Most research on early identification of reading disabilities has focused on word reading problems and little attention has been given to reading comprehension difficulties. In this study, we investigated whether measures of language ability and/or response to language intervention in kindergarten uniquely predicted reading comprehension difficulties in third grade. A total of 366 children were administered a battery of screening measures at the beginning of kindergarten and progress monitoring probes across the school year. A subset of children also received a 26-week Tier 2 language intervention. Participants’ achievement in word reading was assessed at the end of second grade, and their performance in reading comprehension was measured as the end of third grade. Results showed that measures of language ability in kindergarten significantly added to the prediction of reading comprehension difficulties over and above kindergarten word reading predictors and direct measures of word reading in second grade. Response to language intervention also proved to be a unique predictor of reading comprehension outcomes. Findings are discussed in terms of their relevance for the early identification of reading disabilities.
Al OtaibaS.FolsomJ. S.SchatschneiderC.WanzekJ.GreulichL.MeadowsJ.. . . ConnorC. M. (2011). Predicting first-grade reading performance from kindergarten response to tier I instruction. Exceptional Children, 77, 453–470.
2.
BadianN.McAnultyG.DuffyG.AlsH. S. (1990). Prediction of dyslexia in kindergarten boys. Annals of Dyslexia, 40, 152–167.
3.
BeckI.McKeownM. G. (2001). Text talk: Capturing the benefits of read-aloud experiences for young children. Reading Teacher, 55, 10–20.
4.
BeckI.McKeownM.KucanL. (2002). Bringing words to life. New York, NY: Guilford.
5.
BishopD. V. M.McDonaldD.BirdS.Hayiou-ThomasM. E. (2009). Children who read words accurately despite language impairment: Who are they and how do they do it?Child Development, 80, 593–605.
6.
BlachmanB. A.BallE. W.BlackR.TangelD. M. (2000). Road to the code. Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
7.
CamilleriB.LawJ. (2007). Assessing children referred to speech and language therapy: Static and dynamic assessment of receptive vocabulary. Advances in Speech-Language Pathology, 9, 312–322.
8.
CattsH.AdlofS. (2011). Phonological and other language deficits associated with dyslexia. In BradyS.BlazeD.FowlerA. (Eds.), Explaining individual differences in reading: Theory and evidence (pp. 137–152). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
9.
CattsH. W.FeyM. E.ZhangX.TomblinJ. B. (2001). Estimating the risk of future reading difficulties in kindergarten children: A research-based model and its clinical implementation. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 32, 38–50.
10.
CattsH. W.NielsenD. C.BridgesM. S.LiuY.BontempoD. (in press). Early identification of reading disabilities within an RTI framework. Journal of Learning Disabilities.
11.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analyses for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
12.
ComptonD. L.FuchsD.FuchsL. S.BryantJ. D. (2006). Selecting at-risk readers in first grade for early intervention: A two-year longitudinal study of decision rules and procedures. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 394–409.
13.
DollaghanC.CampbellT. F. (1998). Nonword repetition and child language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 41, 1136–1146.
14.
DunnL. M.DunnL. M. (1997). Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test–3. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Services.
15.
ElbroC.BorstromI.PetersenD. K. (1998). Predicting dyslexia from kindergarten: The importance of phonological representations of lexical items. Reading Research Quarterly, 33, 36–60.
16.
Ellis WeismerS.Murray-BranchJ.MillerJ. F. (1994). A prospective longitudinal study of language development in late talkers. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 37, 852–867.
17.
FletcherJ. M.DentonC.FrancisD. J. (2009). Validity of alternative approaches for the identification of learning disabilities: Operationalizing unexpected underachievement. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38, 545–552.
18.
FoormanB. R.TorgesenJ. K.CrawfordE.PetscherY. (2009). Assessments to guide reading instruction: Decisions supported by the new Florida system. Perspectives on Language and Literacy, 4, 13–19.
19.
FuchsD.FuchsL. S. (2006). Introduction to response to intervention: What, why, and how valid is it. Reading Research Quarterly, 41, 93–99.
20.
GathercoleS. E. (1995). Is nonword repetition a test of phonological memory or long-term knowledge? It all depending on the nonwords. Memory & Cognition, 23, 83–94.
21.
GillamR. B.PearsonN. (2004). Test of Narrative Language. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
22.
GoodR. H.KaminskiR. A. (Eds.). (2002). Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills (6th ed.). Eugene, OR: Institute for the Development of Educational Achievement.
23.
GoughP.TunmerW. (1986). Decoding, reading, and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education, 7, 6–10.
24.
GrayS. (2004). Word learning by preschoolers with specific language impairment: Predictors and poor learners. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 47, 1117–1132.
25.
GrigorenkoE. L. (2009). Dynamic assessment and response to intervention: Two sides of one coin. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 42, 111–132.
26.
GrigorenkoE. L.SternbergR. J. (1998). Dynamic testing. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 75–111.
27.
HaagerD.KlingerJ.VaughnS. (2007). Evidence-based reading practices for response to intervention. Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
28.
HammillD. DNewcomerP. L. (1997). Test of Language Development–Primary–3. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
29.
HanleyJ. A.McNeilB. J. (1983). The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Diagnostic Radiology, 143, 29–36.
30.
HurfordD. P.SchaufJ. D.BunceL.BlaichR.MooreK. (1994). Early identification of children at risk for reading disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 27, 371–382.
31.
JohnsonC. J.BeitchmanJ. H.YoungA.EscobarM.AtkinsonL.WilsonB.. . . WangM. (1999). Fourteen-year follow-up of children with and without speech-language impairments: Speech/language stability and outcomes. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 42, 744–760.
32.
JuelC. (1988). Learning to read and write: A longitudinal study of 54 children from first through fourth grades. Journal of educational Psychology, 4, 437–447.
33.
JusticeL. M.MeierJ.WalpoleS. (2005). Learning new words from storybooks: An efficacy study with at-risk kindergarteners. Language, Speech and Hearing Services in Schools, 36, 17–32.
34.
KendeouP.van den BroekP.WhiteM.LynchJ. S. (2009). Predicting reading comprehension in early elementary school: The independent contributions of oral language and decoding skills. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 765–778.
35.
KintschW. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
36.
LeslieL.CaldwellJ. S. (2011). Qualitative Reading Inventory–5. Boston, MA: Pearson Education Inc.
37.
MandlerJ. M.JohnsonN. S. (1977). Remembrance of things parsed: Story structure and recall. Cognitive Psychology, 9, 111–151.
38.
MetsalaJ. L. (1999). Young children’s phonological awareness and nonword repetition as a function of vocabulary development. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 3–19.
39.
MetzC. E. (1978). Basic principles of ROC analysis. Seminars in Nuclear Medicine, 8, 283–298.
40.
NashM.DonaldsonM. L. (2005). Word learning in children with vocabulary deficits. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 48, 439–458.
41.
National Institute for Literacy. (2008). Developing early literacy: Report of the National Early Literacy Panel. Washington, DC: Author.
42.
NICHD Early Child Care Research Network. (2005). Pathways to reading: The role of oral language in the transition to reading. Developmental Psychology, 41, 428–442.
43.
Northwest Evaluation Association. (2009). Measures of Academic Progress. Lake Oswego, OR: Northwest Evaluation Association.
44.
O’ConnorR. E.JenkinsJ. R. (1999). Prediction of reading disabilities in kindergarten and first grade. Scientific Studies of Reading, 3, 159–197.
45.
OlsonR. K.KeenanJ. M.ByrneB.SamuelssonS.CoventryW. L.CorleyR.. . . HulslanderJ. (2011). Genetic and environmental influences on vocabulary and reading development. Scientific Studies of Reading, 15, 26–46.
46.
PeñaE.ResendizM.GillamR (2007). The role of clinical judgments of modifiability in the diagnosis of language impairment. Advances in Speech Language Pathology, 9, 332–345.
47.
PenningtonB. F.Cardoso-MartinsC.GreenP. A.LeflyD. (2001). Comparing the phonological and double deficit hypotheses for developmental dyslexia. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 14, 707–755.
48.
ProtopapasA.SimosP. G.SideridisG. D.MouzakiA. (2012). The components of the simple view of reading: A confirmatory factor analysis. Reading Psychology, 33, 217–240.
49.
RescorlaL.DahlsgaardK.RobertsJ. (2000). Late talking toddlers: MLU and IPSyn outcomes at 3;0 and 4;0. Journal of Child Language, 27, 643–664.
50.
ScarboroughH. S. (1998). Early identification of children at risk for reading disabilities: Phonological awareness and some other promising predictors. In ShapiroB. K.AccardoP. J.CaputeA. J. (Eds.), Specific reading disability: A view of the spectrum (pp. 75–119). Timonium, MD: York Press.
51.
SchatschneiderC.FletcherJ. M.FrancisD. J.CarlsonC. D.FoormanB. R. (2004). Kindergarten prediction of reading skills: A longitudinal comparative analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 265–282.
SpencerM.QuinnJ. M.WagnerR. K. (2014). Specific reading comprehension disability: Major problem, myth, or misnomer. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 29, 1–9.
54.
StorchS. A.WhitehurstG. J. (2002). Oral language and code-related precursors of reading: Evidence from a longitudinal structural model. Developmental Psychology, 38, 934–947.
55.
SwetsJ. A. (1979). Analysis applied to the evaluation of medical imaging techniques. Investigative Radiology, 14, 109–121.
56.
TomblinJ.NippoldM. A.FeyM. E.ZhangX. (2014). The character and course of individual differences in spoken language. In TomblinJ.NippoldM. A. (Eds.), Understanding individual differences in language development across the school year (pp. 47–78). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
57.
TomblinJ.ZhangX.BuckwalterP.O’BrienM. (2003). The stability of primary language disorder: Four years after kindergarten diagnosis. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, 46, 1283–1296.
58.
TorgesenJ. K.WagnerR. K.RashotteC. A. (2011). Test of Word Reading Efficiency–2. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
59.
TzurielD. (2000). Dynamic assessment of young children: Educational and intervention perspectives. Educational Psychology Review, 12, 385–435.
60.
van den BroekP.TrabassoT. (1986). Causal networks verses goal hierarchies in summarizing texts. Discourse Processes, 9, 1–15.
61.
van WeerdenburgM.VerhoevenL.BalkomH.BosmanA. (2009). Cognitive and linguistic precursors of early literacy achievement in children with specific language impairment. Scientific Studies in Reading, 13, 484–507.
62.
VellutinoF. R.ScanlonD. M.ZhangH.SchatschneiderC. (2008). Using response to kindergarten and first grade intervention to identify children at-risk for long-term reading difficulties. Reading and Writing, 21, 437–480.
63.
WagnerR. K.TorgesenJ. K.RashotteC. A. (1999). Comprehensive Test of Phonological Processing. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
64.
WiseJ. C.SevcikR. A.MorrisR. D.LovettM. W.WolfM. (2012). The growth of phonological awareness by children with reading disabilities: A result of semantic knowledge or knowledge of grapheme-phoneme correspondence. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11, 151–164.
65.
WolfM.BowersP. G.BiddleK. (2000). Naming speed processes, timing and reading: A conceptual review. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 387–407.
66.
WoodF. B.HillD. F.MeyerM. S.FlowersD. L. (2005). Predictive Assessment of Reading. Annals of Dyslexia, 55, 193–216.
67.
WoodcockR. W. (1998). Woodcock Reading Mastery Tests–Revised–Normative Update. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
