This case study describes the culturally responsive instruction of one special education teacher with Latino English language learners (ELLs) with learning disabilities in an urban elementary school setting. This study was situated in a social constructivist research based framework. In investigating this instruction with ELLs, this study focused on how one teacher’s knowledge of culturally responsive pedagogy affected her special education instruction. Findings resulted in three major themes that were aligned with the current literature in this area: Cultural Aspects of Teaching Reading, Culturally Relevant Skills-Based Instruction, and Collaborative Agency Time. The results indicated that the success of special education with ELLs at the elementary education level might be dependent on how well the special education teacher integrates culturally responsive instruction with ELLs’ cultural and linguistic needs.
AtkinsonP.DelamontS. (2005). Analytic perspectives. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 821–840). London, UK: Sage.
2.
AuK. (2005). Multicultural issues and literacy achievement. New York, NY: Routledge.
3.
AuK.RaphaelT. E.MooneyK. C. (2008). What we have learned about teacher education to improve literacy achievement in urban schools. In WilkinsonL. C.MorrowL. M.ChouV. (Eds.), Improving literacy achievement in urban schools: Critical elements in teacher preparation (pp. 159–184). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
4.
AugustD.HakutaK. (Eds.). (1998). Educating language-minority children: A research agenda. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
5.
AugustD.ShanahanT. (Eds.). (2006). Developing literacy in second-language learners: Report of the National Literacy Panel on Language-Minority Children and Youth. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
6.
AugustD.SiegelL. S. (2006). Literacy instruction for language-minority children in special education settings. In AugustD.ShanahanT. (Eds.), Developing literacy in second-language learners: Report of the National Literacy Panel on Language-Minority Children and Youth (pp. 523–554). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
7.
AvalosM. A.PlasenciaA.ChavezC.RascónJ. (2007). Modified guided reading: Gateway to English as a second language and literacy learning. Reading Teacher, 61(4), 318–329.
8.
BacaL.CervantesH. T. (2003). The bilingual special education interface (4th ed.). New York, NY: Pearson.
9.
BeckI.McKeownM.KucanL. (2002). Bringing words to life: Robust vocabulary instruction. New York, NY: Guilford.
10.
Bernier-GrandC. T. (2009). Diego: Bigger than life. Tarryton, NY: Marshall Cavendish Corporation.
11.
BosC. S.AndersP. L.FilipD.JaffeL. E. (1989). The effects of an interactive instructional strategy for enhancing reading comprehension and content area learning for students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22(6), 384–390.
12.
BronfenbrennerU. (1981). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
13.
CalhoonM. B.Al OtaibaS.GreenbergD.KingA.AvalosA. (2006). Improving reading skills in predominantly Hispanic Title 1 first-grade classrooms: The promise of peer assisted learning strategies. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 21(4), 261–272.
14.
CazdenC. B. (2001). Classroom discourse: The language of teaching and learning (2nd ed.). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
15.
ChiappeP.SiegelL. S.Wade-WoolseyL. (2002). Linguistic diversity and the development of reading skills: A longitudinal study. Scientific Studies of Reading, 6(4), 369–400.
16.
CumminsJ. (2000). Language, power, and pedagogy: Bilingual children in the crossfire. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
17.
CumminsJ. (2007). Pedagogies for the poor? Realigning reading instruction for low-income students with scientifically based reading research. Educational Research, 36(9), 564–572.
18.
DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.). (2005). The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
19.
GayG. (2000). Culturally responsive teaching. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
20.
GenesseF.RichesC. (2006). Literacy: Instructional issues. In GenesseF.LindholmlearyK.SaundersW.ChristianD. (Eds.), Educating English language learners: A synthesis of research evidence (pp. 109–175). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
21.
GereA. R.BuehlerJ.DallavisC.HavilandV. S. (2009). A visibility project: Learning to see how preservice teachers take up culturally responsive pedagogy. American Educational Research Journal, 46(3), 816–852.
22.
GevaE. (2000). Issues in the assessment of reading disabilities in L2 children: Beliefs and research evidence. Dyslexia, 6, 13–28.
23.
GlaserB. G.StraussA. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Piscataway, NJ: Aldine.
24.
GoldenbergC. (2011). Reading instruction for English language learners. In KamilM. L.PearsonP. D.MojeE. B.AfflerbackP. P. (Eds.), Handbook of reading (Vol. 4, pp. 684–710). New York, NY: Routledge.
25.
GoldenbergC.RuedaR. S.AugustD. (2006). Synthesis: Sociocultural contexts and literacy development. In AugustD.ShanahanT. (Eds.), Developing literacy in second-language learners: Report of the National Literacy Panel on Language-Minority Children and Youth (pp. 249–267). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
26.
GonzálezN.MollL.AmantiC. (Eds.). (2005). Funds of knowledge: Theorizing practices in households and classrooms. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
27.
HarryB.KlingnerJ. K. (2006). Why are so many minority students in special education? Understanding race and disability in schools. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
28.
HarryB.KlingnerJ. K.SturgesK. (2005). Qualitative data analysis: Mapping the process. Educational Researcher, 34(2), 3–13.
29.
HeathS. B. (1983). Ways with words: Language, life, and work in communities and classrooms. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
30.
HerreraS. G.PerezD. R.EscamillaK. (2010). Teaching reading to English language learners: Differentiated literacies. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
31.
HooverJ. J. (2009). Differentiating learning differences from disabilities: Meeting diverse needs through multi-tiered response to intervention. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
32.
MifflinHoughton. (2009). California Houghton Mifflin reading. Boston, MA: Author.
33.
JiménezR. T.GarcíaG. E.PearsonP. D. (1995). Three children, two languages, and strategic reading: Case studies in bilingual/monolingual reading. American Educational Research Journal, 32(1), 67–97.
34.
JiménezR. T.GerstenR. (1999). Lessons and dilemmas derived from the literacy instruction of two Latina/o teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 36(2), 265–301.
35.
KampsD.AbottM.GreenwoodC.Arreaga-MayerC.Arreaga-MayerC.WillsH.LongstaffJ.CulpepperM.WaltonC. (2007). Use of evidence-based, small-group reading instruction for English language learners in elementary grades: Secondary-tier intervention. Learning Disability Quarterly, 30(3), 153–168.
36.
KeeneE.ZimmermanS. (1997). Mosiac of thought. Graves: Heinemann.
37.
KlingnerJ. K.ArtilesA. J.Mendez BarlettaL. (2006). English language learners who struggle with reading: Language acquisition or LD?Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39(2), 108–128.
38.
KlingnerJ. K.EdwardsP. (2006). Cultural considerations with response to intervention models. Reading Research Quarterly, 41, 108–117.
39.
KlingnerJ. K.Soltero-GonzalesL. (2009). Culturally and linguistically responsive literacy instruction for English language learners with learning disabilities. Multiple Voices for Ethnically Diverse Exceptional Learners, 12(1), 4–20.
40.
KlingnerJ. K.VaughnS. (1996). Reciprocal teaching of reading comprehension strategies for students with learning disabilities who use English as a second language. Elementary School Journal, 96(3), 275–293.
41.
KlingnerJ. K.VaughnS.ArgüellesM. E.HughesM. T.LeftwichS. A. (2004). Collaborative strategic reading “real-world” lessons from classroom teachers. Remedial and Special Education, 25(5), 291–302.
42.
KozolJ. (2006). The shame of the nation: The restoration of apartheid schooling in America. New York, NY: Crown.
43.
LachatM. A. (2004). Standards-based instruction and assessment for English language learners. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
44.
Ladson-BillingsG. (2009). The dreamkeepers: Successful teachers of African American students. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
45.
LeCompteM. D.SchensulJ. J. (1999). Analyzing & interpreting ethnographic data. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira.
46.
Lopez-ReynaN. A. (1996). The importance of meaningful contexts in bilingual special education: Moving to whole language. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 11(2), 120–131.
47.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2011). Nation’s report card: Reading 2011 (NCES 2012–457). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences.
48.
NewmanD.ColeM. (2004). Can scientific research from the laboratory be of any use to teachers?Theory Into Practice, 43(4), 260–267.
49.
NietoS. (1999). The light in their eyes: Creating multicultural learning opportunities. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
50.
NietoS. (2002). Language, culture, and teaching: Critical perspectives for a new century. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
51.
O’ConnorR. E.VadasyP. F. (Eds.). (2011). Handbook of reading interventions. New York, NY: Guilford.
52.
OroscoM. J. (2010). Sociocultural considerations when using RTI with English language learners. Theory Into Practice, 49(4), 265–272.
53.
OroscoM. J.KlingnerJ. K. (2009). Bilingual first grade instruction. In HaagerD.KlingnerJ. K.JiménezT. (Eds.), How to teach English language learners: Effective strategies from outstanding educators, grades K–6 (pp. 53–80). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
54.
OroscoM. J.KlingnerJ. K. (2010). One school’s implementation of RTI with English language learners: “Referring into RTI.”Journal of Learning Disabilities, 43(3), 269–288.
55.
OroscoM. J.O’ConnorR. (2011). Cultural aspects of teaching reading with Latino English language learners. In O’ConnorR.VadasyP. (Eds.), Handbook of reading interventions (pp. 356–379). New York, NY: Guilford.
56.
PlantyM.HussarW.SnyderT.KenaG.KewalRamaniA.KempJ.DinkesR. (2009). The condition of education 2009 (NCES 2009–081). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics.
57.
RogoffB. (2003). The cultural nature of human development. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
58.
RuizN. T. (1989). An optimal learning environment for Rosemary. Exceptional Children, 56(2), 130–144.
59.
SáenzL. M.FuchsL. S.FuchsD. (2005). Peer-assisted learning strategies for English language learners with learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 71(3), 231–247.
60.
SeidmanI. (2006). Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
61.
SnowC. (2002). Reading for understanding: Toward a research and development program in reading comprehension. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
62.
SotoG. (1993). Too many tamales. New York, NY: Putman & Grosset.
63.
StakeR. E. (2005). Qualitative case studies. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 443–466). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
64.
StraussA.CorbinJ. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
65.
SullivanA. (2011). Disproportionality in special education identification and placement of English language learners. Exceptional Children, 77(3), 317–334.
66.
SwansonH. L.OroscoM. J.LussierC. M.GerberM. M.Guzman-OrthD. A. (2011). The influence of working memory and phonological processing on English language learner children’s bilingual reading and language acquisition. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(4), 838–856.
67.
VillegasA. M.LucasT. (2002). Preparing culturally responsive teachers: Rethinking the curriculum. Journal of Teacher Education, 53(20), 20–32.
68.
VygotskyL. S. (1962). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
69.
VygotskyL. S. (1978). Mind and society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
70.
WingN. (1996). Jalapeño bagels. New York, NY: Atheneum.
71.
WolcottH. F. (2001). Writing up qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
72.
WoodcockR. W. (2005). Woodcock–Muñoz Language Survey–Revised. Itasca, IL: Riverside.
73.
ZehlerA. M.FleischmanH. L.HopstockP. J.StephensonT. G.PendzickM. L.SapruS. (2003). Descriptive study of services to LEP students and LEP students with disabilities. Volume I: Research report (Submitted to U.S. Department of Education, Office of English Language Acquisition). Arlington, VA: Development Associates.
