It is now well established that learning disabilities (LD) persist into the adult years, yet despite a developing literature base in this area, there is a paucity of evidence-based research to guide research and practice. Consistent with the demands of the adult stage of development, autonomy and self-determination are crucial to quality-of-life issues to adults in general, and specifically to adults with LD. There are many areas of functioning in which adults need to adapt successfully, such as employment, family, social and emotional, daily living routines, community, and recreation and leisure. In essence, there are a myriad of challenges and outcomes as adults navigate the trials and tribulations of LD as it manifests itself into adulthood. This review of the extant evidence-based literature seeks to discover relevant knowledge that can be shared with practitioners who serve adults with LD in a variety of professional and volunteer roles, particularly in adult education settings.
AmbrusterB. B.LehrF.OsbornJ. (2006). Putting reading first: Kindergarten through grade 3. Ann Arbor, MI: Center for the Improvement of Early Reading Achievement.
2.
Americans with Disabilities Act Amendments of 2008, Pub. L. No. 110-325, 122 Stat. 3553 (2008).
3.
Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, Pub. L. No. 101-336, 104 Stat. 327 (1991).
4.
BassettD. S.PollowayE.PattonJ. R. (1994). Learning disabilities: Perspectives on adult development. In GerberP.ReiffH. (Eds.), Learning disabilities in adulthood: Persisting problems and evolving issues (pp. 10–19). Boston, MA: Andover.
5.
BloomB. (1980). A new direction for educational research: Alterable variables. Phi Delta Kappan, 61, 382–385.
6.
Coalition for Evidence-Based Policy. (2002). Bringing evidence-driven progress to education: A recommended strategy for the U.S. Department of Education. Washington, DC: Council for Excellence in Government. Retrieved from http://www.eric.ed.gov/PDFS/ED474378.pdf
7.
DoleS. (2000). The implications of risk and resilience literature for gifted students with learning disabilities. Roeper Review, 23, 91–96. doi:10.1080/0278319000955407410.1080/02783190009554074
8.
EricksonE. H. (1963). Childhood and society. New York, NY: Norton.
9.
GerberP. J. (1992a). Being learning disabled and a beginning teacher and teaching a class of students with learning disabilities. Exceptionality, 3, 213–232. doi:10.1080/0936283920952481610.1080/09362839209524816
10.
GerberP. J. (1992b). Personal perspective, at first glance: Employment for people with learning disabilities in the ADA era. Learning Disability Quarterly, 15, 330–332. doi:10.2307/151132010.2307/1511320
11.
GerberP. J. (1993). Researching adults with learning disabilities from an adult development perspective. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 27, 6–9. doi:10.1177/00222194940270010310.1177/002221949402700103
12.
GerberP. J. (1994). Year two: Starting all over again. In Foucar-SzockiD. (Ed.), Case studies for teacher training and educational leadership (pp. 55–72). Harrisonburg, VA: Commonwealth Center for Teachers.
13.
GerberP. J. (2005). Low-literate adults with learning disabilities: A review of the literature. Thalamus, 24(1), 42–54.
14.
GerberP. J.GinsbergR.ReiffH. B. (1992). Identifying alterable patterns in employment for highly successful adults with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 25, 475–487. doi:10.1177/00222194940270010310.1177/002221949402700103
15.
GerberP. J.MellardD. (1985). Rehabilitation of learning disabled adults: Recommended research priorities. Journal of Rehabilitation, 51, 62–64.
16.
GerberP. J.PriceL. A. (2006). Acceptable loss and potential gain: Self-disclosure and adults with learning disabilities. Thalamus, 24(1), 49–55.
17.
GerberP. J.PriceL. A.MulliganR.ShesselI. (2004). Beyond transition: A comparison of the employment experiences of American and Canadian adults with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 37, 283–292. doi:10.1177/0022219404037004010110.1177/00222194040370040101
18.
GerberP. J.PriceL. A.MulliganR. A.WilliamsP. (2005). To be or not to be learning disabled? A preliminary report on self-disclosure of adults with learning disabilities. Thalamus, 23(2), 18–29.
19.
GerberP. J.ReiffH. B. (1991). Speaking for themselves: Ethnographic interviews of adults with learning disabilities. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
20.
GerberP. J.SchneidersC. A.ParadiseL. V.ReiffH. B.GinsbergR.PoppP. A. (1990). Persisting problems of adults with learning disabilities: Self-reported comparisons form their school-age and adult years. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 23, 570–573. doi:10.1177/00222194900230090710.1177/002221949002300907
21.
GiovengoM.MooreE. J.YoungG. (1998). Screening and assessment of the LD initiative: Identification of individuals with learning disabilities in the job opportunities and basic skills programs. In VogelS. A.RederS. (Eds.), Learning disabilities, literacy, and adult education (pp. 179–194). Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
22.
GoldbergR. J.HigginsE. L.RaskindM. H.HermanK. L. (2003). Predictors of success in individuals with learning disabilities: A qualitative analysis of a 20-year longitudinal study. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 18, 222–236. doi:10.1111/1540–5826.0007710.1111/1540–5826.00077
23.
GouldR. L. (1978). Transformations: Growth and change in adult life. New York, NY: Simon & Shuster.
24.
HaringK. A.LovettD. L.SmithD. D. (1990). A follow-up study of recent special education graduates of learning disabilities programs. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 23, 108–113. doi:10.1111/1540–5826.0007710.1111/1540–5826.00077
25.
HavighurstR. (1972). Developmental tasks and education (3rd ed.). New York, NY: D. McKay.
26.
HellendoornJ.RuijssenaarsW. (1990). Personal experiences and adjustment of Dutch adults with dyslexia. Remedial and Special Education, 21, 227–239.
27.
HollidayG. A.KollerJ. A.ThomasC. D. (1999). Post–high school outcomes of high IQ adults with learning disabilities. Journal of the Education of the Gifted, 22, 266–281.
28.
JohnsonD. J. (1994). Clinical study of adults with severe learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities, 5, 43–50.
KusserowR. P. (1992). Functional impairments of AFDC clients. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Inspector General.
31.
LevinsonD. J. (1978). The seasons of a man’s life. New York, NY: Knopf.
32.
LevinsonD. J. (1986). A conception of adult development. American Psychologist, 41, 3–13. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.41.1.310.1037/0003-066X.41.1.3
33.
MurrayC.GoldsteinD. E.NourseS.EdgarE. (2000). The postsecondary school attendance and completion rates of high school graduates with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 15, 119–127.
34.
National Center for Educational Statistics. (2005). Children 3 to 21 years old served in federally supported programs for the disabled by type of disability, selected years 1976–77 through 2005–06. Retrieved from nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/indicator_cwdasp.28k
35.
National Center for Learning Disabilities. (2009). The state of learning disabilities 2009. New York, NY: Author.
36.
National Joint Committee on Learning Disabilities. (1987). Adults with learning disabilities: A call to action. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 20, 172–175. doi:10.1177/00222194870200030510.1177/002221948702000305
37.
National Joint Committee on Learning Disabilities. (1991). Learning disabilities: Issues on definition. ASHA, 33(Suppl. 5), 18–20.
38.
National Longitudinal Transition Study. (2000). National Longitudinal Transition Study–2 sampling plan. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
39.
National Reading Panel. (2006a). Report of the national reading panel: Teaching children to read. Addendum. Methodology: Processes applied to the selection, review, and analysis of research relevant to reading instruction. Washington, DC: National Institute of Child Health and Development, National Institutes of Health.
40.
National Reading Panel. (2006b). Report of the national reading panel: Teaching children to read. Methodological overview. Washington, DC: National Institute of Child Health and Development, National Institutes of Health.
41.
PriceL. A.GerberP. J. (2001). At second glance: Employers and employees in the Americans with Disabilities Act era. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 34, 202–210, 248. doi:10.1177/00222194010340030110.1177/002221940103400301
42.
PriceL. A.GerberP. J.MulliganR. (2003). The Americans with Disabilities Act and adults with learning disabilities as employees. Remedial and Special Education, 24(6), 350–358. doi:10.1177/0741932503024006060110.1177/07419325030240060601
43.
PriceL. A.GerberP. J.ShesselI. (2003). Adults with learning disabilities and employment: A Canadian perspective. Thalamus, 20(1), 29–39.
44.
RaskindM. H. (1994). Assistive technology for adults with LD. A rationale for use. In GerberP. J.ReiffH. B. (Eds.), Adults with learning disabilities (pp. 152–162). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
45.
RaskindM. H.GoldbergR. J.HigginsE. L.HermanK. L. (1999). Patterns of change and patterns of success in individuals with learning disabilities: Results from a twenty-year longitudinal study. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 14, 35–49. doi:10.1207/sldrp1401_410.1207/sldrp1401_4
46.
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C., 701 et seq. (1973).
47.
ReiffH. B.GerberP. J. (1991). Adults with learning disabilities. In SinghN. N.BealeI. L. (Eds.), Current perspectives in learning disabilities: Nature, theory, and treatment (pp. 170–198). New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
RobinsL. N. (1977). Problems in follow-up studies. American Journal of Psychiatry, 134, 904–907.
50.
RoffmanA. (2000). Meeting the challenge of learning disabilities in adulthood. Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
51.
RoganL. L.HartmannL. D. (1986). Adult outcomes of learning disabled students ten years after initial follow-up. LD Focus, 5(2), 91–102.
52.
RoganL. L.HartmanL. D. (1990). Adult outcomes of learning disabled students ten years after initial follow-up. Learning Disabilities Focus, 5, 91–102.
53.
Roper Starch Worldwide. (1995). Learning disabilities and the American public: A look at America’s awareness and knowledge. Washington, DC: Author.
54.
RosenbergM. S. (1993). Minimum standards for the description of participants in learning disabilities research. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 26, 210–213. doi:10.1177/00222194930260040110.1177/002221949302600401
55.
San MiguelS. K.FornessS. R.KavaleK. (1996). Social skills deficits in learning disabilities: The psychiatric co-morbidity hypothesis. Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 19(2), 21–27.
56.
ScanlonD.MellardD. F.GarrisonS.LancasterS.MellardJ.RauschT. (1998). What we know about literacy practices for adults with learning disabilities: A review of published research. Lawrence: University of Kansas, Center for Research on Learning.
57.
ShaywitzS. E.MorrisR.ShaywitzB. A. (2008). The education of dyslexic children from childhood to young adulthood. Annual Review of Psychiatry, 54, 451–475. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.09363310.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093633
58.
SpekmanN. J.GoldbergR. J.HermanK. L. (1992). Learning disabled children grow up: A search for factors related to success in the young adult years. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 7, 161–170.
59.
U.S. Department of Labor. (1991). The learning disabled in employment and training programs. Washington, DC: Author.
60.
WagnerM.NewmanL.CametoR.GarzaN.LevineP. (2005a). After high school: A first look at the post-school experiences of youth with disabilities. A report from the National Longitudinal Transition Study–2. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
61.
WagnerM.NewmanL.CametoR.GarzaNLevineP. (2005b). Changes over time in the early post-school outcomes of youth with disabilities. A report of findings from the National Longitudinal Transition Study and the National Transition Study–2. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
62.
WagnerM.NewmanL.CametoR.LevineP.GarzaN. (2006). An overview of findings from Wave 2 of the National Longitudinal Transition Study–2. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International, National Center for Special Education Research, Institute of Education Sciences.
63.
WernerE. E. (1993). Risk and resilience in individuals with learning disabilities: Lessons learned from the Kauai longitudinal study. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 8, 28–34.
