.MammarellaI. C. (2011). Selective spatial working memory impairment in a group of children with mathematics learning disabilities and poor problem-solving skills. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 45(4), 341–50. doi: 10.1177/0022219411400746
39.
PiazzaM.FacoettiA.TrussardiA. N.BertelettiI.ConteS.LucangeliD.ZorziM. (2010). Developmental trajectory of number acuity reveals a severe impairment in developmental dyscalculia. Cognition, 116(1), 33–41. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2010.03.012
40.
PiazzaM.IzardV.PinelP.Le BihanD.DehaeneS. (2004). Tuning curves for approximate numerosity in the human intraparietal sulcus. Neuron, 44(3), 547–555. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2004.10.014
41.
RäsänenP.SalminenJ.WilsonA. J.AunioP.DehaeneS. (2009). Computer-assisted intervention for children with low numeracy skills. Cognitive Development, 24(4), 450–472. doi: 10.1016/j.cogdev.2009.09.003
42.
RavenJ. C. (1956). Standard progressive matrices sets A, B, C, D & E. Oxford, UK: Psychologists Press.
43.
ReeveR.ReynoldsF.HumberstoneJ.ButterworthB. (2012). Stability and change in markers of core numerical competencies. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 141(4), 649–666. doi: 10.1037/a0027520
44.
Reigosa-CrespoV.Valdés-SosaM.ButterworthB.EstévezN.RodríguezM.SantosE.LageA. (2012). Basic numerical capacities and prevalence of developmental dyscalculia: The Havana Survey. Developmental Psychology, 48(1), 123–135. doi: 10.1037/a0025356
45.
RousselleL.NoëlM.-P. (2007). Basic numerical skills in children with mathematics learning disabilities: A comparison of symbolic vs non-symbolic number magnitude processing. Cognition, 102(3), 361–395. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2006.01.005
46.
ShalevR. S. (2007). Prevalence of developmental dyscalculia. In BerchD. B.MazzoccoM. M. M. (Eds.), Why is math so hard for some children? The nature and origins of mathematical learning difficulties and disabilities (pp. 49–60). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
47.
SieglerR. S.BoothJ. L. (2004). Development of numerical estimation in young children. Child Development, 75(2), 428–444. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2004.00684.x
48.
SieglerR. S.RamaniG. B. (2009). Playing linear number board games—but not circular ones—improves low-income preschoolers’ numerical understanding. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(3), 545–560. doi: 10.1037/a0014239
49.
StarrA.LibertusM. E.BrannonE. M. (2013). Number sense in infancy predicts mathematical abilities in childhood. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 110(45), 18116–18120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1302751110
50.
TabachnickB.FidellL. (2006). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
51.
WilsonA. J.DehaeneS. (2007). Number sense and developmental dyscalculia. In CochD.DawsonG.FischerK. W. (Eds.), Human behavior, learning, and the developing brain: Atypical development (pp. 212–238). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
52.
WilsonA. J.DehaeneS.PinelP.RevkinS. K.CohenL.CohenD. (2006). Principles underlying the design of “The Number Race”, an adaptive computer game for remediation of dyscalculia. Behavioral and Brain Functions: BBF, 2, 19. doi: 10.1186/1744-9081-2-19
53.
WongT. T.-Y.HoC. S.-H.TangJ. (2015). The relation between ANS and arithmetic achievement: The mediating role of number-numerosity mapping. Manuscript submitted for publication.
