This study entailed a 3 (instructional intervention) × 2 (assessment-type) between-subjects experimental design employing a pretest—intervention—posttest methodology. The instructional interventions were administered between subjects in three conditions: (a) dynamic instruction, (b) triarchic or theory of successful intelligence-control instruction, and (c) standard-control instruction. The assessment-type consisted between subjects of either (a) a group-administered dynamic posttest or (b) the same group-administered posttest interspersed with a control filler activity. Performance in different mathematics content areas taught in fourth grade was investigated. In total, 1,332 students and 63 classroom teachers in 24 schools across six school districts participated in the study. The results indicate the advantages of using dynamic instruction and assessment in regular classrooms while teaching mathematics, especially when the student body is highly ethnically diverse.
Anastasi, A. ( 1988). Psychological testing (6th ed.). New York, NY: Macmillan.
2.
Borman, G.D., & Overman, L.T. ( 2004). Academic resilience in mathematics among poor and minority students. Elementary School Journal, 104, 177-195.
3.
Bradley, R.H., Corwyn, R.F., Burchinal, M., McAdoo, H.P., & Garcia-Coll, C. (2001). The home environments of children in the United States: Part II. Relations with behavioral development through age thirteen. Child Development, 72, 1868-1886.
4.
Bransford, J.D., & Stein, B.S. ( 1993). The IDEAL problem solver. New York, NY: Freeman.
5.
Bryk, A.S., & Raudenbush, S.W. (1992). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. London, UK: Sage.
6.
Bunting, B.P., & Mooney, E. ( 2001). The effects of practice and coaching on test results for educational selection at eleven years of age. Educational Psychology, 21, 243-253.
7.
Byrnes, J.P. ( 2003). Factors predictive of mathematics achievement in White, Black, and Hispanic 12th graders. Journal of Educational Psychology , 95, 316-326.
8.
Cattell, R.B., & Cattell, A.K.S. (2002). Culture Fair Intelligence Tests. Champaign, IL: Institute for Personality and Ability Testing.
9.
Entwisle, D.R., & Alexander, K.L. (1992). Summer setback: Race, poverty, school composition, and mathematics achievement in the first two years of school. American Sociological Review, 57, 72-84.
10.
Ericsson, K.A. ( 1996). The road to excellence: The acquisition of expert performance in the arts, sciences, sports, and games. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
11.
Fagundes, D.D., Haynes, W.O., Haak, N.J., & Moran, M.J. ( 1998). Task variability effects on the language test performance of southern lower socioeconomic class African American and Caucasian five-year-olds . Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 29, 148-157.
12.
Guiton, G., & Oakes, J. ( 1995). Opportunity to learn and conceptions of educational equality . Educational Evaluation & Policy Analysis, 17, 323-336.
13.
Jeltova, A., Birney, D., Fredine, N., Jarvin, L., Sternberg, R.J., & Grigorenko, E.L. (2007). Dynamic assessment as a process-oriented assessment in educational settings. Advances in Speech-Language Pathology, 9, 45-58.
14.
Jeltova, A., Fredine, N., Soxman, H., & Weider-Blank, R. (July, 2004). Psycho-educational correlates of teacher-student match in elementary school: Practical implications . Paper presented at the American Psychological Association annual meeting. Honolulu, Hawaii.
15.
Kamhi, A., Pollock, K. , & Harris, J. (Eds.). ( 1996). Communication development and disorders in African American children. Baltimore, MD: Brookes .
16.
Lee, J., Grigg, W., & Dion, G.S. ( 2007). The nation’s report card: Mathematics 2007 (NCES 2007-494). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics.
17.
Lidz, C.S., (1991). Practitioner’s guide to dynamic testing . New York, NY: Guilford.
18.
Lidz, C. S., & Elliott, J. G. (Eds.). (2000). Dynamic assessment: Prevailing models and applications. London, UK: Elsevier.
Meijer, J., & Elshout, J.J. ( 2001). The predictive and discriminant validity of the zone of proximal development. British Journal of Educational Psychology , 71, 93-113.
21.
Nettles, S.M., Mucherah, W., & Jones, D.S. ( 2000). Understanding resilience: The role of social resources . Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 5, 47-60.
22.
Ogbu, J.U. ( 1993). Differences in cultural frame of reference. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 16, 483-506.
23.
Pace Center. ( 2004). PACE Center Reading Test. New Haven, CT: Yale University.
Roscigno, V.J. ( 2000). Family/school inequality and African-American/Hispanic achievement. Social Problems, 47, 266-290.
26.
Steinberg, L., Dornbusch, S.M., & Brown, B.B. ( 1992). Ethnic differences in adolescent achievement: An ecological perspective. American Psychologist, 47, 723-729.
27.
Sternberg, R.J. ( 1985). Beyond IQ: A triarchic theory of human intelligence. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
28.
Sternberg, R.J. ( 1988). The triarchic mind: A new theory of human intelligence . New York, NY: Viking.
29.
Sternberg, R.J. ( 1996). Successful intelligence. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
30.
Sternberg, R.J. ( 1998). Abilities are forms of developing expertise. Educational Researcher, 27, 11-20.
31.
Sternberg, R.J. ( 1999). The theory of successful intelligence. Review of General Psychology, 3, 292-316.
32.
Sternberg, R.J. ( 2002). Raising the achievement of all students: Teaching for successful intelligence. Educational Psychology Review, 14, 383-393.
33.
Sternberg, R.J. ( 2003). Wisdom, intelligence, and creativity synthesized. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
34.
Sternberg, R.J., Castejón, J.L., Prieto, M.D., Hautamäki, J., & Grigorenko, E.L. (2001). Confirmatory factor analysis of the Sternberg triarchic abilities test in three international samples: An empirical test of the triarchic theory of intelligence. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 17, 1-16.
35.
Sternberg, R.J., & Grigorenko, E.L. (2001). All testing is dynamic testing. Issues in Education, 7, 137-170.
36.
Sternberg, R.J., & Grigorenko, E.L. (2002). Dynamic testing. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Sternberg, R.J., Grigorenko, E.L., Ferrari, M., & Clinkenbeard, P. (1999). A triarchic analysis of an aptitude-treatment interaction. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 15, 1-11.
39.
Sternberg, R.J., Jarvin, L.Birney, D.P., Naples, A., Stemler, S.E., Newman, T., Otterbach, R., Parish, C., Randi, J., Grigrenko, E.L., Robert J. Sternberg .(under review). Testing the theory of successful intelligence in teaching Grade 4 Language Arts, Mathematics, and Science
40.
Sternberg, R.J., Jarvin, L., & Grigorenko, E.L. (2009). Teaching for wisdom, creativity, and success. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
41.
Stevenson, H.W., Chen, C., & Uttal, D.H. ( 1990). Beliefs and achievement: A study of Black, White, and Hispanic children. Child Development, 61, 508-523.
42.
Taylor, O., & Payne, K. ( 1983). Culturally valid testing: A proactive approach. Topics in Language Disorders, 3, 8-20.
43.
Vaughn-Cooke, F. ( 1986). The challenge of assessing the language of nonmainstream speakers. In O. Taylor (Ed.), Treatment of communication disorders in culturally and linguistically diverse populations (pp. 23-48). San Diego, CA: College-Hill Press.
44.
Vygotsky, L.S. ( 1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
45.
Wittmann, W., & Suß, H. ( 1999). Investigating the paths between working memory, intelligence, knowledge, and complex problem-solving performances via Brunswik symmetry . In P. Ackerman, P. C. Kyllonen, & R. D. Roberts (Eds.), Learning and individual differences: Process, trait, and content determinants (pp. 77-105). Washington, DC: APA Press.
